Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Habit7 wrote:Wraith King wrote:WhiteAnalyst wrote:Wraith King wrote:Back to Habit7, on what legal basis is Kamla's defamation guilt established by the arbitration decision?
It's okay to say that you can't answer or there is no legal basis and you were just throwing things out there hoping persons would believe it.
The big PNM man mash you up already like he did to your gyul. What you think of that?
Habit7 can't answer the question so he's using an alternative account to distract.
No, I can't answer your question. Your apparent superior intellect has me dumbfounded. Take win.
Well red government lawyers pockets full. Kick backs for red government cake salesgastly369 wrote:Walking shame yes...
You liesMASH wrote:as the story broke, rowley called nazim from foreign, personally!! i think rowley was in huston negotiating gas deals, he said he dont negotiate.
closed down the company, left the compounds unsecured for hours on end that reporters was able to drive in and roam freely, sent in his OWN personal lawyers, that was known to be his own soldier, and u missing crucial documentation to show the difference in what was received in the plant, what was recorded as received, and what was recoreded as extracted.
sMASH wrote:as the story broke, rowley called nazim from foreign, personally!! i think rowley was in huston negotiating gas deals, he said he dont negotiate.
closed down the company, left the compounds unsecured for hours on end that reporters was able to drive in and roam freely, sent in his OWN personal lawyers, that was known to be his own soldier, and u missing crucial documentation to show the difference in what was received in the plant, what was recorded as received, and what was recoreded as extracted.
Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:as the story broke, rowley called nazim from foreign, personally!! i think rowley was in huston negotiating gas deals, he said he dont negotiate.
closed down the company, left the compounds unsecured for hours on end that reporters was able to drive in and roam freely, sent in his OWN personal lawyers, that was known to be his own soldier, and u missing crucial documentation to show the difference in what was received in the plant, what was recorded as received, and what was recoreded as extracted.
This is a load of crock.
Kamla blew the whistle on A&V in Sept 2017 based on an interim audit. Then audits by Kroll and Gaffney Cline were done by Nov 2017.
They all utilised the crucial documentation.
Dec 2017 Petrotrin terminated A&V's contract. A&V fought from the lower courts all the way to the PC to stay on the site and the PC ruled against them in Feb 2018.
All utilising crucial documentation.
Petrotrin restructure was announced in Aug 2018 everybody got sent home in Nov 2018.
Crucial documentation was being used for a year before anything happened at Petrotrin, it did not go missing. It was cited in the arbitration report and crucial witnesses were called to testify.
Your attempt to share fake news is as bad as your spelling.
sMASH wrote:so if kamala blew the whistle on the internaL audit, why did petrotrin cancel the contract? they taking instruction from kamala.
crucial documentation used for the INTERNAL audit, but not for the criminal investigation. the lawyer went to ENSURE things were spic and span.
Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:so if kamala blew the whistle on the internaL audit, why did petrotrin cancel the contract? they taking instruction from kamala.
crucial documentation used for the INTERNAL audit, but not for the criminal investigation. the lawyer went to ENSURE things were spic and span.
The criminal investigation is still ongoing, you are conflating it with the arbitration. The arbitration is what was concluded and if you actually read the arbitration you would understand that it was the crucial documentation and witness statements that made Petrotrin fail to make its case.
You have no evidence that any crucial documents were missing. You are just holding on to speculation and UNC FB propaganda sites.
Hey, so you used to work in the custody transfer section of oil stocks?sMASH wrote:im saying the arbitration is arbitrary. cause ALLLL the parties are compromised, or fired, lol.
and it failed to make its case cause STUFF ARE MISSING!!!
the man extracting the oil is pnm, the man recieveing the oil is pnm, the company is riddled with pnm, the place was left ungaurded for hours by pnm, and then the personal lawyer sent in as pnm clean up crew.
the ONLY thing that wasnt pnm was the person green lighting the three audits (two internal, and third external).
the person terminating the contract may very well be pnm cause they decide to sue the company for the wrongful termination... and sure to win, cause the documents missing.
woudl be pretty interested to find out what is teh history of production of those same catshill wells. it if maintained that 140% sudden jump in production, or if that was just a blip and it went back down.
where i worked, if our product rate went from 82 t/p to 180 t/p, i would do a work order to get E&I to calibrate those instruments, cause there are multiple ways to extrapolate if that rate increase was legit
Don't explain anything technical to these idiots .sMASH wrote:im saying the arbitration is arbitrary. cause ALLLL the parties are compromised, or fired, lol.
