Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Dat doh effect him, pnm own most of the courts and most judges are pro PNM including the CJ and DPP.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:What he said^....impsbert prolly get shorter after that rinse out
hong kong phooey wrote:i hope when he sues for loss of earnings he sue the idiot and the tax payers doh have to pay for it
Allpugboy wrote:how many cases pnm lose with freedom of information act ?
zoom rader wrote:Allpugboy wrote:how many cases pnm lose with freedom of information act ?
They will put bills forwards to have this changed
In delivering her ruling on April 20th2018, Justice Nadia Kangaloo dismissed Mr. Rambarran’sapplication for the said Statement of Reasons, finding that there was non-excusable and insurmountable delay on his part. The Claimant requested the Statement of Reasons, five (5)and a half months after the revocation of his appointment when, Section16 of the Judicial Review Act provides for such requests to be madewithintwenty eight (28)days.
Further, Mr.Rambarran was found by the Court to be guilty of NON-DISCLOSURE in filing his claim. In his MediaRelease ofDecember26th 2015 he failed to disclosethat he had been invited to meetings with the Minister of Finance prior to the revocation of his appointment. Additionally,in his Monetary Policy Forum address on December 4th2015, Mr. Rambarrandisclosed the names of major foreign exchange users.In delivering her judgment, Justice Kangaloo found ithighly incredible that Mr.Rambarran-could notatthis stage-notknow the reasons for his dismissal, which were clearly stated in the Affidavit filed by the Ministerof Finance.
With respect to theClaimant’s request to view correspondence underthe Freedom of Information Act, the Court refused
Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Allpugboy wrote:how many cases pnm lose with freedom of information act ?
They will put bills forwards to have this changed
You must enjoy being unburdened by fact and unhampered by reality.
https://www.finance.gov.tt/wp-content/u ... 4.2018.pdfIn delivering her ruling on April 20th2018, Justice Nadia Kangaloo dismissed Mr. Rambarran’sapplication for the said Statement of Reasons, finding that there was non-excusable and insurmountable delay on his part. The Claimant requested the Statement of Reasons, five (5)and a half months after the revocation of his appointment when, Section16 of the Judicial Review Act provides for such requests to be madewithintwenty eight (28)days.
Further, Mr.Rambarran was found by the Court to be guilty of NON-DISCLOSURE in filing his claim. In his MediaRelease ofDecember26th 2015 he failed to disclosethat he had been invited to meetings with the Minister of Finance prior to the revocation of his appointment. Additionally,in his Monetary Policy Forum address on December 4th2015, Mr. Rambarrandisclosed the names of major foreign exchange users.In delivering her judgment, Justice Kangaloo found ithighly incredible that Mr.Rambarran-could notatthis stage-notknow the reasons for his dismissal, which were clearly stated in the Affidavit filed by the Ministerof Finance.
With respect to theClaimant’s request to view correspondence underthe Freedom of Information Act, the Court refused
Kangoloo as we all is a PNM judgeRedman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Allpugboy wrote:how many cases pnm lose with freedom of information act ?
They will put bills forwards to have this changed
You must enjoy being unburdened by fact and unhampered by reality.
https://www.finance.gov.tt/wp-content/u ... 4.2018.pdfIn delivering her ruling on April 20th2018, Justice Nadia Kangaloo dismissed Mr. Rambarran’sapplication for the said Statement of Reasons, finding that there was non-excusable and insurmountable delay on his part. The Claimant requested the Statement of Reasons, five (5)and a half months after the revocation of his appointment when, Section16 of the Judicial Review Act provides for such requests to be madewithintwenty eight (28)days.
Further, Mr.Rambarran was found by the Court to be guilty of NON-DISCLOSURE in filing his claim. In his MediaRelease ofDecember26th 2015 he failed to disclosethat he had been invited to meetings with the Minister of Finance prior to the revocation of his appointment. Additionally,in his Monetary Policy Forum address on December 4th2015, Mr. Rambarrandisclosed the names of major foreign exchange users.In delivering her judgment, Justice Kangaloo found ithighly incredible that Mr.Rambarran-could notatthis stage-notknow the reasons for his dismissal, which were clearly stated in the Affidavit filed by the Ministerof Finance.
With respect to theClaimant’s request to view correspondence underthe Freedom of Information Act, the Court refused
apole69 wrote:Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Allpugboy wrote:how many cases pnm lose with freedom of information act ?
They will put bills forwards to have this changed
You must enjoy being unburdened by fact and unhampered by reality.
https://www.finance.gov.tt/wp-content/u ... 4.2018.pdfIn delivering her ruling on April 20th2018, Justice Nadia Kangaloo dismissed Mr. Rambarran’sapplication for the said Statement of Reasons, finding that there was non-excusable and insurmountable delay on his part. The Claimant requested the Statement of Reasons, five (5)and a half months after the revocation of his appointment when, Section16 of the Judicial Review Act provides for such requests to be madewithintwenty eight (28)days.
Further, Mr.Rambarran was found by the Court to be guilty of NON-DISCLOSURE in filing his claim. In his MediaRelease ofDecember26th 2015 he failed to disclosethat he had been invited to meetings with the Minister of Finance prior to the revocation of his appointment. Additionally,in his Monetary Policy Forum address on December 4th2015, Mr. Rambarrandisclosed the names of major foreign exchange users.In delivering her judgment, Justice Kangaloo found ithighly incredible that Mr.Rambarran-could notatthis stage-notknow the reasons for his dismissal, which were clearly stated in the Affidavit filed by the Ministerof Finance.
With respect to theClaimant’s request to view correspondence underthe Freedom of Information Act, the Court refused
Out of curiosity , is Justice Nadia Kangaloo related to Christine Kangaloo ?
Dizzy28 wrote:apole69 wrote:Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Allpugboy wrote:how many cases pnm lose with freedom of information act ?
They will put bills forwards to have this changed
You must enjoy being unburdened by fact and unhampered by reality.
https://www.finance.gov.tt/wp-content/u ... 4.2018.pdfIn delivering her ruling on April 20th2018, Justice Nadia Kangaloo dismissed Mr. Rambarran’sapplication for the said Statement of Reasons, finding that there was non-excusable and insurmountable delay on his part. The Claimant requested the Statement of Reasons, five (5)and a half months after the revocation of his appointment when, Section16 of the Judicial Review Act provides for such requests to be madewithintwenty eight (28)days.
Further, Mr.Rambarran was found by the Court to be guilty of NON-DISCLOSURE in filing his claim. In his MediaRelease ofDecember26th 2015 he failed to disclosethat he had been invited to meetings with the Minister of Finance prior to the revocation of his appointment. Additionally,in his Monetary Policy Forum address on December 4th2015, Mr. Rambarrandisclosed the names of major foreign exchange users.In delivering her judgment, Justice Kangaloo found ithighly incredible that Mr.Rambarran-could notatthis stage-notknow the reasons for his dismissal, which were clearly stated in the Affidavit filed by the Ministerof Finance.
With respect to theClaimant’s request to view correspondence underthe Freedom of Information Act, the Court refused
Out of curiosity , is Justice Nadia Kangaloo related to Christine Kangaloo ?
Her husband is Christine's brother.
http://www.fitzwilliamstone.com/partner ... galoo.html
PNM judges = PNM sinister rulesapole69 wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:apole69 wrote:Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Allpugboy wrote:how many cases pnm lose with freedom of information act ?
They will put bills forwards to have this changed
You must enjoy being unburdened by fact and unhampered by reality.
https://www.finance.gov.tt/wp-content/u ... 4.2018.pdfIn delivering her ruling on April 20th2018, Justice Nadia Kangaloo dismissed Mr. Rambarran’sapplication for the said Statement of Reasons, finding that there was non-excusable and insurmountable delay on his part. The Claimant requested the Statement of Reasons, five (5)and a half months after the revocation of his appointment when, Section16 of the Judicial Review Act provides for such requests to be madewithintwenty eight (28)days.
