Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
MaxPower wrote:I will never serve in the military unless my country deserves it.
MaxPower wrote:I will never serve in the military unless my country deserves it.
Focus 88.This is a battle on behalf of your manhood.Country could wait88sins wrote:MaxPower wrote:I will never serve in the military unless my country deserves it.
Then you should be living on a vessel anchored in the middle of international waters and never touch land again.
Hi Jared.This is what your colleagues in the feminist agenda are encouraging.SuperiorMan wrote:
88sins wrote:MaxPower wrote:I will never serve in the military unless my country deserves it.
Then you should be living on a vessel anchored in the middle of international waters and never touch land again.
MaxPower wrote:88sins wrote:MaxPower wrote:I will never serve in the military unless my country deserves it.
Then you should be living on a vessel anchored in the middle of international waters and never touch land again.
Nope, try again. I already told u i am not serving and i have my reasons. But sure, you go right ahead and think what i should/should not be doing.
matr1x wrote:MaxPower wrote:88sins wrote:MaxPower wrote:I will never serve in the military unless my country deserves it.
Then you should be living on a vessel anchored in the middle of international waters and never touch land again.
Nope, try again. I already told u i am not serving and i have my reasons. But sure, you go right ahead and think what i should/should not be doing.
Max, being a pantyman does not exclude you from serving the country
alfa wrote:Y'all know conscription is not a thing in this country right? Taking chain up from Max lol
alfa wrote:Y'all know conscription is not a thing in this country right? Taking chain up from Max lol
Nexus wrote:Where are the feminist when is time to replace the water cooler bottles
Unless the evidence was incredibly strong for one side, let us first hear about the case from both sides of the party before jumping onto conclusions.timelapse wrote:Hi Jared.This is what your colleagues in the feminist agenda are encouraging.SuperiorMan wrote:
Jared Mohammed wrote:Unless the evidence was incredibly strong for one side, let us first hear about the case from both sides of the party before jumping onto conclusions.timelapse wrote:Hi Jared.This is what your colleagues in the feminist agenda are encouraging.SuperiorMan wrote:
DMan7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Unless the evidence was incredibly strong for one side, let us first hear about the case from both sides of the party before jumping onto conclusions.timelapse wrote:Hi Jared.This is what your colleagues in the feminist agenda are encouraging.SuperiorMan wrote:
If the roles were reversed would you be saying this same thing about a woman being groped by a male superior? Will she also need 'incredibly strong evidence' or will her word be the only thing is needed?
Jared Mohammed wrote:DMan7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Unless the evidence was incredibly strong for one side, let us first hear about the case from both sides of the party before jumping onto conclusions.timelapse wrote:Hi Jared.This is what your colleagues in the feminist agenda are encouraging.SuperiorMan wrote:
If the roles were reversed would you be saying this same thing about a woman being groped by a male superior? Will she also need 'incredibly strong evidence' or will her word be the only thing is needed?
Yes. Though the chances of a women getting groped are much higher than a man getting groped. If the male superior had a history of sexually harrassment, then yes, I would believe her more often than not.
It is not simply a yes or no answer, there is alot of nuisance to it.
She can.DMan7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:DMan7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Unless the evidence was incredibly strong for one side, let us first hear about the case from both sides of the party before jumping onto conclusions.timelapse wrote:Hi Jared.This is what your colleagues in the feminist agenda are encouraging.SuperiorMan wrote:
If the roles were reversed would you be saying this same thing about a woman being groped by a male superior? Will she also need 'incredibly strong evidence' or will her word be the only thing is needed?
Yes. Though the chances of a women getting groped are much higher than a man getting groped. If the male superior had a history of sexually harrassment, then yes, I would believe her more often than not.
It is not simply a yes or no answer, there is alot of nuisance to it.
So can the female superior also have a history of sexual harrassment?
matr1x wrote:Women want to get paid same as men for sane positions...but don't want to do the work. Women in IT not joke lazy.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, foreignused, Google [Bot], Habit7, pugboy and 201 guests