TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

UNC 2.0?!?!?!

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
Rovin
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9611
Joined: January 23rd, 2014, 1:14 pm
Location: In the middle of Chaguanas ...

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby Rovin » January 4th, 2023, 1:03 pm

yes its a shame unc didnt build a decent permanent hq while they had d chance but its unbelievable how some of u cud point n laff n mock 1 party while thinking d other party is a saint & that it really "honestly got its million$ thru innocent patriotic citizens fund raising events & donations from d goodness of their members hearts" to construct a multi-million $ HQ ... alllyuh really believe dat whether u like\hate pee nm, unc or whoever else ?

when d idea of govt was conceived thousands of yrs ago d politicians & their selected ppl came out with devised a plan to get favors & kickbacks for their funding & efforts

a simple ex : a project cost 100m , 20 for d party, 20 for d contractor & 10 for future election campaign funding so total is a conservative 150 , cud be even more by subcontracting d work to a smaller contractor or 2 while d main contractor over sees them & make a further profit so put it as 175 or even more too ....

bluefete
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 13258
Joined: November 12th, 2008, 10:56 pm
Location: POS

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby bluefete » January 4th, 2023, 1:16 pm

VexXx Dogg wrote:
wing wrote:
Kickstart wrote:
De Dragon wrote:Imagine watching that monstrosity of a political party's HQ, supposedly paid for with "raffle" and "cake" and boasting about it.
People more concerned that UNC does not have a home but turn a blind eye as to where the money came from to buy and renovation Bailiser house with cake sales
Do you know where the money came from? Are you a PNM to have that information? Or just rum shop talk?



I'm anti-everyone when it comes to politics, but I like being the devil's advocate.

Plenty people push this narrative (stolen money for HQ), but no evidence to back it up. Won't it have paper trails to prove/disprove it?

Honestly that's the playbook for all Trini politics inno. Pelt accusations willy nilly, but they mostly smart enough leave it vague enough to avoid litigation. At least the smarter ones know how to handle that.


Cash only, boss! cash only!

Remember the SUV around election time in St. Augustine in the night?

Kickstart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1152
Joined: September 25th, 2019, 2:13 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby Kickstart » January 4th, 2023, 1:20 pm

j.o.e wrote:Those 10 car raffles brought big money eh. Plenty non affiliated ppl PNM bought, and unlike UNC there are always fundraising activities, galas, membership fees and donations.
UNC should structure themselves better to take advantage of these things.
It’s all well and good to bawl is tief but where are UNC seeking to raise funds from?



Rightttt so 10 car raffles gave PNM $50 Million to fund the renovations on Balisier House .

Ok carry on

Kickstart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1152
Joined: September 25th, 2019, 2:13 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby Kickstart » January 4th, 2023, 1:22 pm

mero wrote:But seriously though. All the big shot multi millionaire lawyer, doctor, businessman and real estate mogul in UNC and they can't find a proper HQ?

Seems more intentional than not, not so? Why HQ upstairs a bar? Why UNC getting evicted from Rienzi....

Or UNC really just that poorly managed and will forever depend solely on grassroot UNC till ah dead to keep them afloat?

What is the real issue here?


If they built a HQ then you would be the first and others to cry that they used Tax payers monies

User avatar
wing
Riding on 18's
Posts: 1669
Joined: December 17th, 2008, 6:57 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby wing » January 4th, 2023, 1:22 pm

Rovin wrote:yes its a shame unc didnt build a decent permanent hq while they had d chance but its unbelievable how some of u cud point n laff n mock 1 party while thinking d other party is a saint & that it really "honestly got its million$ thru innocent patriotic citizens fund raising events & donations from d goodness of their members hearts" to construct a multi-million $ HQ ... alllyuh really believe dat whether u like\hate pee nm, unc or whoever else ?

when d idea of govt was conceived thousands of yrs ago d politicians & their selected ppl came out with devised a plan to get favors & kickbacks for their funding & efforts

a simple ex : a project cost 100m , 20 for d party, 20 for d contractor & 10 for future election campaign funding so total is a conservative 150 , cud be even more by subcontracting d work to a smaller contractor or 2 while d main contractor over sees them & make a further profit so put it as 175 or even more too ....
Rum shop talk. Who is mocking anyone? Who is putting PNM on a pedestal? Persons are assuming there is corruption in the PNM building.... that is very possible, but nobody can show any evidence of such at this time. The UNC whether legitimate funds or corruption was unable to put the party before individuals and build a headquarters for the same grassroots who keep voting them. The fact that even as renters, they can only find places like the funeral home and the sports bar, says a lot about their ability to attract financial support when things not going well.

bluefete
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 13258
Joined: November 12th, 2008, 10:56 pm
Location: POS

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby bluefete » January 4th, 2023, 1:29 pm

wing wrote:The fact that even as renters, they can only find places like the funeral home and the sports bar, says a lot about their ability to attract financial support when things not going well.


:shock: :shock: :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol:

FREE DRINKS YO!

