Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
hover11 wrote:Better chance of winning that than the lotto here where only the government wins
I love the transparency that America has where they can put your name and declare ok you won how many millions, to be fair. Compared to this kind of secrecy we have here when someone "wins" the lotto locally, it is someone in South.bluefete wrote:hover11 wrote:Better chance of winning that than the lotto here where only the government wins
Tell that to the millions of people who did not win the jackpot in the last draw.
hover11 wrote:I love the transparency that America has where they can put your name and declare ok you won how many millions, to be fair. Compared to this kind of secrecy we have here when someone "wins" the lotto locally, it is someone in South.bluefete wrote:hover11 wrote:Better chance of winning that than the lotto here where only the government wins
Tell that to the millions of people who did not win the jackpot in the last draw.
Rovin wrote:dat kinda $ u set for life ...
hover11 wrote:I love the transparency that America has where they can put your name and declare ok you won how many millions, to be fair. Compared to this kind of secrecy we have here when someone "wins" the lotto locally, it is someone in South.bluefete wrote:hover11 wrote:Better chance of winning that than the lotto here where only the government wins
Tell that to the millions of people who did not win the jackpot in the last draw.
It is something called transparency you are playing a PUBLIC game with taxpayers money. It is not a PRIVATE casino or members club event.Phone Surgeon wrote:hover11 wrote:I love the transparency that America has where they can put your name and declare ok you won how many millions, to be fair. Compared to this kind of secrecy we have here when someone "wins" the lotto locally, it is someone in South.bluefete wrote:hover11 wrote:Better chance of winning that than the lotto here where only the government wins
Tell that to the millions of people who did not win the jackpot in the last draw.
really
you find that winners names should be published locally?
considering how things are here?
not surprised, this is in line with many of your other brilliant ideas/strategies
Phone Surgeon wrote:hover11 wrote:I love the transparency that America has where they can put your name and declare ok you won how many millions, to be fair. Compared to this kind of secrecy we have here when someone "wins" the lotto locally, it is someone in South.bluefete wrote:hover11 wrote:Better chance of winning that than the lotto here where only the government wins
Tell that to the millions of people who did not win the jackpot in the last draw.
really
you find that winners names should be published locally?
considering how things are here?
not surprised, this is in line with many of your other brilliant ideas/strategies
Phone Surgeon wrote:hover11 wrote:I love the transparency that America has where they can put your name and declare ok you won how many millions, to be fair. Compared to this kind of secrecy we have here when someone "wins" the lotto locally, it is someone in South.bluefete wrote:hover11 wrote:Better chance of winning that than the lotto here where only the government wins
Tell that to the millions of people who did not win the jackpot in the last draw.
really
you find that winners names should be published locally?
considering how things are here?
not surprised, this is in line with many of your other brilliant ideas/strategies
You does help people buy their lotto ticket?Dizzy28 wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:hover11 wrote:I love the transparency that America has where they can put your name and declare ok you won how many millions, to be fair. Compared to this kind of secrecy we have here when someone "wins" the lotto locally, it is someone in South.bluefete wrote:hover11 wrote:Better chance of winning that than the lotto here where only the government wins
Tell that to the millions of people who did not win the jackpot in the last draw.
really
you find that winners names should be published locally?
considering how things are here?
not surprised, this is in line with many of your other brilliant ideas/strategies
I agree. You can't fraid powder if yuh play old mas!!!
I live in a country where corruption is a way of life. As a state enterprise involved in the turnover of billions of dollars (during Covid Nancis said NLCB's monthly revenue is 240m) transparency on the biggest single payout is one thing I would like to see.
If you don't want your name out there don't play lotto. Its a choice to gamble.
Phone Surgeon wrote:Submit a foia request to nlcb and ask for the names of the last 20 lottery winners if it concerns you that much.
Phone Surgeon wrote:You does help people buy their lotto ticket?Dizzy28 wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:hover11 wrote:I love the transparency that America has where they can put your name and declare ok you won how many millions, to be fair. Compared to this kind of secrecy we have here when someone "wins" the lotto locally, it is someone in South.bluefete wrote:hover11 wrote:Better chance of winning that than the lotto here where only the government wins
Tell that to the millions of people who did not win the jackpot in the last draw.
really
you find that winners names should be published locally?
considering how things are here?
not surprised, this is in line with many of your other brilliant ideas/strategies
I agree. You can't fraid powder if yuh play old mas!!!
I live in a country where corruption is a way of life. As a state enterprise involved in the turnover of billions of dollars (during Covid Nancis said NLCB's monthly revenue is 240m) transparency on the biggest single payout is one thing I would like to see.
If you don't want your name out there don't play lotto. Its a choice to gamble.
People always know who the winners are. Family, friends, people in the bank, fiu etc
Dizzy28 wrote:If you happy state entities and its operations should have limited transparency good for you.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: GoochMonay and 42 guests