Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
De Dragon wrote:matr1x wrote:The atypical pnm gunta
Spray tan go work?
matr1x wrote:De Dragon wrote:matr1x wrote:The atypical pnm gunta
Spray tan go work?
You gotta get the walk and talk right
RedVEVO wrote:^^
When you homeless you are homeless .
What documentation do you need to be homeless ?
Brain Boy is a wind that blows beneath callousness .
De Dragon wrote:RedVEVO wrote:^^
When you homeless you are homeless .
What documentation do you need to be homeless ?
Brain Boy is a wind that blows beneath callousness .
Documentation to qualify her for the grant to rebuild the home she said her neighbours torched.
Rovin wrote:when is election time politrickcians does come by ur house to pick u up to carry u to vote for dem but when u in need u feel dem have time for u , they done get in power & living it up nice , they only need d ppl's vote every 3-5yrs ...
matr1x wrote:You gotta get the walk and talk right
RedVEVO wrote:Why the callousness for a homeless woman person ?
Another abuse for woman ! She went for assistance to her MP !
Why the media attention on a high horse that the woman's predicament was staged ?
There is a common sense approach that allows an MP to give assistance to the less fortunate , however Brain Boy seems not able to understand he is dealing with PEOPLE and it's his JOB to assist PEOPLE.
sMASH wrote:using pre covid projections that showed the slimmest of increases to show how tnt will look in 2024... the whole estimate of just the second term of rowliar cant even make up for the downward spiral of 2016 year alone.
Wraith King wrote:Lie 13.
The source I used was the Guardian article you posted and I already explained it above and you falsely claimed it was a biased opinion (see Lie 12).
sMASH wrote:correcting pnm propaganda is tedious as its more like repeating obvious facts
when goebbels young went on cnc 3 and talking counter to marla doukeran and pronounced 'levying is not borrowing' economics students around the world threw up an eyebrow.
u need to be lobotomized to believe pnm propaganda. and u need to believe every one else is lobotomized, to PUSH pnm propaganda.
sMASH wrote:u can have densely populated rural areas and sparsely populated urban areas.
urban and rural has to do with the amount/kinds of infrastructure and the main kinds of activity, basic agriculture to specialized administration.
gt4tified wrote:RedVEVO wrote:Why the callousness for a homeless woman person ?
Another abuse for woman ! She went for assistance to her MP !
Why the media attention on a high horse that the woman's predicament was staged ?
There is a common sense approach that allows an MP to give assistance to the less fortunate , however Brain Boy seems not able to understand he is dealing with PEOPLE and it's his JOB to assist PEOPLE.
That’s what happens when you take an entitled child, one who never spent a day in his life working in the trenches, but when it makes better political sense because of his father’s name to give him a seat and expect that will solve all problems.
Gladiator wrote:Entitled and spoilt... I remember being his father's guest at a Divali function at the Prime Minister's house, in the middle of the formalities junior start playing hard rap music in the guest house. They went and told him to slow it down beause it was affecting the prayers etc. 15 mins later music come on again... i think security took off the breaker.
bluefete wrote:For those with short memories and feel that Brian in this to help others:
Later yesterday when asked about Opposition Leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s claim that under his leadership since 2015, some $300 billion was spent with nothing to show for it, the Prime Minister fired back via WhatsApp:
“I’m glad she, even in her stupor of fog, is not able to say that we stole that. At least she could say that we spent the people’s money on the people’s business, especially in a pandemic, which from her ridiculous utterances, she still thinks it’s about dome and sunshine.”
Gee dem Habitarse7.Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:using pre covid projections that showed the slimmest of increases to show how tnt will look in 2024... the whole estimate of just the second term of rowliar cant even make up for the downward spiral of 2016 year alone.
Dragon said "prior to the pandemic, which you so dotishly lie and try to portray as our source of economic woe, that the LFD RFD PNM was already facking it up?"
I was responding that prior to the pandemic IMF and World Bank were projecting growth for T&T. You need to read and understand the context.
