Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
bluefete wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:A pregnancy is considered a geriatric one when the woman is 35 and overpaid_influencer wrote:I actually meant "advanced maternal age." Past like 40, the risk of birth defects and complications in pregnancy goes way up and up for every year thereafter. God maybe intended for couples to get pregnant at that age but he ent make it safe.
I know some man does go find vene and have outside children, but that is meh cousin scene, not me. I hear the vows.
Well according to this, my mother would have been "ancient" when she had me.
Many people have children after 30 with very little complications. Today, women are having their first child in their early 40's.
Dizzy28 wrote:The power of modern medicinebluefete wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:A pregnancy is considered a geriatric one when the woman is 35 and overpaid_influencer wrote:I actually meant "advanced maternal age." Past like 40, the risk of birth defects and complications in pregnancy goes way up and up for every year thereafter. God maybe intended for couples to get pregnant at that age but he ent make it safe.
I know some man does go find vene and have outside children, but that is meh cousin scene, not me. I hear the vows.
Well according to this, my mother would have been "ancient" when she had me.
Many people have children after 30 with very little complications. Today, women are having their first child in their early 40's.
bluefete wrote:True. But people used to safely deliver back in the cavepeople days even when they were over 30.
I never understood the scaremongering about having a child after 30 / 35/ 40. Yes, the "risks" may have been greater but the same could apply to those under 30.
We do not know what we will have and only the Creator can determine if we make it out of the womb at all.
alfa wrote: Why does mortality seem to increase each year since 2018 irregardless of age group?
bluefete wrote:True. But people used to safely deliver back in the cavepeople days even when they were over 30.
I never understood the scaremongering about having a child after 30 / 35/ 40. Yes, the "risks" may have been greater but the same could apply to those under 30.
We do not know what we will have and only the Creator can determine if we make it out of the womb at all.
Down syndrome is the most common genetic problem that occurs with later childbearing. The risk of having a pregnancy affected by Down syndrome is
1 in 1,250 at age 20
1 in 1,000 at age 25
1 in 714 at age 30
1 in 294 at age 35
1 in 86 at age 40
paid_influencer wrote:bluefete wrote:True. But people used to safely deliver back in the cavepeople days even when they were over 30.
I never understood the scaremongering about having a child after 30 / 35/ 40. Yes, the "risks" may have been greater but the same could apply to those under 30.
We do not know what we will have and only the Creator can determine if we make it out of the womb at all.
true true, God alone know what will happen. But I am surprised you on that late pregnancy advocacy train. That is more a woke/feminist/girlboss scene.
lemme just throw some stats here, from the american professional association for OBGYNs
https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs ... -pregnancyDown syndrome is the most common genetic problem that occurs with later childbearing. The risk of having a pregnancy affected by Down syndrome is
1 in 1,250 at age 20
1 in 1,000 at age 25
1 in 714 at age 30
1 in 294 at age 35
1 in 86 at age 40
(1 in 34 at age 45)
you know we could say modern medicine is magic but consider this: Those stats are from natural conception and we can't change them (barring IVF and genetic selection that way). The "solution" we have for those unfortunate couples is screening for genetic conditions and then ... sabsmortions. I not going to spell it out but that is the option those couples get when those cases are detected... sabsmortions.
I not really comfortable rolling dice like that so I fix up my scene before it leave my nuts. If you want Jesus take the wheel, you go ahead, put your faith in Jesus.
adnj wrote:None of what you wrote is true.
bluefete wrote:adnj wrote:None of what you wrote is true.
Check my reply above.
I wrote from experience.
bluefete wrote:I keep saying the true target is children.
And yes, I know you don't have to buy it if you don't want to. That belies a much larger agenda.
Now KOHL'S:
Another company needing Bud-Lighting': Outrage grows as Kohl's stores offer LGBTQ clothing for babies as the outlet is the latest to face backlash over woke merchandise
Popular Twitter account, 'End Wokeness', led the charge against LGBTQ+ onesies for infants, writing: 'Kohl’s is pushing LGBTQ Pride for literal babies' and added 'Looks like Kohl’s didn’t learn a thing from Bud Lite and Target.'
Conservative influencer Benny Johnson wondered 'why is Kohl's selling 'Pride Merch' for three-month-old babies?'
'Wouldn't it be nice if Target and Kohl's also offered toddler wear that had pictures of the American Flag? Patriots? Eagles?' asked another account.
One more liberal content creator defended Kohl's in the wake of the boycotts against other companies and stated the company should stand its ground.
'Kohl's please stand your ground and keep your pride collection. I'm sick of gun hungry bigots acting like not being straight is killing kids, when we all know what happens EVERY F***ING DAY IN THIS COUNTRY.'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... abies.html
redmanjp wrote:What is a Woman? full film on twitter only for 24 hrs but limited due to being labelled as hateful
https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1664424891372941312/video/1
just a couple things that stood out:
man jailed for misgendering own daughter, kids identifying as cats in school and teachers must affirm them (queer theory)
video now has more than 29 million views
bluefete wrote:redmanjp wrote:What is a Woman? full film on twitter only for 24 hrs but limited due to being labelled as hateful
https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1664424891372941312/video/1
just a couple things that stood out:
man jailed for misgendering own daughter, kids identifying as cats in school and teachers must affirm them (queer theory)
video now has more than 29 million views
Really good video and it has almost 60 million views. 24 hour viewing expires around 8:15 p.m. this evening.
redmanjp wrote:Sesame Street celebrates Pride month
kids that age should be learning their ABCs not their LGBTQIAs
paid_influencer wrote:the kids are learning social values like accepting differences and being kind to others
and developing the idea that everyone deserves a sense of self worth no matter who they are
mr rogers (recommended viewing for all ages)
https://www.misterrogers.org/articles/h ... ho-we-are/
ruffneck_12 wrote:maj. tom wrote:What's with the actual one-sided extremely biased mostly bullshiet fear-mongering campaign this thread has turned into once again?
Nothing better to do? Someone trans in your life actively bothering and harassing you or your kids? The church pastor need more money? Scroll back up and read what Phone Surgeon said.
Dan, they ARE going after the kids now.
No matter how much soft piano music they put on the Buzzfeed videos they putting out to soften your emotions, it doesn't change the fact that they are going after kids now.
LOOK AT THE NAME OF THE CHANNEL
Stop defending groomers and pedos maj.tom, big man ting dread. Get on the right side of history here.
In the beginning, they just wanted to get married, and the majority of people was cool with that, but they are honestly going too far now.
adnj wrote:Let's just start with a national program to teach ethics and morality - especially for the posters in this thread that clearly don't know the difference between the two and seem to feel personally threatened as a consequence.
ruffneck_12 wrote:adnj wrote:Let's just start with a national program to teach ethics and morality - especially for the posters in this thread that clearly don't know the difference between the two and seem to feel personally threatened as a consequence.
Man preaching bout ethics but was okay with government tyranny all in the name of public health for a minor cold.
Doh talk bout ethics when things reach the point where drag queens twerking for lil chirren hoss.
UDFR with yuh pedo friend dey
Do you:ruffneck_12 wrote:Ok Groomer.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Dohplaydat, nick5434, st7 and 154 guests