Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Redman wrote:You mean he win, get the docs but he just put his spin on it-they eh publish it??
Forget the antics- deal with what they have done.
if it was that clear they would have wine back.
Again NEGLIGENCE is the bar-different from acknowledging they did crap.
You had the UNCs finest legal team-Ramlogan,Ramdeen,Debedeen and Nelson-45M worth of fees pass and apparently pass back they eh really make progress until after elections men start to bail
2019 -now the UNC have the pivotal witness statements.... besides cherry picking some juicy parts....they boil down.
What is the picture painted by the WHOLE of the witness statement??
The facts are that the same Nelson QC plead guilty to corruption with Ramlogan and Ramdeen.
You feel it beyond probability that the NEGLIGENCE case was stretched...at the state expense to the benefit of the pay for play UNC legal dream team.
Redman wrote:No sheeeeit !!!there was political interference???-you needed the PC to realise that????
Its a political case- start to finish....now establish the Negligence aspect...cuz the Q here isnt whether they did tootz(they did) but whether there is negligence...to a level that will hold up in court.
The facts are that the same Nelson QC plead guilty to corruption with Ramlogan and Ramdeen pay for play....
You feel it beyond probability that the NEGLIGENCE case was stretched...at the state expense to the benefit of the pay for play UNC legal dream team???
What did the witness statements say in their entirety???-not what the cherry picked paragraph says....if that is the best Balgobin can do after a PC run led by Anand himself...then the witness statements seem rather useless to the UNCs 'fight for justice'
you keep fighting that noise cuz it matches your politics.....
Redman wrote:What is it you said to me about running down white folks for their opinion?
Here you are pivoting on a suggestion...not a ruling mind you.. of the same white folk...whose opinion you disdained because they don't fit your politics.
Base hypocrisy...
More relevantly...
...why would the UNC drop the whole deal after reading the witness statements they went to the PC for?
If the witness statements supported the UNC claim of Negligence on MJs part,the unc would have been flogging it till now...and correctly so.
However they have not gone a step further...why is that?
The simplest conclusion is that it didn't.
The UNC dream team was taking payment for playment.They made 45M off of the case.
Nelson QC...pled guilty and implicated And and Gerry.
You think it is only the Petrotrin case?
Of course tantie Kamla knew nothing about the wholesale fraud taking place under her nose...not like she is a SC or nuttin.
MaxPower wrote:Friends,
Please stop.
The UNC has LOST the elections and nothing can get them back into power atm.
Zoom has said over and over that the UNC is not important at this stage.
Don’t work yourselves up.
Redman wrote:As usual you revert to your stock in trade.
More blather.
The pivotal witness statements probably didn't support the UNCs claim of Negligence.Hence radio silence from Balgobin and Anand....but dem get their cut already...45M...Nelson pled guilty to the kickback deals.
It isn't hard to see that Anan stretched cases.so he and Gerry could eat ah food.
Not like it's the only one.All day silk had to be paid for.
Negligence was the charge..again tough to prove Negligence vs bad decisions...in a business as complex as Petrotrin.
Nothing you posted has added to your point.. unsurprisingly.
Political interference at the start and political interference at the end..its PETROTRIN...that was .stated already...yet you blathering on.
Now yuh quoting what PC is for cuz they pelt a stone at Al Rawi....yet in your usual bigotry you had a problem with white people opinions wrt Poten and Associates when they validated GORTT actions.
You all over the place and nowhere.
YupMaxPower wrote:Friends,
Please stop.
The UNC has LOST the elections and nothing can get them back into power atm.
Zoom has said over and over that the UNC is not important at this stage.
Don’t work yourselves up.
Red puss , its time to stop posting.Redman wrote:You unpack your dotish yourself, you obviously have much to do.
As stated the point here is that the case at the outset, was tainted by the pay for play UNC legal team made up of the AG and Senators Gerry.
So it is probable that they stretched for the charge....cuz it was money in their pockets...45M
They then spent a few years filing little to progress the case...Why???
That combined with the fact that the Anand himself has read Chan Tack and Baptiste's statements and left it there, says much about the contents of the statements.
If they showed that Jones was negligent..I'm sure it would be public knowledge.
As I said already MJ did crap...whether it met the legal requirements of a Negligence charge is what is at question.
You repeating stuff that isn't in question wouldn't change anything.
And Poten wasn't about anything other than your reference to white people's opinion when you were shown to be talking crap.
It's your bigoted hypocrisy that is the point not Poten or the PC jurisdictions.
You know that.
Redman wrote:You unpack your dotish yourself, you obviously have much to do.
As stated the point here is that the case at the outset, was tainted by the pay for play UNC legal team made up of the AG and Senators Gerry.
