Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
sam1978 wrote:It's scary to think Dr Chaos might really be a doctor , and seeing patients in real life. That behavior going on here is cause for concern.
drchaos wrote:redmanjp wrote:MaxPower wrote:Time to call the SOE and deploy army.
We cannot waste any more time.
Keeping citizens home by force is now necessary.
A violent approach may be considered to send a clear message to delinquent Trinis.
I concur. But the army should be deployed to the porous borders to stop further importation of that P1 variant
Stupid idea ... Its already here.
Go close and lock up your front gate after yuh pothong geh way.
BUG wrote:Okay, it's become increasingly clear that people here are not aware that certain occupations were listed as priority to receive the vaccination. A range of different roles were vaccinated as a matter of urgency for a multitude of reasons ie. the role involved frequent contact with covid positives or even covid positive materials etc.
I thought it was general knowledge that certain occupations would have to and were being vaccinated ASAP so I guess that's on me for not explaining it better. In my defence though, have you been living under a rock? This is literally how every single country has run their vaccination programs, surely you already know that certain occupations must be vaccinated first?
redmanjp wrote:drchaos wrote:redmanjp wrote:MaxPower wrote:Time to call the SOE and deploy army.
We cannot waste any more time.
Keeping citizens home by force is now necessary.
A violent approach may be considered to send a clear message to delinquent Trinis.
I concur. But the army should be deployed to the porous borders to stop further importation of that P1 variant
Stupid idea ... Its already here.
Go close and lock up your front gate after yuh pothong geh way.
yeah but this lockdown is supposed to drive down local cases. we can't have more comin in again which going to cause more waves and ultimately more lockdowns. just like we not opening the offical borders.
sam1978 wrote:It's scary to think Dr Chaos might really be a doctor , and seeing patients in real life. That behavior going on here is cause for concern.
j.o.e wrote:Who is the line jumper? I’m a line jumper too and don’t even care. Get a life.
sam1978 wrote:It's scary to think Dr Chaos might really be a doctor , and seeing patients in real life. That behavior going on here is cause for concern.
drchaos wrote:j.o.e wrote:Who is the line jumper? I’m a line jumper too and don’t even care. Get a life.
Yeah you are a line Jumper but you are not bothered by it ...
Bug seems to be emotional torn about it, thats why he keeps responding when being trolled about it.
Its fun to rile him up.
drchaos wrote:j.o.e wrote:Who is the line jumper? I’m a line jumper too and don’t even care. Get a life.
Yeah you are a line Jumper but you are not bothered by it ...
Bug seems to be emotional torn about it, thats why he keeps responding when being trolled about it.
Its fun to rile him up.
j.o.e wrote:drchaos wrote:j.o.e wrote:Who is the line jumper? I’m a line jumper too and don’t even care. Get a life.
Yeah you are a line Jumper but you are not bothered by it ...
Bug seems to be emotional torn about it, thats why he keeps responding when being trolled about it.
Its fun to rile him up.
Sucks to be him
30’s, no comorbidities , healthy BMI, non smoker, working from home. Who want to wait and see, fack dem.
BUG wrote:j.o.e wrote:drchaos wrote:j.o.e wrote:Who is the line jumper? I’m a line jumper too and don’t even care. Get a life.
Yeah you are a line Jumper but you are not bothered by it ...
Bug seems to be emotional torn about it, thats why he keeps responding when being trolled about it.
Its fun to rile him up.
Sucks to be him
30’s, no comorbidities , healthy BMI, non smoker, working from home. Who want to wait and see, fack dem.
All correct except for the working from home part but I'll forgive it
sMASH wrote:No covid to see here.. Move along, citizen. FB_IMG_1620669527742.jpeg
j.o.e wrote:Who is the line jumper? I’m a line jumper too and don’t even care. Get a life.
SuperiorMan wrote:j.o.e wrote:Who is the line jumper? I’m a line jumper too and don’t even care. Get a life.
This is a typical low IQ Trinidadian response. Idiot.
