TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

New World Order

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

New World Order

Postby sMASH » May 18th, 2022, 6:52 pm

Soo , mechanisms setting up to make u indentured to the system. They could switch of ur ability to use money at whim.
If u don't comply with their decrees, if u resist their demands, if ur social credit score is too low.
They would even regulate what u can and can't pay for.

IMG_20220518_184406.jpg

abducted
I LUV THIS PLACE
Posts: 939
Joined: April 10th, 2007, 9:35 pm

Re: New World Order

Postby abducted » May 18th, 2022, 7:30 pm

It seems you are running low on your meds sMASH, for some time now, your posts are becoming crazier by the day,

User avatar
Ripe Chenette
Sweet on this forum
Posts: 349
Joined: October 1st, 2020, 12:24 am

Re: New World Order

Postby Ripe Chenette » May 18th, 2022, 7:56 pm

abducted wrote:It seems you are running low on your meds sMASH, for some time now, your posts are becoming crazier by the day,
Is all madness, conspiracy theory and disinformation until about 8 or so years down the line and yuh not allowed to buy bread because you did something werent supposed to.

User avatar
timelapse
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8113
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 7:13 pm

Re: New World Order

Postby timelapse » May 18th, 2022, 8:06 pm

Smash is on the right path with this one...for now

Mmoney607
30 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2544
Joined: April 1st, 2021, 9:21 am

Re: New World Order

Postby Mmoney607 » May 18th, 2022, 8:36 pm

Good timing as world economic forum is starting on Sunday

Redress10
12 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2286
Joined: July 15th, 2014, 1:04 am

Re: New World Order

Postby Redress10 » May 18th, 2022, 9:01 pm

sMASH wrote:Soo , mechanisms setting up to make u indentured to the system. They could switch of ur ability to use money at whim.
If u don't comply with their decrees, if u resist their demands, if ur social credit score is too low.
They would even regulate what u can and can't pay for.

IMG_20220518_184406.jpg


Steupsss...you living in a third world country with little to no extractable resource. You not even part of the system farless the Nwo.

You will not even receive an invite. Stop worrying about foolishness and go enjoy what little TT has to offer.

User avatar
Les Bain
3ne2nr Toppa Toppa
Posts: 5038
Joined: May 17th, 2012, 9:46 pm
Location: Cruising for chicks

Re: New World Order

Postby Les Bain » May 18th, 2022, 9:14 pm

Why Imbert standing like that?

nwo.jpg

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: New World Order

Postby sMASH » May 18th, 2022, 9:15 pm

U got to see a demo in Canada recently...
A word to the wise is sufficient.
Do as u please.

Redress10
12 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2286
Joined: July 15th, 2014, 1:04 am

Re: New World Order

Postby Redress10 » May 18th, 2022, 9:33 pm

Bai...no NWO gonna affect us. We so low down the pecking order that ANY order more or less results in us just getting whatever scraps are left.

Cyah tell scraps from scraps. Go take a sea bath, eat a bake and shark and relax yuhself. Your life nice and unbothered.

Right now it have Ukrainians being placed on buses without identification and passports and sent to places such as Siberia so Russia could repopulate parts of Ukraine.

That is what nwo looks like. Nobody fussing with TT.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: New World Order

Postby sMASH » May 18th, 2022, 11:25 pm

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/do ... 21_EN.html





Parliamentary questions
PDF 39k WORD 10k
7 March 2022
P-000921/2022
Priority question for written answer P-000921/2022
to the Commission
Rule 138
Christine Anderson (ID)

Answer in writing
Subject: WHO pandemic treaty

On 1 December 2021(1) the 194 members of the World Health Organization (WHO) reached a consensus to begin the process of drafting and negotiating a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.

An intergovernmental negotiating body will now be constituted and hold its first meeting by 1 March 2022 (to agree on ways of working and timelines) and its second by 1 August 2022 (to discuss progress on a working draft). It will then deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023, with the aim to adopt the instrument by 2024.

Many who favour the treaty believe that it offers the best way to increase political commitment from states to reform global health governance. However, the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates that this proposition has no basis in fact. Government responses to COVID-19 have purportedly violated or manipulated many treaties, including human rights agreements.(2)

To what extent will the Commission ensure that the citizen, who has no direct vote in a body such as the WHO, is not bypassed in the decision-making process and that a shift of competence further and further away from the voter does not lead to an increasing ‘de-democratisation’ of our society?

