Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
st7 wrote:ed360123 wrote:That's not what I was saying and you know it. I was saying that since you distrust the vaccines because of the Tuskegee experiment (which again was carried out by the US Govt and not simply "science") then I hope you also don't trust the hospitals and any form of medication for the same reason.hover11 wrote:So we only recognize the good in science and disregard the bad ...got youed360123 wrote:Exactly! If he ever needs to go to a hospital or take medication I wonder off he'll shun the same "science".st7 wrote:ed360123 wrote:Saying "the same science" is extremely broad. The Tuskegee study was carried out by the US Government, not simply "the science". Cause you can also say "the same science" invented Panadol, or Space travel or Computers etc.hover11 wrote:Bro alot of ppl say trust the science right .....the same science did the tuskegee project..Google itmatr1x wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52151722.amp
Leaving this rigggghhhttt here
Science and Scientists are not a monolith.
hover does try to throw out very broad sticks hoping one of them catches fire. that has been his strategy since day one.
he is spreading misinformation about everything because he does not understand the topic he's trying to debate, forcing everyone to not take the vaccine as well so he feels validated about his decision.
+1
he is trying his best to constantly stir up drama. imagine his other toxic traits
hover11 wrote:Didn't know you were a psychologist.....struggling with the English language yet at the same time can analyze people....utterly remarkablest7 wrote:ed360123 wrote:That's not what I was saying and you know it. I was saying that since you distrust the vaccines because of the Tuskegee experiment (which again was carried out by the US Govt and not simply "science") then I hope you also don't trust the hospitals and any form of medication for the same reason.hover11 wrote:So we only recognize the good in science and disregard the bad ...got youed360123 wrote:Exactly! If he ever needs to go to a hospital or take medication I wonder off he'll shun the same "science".st7 wrote:ed360123 wrote:Saying "the same science" is extremely broad. The Tuskegee study was carried out by the US Government, not simply "the science". Cause you can also say "the same science" invented Panadol, or Space travel or Computers etc.hover11 wrote:Bro alot of ppl say trust the science right .....the same science did the tuskegee project..Google it
Science and Scientists are not a monolith.
hover does try to throw out very broad sticks hoping one of them catches fire. that has been his strategy since day one.
he is spreading misinformation about everything because he does not understand the topic he's trying to debate, forcing everyone to not take the vaccine as well so he feels validated about his decision.
+1
he is trying his best to constantly stir up drama. imagine his other toxic traits
st7 wrote:hover11 wrote:Didn't know you were a psychologist.....struggling with the English language yet at the same time can analyze people....utterly remarkablest7 wrote:ed360123 wrote:That's not what I was saying and you know it. I was saying that since you distrust the vaccines because of the Tuskegee experiment (which again was carried out by the US Govt and not simply "science") then I hope you also don't trust the hospitals and any form of medication for the same reason.hover11 wrote:So we only recognize the good in science and disregard the bad ...got youed360123 wrote:Exactly! If he ever needs to go to a hospital or take medication I wonder off he'll shun the same "science".st7 wrote:ed360123 wrote:Saying "the same science" is extremely broad. The Tuskegee study was carried out by the US Government, not simply "the science". Cause you can also say "the same science" invented Panadol, or Space travel or Computers etc.
Science and Scientists are not a monolith.
hover does try to throw out very broad sticks hoping one of them catches fire. that has been his strategy since day one.
he is spreading misinformation about everything because he does not understand the topic he's trying to debate, forcing everyone to not take the vaccine as well so he feels validated about his decision.
+1
he is trying his best to constantly stir up drama. imagine his other toxic traits
struggling with the english language? what? grasping at straws again dey or what.
matr1x wrote:Fact is, all of these are still in testing phase. 1 year is barely enough testing time for short term side effects.
Wonder how much WHO partners making from this.
hover11 wrote:Well I asked for your grade in English again a very simple question and you have yet to answer such so I have come to the conclusion that you have difficulties in grasping the English language...completely understandablest7 wrote:hover11 wrote:Didn't know you were a psychologist.....struggling with the English language yet at the same time can analyze people....utterly remarkablest7 wrote:ed360123 wrote:That's not what I was saying and you know it. I was saying that since you distrust the vaccines because of the Tuskegee experiment (which again was carried out by the US Govt and not simply "science") then I hope you also don't trust the hospitals and any form of medication for the same reason.hover11 wrote:So we only recognize the good in science and disregard the bad ...got youed360123 wrote:Exactly! If he ever needs to go to a hospital or take medication I wonder off he'll shun the same "science".st7 wrote:
hover does try to throw out very broad sticks hoping one of them catches fire. that has been his strategy since day one.
he is spreading misinformation about everything because he does not understand the topic he's trying to debate, forcing everyone to not take the vaccine as well so he feels validated about his decision.