Dohplaydat wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:j.o.e wrote:Who is the line jumper? I’m a line jumper too and don’t even care. Get a life.
This is a typical low IQ Trinidadian response. Idiot.
I disagree, line jumpers are irrelevant, everyone needs to be vaccinated right now so I don't care who jumps the line. Tonnes of people still didn't show up to appointments or in the first AZ set a month, didn't even try to go. Nurses insisted my 33-year-old cousin get vaccinated the day he took his mom and dad to get the vaccine. They said they needed to make their quota and people weren't signing up.
People creating this mentality of line jumping and old people suffering in wait is just creating more hate and division.
There was no rush until last Thursday. If they wanted to get it, they could have signed up earlier. Many still 'waiting' to see, or thinking they might get a blood clot from it.
And lastly, if the younger person in the household is the one going grocery/working and going out in public more, then they should be vaccinated instead of the older folks, they are protecting their bubble.
Dohplaydat wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:j.o.e wrote:Who is the line jumper? I’m a line jumper too and don’t even care. Get a life.
This is a typical low IQ Trinidadian response. Idiot.
I disagree, line jumpers are irrelevant, everyone needs to be vaccinated right now so I don't care who jumps the line. Tonnes of people still didn't show up to appointments or in the first AZ set a month, didn't even try to go. Nurses insisted my 33-year-old cousin get vaccinated the day he took his mom and dad to get the vaccine. They said they needed to make their quota and people weren't signing up.
People creating this mentality of line jumping and old people suffering in wait is just creating more hate and division.
There was no rush until last Thursday. If they wanted to get it, they could have signed up earlier. Many still 'waiting' to see, or thinking they might get a blood clot from it.
And lastly, if the younger person in the household is the one going grocery/working and going out in public more, then they should be vaccinated instead of the older folks, they are protecting their bubble.
Dohplaydat wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:j.o.e wrote:Who is the line jumper? I’m a line jumper too and don’t even care. Get a life.
This is a typical low IQ Trinidadian response. Idiot.
I disagree, line jumpers are irrelevant, everyone needs to be vaccinated right now so I don't care who jumps the line. Tonnes of people still didn't show up to appointments or in the first AZ set a month, didn't even try to go. Nurses insisted my 33-year-old cousin get vaccinated the day he took his mom and dad to get the vaccine. They said they needed to make their quota and people weren't signing up.
People creating this mentality of line jumping and old people suffering in wait is just creating more hate and division.
There was no rush until last Thursday. If they wanted to get it, they could have signed up earlier. Many still 'waiting' to see, or thinking they might get a blood clot from it.
And lastly, if the younger person in the household is the one going grocery/working and going out in public more, then they should be vaccinated instead of the older folks, they are protecting their bubble.
redmanjp wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:j.o.e wrote:Who is the line jumper? I’m a line jumper too and don’t even care. Get a life.
This is a typical low IQ Trinidadian response. Idiot.
I disagree, line jumpers are irrelevant, everyone needs to be vaccinated right now so I don't care who jumps the line. Tonnes of people still didn't show up to appointments or in the first AZ set a month, didn't even try to go. Nurses insisted my 33-year-old cousin get vaccinated the day he took his mom and dad to get the vaccine. They said they needed to make their quota and people weren't signing up.
People creating this mentality of line jumping and old people suffering in wait is just creating more hate and division.
There was no rush until last Thursday. If they wanted to get it, they could have signed up earlier. Many still 'waiting' to see, or thinking they might get a blood clot from it.
And lastly, if the younger person in the household is the one going grocery/working and going out in public more, then they should be vaccinated instead of the older folks, they are protecting their bubble.
it all depends on which age groups are taking up the most hospital bed space- with the Wuhan strain it was almost all elderly with a couple young ppl and only those with NCDs. this brazil strain seriously sickening younger ppl but MOH hasn't given us a chart with hospitalizations by age. if its similar numbers to elderly ppl then it makes sense to go down to at least 40 year and over - i think most of them are middle age. then when vaccine ramps up and hospitalizations of those over 40 go down then expand to 18+.
drchaos wrote:Again still no data with differences between wuhan and P1 variant in terms of age and serious disease and Allu men already have decided that P1 is killing young people in droves.