Nevertheless, our credit rating is directly proportional to external hydrocarbon prices and our internal production. Production had been falling long this admin and projected to stabilise and probably increase. Prices were supposed to remain low. Hence the falling credit rating. Then covid hit which dropped production and prices even further. Now production is ramping up, prices are going up.
"The negative outlook reflects our view that there is at least a one-in-three chance that we could lower the ratings over the next 12-to-24 months. "Wraith King wrote:Lie 13.
The source I used was the Guardian article you posted and I already explained it above and you falsely claimed it was a biased opinion (see Lie 12).
The article never says citizens' lives were better under the UNC, that is your biased interpretation you are putting on it. The citizens speak with their votes, and since 2011 UNC has lost every major election because the citizen don't agree that their lives are better under the UNC. Even as recent as last year, the citizen/electorate reaffirm that. You can disagree, you can call it a lie, you can cry in your pillow about it. But one absolute truth is that the majority of citizens in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago do not want the current UNC party, led by Kamla Persad-Bissessar, governing them because they don't believe their lives were better under her. If you want to call that truth a lie, I can't help you.sMASH wrote:correcting pnm propaganda is tedious as its more like repeating obvious facts
when goebbels young went on cnc 3 and talking counter to marla doukeran and pronounced 'levying is not borrowing' economics students around the world threw up an eyebrow.
u need to be lobotomized to believe pnm propaganda. and u need to believe every one else is lobotomized, to PUSH pnm propaganda.
How do you think geography feel when you say this?sMASH wrote:u can have densely populated rural areas and sparsely populated urban areas.
urban and rural has to do with the amount/kinds of infrastructure and the main kinds of activity, basic agriculture to specialized administration.
Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:using pre covid projections that showed the slimmest of increases to show how tnt will look in 2024... the whole estimate of just the second term of rowliar cant even make up for the downward spiral of 2016 year alone.
Dragon said "prior to the pandemic, which you so dotishly lie and try to portray as our source of economic woe, that the LFD RFD PNM was already facking it up?"
I was responding that prior to the pandemic IMF and World Bank were projecting growth for T&T. You need to read and understand the context.
Nevertheless, our credit rating is directly proportional to external hydrocarbon prices and our internal production. Production had been falling long this admin and projected to stabilise and probably increase. Prices were supposed to remain low. Hence the falling credit rating. Then covid hit which dropped production and prices even further. Now production is ramping up, prices are going up.
"The negative outlook reflects our view that there is at least a one-in-three chance that we could lower the ratings over the next 12-to-24 months. "Wraith King wrote:Lie 13.
The source I used was the Guardian article you posted and I already explained it above and you falsely claimed it was a biased opinion (see Lie 12).
The article never says citizens' lives were better under the UNC, that is your biased interpretation you are putting on it. The citizens speak with their votes, and since 2011 UNC has lost every major election because the citizen don't agree that their lives are better under the UNC. Even as recent as last year, the citizen/electorate reaffirm that. You can disagree, you can call it a lie, you can cry in your pillow about it. But one absolute truth is that the majority of citizens in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago do not want the current UNC party, led by Kamla Persad-Bissessar, governing them because they don't believe their lives were better under her. If you want to call that truth a lie, I can't help you.sMASH wrote:correcting pnm propaganda is tedious as its more like repeating obvious facts
when goebbels young went on cnc 3 and talking counter to marla doukeran and pronounced 'levying is not borrowing' economics students around the world threw up an eyebrow.
u need to be lobotomized to believe pnm propaganda. and u need to believe every one else is lobotomized, to PUSH pnm propaganda.
How do you think geography feel when you say this?sMASH wrote:u can have densely populated rural areas and sparsely populated urban areas.
urban and rural has to do with the amount/kinds of infrastructure and the main kinds of activity, basic agriculture to specialized administration.
