Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
paid_influencer wrote:
adnj wrote:drchaos wrote:
You do actually realize you proved my point with that death certificate.
Influenza + pneumonia death = Pneumonia death
Covid + Pneumonia death = Covid death
ONLY you FEMbot can try to disprove someone in an argument and end up proving them right
What a retard
Nope.
sMASH wrote:Ey, bonx dong in the road + positive covee test= covee death
There is a difference between the 'cause of death' on the certificates, and the statistics.
The Problem was that ANY death, as long as it wss covee positive, was used as a figure fir civee death stats.
So, u die from ice staking, u test positive fir covee, the death certificate will state 'ice skating death', BUT the death would be used on the civee death stats as thst lumped deaths FROM covee together with deaths merely WITH covee.
Thats the main way they fudged the numbers to get adnj frighten to take jab
maj. tom wrote:Allyuh never used to wash your hands with soap before covid? It always had other germs spread the same way before Covid-19.
Science changes agsin. Like omicron solved the pneumonia too...adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:Ey, bonx dong in the road + positive covee test= covee death
There is a difference between the 'cause of death' on the certificates, and the statistics.
The Problem was that ANY death, as long as it wss covee positive, was used as a figure fir civee death stats.
So, u die from ice staking, u test positive fir covee, the death certificate will state 'ice skating death', BUT the death would be used on the civee death stats as thst lumped deaths FROM covee together with deaths merely WITH covee.
Thats the main way they fudged the numbers to get adnj frighten to take jab
Repeating the same thing over and over again doesn't make it so. Because what you still fail to grasp is cause of death vs. underlying cause of death.
Nearly twenty years ago, David Rosenthal, director of Harvard University Health Services, said, “People don't necessarily die, per se, of the [flu] virus—the viraemia. What they die of is a secondary pneumonia. So many of these pneumonias are not viral pneumonias but secondary [pneumonias].” But Dr Rosenthal agreed that the flu/pneumonia relationship was not unique.
In the US and Europe, essentially the same etiological methodology has been followed for over 100 years:
The underlying cause-of-death is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as "the disease or injury which initiated the train of events leading directly to death, or the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury." Underlying cause-of-death is selected from the conditions entered by the physician on the cause of death section of the death certificate. When more than one cause or condition is entered by the physician, the underlying cause is determined by the sequence of conditions on the certificate, provisions of the ICD, and associated selection rules and modifications.
https://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/ucd.html
If a mask has a NIOSH N95 rating, then it's 95% effective at filtering particles at the 0.3 micron range.sMASH wrote:N95 is 5 micron size, i think. And covee os 3 micron...
Make it make sense...
Damned it, i wuz wrong againadnj wrote:If a mask has a NIOSH N95 rating, then it's 95% effective at filtering particles at the 0.3 micron range.sMASH wrote:N95 is 5 micron size, i think. And covee os 3 micron...
Make it make sense...
The effective ability to filter particles INCREASES as the particle size becomes SMALLER than 0.3 microns for N95 filter media.sMASH wrote:Damned it, i wuz wrong againadnj wrote:If a mask has a NIOSH N95 rating, then it's 95% effective at filtering particles at the 0.3 micron range.sMASH wrote:N95 is 5 micron size, i think. And covee os 3 micron...
Make it make sense...
I think 0.3 microns is 300 nm
I too used a rice strainer to filter salt out of sea water cause filtration works better the smaller the particle size...adnj wrote:The effective ability to filter particles INCREASES as the particle size becomes SMALLER than 0.3 microns for N95 filter media.sMASH wrote:Damned it, i wuz wrong againadnj wrote:If a mask has a NIOSH N95 rating, then it's 95% effective at filtering particles at the 0.3 micron range.sMASH wrote:N95 is 5 micron size, i think. And covee os 3 micron...
Make it make sense...
I think 0.3 microns is 300 nm
I know, I know. You can't see how that could make sense.
If you need some education of the physics involved, send a PM and I will shoot back some links.
If you still find that the concept is perplexing, it's rumored that a new Ant-Man movie, "Nanomania," will discuss this phenomenon. Maybe you'll be able to make sense out of it then.
I see that the movie ticket prices are going up, though. You'll need to bring candy from home instead of buying it at the concession stand to offset that extra cost.
sMASH wrote:I too used a rice strainer to filter salt out of sea water cause filtration works better the smaller the particle size...
