Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Citizens pay insane taxes to which they get little to no service.MaxPower wrote:zoom rader wrote:X2De Dragon wrote:MaxPower wrote:Friends,
Let’s remember a life was lost.
Someone’s family member is now gone/
Put the politics aside, learn from his mistakes and move on. Let him rest in peace.
Fack that, too many of these Guy Smileys, Malcolm Joneses, O' Hallarans die rich after stealing our money and you're supposed to be all forgiving and forgetful? Again, fack that.
Smiley was a total scamp, he did nothing for citizens
Zoom,
And what did the citizens do for the country?
The citizens are to blame for the Govt placing all these restrictions.
Had they listened...
So when they die, should we care?
Didnt they destroy the economy just as Khan?
Or do we choose who we should sympathize over when it comes to death?
The red government agents in the courts covered it up. They made sure he got away with blatant stealing.sam1978 wrote:How did ROWley escape Landate?
zoom rader wrote:Citizens pay insane taxes to which they get little to no service.MaxPower wrote:zoom rader wrote:X2De Dragon wrote:MaxPower wrote:Friends,
Let’s remember a life was lost.
Someone’s family member is now gone/
Put the politics aside, learn from his mistakes and move on. Let him rest in peace.
Fack that, too many of these Guy Smileys, Malcolm Joneses, O' Hallarans die rich after stealing our money and you're supposed to be all forgiving and forgetful? Again, fack that.
Smiley was a total scamp, he did nothing for citizens
Zoom,
And what did the citizens do for the country?
The citizens are to blame for the Govt placing all these restrictions.
Had they listened...
So when they die, should we care?
Didnt they destroy the economy just as Khan?
Or do we choose who we should sympathize over when it comes to death?
That is what the Citizens do in this banana Republic ruled by the red government that cons this population daily.
Jack arse people working and paying taxes is a serviceMaxPower wrote:zoom rader wrote:Citizens pay insane taxes to which they get little to no service.MaxPower wrote:zoom rader wrote:X2De Dragon wrote:MaxPower wrote:Friends,
Let’s remember a life was lost.
Someone’s family member is now gone/
Put the politics aside, learn from his mistakes and move on. Let him rest in peace.
Fack that, too many of these Guy Smileys, Malcolm Joneses, O' Hallarans die rich after stealing our money and you're supposed to be all forgiving and forgetful? Again, fack that.
Smiley was a total scamp, he did nothing for citizens
Zoom,
And what did the citizens do for the country?
The citizens are to blame for the Govt placing all these restrictions.
Had they listened...
So when they die, should we care?
Didnt they destroy the economy just as Khan?
Or do we choose who we should sympathize over when it comes to death?
That is what the Citizens do in this banana Republic ruled by the red government that cons this population daily.
The Citizens themselves don’t even give their own country proper service bro....you expect the Govt to care about them?
matr1x wrote:Maybe if you weren't a little sheit you would get better service
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Still can't quite comprehend how natural justice works huh?
Apparently, I can't. But tell me, what criminal accusation or allegation of thievery or "stealing our money" did Malcolm Jones face since you accusing him of it?
Malcolm Jones breached his fiduciary duty and lost our money nimrod. Would you have been happier if he had stolen it? Isn't the fact that tight shirt obtained two diametrically opposed opinions from the same lawyer pre, and post election not enough for you?
Conspired with Anand Ramlogan and Gerald Ramdeen to receive, conceal and transfer criminal property namely rewards given to Anand Ramlogan by Vincent Nelson for the said Vincent Nelson being instructed to advocate in various matters in which the State was interested or in which the State was the client.
Nope ,j.o.e wrote:Time to lock this thread
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Still can't quite comprehend how natural justice works huh?
Apparently, I can't. But tell me, what criminal accusation or allegation of thievery or "stealing our money" did Malcolm Jones face since you accusing him of it?
Malcolm Jones breached his fiduciary duty and lost our money nimrod. Would you have been happier if he had stolen it? Isn't the fact that tight shirt obtained two diametrically opposed opinions from the same lawyer pre, and post election not enough for you?