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: New World Order

Postby sMASH » May 18th, 2022, 11:28 pm

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/covid19/2022/03 ... o-do-next/



A new pandemic treaty: what the World Health Organization needs to do next

9 comments | 166 shares

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes
166 Shares

The wishlist for a pandemic treaty is long, and there are formidable obstacles to achieving it. Maike Voss (German Alliance on Climate Change and Health, KLUG), Clare Wenham (LSE), Mark Eccleston-Turner (Kings College London), Rithika Sangameshwaran and Bianka Detering (KLUG) look at the challenges involved.

After the multiple governance failures of the pandemic, the international community agreed at a Special Session of the World Health Assembly (WHASS) on the need to draft a convention, agreement or other international instrument for pandemic preparedness and response. An intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) was established to draft it under the Constitution of the World Health Organization (WHO).

The justification for a pandemic treaty is that whilst the technical expertise on how to govern and end a pandemic exists, the political will to do so is missing. A new pandemic treaty cannot stand on its own and will not be the solution to all failures in global health. Nonetheless, the INB, WHO member states and in particular the German government in its current G7 presidency can take concrete next steps, without stretching a treaty’s mandate so far as to make it unachievable.
A shared understanding of the problem that needs to be fixed

A lack of clarity and coherence on the specific problems the treaty aims to resolve risks rendering it futile. The IHR failed to prevent COVID-19 becoming a global pandemic. Multiple contraventions included (presumed) limitations on sharing of information of infectious disease outbreaks; the implementation of travel and trade restrictions despite the WHO not recommending them; and a failure to follow the other temporary recommendations issued by the WHO IHR Emergency Committee. Furthermore, IHR obligations are heavily tailored towards prevention and detection of pathogens, and very limited on response stages to prevent transmission. However, to date there is no comprehensive analysis as to why governments failed to comply with their IHR obligations.
Process for the treaty text and beyond

A draft text is expected for 1 August 2022. To get there, a member state-led, transparent, inclusive and fair procedure is necessary, with full participation of all member states with meaningful inclusion of non-state actors. Nikogosian & Kickbusch (2021) recommend involving the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, World Trade Organisation and International Labour Organisation for treaty negotiations. So that the treaty is not seen as an instrument pushed by high-income countries, the involvement of important regional bodies such as the African Union, ASEAN, Mercosur and others will be crucial. Without the support of civil society, a pandemic treaty will not see the light of day, or it will not protect those most at risk.
Instrument form

The treaty is expected to be modelled as a Framework Convention complemented by additional instruments (protocols, guidelines or standards) for adoption by governance bodies created through the treaty. This approach allows parties to reach consensus on high-level legally binding principles and commitments within the initial Convention – i.e., the meaning of ‘equity’ or ‘solidarity’ in a health emergency, and states that parties give a commitment to act in solidarity during such an emergency, followed by agreements adding detailed commitments regarding operationalising these commitments – i.e., a protocol regarding pathogen sharing, or one on equitable access to vaccines, etc.

While a framework convention may seem appealing from a “get it done” perspective, its inability to create a harmonious international legal regime could leave significant gaps. By enabling states to select which protocols within the treaty they wish to be party to, the approach risks states ratifying different elements of the overall treaty package, leading to more fragmentation in global health governance. On the other hand, this may promote a broad consensus to overarching principles and norms, but with national differentiation regarding specific obligations.
The long list of thematic wishes

These include:

Anchoring the treaty in human rights and addressing the principles of the right to health, equity, solidarity, transparency, trust, and accountability;
Using a One Health approach for pandemic prevention and early detection
Stronger health systems information and reporting mechanisms; including a better use of digital technology for data collection and sharing
A reform of the WHO alarm mechanism, the public health emergency of international control (PHEIC) declaration process and travel and travel restrictions;
Pathogen and genomic data sharing
Resilience to and response to pandemics, including universal access to medicines, vaccines, diagnostics, medical equipment and treatments as well as resilient supply chains, technology transfer
Investments in health system strengthening and increased financing for pandemic preparedness and response
Stronger international health framework with a strengthened WHO at the centre and increase global coordination
Reinforcing legal obligations and norms of global health security and standard settings of health care systems
Coordination of research and development (R&D).

So much is being touted for inclusion that achieving it all seems unlikely. If the substantive content does make it to the drafting and negotiation process of the INB, it is unlikely there will be consensus on these issues from member states, which in turn will limit ratification of any treaty nationally, particularly if it is seen to infringe on trade or sovereignty.

