Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
VexXx Dogg wrote:fishy case.
Wonder if it was a clerical error, or actual internal fraud
Rovin wrote:iirc ent this story was on d news few mths back ?
LO gonna take yrs with dat while uncle & he fam starving , dise a rel hard luck boi ....
Rovin wrote:iirc ent this story was on d news few mths back ?
LO gonna take yrs with dat while uncle & he fam starving , dise a rel hard luck boi ....
Reminds me of 443. What was it?. A forrester or a gc8. Yea it was both.K74T wrote:#flashback
LO mistake? An odd choice of vehicle to run racket with IMHODuane 3NE 2NR wrote:
Don't vehicles have to be 4 years old to need to be inspectedsMASH wrote:If they were to scan the inspections stickers, wonder what info will come up...
Phone Surgeon wrote:Don't vehicles have to be 4 years old to need to be inspectedsMASH wrote:If they were to scan the inspections stickers, wonder what info will come up...
I think I see the new machine readable sticker on some tea or sumting. When it now came out and advertised.Phone Surgeon wrote:Don't vehicles have to be 4 years old to need to be inspectedsMASH wrote:If they were to scan the inspections stickers, wonder what info will come up...
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Dohplaydat, matr1x, Seeker and 143 guests