Further, Mr.Rambarran was found by the Court to be guilty of NON-DISCLOSURE in filing his claim. In his MediaRelease ofDecember26th 2015 he failed to disclosethat he had been invited to meetings with the Minister of Finance prior to the revocation of his appointment. Additionally,in his Monetary Policy Forum address on December 4th2015, Mr. Rambarrandisclosed the names of major foreign exchange users.In delivering her judgment, Justice Kangaloo found ithighly incredible that Mr.Rambarran-could notatthis stage-notknow the reasons for his dismissal, which were clearly stated in the Affidavit filed by the Ministerof Finance.
With respect to theClaimant’s request to view correspondence underthe Freedom of Information Act, the Court refused
Out of curiosity , is Justice Nadia Kangaloo related to Christine Kangaloo ?
Her husband is Christine's brother.
http://www.fitzwilliamstone.com/partner ... galoo.html
Could it be coincidence that this ended up in her court ?
food for thought !!!!
No it's a PNM courtThe_Honourable wrote:lol so is a Kangaloo court.
That is why many go all the way to the privy council... get away from the family related, political, afro, indo, who know who bs.
btw tv6 reported that imbert is planning to appeal the decision in the Jwala case.
PNM runs the courts and the DPP.Redman wrote:If Kangaloos marriage is indicative of corruptive influence.
Is the fact that Ramberran is Dookerans nephew relevant?
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:zoom rader wrote:
Well I have a PNM padner from Tobago who believes the earth is flat.
Redman wrote:If Kangaloos marriage is indicative of corruptive influence.
Is the fact that Ramberran is Dookerans nephew relevant?
One controls the courtsapole69 wrote:Redman wrote:If Kangaloos marriage is indicative of corruptive influence.
Is the fact that Ramberran is Dookerans nephew relevant?
Apparent Bias ?
apole69 wrote:Redman wrote:If Kangaloos marriage is indicative of corruptive influence.
Is the fact that Ramberran is Dookerans nephew relevant?
Apparent Bias ?
PNM places hacks in key state sector jobs But to thier credit it always seems to be qualified hacks.Redman wrote:apole69 wrote:Redman wrote:If Kangaloos marriage is indicative of corruptive influence.
Is the fact that Ramberran is Dookerans nephew relevant?
Apparent Bias ?
what else got him the job...in front of multiple people in and out of CBTT that had better and more relevant quals and experience.
Not like the PP was in the habit of promoting their people despite a lack of quals and experience.
In ZRs world only PNM uses its influence in nefariousness.
Not my world bro, the nation is slowly waking up.Redman wrote:apole69 wrote:Redman wrote:If Kangaloos marriage is indicative of corruptive influence.
Is the fact that Ramberran is Dookerans nephew relevant?
Apparent Bias ?
what else got him the job...in front of multiple people in and out of CBTT that had better and more relevant quals and experience.
Not like the PP was in the habit of promoting their people despite a lack of quals and experience.
In ZRs world only PNM uses its influence in nefariousness.
And then loose again as with all PNM casesDe Dragon wrote:This supremely arrogant kant Impsy will appeal this all the way to the Privy Council (on our dime mind you).
zoom rader wrote:^^^ Too many people will not understand what took place there.
Yet still those are the hard core supporters of PNM
I hope imbert gets full shaft for this.
You have to tune in the PNM stations and listen to how these ppl think.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:zoom rader wrote:^^^ Too many people will not understand what took place there.
Yet still those are the hard core supporters of PNM
I hope imbert gets full shaft for this.
This doh really matter to the avg joe
..as long as they know kamla thief, great is the pnm...they can do no wrong
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Habit7 and 182 guests