We suggest aiming to formalise cooperation on the systems that alert the world to a pandemic that triggers action in four areas, following the life cycle of an outbreak:

Pandemic prevention: proponents of the treaty push to address potential pandemic sources using the concept of One or Planetary Health and ‘deep prevention’ to include antimicrobial resistance (AMR), zoonoses, climate adaptation and mitigation and accidental pathogen release into the content discussion of a pandemic treaty.

Pandemic preparedness and detection: There is an urgent need to promote equity in pathogens and data sharing during outbreaks, as part of efforts to decolonise global health and the environment.

Pandemic response: The issue of equitable access to vaccines, diagnostics, therapeutics and equipment will be one of the most serious conversations taking place.

Financing pandemic preparedness and response: Financing for the pandemic treaty could come from the IMF as Special Drawing Rights or from the World Bank in the form of loans. A new pooled insurance mechanism could be established to share the risks associated with infectious disease outbreaks, while simultaneously using these financing resources to encourage compliance with a pandemic treaty. A new Global Health Security Financial Intermediary Fund (FIF) pushed by the US could be housed at the World Bank. The importance of sustainable financing would also entail an increase of compulsory and voluntary funding of the WHO by member states, public health taxation, and permanent endowments. This would allow for greater autonomy and support independent governance by shielding the body from excessive political influence. However, these discussions, while crucial to the future success of the WHO during a health emergency, are not part of the present treaty negotiations.
tedros adhanom Ghebreyesus
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organization, speaks at an event in November 2021. Photo: gointernationalgroup.com via a CC BY NC 2.0 licence
Interaction with the IHR

A potential alternative to the treaty would be to update the IHR, as the US and European Commission are suggesting, to make them more relevant and enhance governance and compliance gaps to move beyond the current “name and shame”. However, reopening the text of the IHR for renegotiation runs the risk of losing some of what is currently there. States have clarified their expectations that any treaty must work in conjunction with IHR (2005), with legally binding enforcement mechanisms, a strong secretariat, clear metrics for monitoring and evaluation, and form part of broader WHO reform efforts.
Enhanced response will enhance compliance

For this treaty to have teeth, the organisation that governs it needs to have the power – either political or legal – to enforce compliance. In its current form, the WHO does not possess such powers. In order to enforce compliance, some commentators have recommended concluding the treaty at the United Nations level. However, we fear that it has been already decided with the INB (mandated by WHASS) that a treaty will be developed under the roof of WHO.

To move on with the treaty, WHO therefore needs to be empowered — financially, and politically. If international pandemic response is enhanced, compliance is enhanced. In case of a declared health emergency, resources need to flow to countries in which the emergency is occurring, triggering response elements such as financing and technical support. These are especially relevant for LMICs, and could be used to encourage and enhance the timely sharing of information by states, reassuring them that they will not be subject to arbitrary trade and travel sanctions for reporting, but instead be provided with the necessary financial and technical resources they require to effectively respond to the outbreak. High-income settings may not be motivated by financial resources in the same way as their low-income counterparts. An adaptable incentive regime is therefore needed, with sanctions such as public reprimands, economic sanctions, or denial of benefits.
Next steps

It will likely take years to negotiate the treaty. The world cannot wait until 2024. The minimum outcome of the treaty negotiations are trustworthy relations between the global south and the global north; the maximum outcome must be trust, built by a process that leads to a pandemic treaty with teeth, and a sensible incentive regime.

To get there, negotiators and all WHO member states need to be willing to compromise and to collectively chose a set of rules with which they are willing to comply in both health emergencies and ‘peacetime’. At the same time, a treaty cannot and will not bind together all the proposed initiatives, and will not fix all the challenges the WHO and global health face.

The world cannot wait for the pandemic treaty to be implemented to accelerate the response to the current pandemic, but we believe that in the process of developing it, trust can be (re)built.