Fear driven not data driven.
Brazil is currently suffering a deadly surge of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections, which has been attributed to the spread of a new strain known as P.1 (B.1.1.28.1). In this investigation, we analyzed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health data from Parana, the largest state in southern half of Brazil, between September 1, 2020 and March 17, 2021, to evaluate recent trends in case fatality rates in different age groups. A total of 553,518 cases of SARS-CoV-2, 8,853 currently registered as fatal, were finally included in our analysis. All age groups showed either decline or stabilization of the case fatality rates (CFRs) between September 2020 and January 2021. In February 2021, an increase in CFR for almost all age groups could be instead observed. All groups above 20 years of age showed statistically significant increases in CFR when diagnosed in February 2021 as opposed to January 2021. Patients aged 20-29 years experienced a tripling of their CFR, from 0.04% to 0.13%, while those aged 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 experienced approximate CFR doubling. Individuals between 20 and 29 years of age whose diagnosis was made in February 2021 had an over 3-fold higher risk of death compared to those diagnosed in January 2021 (Risk Ratio (RR): 3.15 [95%CI: 1.52-6.53], p<0.01), while those aged 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 years experienced 93% (1.93 [95%CI:1.31-2.85], p<0.01), 110% (RR: 2.10 [95%CI:1.62-2.72], p<0.01), and 80% (RR: 1.80 [95%CI:1.50-2.16], p<0.01) increases in risk of death, respectively. Notably, the observed CFR increase coincided with the second consecutive month of declining number of diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 cases. Taken together, these preliminary findings suggest significant increases in CFR in young and middle-aged adults after identification of a novel SARS-CoV-2 strain circulating in Brazil, and this should raise public health alarms, including the need for more aggressive local and regional public health interventions and faster vaccination.
Dohplaydat wrote:drchaos wrote:Again still no data with differences between wuhan and P1 variant in terms of age and serious disease and Allu men already have decided that P1 is killing young people in droves.
Fear driven not data driven.
A fake doctor who can't do research, surprise surprise....
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 21254046v1Brazil is currently suffering a deadly surge of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections, which has been attributed to the spread of a new strain known as P.1 (B.1.1.28.1). In this investigation, we analyzed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health data from Parana, the largest state in southern half of Brazil, between September 1, 2020 and March 17, 2021, to evaluate recent trends in case fatality rates in different age groups. A total of 553,518 cases of SARS-CoV-2, 8,853 currently registered as fatal, were finally included in our analysis. All age groups showed either decline or stabilization of the case fatality rates (CFRs) between September 2020 and January 2021. In February 2021, an increase in CFR for almost all age groups could be instead observed. All groups above 20 years of age showed statistically significant increases in CFR when diagnosed in February 2021 as opposed to January 2021. Patients aged 20-29 years experienced a tripling of their CFR, from 0.04% to 0.13%, while those aged 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 experienced approximate CFR doubling. Individuals between 20 and 29 years of age whose diagnosis was made in February 2021 had an over 3-fold higher risk of death compared to those diagnosed in January 2021 (Risk Ratio (RR): 3.15 [95%CI: 1.52-6.53], p<0.01), while those aged 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 years experienced 93% (1.93 [95%CI:1.31-2.85], p<0.01), 110% (RR: 2.10 [95%CI:1.62-2.72], p<0.01), and 80% (RR: 1.80 [95%CI:1.50-2.16], p<0.01) increases in risk of death, respectively. Notably, the observed CFR increase coincided with the second consecutive month of declining number of diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 cases. Taken together, these preliminary findings suggest significant increases in CFR in young and middle-aged adults after identification of a novel SARS-CoV-2 strain circulating in Brazil, and this should raise public health alarms, including the need for more aggressive local and regional public health interventions and faster vaccination.
https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/373/bmj.n879.full.pdf
Screenshot 2021-05-10 at 4.35.45 pm.png
drchaos wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:drchaos wrote:Again still no data with differences between wuhan and P1 variant in terms of age and serious disease and Allu men already have decided that P1 is killing young people in droves.