First, it was Dragon lying about S&P, now is this embarrassed UNC apologist trying to spin it for UNC.Wraith King wrote:*Trigger warning* My post below contains facts to discredit your asinine statements. PNM fanboys may get butthurt.
Lie 14.
The article stated -
However the S&P overview, did also assess other factors which could negatively affect the economy and lead to a potential downgrade.
S&P said it expected the decline in energy production to reverse over the next two years, and the economy to return to growth by next year and that uptick “should significantly reduce the government’s fiscal deficit and eventually stabilise its net debt-to-GDP figures. However, it remains uncertain whether this improvement will be sufficient to bring per capita income back toward earlier levels, following five years of negative real GDP per capita growth, on a sustained basis.”
Per capita income can be used to determine the average per-person income for an area and to evaluate the standard of living and quality of life of the population.
So if per capita income will not be brought back towards earlier levels that means citizens will not enjoy the same standard of living it did in earlier times following 5 years of negative real GDP per capita experienced under the PNM. Which administration was there prior to the 5 years of negative real GDP per capita, the UNC. Therefore the standard of living was better under the UNC.
Habit7 wants others to believe the article didn't directly state a bad reflection of the PNM's performance so it's a lie.
Habit7 wrote:First, it was Dragon lying about S&P, now is this embarrassed UNC apologist trying to spin it for UNC.Wraith King wrote:*Trigger warning* My post below contains facts to discredit your asinine statements. PNM fanboys may get butthurt.
Lie 14.
The article stated -
However the S&P overview, did also assess other factors which could negatively affect the economy and lead to a potential downgrade.
S&P said it expected the decline in energy production to reverse over the next two years, and the economy to return to growth by next year and that uptick “should significantly reduce the government’s fiscal deficit and eventually stabilise its net debt-to-GDP figures. However, it remains uncertain whether this improvement will be sufficient to bring per capita income back toward earlier levels, following five years of negative real GDP per capita growth, on a sustained basis.”
Per capita income can be used to determine the average per-person income for an area and to evaluate the standard of living and quality of life of the population.
So if per capita income will not be brought back towards earlier levels that means citizens will not enjoy the same standard of living it did in earlier times following 5 years of negative real GDP per capita experienced under the PNM. Which administration was there prior to the 5 years of negative real GDP per capita, the UNC. Therefore the standard of living was better under the UNC.
Habit7 wants others to believe the article didn't directly state a bad reflection of the PNM's performance so it's a lie.
It seems none of you all read the actual S&P report which says, "Nevertheless, we expect the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, together with the domestic energy sector downturn that began before, but was exacerbated by, the pandemic, will result in per capita income that is 19% lower this year than it was a decade ago." A decade ago was when we had our highest GDP growth rates ever: 13.2% 2006, 4.8% 2007, 3.8% 2008, -4.4% 2009, 3.3% 2010.
Our GDP didn't start falling since 5 years ago, it started since 2014 -0.6%. S&P predicts that in 2022 our real GDP growth will be 3.9% which is a higher growth rate than ever experienced under the UNC. The only time higher was a decade prior under the PNM.
So when it says, "However, it remains uncertain whether this improvement will be sufficient to bring per capita income back toward earlier levels, following five years of negative real GDP per capita growth, on a sustained basis." The "earlier levels" are 2010 and prior, since then we never got above 3%.
Nevertheless, to say that "citizens' lives were better under the UNC" is to ignore the large democratic voice of the citizens who rejected the UNC with their individual votes since 2013. That is how you judge what citizens think, with elections. You don't judge it with fortuitous oil prices between 2010-2014 and when the price starts to drop we were in a recession.
Say it with me, "the citizens rejected the UNC and choose the PNM...twice" Ent you say you are not a UNC supporter? Why is that so hard for you to understand?
Wraith King wrote:You out forward an article and then want to disregard certain contents of the same article that doesn't suit your agenda. Not the first time you attempted to do so.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Dohplaydat, ProtonPowder, pugboy and 241 guests