This post represents the views of the authors and not those of the COVID-19 blog, nor LSE. It is an edited extract from A new treaty on pandemics: key to (re)build trust in international cooperation?, a policy brief by the German Alliance on Climate Change and Health, King’s College London, and LSE.

redmanjp
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16195
Joined: September 22nd, 2009, 11:01 pm
Contact:

Re: New World Order

Postby redmanjp » May 19th, 2022, 11:42 pm

Rothchild's. Illuminati. Council on Foreign Relations

Last edited by redmanjp on May 20th, 2022, 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The_Honourable
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8473
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 3:45 pm
Location: In the Land of Stupidity & Corruption

Re: New World Order

Postby The_Honourable » May 19th, 2022, 11:58 pm

The King of the North has been picking up pace, interesting times.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: New World Order

Postby sMASH » May 20th, 2022, 7:04 am



they could turn off and turn what when where what u may or may not spend ur money on.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: New World Order

Postby sMASH » May 20th, 2022, 7:07 am


User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: New World Order

Postby sMASH » May 20th, 2022, 7:11 am



if i mad, i have many company

User avatar
timelapse
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8113
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 7:13 pm

Re: New World Order

Postby timelapse » May 20th, 2022, 7:27 am

Man like redress can keep burying their heads in the sand.If PNM could keep them fooled, that says a lot.
The World Economic Forum is not a regulatory body dear tuners.They have zero benevolent intentions.
It is a paid membership of the big companies, Johnson and Johnson, Samsung,etc ,in order to get their products sold and to maximize their profits.It isn't an advertising company either.Think more along the lines of lobbying governments to have laws changed to accommodate their business and you will get the idea .It is very real and applies to every possible form of commercial activity.
Wont touch a third world nation you say?
Those companies control food, clothing,banking, hardware supplies,tech, medicine,oil and gas, sex toys, sporting goods.You name it , they control it.
You feel Sabga dem is 1%? Dem is joke.Much less for the rest of us.

User avatar
VexXx Dogg
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16212
Joined: May 1st, 2003, 10:23 am
Location: ☠☠☠

Re: New World Order

Postby VexXx Dogg » May 20th, 2022, 8:36 am

Hold on to your tinfoil hats

User avatar
timelapse
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8113
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 7:13 pm

Re: New World Order

Postby timelapse » May 20th, 2022, 8:53 am

VexXx Dogg wrote:Hold on to your tinfoil hats
From the horse's mouth

The World Economic Forum
The World Economic Forum is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation.

The Forum engages the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas.

It was established in 1971 as a not-for-profit foundation and is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. It is independent, impartial and not tied to any special interests. The Forum strives in all its efforts to demonstrate entrepreneurship in the global public interest while upholding the highest standards of governance. Moral and intellectual integrity is at the heart of everything it does.
As an international organization with no commercial interest, the Forum provides a platform for leaders from all stakeholder groups from around the world – business, government and civil society – to come together.

Their 'partners'
https://www.weforum.org/partners/

If your head in the sand, your arse in the air, and as our esteemed colleague Zoom would say "take bull"

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: New World Order

Postby sMASH » May 20th, 2022, 8:56 am

timelapse wrote:
VexXx Dogg wrote:Hold on to your tinfoil hats
From the horse's mouth

The World Economic Forum
The World Economic Forum is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation.

The Forum engages the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas.

It was established in 1971 as a not-for-profit foundation and is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. It is independent, impartial and not tied to any special interests. The Forum strives in all its efforts to demonstrate entrepreneurship in the global public interest while upholding the highest standards of governance. Moral and intellectual integrity is at the heart of everything it does.
As an international organization with no commercial interest, the Forum provides a platform for leaders from all stakeholder groups from around the world – business, government and civil society – to come together.

Their 'partners'
https://www.weforum.org/partners/

If your head in the sand, your arse in the air, and as our esteemed colleague Zoom would say "take bull"

take it from this man, in digital and in the money. the mechanisms are there, and getting rolled out.

make meh care
Trinituner Peong
Posts: 458
Joined: October 24th, 2007, 6:24 pm

Re: New World Order

Postby make meh care » May 20th, 2022, 9:49 am

one government one religion also as we wait for the antichrist. illuminati and free masons are involved

User avatar
timelapse
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8113
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 7:13 pm

Re: New World Order

Postby timelapse » May 20th, 2022, 10:15 am

make meh care wrote:one government one religion also as we wait for the antichrist. illuminati and free masons are involved
Nah, just a global Chamber of Commerce

User avatar
FrankChag
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1111
Joined: May 9th, 2017, 4:28 pm
Location: W.C.N.S.F

Re: New World Order

Postby FrankChag » May 20th, 2022, 10:28 am

sMASH wrote:
timelapse wrote:
VexXx Dogg wrote:Hold on to your tinfoil hats
From the horse's mouth

The World Economic Forum
The World Economic Forum is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation.

The Forum engages the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas.