The only time filtration works on smaller than design particle sizes is at end of run conditions, when there us so much fouling, that the residue on the filter obstruct snd effectively create smsller pore sizes.
Post ur ctrl c/v links. I talking from experience
If masks worked, China would not hsve had thst steep omicron curve after lock down.
And in the 140nm size thst the covee exists at...adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:I too used a rice strainer to filter salt out of sea water cause filtration works better the smaller the particle size...
The only time filtration works on smaller than design particle sizes is at end of run conditions, when there us so much fouling, that the residue on the filter obstruct snd effectively create smsller pore sizes.
Post ur ctrl c/v links. I talking from experience
If masks worked, China would not hsve had thst steep omicron curve after lock down.
Sorry. Wrong again.
sMASH wrote:And in the 140nm size thst the covee exists at...
Bs.adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:And in the 140nm size thst the covee exists at...
Repost:
The effective ability to filter particles INCREASES as the particle size becomes SMALLER than 0.3 microns for N95 filter media.
Not BS, it's BM - Brownian motion.sMASH wrote:Bs.adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:And in the 140nm size thst the covee exists at...
Repost:
The effective ability to filter particles INCREASES as the particle size becomes SMALLER than 0.3 microns for N95 filter media.
Brownian motion is wrt the other particles of similar size. Not wrt to the flow of the fluid body.adnj wrote:Not BS, it's BM - Brownian motion.sMASH wrote:Bs.adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:And in the 140nm size thst the covee exists at...
Repost:
The effective ability to filter particles INCREASES as the particle size becomes SMALLER than 0.3 microns for N95 filter media.
Particles that are very small exhibit Brownian movement. These particles do not move along a fluid streamline, but diffuse throughout the electrospun nanofiber filter matrix. They may reach a possible retention site and remain there. The effect of Brownian motion would increase with smaller particles and decrease with higher fluid velocities.
sMASH wrote:Brownian motion is wrt the other particles of similar size. Not wrt to the flow of the fluid body.
Yes, they will bonx and move chaotically, until someone inhales and exhales and the fluid flow changes.
I know, i know, turbidity exhibits Brownian motion under a microscope in a petri dish, but sill passes through the filter bed when pumped by a 5 bars.
Oh, btw, the water droplets thst get stopped by the masks, they dry up. Leaving the virus with smaller and smaller droplets.
Unless, there is a study thsts shows that droplets containing virus particles, trapped by masks, always remain the same size, never dry smaller
sMASH wrote:N95 filtering air? Droplets of air?
wing wrote:Mask wearing sheep?RDT_20230513_2137278996352864635750070.jpg
sMASH wrote:Brownian motion is wrt the other particles of similar size. Not wrt to the flow of the fluid body.adnj wrote:Not BS, it's BM - Brownian motion.sMASH wrote:Bs.adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:And in the 140nm size thst the covee exists at...
Repost:
The effective ability to filter particles INCREASES as the particle size becomes SMALLER than 0.3 microns for N95 filter media.
Particles that are very small exhibit Brownian movement. These particles do not move along a fluid streamline, but diffuse throughout the electrospun nanofiber filter matrix. They may reach a possible retention site and remain there. The effect of Brownian motion would increase with smaller particles and decrease with higher fluid velocities.
Yes, they will bonx and move chaotically, until someone inhales and exhales and the fluid flow changes.
I know, i know, turbidity exhibits Brownian motion under a microscope in a petri dish, but sill passes through the filter bed when pumped by a 5 bars.
Oh, btw, the water droplets thst get stopped by the masks, they dry up. Leaving the virus with smaller and smaller droplets.
Unless, there is a study thsts shows that droplets containing virus particles, trapped by masks, always remain the same size, never dry smaller
ruffneck_12 wrote:wing wrote:Mask wearing sheep?RDT_20230513_2137278996352864635750070.jpg
Feds,
cmon mane, keep up with reality
notice how antifa wasnt there to protest them?
Masks are still a good way to hide your identity. So that's one thing I hope they don't ban tbh. I be up to dastardly deeds sometimes
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: [X]~Outlaw, Google Adsense [Bot] and 158 guests