+1
he is trying his best to constantly stir up drama. imagine his other toxic traits
struggling with the english language? what? grasping at straws again dey or what.
st7 wrote:hover11 wrote:Well I asked for your grade in English again a very simple question and you have yet to answer such so I have come to the conclusion that you have difficulties in grasping the English language...completely understandablest7 wrote:hover11 wrote:Didn't know you were a psychologist.....struggling with the English language yet at the same time can analyze people....utterly remarkablest7 wrote:ed360123 wrote:That's not what I was saying and you know it. I was saying that since you distrust the vaccines because of the Tuskegee experiment (which again was carried out by the US Govt and not simply "science") then I hope you also don't trust the hospitals and any form of medication for the same reason.hover11 wrote:So we only recognize the good in science and disregard the bad ...got youed360123 wrote:Exactly! If he ever needs to go to a hospital or take medication I wonder off he'll shun the same "science".
+1
he is trying his best to constantly stir up drama. imagine his other toxic traits
struggling with the english language? what? grasping at straws again dey or what.
i get a G in english... as in Good. come at me brah
ed360123 wrote:That guy doesn't really seem to know what he's talking about. This article does a decent job of explaining why he's incorrect. Also there are no 'credible sources' on the against side.Redman wrote:Of course others just need to bracket others as stupid just to be dismissive.
I took the vax...and I fully understand anyone's reluctance to take it.
It's a choice based on insufficient information on both sides.
There is a ton of info from seemingly credible sources that advocate for and against.
The article includes a link to Vanden Bossches blog.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/vacci ... s-variants
In a summary of his findings, he writes: "As of the early days of the mass vaccination campaigns, at least a few experts have been warning against the catastrophic impact such a program could have on global and individual health. Mass vaccination in the middle of a pandemic is prone to promoting selection and adaptation of immune escape variants that are featured by increasing infectiousness and resistance to spike protein (S)-directed antibodies (Abs), thereby diminishing protection in vaccinees and threatening the unvaccinated."
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid ... en-bossche
I agree that you ultimately should talk to your doctor about it. But what VB is saying is completely contrary to the consensus of other scientists. That's the point I was making.Redman wrote:ed360123 wrote:That guy doesn't really seem to know what he's talking about. This article does a decent job of explaining why he's incorrect. Also there are no 'credible sources' on the against side.Redman wrote:Of course others just need to bracket others as stupid just to be dismissive.
I took the vax...and I fully understand anyone's reluctance to take it.
It's a choice based on insufficient information on both sides.
There is a ton of info from seemingly credible sources that advocate for and against.
The article includes a link to Vanden Bossches blog.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/vacci ... s-variants
In a summary of his findings, he writes: "As of the early days of the mass vaccination campaigns, at least a few experts have been warning against the catastrophic impact such a program could have on global and individual health. Mass vaccination in the middle of a pandemic is prone to promoting selection and adaptation of immune escape variants that are featured by increasing infectiousness and resistance to spike protein (S)-directed antibodies (Abs), thereby diminishing protection in vaccinees and threatening the unvaccinated."
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid ... en-bossche
Yes and that's the point....VB is in a position to know what he is talking about.
So is McGill.
You pick who you choose to listen too...on the basis of what some one elsee says about the source.
Every one here is relying on third fourth and fifth party credibly on order to make a decision that has long term PERSONAL consequences.
Smart people do what makes sense to them.
ed360123 wrote:I agree that you ultimately should talk to your doctor about it. But what VB is saying is completely contrary to the consensus of other scientists. That's the point I was making.Redman wrote:ed360123 wrote:That guy doesn't really seem to know what he's talking about. This article does a decent job of explaining why he's incorrect. Also there are no 'credible sources' on the against side.Redman wrote:Of course others just need to bracket others as stupid just to be dismissive.
I took the vax...and I fully understand anyone's reluctance to take it.
It's a choice based on insufficient information on both sides.
There is a ton of info from seemingly credible sources that advocate for and against.
The article includes a link to Vanden Bossches blog.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/vacci ... s-variants
In a summary of his findings, he writes: "As of the early days of the mass vaccination campaigns, at least a few experts have been warning against the catastrophic impact such a program could have on global and individual health. Mass vaccination in the middle of a pandemic is prone to promoting selection and adaptation of immune escape variants that are featured by increasing infectiousness and resistance to spike protein (S)-directed antibodies (Abs), thereby diminishing protection in vaccinees and threatening the unvaccinated."
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid ... en-bossche
Yes and that's the point....VB is in a position to know what he is talking about.
So is McGill.
You pick who you choose to listen too...on the basis of what some one elsee says about the source.
Every one here is relying on third fourth and fifth party credibly on order to make a decision that has long term PERSONAL consequences.