It was established in 1971 as a not-for-profit foundation and is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. It is independent, impartial and not tied to any special interests. The Forum strives in all its efforts to demonstrate entrepreneurship in the global public interest while upholding the highest standards of governance. Moral and intellectual integrity is at the heart of everything it does.
As an international organization with no commercial interest, the Forum provides a platform for leaders from all stakeholder groups from around the world – business, government and civil society – to come together.

Their 'partners'
https://www.weforum.org/partners/

If your head in the sand, your arse in the air, and as our esteemed colleague Zoom would say "take bull"

take it from this man, in digital and in the money. the mechanisms are there, and getting rolled out.



"Money" is a made-up thing, mijo. A human construct of value. Diamonds, gold, paper, bytes, digital blocks on a digital chain.. all the same. We're just storing under someone else's mattress (platform) now.

If you're worried about that, then invest in physical assets. Land, animals, trees/orchids, buildings, tools, gold, etc. /nosarc




User avatar
VexXx Dogg
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16212
Joined: May 1st, 2003, 10:23 am
Location: ☠☠☠

Re: New World Order

Postby VexXx Dogg » May 20th, 2022, 10:36 am

timelapse wrote:Man like redress can keep burying their heads in the sand.If PNM could keep them fooled, that says a lot.
The World Economic Forum is not a regulatory body dear tuners.They have zero benevolent intentions.
It is a paid membership of the big companies, Johnson and Johnson, Samsung,etc ,in order to get their products sold and to maximize their profits.It isn't an advertising company either.Think more along the lines of lobbying governments to have laws changed to accommodate their business and you will get the idea .It is very real and applies to every possible form of commercial activity.
Wont touch a third world nation you say?
Those companies control food, clothing,banking, hardware supplies,tech, medicine,oil and gas, sex toys, sporting goods.You name it , they control it.
You feel Sabga dem is 1%? Dem is joke.Much less for the rest of us.


Agreed with that part.
WEF does not make decisions, nor do they have the power to directly influence outcomes.
Yes, they have commercial members (like many other similar entities ), but so do other lobby organisations. That's how lobbyists work.

You might be getting your signals crossed or mixing them up with something else - but y'all overestimating their impact.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: New World Order

Postby sMASH » May 20th, 2022, 12:29 pm

WHO sent out guide lines to governments for covee, and some governments took it as gospel and made them into laws, with fines and arrests.

remember when covee now start in trinidad, and there were advice for people to wear masks, from the pm ALONE, police had forced a taxi driver out of the queue for not having a mask, even tho it was NOT a law?
remember when police was turning people away from the roads, just because the pm siad only go to essential places, but that was NOT enforceable law, but police enforced it?

they will keep putting pieces and pieces in place, and only pull the trigger when its all there.

every body will say, 'nah they will cyar do dat' for every ting, until one day, skynet!

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17902
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: New World Order

Postby De Dragon » May 21st, 2022, 2:24 pm

*Gasp* a business organization is pro business :shock: :shock:
Oh the humanity!

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: New World Order

Postby sMASH » May 22nd, 2022, 7:16 am

hugo boss and tommy hillfiger rolling out their lines of tin foil hats...


User avatar
88sins
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10110
Joined: July 22nd, 2007, 3:03 pm
Location: Corner of Everywhere Avenue & Nowhere Drive

Re: New World Order

Postby 88sins » May 22nd, 2022, 8:17 am

All who think that if/when cbdc's are implemented in bigger countries, that it won't affect lil old backwards T&T, a tiny nation that is forever heavily dependentbon foreign currencies, it have a surprise coming for allyuh.

User avatar
timelapse
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8113
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 7:13 pm

Re: New World Order

Postby timelapse » May 22nd, 2022, 8:20 am

Who want to hear,hear.
"You will own nothing and you will be happy"
-WEF
The agenda for 2022 is the great economic reset, but guess what, it only benefits the big industrialists.Be as naive as you want, big businesses play very dirty and convince you that you like it.This isn't chuppid lil Trinidad businesses we talking about.These companies could buy the whole of the Caribbean on a whim.
Tell me if this sounds like chuppid conspiracy
https://youtu.be/8Bm8j08sq5g
This has expanded from the 'negro' to anybody middle class go down.
Last edited by timelapse on May 22nd, 2022, 8:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: New World Order

Postby sMASH » May 22nd, 2022, 8:22 am

allyuh remember the movie Equilibrium?

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 132 guests