You said "stealing our money" which is not true.
Why is it when ppl challenge your nonsense you more vex as if we typed it under your name?
Calm down and write sense nah,
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Still can't quite comprehend how natural justice works huh?
Apparently, I can't. But tell me, what criminal accusation or allegation of thievery or "stealing our money" did Malcolm Jones face since you accusing him of it?
Malcolm Jones breached his fiduciary duty and lost our money nimrod. Would you have been happier if he had stolen it? Isn't the fact that tight shirt obtained two diametrically opposed opinions from the same lawyer pre, and post election not enough for you?
So of course you believe the opinion that was given by the lawyer....that was politically expedient to the same AG and co that were paying him for opinions and collecting commissions from him...for doing the states work?Conspired with Anand Ramlogan and Gerald Ramdeen to receive, conceal and transfer criminal property namely rewards given to Anand Ramlogan by Vincent Nelson for the said Vincent Nelson being instructed to advocate in various matters in which the State was interested or in which the State was the client.
Redman wrote:So he was honest when he was anti PNM-alongside your Ag and his partner in crime...but lying as soon as he went in favor of MJ.
Of course.
Lawyers give the opinion they are paid to argue.
For all your bluster your hypocrisy is showing.
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Still can't quite comprehend how natural justice works huh?
Apparently, I can't. But tell me, what criminal accusation or allegation of thievery or "stealing our money" did Malcolm Jones face since you accusing him of it?
Malcolm Jones breached his fiduciary duty and lost our money nimrod. Would you have been happier if he had stolen it? Isn't the fact that tight shirt obtained two diametrically opposed opinions from the same lawyer pre, and post election not enough for you?
You said "stealing our money" which is not true.
Why is it when ppl challenge your nonsense you more vex as if we typed it under your name?
Calm down and write sense nah,
Says the imps who said Panday was a crook based on a dismissed case You can't get someone for stealing on a civil case too Pornsie. I wish you'd spend half of the time actually learning stuff before running in like a LFD RFD PNM clown and getting batted down every single time.
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Still can't quite comprehend how natural justice works huh?
Apparently, I can't. But tell me, what criminal accusation or allegation of thievery or "stealing our money" did Malcolm Jones face since you accusing him of it?
Malcolm Jones breached his fiduciary duty and lost our money nimrod. Would you have been happier if he had stolen it? Isn't the fact that tight shirt obtained two diametrically opposed opinions from the same lawyer pre, and post election not enough for you?
You said "stealing our money" which is not true.
Why is it when ppl challenge your nonsense you more vex as if we typed it under your name?
Calm down and write sense nah,
Says the imps who said Panday was a crook based on a dismissed case You can't get someone for stealing on a civil case too Pornsie. I wish you'd spend half of the time actually learning stuff before running in like a LFD RFD PNM clown and getting batted down every single time.
Panday is a crook because he was caught hiding his crooked money. His case was dismissed because of a procedural fault, not that information came forward to absolve him. He is also a crook because he was charged with receiving bribes, a charged that his coconspirators already received justice for. But when it comes to Panday who has mounds of evidence of his thievery, you proclaiming him innocent.
But when it a PNM who the UNC AG's opinion is that he did not perform his fiduciary duty, you lie and magnify the claim beyond what the UNC AG claimed. Thus you proclaim him guilty.
This is hypocrisy and lying and you know it. And because you do, and ppl are pointing out the obvious. You beating up.
Be consistent and be factual. Is that too hard to ask?
MaxPower wrote:Pantymen still toting UNC loss elections?
When will the crying stop?
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:So he was honest when he was anti PNM-alongside your Ag and his partner in crime...but lying as soon as he went in favor of MJ.
Of course.
Lawyers give the opinion they are paid to argue.
For all your bluster your hypocrisy is showing.
Well your Red Panty has never been hidden so we know you'll swallow and defend any thing LFD RFD PNM. You also miss the point entirely, which is that Malcolm Jones mismanaged BILLIONS of dollars and was let off the hook by a corrupt lawyer and that the AG nearly broke his neck hurrying to rely on the corruption.