User avatar
wing
Riding on 18's
Posts: 1669
Joined: December 17th, 2008, 6:57 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby wing » January 4th, 2023, 2:58 pm

bluefete wrote:
wing wrote:The fact that even as renters, they can only find places like the funeral home and the sports bar, says a lot about their ability to attract financial support when things not going well.


:shock: :shock: :shock:

FREE DRINKS YO!
I see what you did there lol.

User avatar
MaxPower
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14156
Joined: October 31st, 2010, 2:37 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby MaxPower » January 4th, 2023, 3:01 pm

mero wrote:But seriously though. All the big shot multi millionaire lawyer, doctor, businessman and real estate mogul in UNC and they can't find a proper HQ?

Seems more intentional than not, not so? Why HQ upstairs a bar? Why UNC getting evicted from Rienzi....

Or UNC really just that poorly managed and will forever depend solely on grassroot UNC till ah dead to keep them afloat?

What is the real issue here?


The answer is simple Merz.

Another L.

User avatar
mero
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6598
Joined: September 29th, 2008, 6:16 pm
Location: iymc

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby mero » January 4th, 2023, 3:15 pm

Rovin wrote:yes its a shame unc didnt build a decent permanent hq while they had d chance but its unbelievable how some of u cud point n laff n mock 1 party while thinking d other party is a saint & that it really "honestly got its million$ thru innocent patriotic citizens fund raising events & donations from d goodness of their members hearts" to construct a multi-million $ HQ ... alllyuh really believe dat whether u like\hate pee nm, unc or whoever else ?

when d idea of govt was conceived thousands of yrs ago d politicians & their selected ppl came out with devised a plan to get favors & kickbacks for their funding & efforts

a simple ex : a project cost 100m , 20 for d party, 20 for d contractor & 10 for future election campaign funding so total is a conservative 150 , cud be even more by subcontracting d work to a smaller contractor or 2 while d main contractor over sees them & make a further profit so put it as 175 or even more too ....
This is a whole lot of saying absolutely nothing.

2nr UNC apologists again yes.

User avatar
mero
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6598
Joined: September 29th, 2008, 6:16 pm
Location: iymc

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby mero » January 4th, 2023, 3:24 pm

MaxPower wrote:
mero wrote:But seriously though. All the big shot multi millionaire lawyer, doctor, businessman and real estate mogul in UNC and they can't find a proper HQ?

Seems more intentional than not, not so? Why HQ upstairs a bar? Why UNC getting evicted from Rienzi....

Or UNC really just that poorly managed and will forever depend solely on grassroot UNC till ah dead to keep them afloat?

What is the real issue here?


The answer is simple Merz.

Another L.
Ls are immediately assumed with the UNC but I mean as a serious member or supporter of the UNC. This has to be quite embarrassing.

Cant even ask a man why on 2nr, cuz dey go fling sheit and talk bout PNM, cake sales and contractor cost.

UNC have nuff shottas and big sawatee to have a HQ by now.

User avatar
Rovin
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9611
Joined: January 23rd, 2014, 1:14 pm
Location: In the middle of Chaguanas ...

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby Rovin » January 4th, 2023, 3:30 pm

i wonder how come when i often bad talk kamla & d others in d unc nobody does call me a pee nmite or a pnm apologist too

it look like nobody cud have an independent mind without being called ah u eh see or ah pee nm


some of yall really falling for dat fund raising chain up & prolly believe in santa, d tooth fairy & d easter bunny too yes ... carry on with ur naive selves :|

User avatar
mero
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6598
Joined: September 29th, 2008, 6:16 pm
Location: iymc

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby mero » January 4th, 2023, 4:25 pm

Still flinging sheit and saying zilch though

Can we focus on the UNC on their HQ, or lack thereof of one, but exclude the words "PNM, fundraiser, cake sales"…?

Cyah ask bout UNC in here or?!

User avatar
Rovin
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9611
Joined: January 23rd, 2014, 1:14 pm
Location: In the middle of Chaguanas ...

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby Rovin » January 4th, 2023, 4:29 pm

yes we all can see u flinging sh1t & saying nothing

i had already said what i had to say about unc not having a hq

can u contribute sensibly now & stay on topic ... :|

User avatar
mero
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6598
Joined: September 29th, 2008, 6:16 pm
Location: iymc

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby mero » January 4th, 2023, 4:46 pm

Rovin, the topic is UNC.

User avatar
paid_influencer
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6803
Joined: November 18th, 2017, 4:15 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby paid_influencer » January 4th, 2023, 5:16 pm

Rovin wrote:i wonder how come when i often bad talk kamla & d others in d unc nobody does call me a pee nmite or a pnm apologist too

it look like nobody cud have an independent mind without being called ah u eh see or ah pee nm


some of yall really falling for dat fund raising chain up & prolly believe in santa, d tooth fairy & d easter bunny too yes ... carry on with ur naive selves :|


I around long enough to know is not naivety, but dishonesty. Them also around long enough to know how things run on the island.