Smart people do what makes sense to them.
hover11 wrote:I always say ....consult with your MD before taking that plunge and taking the vaccine at the end of the day it's your choice. [b]However we all have to follow the same health protocols and still protect ourselves from covid [/b]not like after you're fully vaccinated you automatically don't have to wear a mask or sanitize anymorePariaMan wrote:I wonder how people feeling encouraging people not to take the vaccine when there are people who would be alive today if they had been vaccinated
It's one thing to not take but to encourage others who may not be as healthy and who ends up dead is a grevious offense
Indiahover11 wrote:How in God's green earth is that unrelated, this shows their manner of "study" when doing tests ....when I travel I never had to take shots so I confused what you talking about and when it had breakouts of yellow fever etc I simply waited till it died down then flew outtimelapse wrote:Again you are relating unrelated things.hover11 wrote:Bro alot of ppl say trust the science right .....the same science did the tuskegee project..Google itmatr1x wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52151722.amp
Leaving this rigggghhhttt here
Tell me, what makes this particular vaccine different?
Because if you were traveling to some countries in the past, you would need yellow fever, typhoid etc vaccines.What changed? Global wokeness? Tell me more
timelapse wrote:Indiahover11 wrote:How in God's green earth is that unrelated, this shows their manner of "study" when doing tests ....when I travel I never had to take shots so I confused what you talking about and when it had breakouts of yellow fever etc I simply waited till it died down then flew outtimelapse wrote:Again you are relating unrelated things.hover11 wrote:Bro alot of ppl say trust the science right .....the same science did the tuskegee project..Google itmatr1x wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52151722.amp
Leaving this rigggghhhttt here
Tell me, what makes this particular vaccine different?
Because if you were traveling to some countries in the past, you would need yellow fever, typhoid etc vaccines.What changed? Global wokeness? Tell me more
WHO page has a whole pdf of countries.hover11 wrote:Have no plans to visit there so I could live without seeing theretimelapse wrote:Indiahover11 wrote:How in God's green earth is that unrelated, this shows their manner of "study" when doing tests ....when I travel I never had to take shots so I confused what you talking about and when it had breakouts of yellow fever etc I simply waited till it died down then flew outtimelapse wrote:Again you are relating unrelated things.hover11 wrote:Bro alot of ppl say trust the science right .....the same science did the tuskegee project..Google itmatr1x wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52151722.amp
Leaving this rigggghhhttt here
Tell me, what makes this particular vaccine different?
Because if you were traveling to some countries in the past, you would need yellow fever, typhoid etc vaccines.What changed? Global wokeness? Tell me more
Who is their?hover11 wrote:How in God's green earth is that unrelated, this shows their manner of "study" when doing tests ....when I travel I never had to take shots so I confused what you talking about and when it had breakouts of yellow fever etc I simply waited till it died down then flew outtimelapse wrote:Again you are relating unrelated things.hover11 wrote:Bro alot of ppl say trust the science right .....the same science did the tuskegee project..Google itmatr1x wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52151722.amp
Leaving this rigggghhhttt here
Tell me, what makes this particular vaccine different?
Because if you were traveling to some countries in the past, you would need yellow fever, typhoid etc vaccines.What changed? Global wokeness? Tell me more
timelapse wrote:Who is their?hover11 wrote:How in God's green earth is that unrelated, this shows their manner of "study" when doing tests ....when I travel I never had to take shots so I confused what you talking about and when it had breakouts of yellow fever etc I simply waited till it died down then flew outtimelapse wrote:Again you are relating unrelated things.hover11 wrote:Bro alot of ppl say trust the science right .....the same science did the tuskegee project..Google itmatr1x wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52151722.amp
Leaving this rigggghhhttt here
Tell me, what makes this particular vaccine different?
Because if you were traveling to some countries in the past, you would need yellow fever, typhoid etc vaccines.What changed? Global wokeness? Tell me more
That's why I said it is unrelated.
I suppose in your mind , once you name scientist, you automatically become a member of Science Inc. which is responsible for everything scientific.
If you are buying into that theory, stop using your smartphone, computer, car and whatever else 'they' have influenced, because other than that you are a hypocrite.
fokhan_96 wrote:Just gonna leave this here.
hover11 wrote:So this chart clearly shows you can be hospitalized even after being fully vaccinated....interestingfokhan_96 wrote:Just gonna leave this here.FB_IMG_1628968870292.jpg
De Dragon wrote:hover11 wrote:So this chart clearly shows you can be hospitalized even after being fully vaccinated....interestingfokhan_96 wrote:Just gonna leave this here.FB_IMG_1628968870292.jpg
You are nothing if not determined to spew the same nonsense throughout.
Where did you read/research that you absolutely cannot get Covid if you're vaccinated? I hope the same place shows you the lesser severity of illness and death rates and not just infections. I hope you see the recovery times and long Covid rates in both groups
Is how people say such nasty things about doctors and when they get sick they go and have treatment by these very doctors. I mean, if you think doctors don't know what they talking about, why would you go seek treatment by doctors when you get sick. I'm confused.Ben_spanna wrote:When delta overwhelms our current hospital beds and ICU, they should give priority to those who are vaccinated should they have breakthrough cases.. leave all the anti vaccers outside by the tents as they did not want to help support our fight against covid….
fokhan_96 wrote:Just gonna leave this here.FB_IMG_1628968870292.jpg
In a series of tweets published Monday night, the state argued the CDC was getting the Florida stats wrong and misleading the public.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 214 guests