What you dotishly fail to realize also, is that the FACTS (stubborn things no?)are there where the timeline of Malcolm Jones mismanagement and possible corruption are laid out. GTL wasn't a mirage dummy, it happened
De Dragon wrote:Tuntsy Tuntsy Tuntsy.
Lemme try to use small words so even your pea brain could grasp it
1) Panday was freed by the court, thus his name is clear and he is not a thief in the eyes of the law. Your bias and wishful fantasizing aside, he is not guilty
2) In a CIVIL case, you cannot try to prove theft, only breach of fiduciary duty.
3) JUHN Scarfy got off on the EXACT same "procedural fault" that you're trying to taint Panday's innocence with in the Landate matter. Is he a crook?
Pitiful that in baselessly crying hypocrite, you've shown yourself(again) to be the worse hypocrite on 2NR.
If you're so sure about your position, why don't you accuse Panday publicly to his face? My guess is you don't have two once cent pieces to knock together, far less pay damages in a slander/libel case.
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Tuntsy Tuntsy Tuntsy.
Lemme try to use small words so even your pea brain could grasp it
1) Panday was freed by the court, thus his name is clear and he is not a thief in the eyes of the law. Your bias and wishful fantasizing aside, he is not guilty
2) In a CIVIL case, you cannot try to prove theft, only breach of fiduciary duty.
3) JUHN Scarfy got off on the EXACT same "procedural fault" that you're trying to taint Panday's innocence with in the Landate matter. Is he a crook?
Pitiful that in baselessly crying hypocrite, you've shown yourself(again) to be the worse hypocrite on 2NR.
If you're so sure about your position, why don't you accuse Panday publicly to his face? My guess is you don't have two once cent pieces to knock together, far less pay damages in a slander/libel case.
1/ The court never gave a verdict of not guilt, it dismissed the conviction opening up for a retrial' However Panday has ANOTHER charge of bribery which is still before the courts. His name is not clear, unlike MJ who you accused of stealing money when no one else has.
2/ Theft is a criminal matter, there was no criminal allegation of theft. You lied and created one.
3/I never said Rowley is innocent, it is you who said Panday is innocent. There is no way near the level of proof of Panday's guilt compared to Rowley's Landate issue. That is the basis of me calling Panday a crook AND the other bribery charge that he faces. When KCR faces that level of accusation, then I will call him a crook
I don't need to accuse Panday to his face, Panday stand accused before the courts of T&T and sought to get his case dismissed through Section 34. There is no libel or slander to say that about him. MJ did not have anything close to this yet you accuse him of stealing money but vex because ppl point out your lie and hypocrisy.
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:So he was honest when he was anti PNM-alongside your Ag and his partner in crime...but lying as soon as he went in favor of MJ.
Of course.
Lawyers give the opinion they are paid to argue.
For all your bluster your hypocrisy is showing.
Well your Red Panty has never been hidden so we know you'll swallow and defend any thing LFD RFD PNM. You also miss the point entirely, which is that Malcolm Jones mismanaged BILLIONS of dollars and was let off the hook by a corrupt lawyer and that the AG nearly broke his neck hurrying to rely on the corruption.
What you dotishly fail to realize also, is that the FACTS (stubborn things no?)are there where the timeline of Malcolm Jones mismanagement and possible corruption are laid out. GTL wasn't a mirage dummy, it happened
Well dumbass- maybe it didnt go down the way Anand and Gerry say it went down supported by Nelsons paid for opinion.
but continue to blather.
Prosecuting an individual for negligence ...for what is a protracted failure of the whole State Co management structure and with Cabinet oversight is a tough call.
Thats the rub.
ETA- The simple facts are that Anand and Ramdeen,Nelson et al were in the middle of their pay for play legal system-Ramlogan Debideen Ramdeen and Nelson ran the case under the UNC.....but did little or nothing to fight the case-but some 45M change hands. If the case was so clear cut as you blather then why would they failed so miserably to defend the peoples interest?
keep blathering-
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests