Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pugboy wrote:it is a good initiative, too many ppl waste water, have leaking toilets and so on.
it is a monumental task, they should start selectively with them businesses which abuse the usage.
get the revenue flowing.
I pay semi commercial rates for a property in woodbrook and will greatly benefit from a meter as we hardly use water.
What kind of cost is associated with smart meters?
Smart meters can cost two to three times more than traditional meters, House said.
When Glendale replaced 85,000 electric meters and 34,000 water meters in 2008, the project cost $70 million. It was partially funded by a $20-million grant from the federal Department of Energy and a $1 million grant from the California Energy Commission.
The smart meters cost $312 each and with installation constituted about $10.5 million of the total cost, Zurn said.
https://www.govtech.com/fs/smart-water- ... ornia.html
Presently, my bill is $363 / 3 months, which I don't have an issue with because that works out to just about $4 / day. If the cubic rate is same across the country, my bill could potentially drop thenshake d livin wake d dead wrote:The meter system is already in effect in new developments. Im paying $1.87 per cubic meter. For the qtr, bill is like $320 or there about
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Question: how come cabinet had a problem with this initiative before election but after election there is no problem. All kinda lies to win election yes
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Question: how come cabinet had a problem with this initiative before election but after election there is no problem. All kinda lies to win election yes
Numb3r4 wrote:Do you think we'll see it before this election or soon after or is this just a PR piece?
sam1978 wrote:Great , when we go to the Dentist and other professionals now , we’ll have to pay for their equipment?
Why do we pay for their infrastructure that they have to use to bill us for what we are using? It’s just like TTEC charging for transformers poles and lines( yes they do).
Redman wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Question: how come cabinet had a problem with this initiative before election but after election there is no problem. All kinda lies to win election yes
As mentioned this initiative has been on the books since 2008 ish....no one wanted to touch it even it's long accepted as necessary
All this means is that water meters will be coming.VexXx Dogg wrote:
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Question: how come cabinet had a problem with this initiative before election but after election there is no problem. All kinda lies to win election yes
As mentioned this initiative has been on the books since 2008 ish....no one wanted to touch it even it's long accepted as necessary
We seem to not know about phasing in stuff so that you don't have a huge one time capital outlay. If what you're saying is true, then 13 years have passed with nothing doing, and now the paying customer is expected to fork out $3K to pay for the State's inaction?
Redman wrote:Ultimately there is a way to roll this out sensibly.
Issue a meter bond.
Buy some meters
Install them in the places that are most capable of paying off the cost in 6 months.
How many here would volunteer to make that change-I would.
Let the customers install and the WASA inspects and certify.
Customer pays off cost --WASA repays bond.
Repeat.
Instead of 1.2B WASA takes on short term debt on a 6 month roll -and we migrate towards a metered society.
We might be surprised as to how many people/businesses etc migh sign up.
Wouldnt hurt to ask.
sMASH wrote:^^ wasa to bring in the meters, and customers buy and install?
or people to buy their meters, and install?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, Google Adsense [Bot] and 244 guests