and it failed to make its case cause STUFF ARE MISSING!!!
the man extracting the oil is pnm, the man recieveing the oil is pnm, the company is riddled with pnm, the place was left ungaurded for hours by pnm, and then the personal lawyer sent in as pnm clean up crew.
the ONLY thing that wasnt pnm was the person green lighting the three audits (two internal, and third external).
the person terminating the contract may very well be pnm cause they decide to sue the company for the wrongful termination... and sure to win, cause the documents missing.
woudl be pretty interested to find out what is teh history of production of those same catshill wells. it if maintained that 140% sudden jump in production, or if that was just a blip and it went back down.
where i worked, if our product rate went from 82 t/p to 180 t/p, i would do a work order to get E&I to calibrate those instruments, cause there are multiple ways to extrapolate if that rate increase was legit
No he's their Boysam1978 wrote:Rollee have real Indian and white friends !
Show me your friends.
zoom rader wrote:Don't explain anything technical to these idiots .sMASH wrote:im saying the arbitration is arbitrary. cause ALLLL the parties are compromised, or fired, lol.
and it failed to make its case cause STUFF ARE MISSING!!!
the man extracting the oil is pnm, the man recieveing the oil is pnm, the company is riddled with pnm, the place was left ungaurded for hours by pnm, and then the personal lawyer sent in as pnm clean up crew.
the ONLY thing that wasnt pnm was the person green lighting the three audits (two internal, and third external).
the person terminating the contract may very well be pnm cause they decide to sue the company for the wrongful termination... and sure to win, cause the documents missing.
woudl be pretty interested to find out what is teh history of production of those same catshill wells. it if maintained that 140% sudden jump in production, or if that was just a blip and it went back down.
where i worked, if our product rate went from 82 t/p to 180 t/p, i would do a work order to get E&I to calibrate those instruments, cause there are multiple ways to extrapolate if that rate increase was legit
They never worked in industry.
sMASH wrote:im saying the arbitration is arbitrary. cause ALLLL the parties are compromised, or fired, lol.
and it failed to make its case cause STUFF ARE MISSING!!!
the man extracting the oil is pnm, the man recieveing the oil is pnm, the company is riddled with pnm, the place was left ungaurded for hours by pnm, and then the personal lawyer sent in as pnm clean up crew.
the ONLY thing that wasnt pnm was the person green lighting the three audits (two internal, and third external).
the person terminating the contract may very well be pnm cause they decide to sue the company for the wrongful termination... and sure to win, cause the documents missing.
woudl be pretty interested to find out what is teh history of production of those same catshill wells. it if maintained that 140% sudden jump in production, or if that was just a blip and it went back down.
where i worked, if our product rate went from 82 t/p to 180 t/p, i would do a work order to get E&I to calibrate those instruments, cause there are multiple ways to extrapolate if that rate increase was legit
sMASH wrote:the arbitration is arbitrary cause its petrotrin sorting out its differences with the friend of the PM, who might have colluded with the pnm election candidate who was also employed in petrotrin to cook the books.
zoom rader wrote:No he's their Boysam1978 wrote:Rollee have real Indian and white friends !
Show me your friends.
Watch brother Malcom X house Negro speech.
https://youtu.be/7kf7fujM4ag
Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:the arbitration is arbitrary cause its petrotrin sorting out its differences with the friend of the PM, who might have colluded with the pnm election candidate who was also employed in petrotrin to cook the books.
It is not Petrotrin sorting out differences with the PM's friend. It is 3 highly respected jurists, adjudicating the matter independently based on evidence. Much like the highest court in our country the Court of Appeal would.
Smash I don't think you are intelligent enough to understand this subject. From confusing it with a criminal investigation, to misunderstanding the timeline. Your simplistic understanding of the issue is your demise. People are looking at the actual sources and you are looking at Kick Out the PNM. You are way out of your league on this one.
sMASH wrote:i totally forgot who were the adjuticators. cause that was just how arbitrary it was.. to go to arbitration. lol.
dat is like a man rob a house, and the owner brace him, and he tell the owner, dont call police let we work it out. that what arbitration is....arbitrary and that is inhouse for petrotrin based things.
its not even close to the out of court settlement edmund dillion had to sell back the apartment complex for 10 dollars.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 124 guests