So it is probable that they stretched for the charge....cuz it was money in their pockets...45M
They then spent a few years filing little to progress the case...Why???
That combined with the fact that the Anand himself has read Chan Tack and Baptiste's statements and left it there, says much about the contents of the statements.
If they showed that Jones was negligent..I'm sure it would be public knowledge.
As I said already MJ did crap...whether it met the legal requirements of a Negligence charge is what is at question.
You repeating stuff that isn't in question wouldn't change anything.
And Poten wasn't about anything other than your reference to white people's opinion when you were shown to be talking crap.
It's your bigoted hypocrisy that is the point not Poten or the PC jurisdictions.
You know that.
YawnRedman wrote:Morning dumbass and Zoombindranath
I am biased....I should be since the UNC AG was getting kickbacks to persecute political cases.
I am biased ...Gerry and the AG was cutting and pasting for big money.
I am biased...Kamla Persad Bissesaar SC was overseeing all of that and more ...big time lawyer but clueless as to the indepth fraud in the AGs chair.
So yes I'm biased...that however doesn't change the realities of this case.
Proving Negligence is a high hurdle... especially in the context of Petrotrin.
Your UNC legal team was on the take.
Why would a QC plead guilty?...money was passing back to AG and Gerry...They were studying 45M in fees that they sharing not protection of the people's interest.
Anand and Balgobin have the witness statements that you quoted...yet beyond a tepid cherry pick...are silent since 2019..Why?
Isn't it possible that the statements didn't support the Negligence charge.?
...you both seem unable to accept that the case may have been a long shot to win from the start.Not part of the UNC good narrative.
Blather on Jr.
He played the red government tune and was brought out, his rewards for false information will have him set for life.Habit7 wrote:Hearsay?
QC Nelson was tried and convicted for corruption. If he is guilty of a kickback conspiracy, who did he conspire with?
zoom rader wrote:He played the red government tune and was brought out, his rewards for false information will have him set for life.Habit7 wrote:Hearsay?
QC Nelson was tried and convicted for corruption. If he is guilty of a kickback conspiracy, who did he conspire with?
30 peices of silver does a lot
Another case of emailgate
Redman wrote:Morning dumbass and Zoombindranath
I am biased....I should be since the UNC AG was getting kickbacks to persecute political cases.
I am biased ...Gerry and the AG was cutting and pasting for big money.
I am biased...Kamla Persad Bissesaar SC was overseeing all of that and more ...big time lawyer but clueless as to the indepth fraud in the AGs chair.
So yes I'm biased...that however doesn't change the realities of this case.
Proving Negligence is a high hurdle... especially in the context of Petrotrin.
Your UNC legal team was on the take.
Why would a QC plead guilty?...money was passing back to AG and Gerry...They were studying 45M in fees that they sharing not protection of the people's interest.
Anand and Balgobin have the witness statements that you quoted...yet beyond a tepid cherry pick...are silent since 2019..Why?
Isn't it possible that the statements didn't support the Negligence charge.?
...you both seem unable to accept that the case may have been a long shot to win from the start. Not part of the UNC good narrative.
Blather on Jr.
Redman wrote:You sound like a real unc lawyer dumbass ....witness statements irrelevant when there is money to be made.
In their angst to jam the PNM and eat ah 45m food the unc lawyers witheld material witness statements from disclosure.
In their angst to kill the case Cuffie buss the mark early.
Martin Daly said the PC alluded to political interference on both sides.He white so I eh know how you would take his opinion.This after he watched the entire PC hearing.Not just the cherry picked part that bad for the PNM
As stated multiple times the Baptiste and Chan Tack statements are what Nelson used to kill it.
Balgobin and Anand have these statements in hand...having gone to the PC to get sight of them in order to determine whether the people's interest.
Yet he has been quiet...as has Balgobin.
These two champion s of the people haven't published the statements to vindicate themselves.
That says alot.
Redman wrote:They better....cuz they certainly can't win an election.
Redman wrote:You sound like a real unc lawyer dumbass ....witness statements irrelevant when there is money to be made.
In their angst to jam the PNM and eat ah 45m food the unc lawyers witheld material witness statements from disclosure.
In their angst to kill the case Cuffie buss the mark early.
Martin Daly said the PC alluded to political interference on both sides.He white so I eh know how you would take his opinion.This after he watched the entire PC hearing.Not just the cherry picked part that bad for the PNM
As stated multiple times the Baptiste and Chan Tack statements are what Nelson used to kill it.
Balgobin and Anand have these statements in hand...having gone to the PC to get sight of them in order to determine whether the people's interest.
Yet he has been quiet...as has Balgobin.
These two champion s of the people haven't published the statements to vindicate themselves.
That says alot.
Redman wrote:Lol
You get pitiful when you dregsing
Lol de man say bago.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 236 guests