Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Pearls to hogs.sMASH wrote:Sounding like Hinds... A lot of words with out any added value.adnj wrote:That is what you want to believe that I said. You're wrong - it only seems funny to you because you either choose, or simply lack the capacity, to understand the information that is actually being presented.Mmoney607 wrote:adnj wrote:I don't believe that you know what your lolling about.Mmoney607 wrote:adnj wrote:timothymcdavid wrote:Question are the vaccines being administered in Trinbago the ones specifically modified to deal with the Omicron variant?
I am vaxxed and boosted plus I got covid19 already very mild a sore throat in the morning and a lill chills the same night back to normal in less than 3 days ... I just wanna know if this makes any sense to those of us in similar situation.
The available vaccines in Trinidad are Sinopharm and Janssen.
US data indicates that the bivalent booster offers little added benefit when compared to earlier mRNA doses.
viewtopic.php?p=10341005#p10341005
Ogoud. Lol. Somebody hack your account or you finally realizing the thing don't work?
You saying that the boosters the moh is offering don't work
The booster recommendations are essentially similar to the booster recommendations from a year ago:
Vaccinated and boosted - better protection from an increase in antibodies.
Boosted with a different vaccine - better protection.
Boosted by mixing mRNA vaccine with other vaccines - much better protection still.
Boosted with a covalent mRNA vaccine - no noted appreciable difference when compared to a monovalent mRNA vaccine.
Not at two week intervals, but similar studies have been done. There are studies that doubt that more that two boosters are ineffective unless immunocompromised.redmanjp wrote:Someone should do an experiment- get an antibody test then get a booster. Wait 2 weeks for it to work and then get another antibody test. We will see how much it really work.
More like blind regurgitation.adnj wrote:Pearls to hogs.sMASH wrote:Sounding like Hinds... A lot of words with out any added value.adnj wrote:That is what you want to believe that I said. You're wrong - it only seems funny to you because you either choose, or simply lack the capacity, to understand the information that is actually being presented.Mmoney607 wrote:adnj wrote:I don't believe that you know what your lolling about.Mmoney607 wrote:adnj wrote:timothymcdavid wrote:Question are the vaccines being administered in Trinbago the ones specifically modified to deal with the Omicron variant?
I am vaxxed and boosted plus I got covid19 already very mild a sore throat in the morning and a lill chills the same night back to normal in less than 3 days ... I just wanna know if this makes any sense to those of us in similar situation.
The available vaccines in Trinidad are Sinopharm and Janssen.
US data indicates that the bivalent booster offers little added benefit when compared to earlier mRNA doses.
viewtopic.php?p=10341005#p10341005
Ogoud. Lol. Somebody hack your account or you finally realizing the thing don't work?
You saying that the boosters the moh is offering don't work
The booster recommendations are essentially similar to the booster recommendations from a year ago:
Vaccinated and boosted - better protection from an increase in antibodies.
Boosted with a different vaccine - better protection.
Boosted by mixing mRNA vaccine with other vaccines - much better protection still.
Boosted with a covalent mRNA vaccine - no noted appreciable difference when compared to a monovalent mRNA vaccine.
sMASH wrote:After millions of doses, 2 years, why are the vaxes still emergency use? Why not give them full approval as full fledged, tested vaxes?
Or are they still pensive, and don't want liability years duwn the road for negative effects from an approved Vax?
At least this way, they could hide and say, 'eet wuz steel experimental, iz nuh we fault allyuh doh unnerstanz fine print'
... EUA by the WHO. Pfizer and Moderna have full USFDA, EMA and Health Canada approval.Mmoney607 wrote:sMASH wrote:After millions of doses, 2 years, why are the vaxes still emergency use? Why not give them full approval as full fledged, tested vaxes?
Or are they still pensive, and don't want liability years duwn the road for negative effects from an approved Vax?
At least this way, they could hide and say, 'eet wuz steel experimental, iz nuh we fault allyuh doh unnerstanz fine print'
Wait na. It's still emergency use, I forget about that
sMASH wrote:After millions of doses, 2 years, why are the vaxes still emergency use? Why not give them full approval as full fledged, tested vaxes?
Or are they still pensive, and don't want liability years duwn the road for negative effects from an approved Vax?
At least this way, they could hide and say, 'eet wuz steel experimental, iz nuh we fault allyuh doh unnerstanz fine print'
Florida banned them for some adults.adnj wrote:... EUA by the WHO. Pfizer and Moderna have full USFDA, EMA and Health Canada approval.Mmoney607 wrote:sMASH wrote:After millions of doses, 2 years, why are the vaxes still emergency use? Why not give them full approval as full fledged, tested vaxes?
Or are they still pensive, and don't want liability years duwn the road for negative effects from an approved Vax?
At least this way, they could hide and say, 'eet wuz steel experimental, iz nuh we fault allyuh doh unnerstanz fine print'
Wait na. It's still emergency use, I forget about that
If you don't have access to fully approved vaccines, that is a different discussion.
The acceptance is based on whether the manufacturer applied to a particular national regulatory agency. That application is then reviewed by that agency. Some vaccine approval applications were never filed for some agencies. Astra Zeneca, as an example, pulled their full approval application because of a manufacturing problem.sMASH wrote:When u check the approval status fir the vaxes, it seems its based on political acceptance rather than science.
Some governments like them, and others still iffy...
'If it works it works' seem not to apply to covid vaxes.
They should move at the speed of science.adnj wrote:The acceptance is based on whether the manufacturer applied to a particular national regulatory agency. That application is then reviewed by that agency. Some vaccine approval applications were never filed for some agencies. Astra Zeneca, as an example, pulled their full approval application because of a manufacturing problem.sMASH wrote:When u check the approval status fir the vaxes, it seems its based on political acceptance rather than science.
Some governments like them, and others still iffy...
'If it works it works' seem not to apply to covid vaxes.
sMASH wrote:https://youtube.com/watch?v=eYz-yelhkYE&si=EnSIkaIECMiOmarE
Study into effects, picking up rare side effects.
I'm special, I value my heart.
Nice!SuperiorMan wrote:
where my conspiracy theorists at!
Ey, covee is 22.74 times more dangerous than 8 pit bulls.SuperiorMan wrote:
SuperiorMan wrote:
Just another way fur big ppharma to milk the citizens.alfa wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:
Ahh the science keeps evolving again
A word used by antivaxer slacktivists to make it sound less serious.adnj wrote:What the helll is covee?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: aaron17, death365, VexXx Dogg and 145 guests