User avatar
paid_influencer
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6803
Joined: November 18th, 2017, 4:15 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby paid_influencer » January 4th, 2023, 5:22 pm

mero wrote:Rovin, the topic is UNC.


this tru tho. UNC a failure of a party

User avatar
paid_influencer
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6803
Joined: November 18th, 2017, 4:15 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby paid_influencer » January 4th, 2023, 5:25 pm

support the PEP

K74T
TunerGod
Posts: 21234
Joined: June 7th, 2010, 11:01 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby K74T » January 4th, 2023, 5:37 pm

paid_influencer wrote:support the PEP
Nah

User avatar
paid_influencer
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6803
Joined: November 18th, 2017, 4:15 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby paid_influencer » January 4th, 2023, 6:40 pm

K74T wrote:
paid_influencer wrote:support the PEP
Nah


answer meros question answer it

User avatar
j.o.e
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6828
Joined: October 5th, 2008, 8:56 pm
Location: On tuner

UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby j.o.e » January 4th, 2023, 7:28 pm

Is how ppl saying PNM tief for the HQ upgrade but eh study how long the old version was there and needed an upgrade.
UNC tho ….. still have none. Failure tings.

Kickstart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1152
Joined: September 25th, 2019, 2:13 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby Kickstart » January 4th, 2023, 7:48 pm

j.o.e wrote:Is how ppl saying PNM tief for the HQ upgrade but eh study how long the old version was there and needed an upgrade.
UNC tho ….. still have none. Failure tings.
A building does not run a government and it matters not.

PNM has a building with a record 600 murders

User avatar
j.o.e
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6828
Joined: October 5th, 2008, 8:56 pm
Location: On tuner

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby j.o.e » January 4th, 2023, 10:46 pm

Kickstart wrote:
j.o.e wrote:Is how ppl saying PNM tief for the HQ upgrade but eh study how long the old version was there and needed an upgrade.
UNC tho ….. still have none. Failure tings.
A building does not run a government and it matters not.

PNM has a building with a record 600 murders


UNC owns no home, never did and it seems never will and has only regressed after Panday with no plan to leave opposition

Kickstart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1152
Joined: September 25th, 2019, 2:13 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby Kickstart » January 5th, 2023, 10:46 am

j.o.e wrote:
Kickstart wrote:
j.o.e wrote:Is how ppl saying PNM tief for the HQ upgrade but eh study how long the old version was there and needed an upgrade.
UNC tho ….. still have none. Failure tings.
A building does not run a government and it matters not.

PNM has a building with a record 600 murders


UNC owns no home, never did and it seems never will and has only regressed after Panday with no plan to leave opposition
Then, no home less murders is bad

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17902
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby De Dragon » January 7th, 2023, 11:53 am

The dotish gullible racist sheep calling for proof seem to be unabashed hypocrites. Where is the LFD RFD PNM proof of the funds? A food card and CEPEP wuk does tun man into kants it seems

Mmoney607
30 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2544
Joined: April 1st, 2021, 9:21 am

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby Mmoney607 » January 8th, 2023, 2:44 pm

I must say that it was a very stupid move by kamla to say that she wants Israel Khan to be president. So now the conversation gone from Christine Kangaloo to Israel Khan. A unc nominee can never win so what was the point.

That being said, I still support kamla and the pnm must go.

User avatar
Rovin
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9611
Joined: January 23rd, 2014, 1:14 pm
Location: In the middle of Chaguanas ...

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby Rovin » January 21st, 2023, 11:11 am

Helen Humphrey, wife of John Humphrey dies ...

https://trinidadexpress.com/news/local/ ... kuJ_kVVSbY

matr1x
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6999
Joined: February 25th, 2017, 7:46 am

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby matr1x » January 21st, 2023, 11:32 am

Mmoney607 wrote:I must say that it was a very stupid move by kamla to say that she wants Israel Khan to be president. So now the conversation gone from Christine Kangaloo to Israel Khan. A unc nominee can never win so what was the point.

That being said, I still support kamla and the pnm must go.



Kamla needs to go. We need someone not just new, but competent at their job.

You know I still hear people making issue of her getting silk. Idiots

User avatar
SuperiorMan
punchin NOS
Posts: 2899
Joined: December 1st, 2020, 2:35 am

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby SuperiorMan » January 21st, 2023, 11:35 am

Ew Kamla.

pugboy
TunerGod
Posts: 25282
Joined: September 6th, 2003, 6:18 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby pugboy » January 21st, 2023, 11:40 am

:lol: :lol:
9F7D9D16-1916-48A5-A91A-2F3079865899.jpeg

User avatar
DMan7
punchin NOS
Posts: 4036
Joined: February 2nd, 2021, 5:17 pm

Re: UNC 2.0?!?!?!

Postby DMan7 » January 21st, 2023, 11:59 am

Instant bleach you pour on my eyes dey boi pug. :sick:

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: VII and 109 guests