Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
zoom rader wrote:These clerks are employed direct from bailiser brothel.Mmoney607 wrote:Them clerks look like them young people who don't know nothing but they just like pnm because issa black man party
zoom rader wrote:These clerks are employed direct from bailiser brothel.Mmoney607 wrote:Them clerks look like them young people who don't know nothing but they just like pnm because issa black man party
Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Was it democratic not to debate the matter?Redman wrote:It can't be democratic if the UNC didn't get it's way
The independents are PNM agents.VexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
There is no right to a debate...it's a vote.
That's what the speaker read out at the outset....rules that govern this process.
Seems that the UNC made themselves irrelevant at this stage as well.
Redman wrote:The motion is based on whether the Prez did chit or not.
Not the actions of the PSC.....
That said if I were her I would have abstained...to prove the point,not like it was even close.
We have to accept that the vast majority of the electoral college did not think a tribunal was necessary.
The debate would have just been the unc trying the matter under parliamentary cover.Dizzy28 wrote:The Independent bench also includes the sister of a key party in this whole issue. Charisse sister or Bliss.
Its not unfeasible for her to canvass the remaining Independents who all are PMW appointees anyhows. This is Trinidad nothing less than ethical is not realisticVexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
Yes I saw itpugboy wrote:kamala say they was switching off the microphones during the motion
You still did not answer the questionMaxPower wrote:zoom rader wrote:Which people can file motions?MaxPower wrote:We need more important and relevant people to file motions.
There should be NO room for incompetency.
Ahhhhh now we talking.
We have to determine who can file motions and what their competency level is.
Can’t file a motion, fail, and then ask who can file a motion bro.
These "Clerk positions " has to be vetted in favor of the red government. They would not put people in those positions who are non red government.Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:These clerks are employed direct from bailiser brothel.Mmoney607 wrote:Them clerks look like them young people who don't know nothing but they just like pnm because issa black man party
For some big men you guys act like real children.
The precedent has already be set, so all future no confidence motions does not need a debate from now on.Dizzy28 wrote:The speaker whilst within her rights to not allow a debate also could have let it happened based on the powers granted to her (as per Express's editorial today)
In the interest of national concern and if everyone did nothing wrong why not have the debate? Sunlight is after all the best disinfectantRedman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Was it democratic not to debate the matter?Redman wrote:It can't be democratic if the UNC didn't get it's way
The independents are PNM agents.VexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
There is no right to a debate...it's a vote.
That's what the speaker read out at the outset....rules that govern this process.
Seems that the UNC made themselves irrelevant at this stage as well.
Dizzy28 wrote:Sigh!!!IMG_20211021_201054.jpgRedman wrote:The motion is based on whether the Prez did chit or not.
Not the actions of the PSC.....
That said if I were her I would have abstained...to prove the point,not like it was even close.
We have to accept that the vast majority of the electoral college did not think a tribunal was necessary.
The debate would have just been the unc trying the matter under parliamentary cover.Dizzy28 wrote:The Independent bench also includes the sister of a key party in this whole issue. Charisse sister or Bliss.
Its not unfeasible for her to canvass the remaining Independents who all are PMW appointees anyhows. This is Trinidad nothing less than ethical is not realisticVexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
Joe you know very well to get those clerk positions and higher up positions you need to show you affiliation to the red government. Also those positions has to be vetted by the red government.j.o.e wrote:zoom rader wrote:These clerks are employed direct from bailiser brothel.Mmoney607 wrote:Them clerks look like them young people who don't know nothing but they just like pnm because issa black man party
What do you call the place Reshmi Ramnarine was employed from ?
zoom rader wrote:These "Clerk positions " has to be vetted in favor of the red government. They would not put people in those positions who are non red government.Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:These clerks are employed direct from bailiser brothel.Mmoney607 wrote:Them clerks look like them young people who don't know nothing but they just like pnm because issa black man party
For some big men you guys act like real children.
They have to toe the line, you know this very much so hush ya lil Cont
RighttttRedman wrote:zoom rader wrote:These "Clerk positions " has to be vetted in favor of the red government. They would not put people in those positions who are non red government.Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:These clerks are employed direct from bailiser brothel.Mmoney607 wrote:Them clerks look like them young people who don't know nothing but they just like pnm because issa black man party
For some big men you guys act like real children.
They have to toe the line, you know this very much so hush ya lil Cont
Yawn.
This was not a motion of no confidence
Different motion different rules.
zoom rader wrote:You still did not answer the question
zoom rader wrote:RighttttRedman wrote:zoom rader wrote:These "Clerk positions " has to be vetted in favor of the red government. They would not put people in those positions who are non red government.Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:These clerks are employed direct from bailiser brothel.Mmoney607 wrote:Them clerks look like them young people who don't know nothing but they just like pnm because issa black man party
For some big men you guys act like real children.
They have to toe the line, you know this very much so hush ya lil Cont
Yawn.
This was not a motion of no confidence
Different motion different rules.
zoom rader wrote:These "Clerk positions " has to be vetted in favor of the red government. They would not put people in those positions who are non red government.Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:These clerks are employed direct from bailiser brothel.Mmoney607 wrote:Them clerks look like them young people who don't know nothing but they just like pnm because issa black man party
For some big men you guys act like real children.
They have to toe the line, you know this very much so hush ya lil Cont
Thank youMaxPower wrote:zoom rader wrote:You still did not answer the question
Or right sorry.
I would say any Parliamentarian/MP can file a motion.
These "Clerk positions " has to be vetted in favor of the red government. They would not put people in those positions who are non red government.wtf wrote:Honestly though what are the requirements to be a parliamentary clerk?
It can't be high because it looks like a boring dead end job only a loser will take.
Blaze d Chalice wrote:Seems like Kamala just likes wasting time.
Oh yeah and PNM til 2050.
Tell us how she is wasting time?Blaze d Chalice wrote:Seems like Kamala just likes wasting time.
Oh yeah and PNM til 2050.
Joe was one of those tuners I had out of the jackarse list but his true colours showed today .De Dragon wrote:Imagine a big fat facking fairy President admitting that there was interference in the selection process for a CoP by a LFD RFD PNM "high official".
Imagine a big fat facking fairy President admitting that she didn't do her constitutional DUTY and forward the Merit List.
Imagine a big fat facking fairy PM defending this sheit because he was allegedly involved,
Imagine a big fat fairy facking AG calling this a victory when a judge basically said he failed to craft proper legislation.
Imagine big fat fairy kants like Colos, j.o.e. etc, defending this sheit.
Imagine a big fat facking leech of a Speaker deciding unilaterally that an unprecedented motion in our history is not worthy of a debate.
Then understand why we are where we are.
wtf wrote:Honestly though what are the requirements to be a parliamentary clerk?
It can't be high because it looks like a boring dead end job only a loser will take.
See why I say I we live in Stupid Cont Tree filled with idiots and no bellypaid_influencer wrote:the people on this island do not care if we live under a dictatorship. welp
eliteauto wrote:wtf wrote:Honestly though what are the requirements to be a parliamentary clerk?
It can't be high because it looks like a boring dead end job only a loser will take.
The Clerk of the House aka the powder neck red member has a BSc is Public Admin and Law from UWI Cave Hill, an LEC from Hugh Wooding and an LLB from the University of London. Hope that helps
That may be so but they also have to be vetted by the red government. They are hand picked .eliteauto wrote:wtf wrote:Honestly though what are the requirements to be a parliamentary clerk?
It can't be high because it looks like a boring dead end job only a loser will take.
The Clerk of the House aka the powder neck red member has a BSc is Public Admin and Law from UWI Cave Hill, an LEC from Hugh Wooding and an LLB from the University of London. Hope that helps
De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:wtf wrote:Honestly though what are the requirements to be a parliamentary clerk?
It can't be high because it looks like a boring dead end job only a loser will take.
The Clerk of the House aka the powder neck red member has a BSc is Public Admin and Law from UWI Cave Hill, an LEC from Hugh Wooding and an LLB from the University of London. Hope that helps
Qualifications mean you're somehow above reproach?
paid_influencer wrote:the people on this island do not care if we live under a dictatorship. welp
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 311 guests