Fear driven not data driven.
A fake doctor who can't do research, surprise surprise....
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 21254046v1Brazil is currently suffering a deadly surge of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections, which has been attributed to the spread of a new strain known as P.1 (B.1.1.28.1). In this investigation, we analyzed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health data from Parana, the largest state in southern half of Brazil, between September 1, 2020 and March 17, 2021, to evaluate recent trends in case fatality rates in different age groups. A total of 553,518 cases of SARS-CoV-2, 8,853 currently registered as fatal, were finally included in our analysis. All age groups showed either decline or stabilization of the case fatality rates (CFRs) between September 2020 and January 2021. In February 2021, an increase in CFR for almost all age groups could be instead observed. All groups above 20 years of age showed statistically significant increases in CFR when diagnosed in February 2021 as opposed to January 2021. Patients aged 20-29 years experienced a tripling of their CFR, from 0.04% to 0.13%, while those aged 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 experienced approximate CFR doubling. Individuals between 20 and 29 years of age whose diagnosis was made in February 2021 had an over 3-fold higher risk of death compared to those diagnosed in January 2021 (Risk Ratio (RR): 3.15 [95%CI: 1.52-6.53], p<0.01), while those aged 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 years experienced 93% (1.93 [95%CI:1.31-2.85], p<0.01), 110% (RR: 2.10 [95%CI:1.62-2.72], p<0.01), and 80% (RR: 1.80 [95%CI:1.50-2.16], p<0.01) increases in risk of death, respectively. Notably, the observed CFR increase coincided with the second consecutive month of declining number of diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 cases. Taken together, these preliminary findings suggest significant increases in CFR in young and middle-aged adults after identification of a novel SARS-CoV-2 strain circulating in Brazil, and this should raise public health alarms, including the need for more aggressive local and regional public health interventions and faster vaccination.
https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/373/bmj.n879.full.pdf
Screenshot 2021-05-10 at 4.35.45 pm.png
Numb skull like you living in Brazil?
Trinidad Data please all else you speculating.
Yall keep comparing Trinidad to Brazil.
Like I said you does move to high ground when Malaysia get hit with a Tsunami.
redmanjp wrote:drchaos wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:drchaos wrote:Again still no data with differences between wuhan and P1 variant in terms of age and serious disease and Allu men already have decided that P1 is killing young people in droves.
Fear driven not data driven.
A fake doctor who can't do research, surprise surprise....
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 21254046v1Brazil is currently suffering a deadly surge of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections, which has been attributed to the spread of a new strain known as P.1 (B.1.1.28.1). In this investigation, we analyzed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health data from Parana, the largest state in southern half of Brazil, between September 1, 2020 and March 17, 2021, to evaluate recent trends in case fatality rates in different age groups. A total of 553,518 cases of SARS-CoV-2, 8,853 currently registered as fatal, were finally included in our analysis. All age groups showed either decline or stabilization of the case fatality rates (CFRs) between September 2020 and January 2021. In February 2021, an increase in CFR for almost all age groups could be instead observed. All groups above 20 years of age showed statistically significant increases in CFR when diagnosed in February 2021 as opposed to January 2021. Patients aged 20-29 years experienced a tripling of their CFR, from 0.04% to 0.13%, while those aged 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 experienced approximate CFR doubling. Individuals between 20 and 29 years of age whose diagnosis was made in February 2021 had an over 3-fold higher risk of death compared to those diagnosed in January 2021 (Risk Ratio (RR): 3.15 [95%CI: 1.52-6.53], p<0.01), while those aged 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 years experienced 93% (1.93 [95%CI:1.31-2.85], p<0.01), 110% (RR: 2.10 [95%CI:1.62-2.72], p<0.01), and 80% (RR: 1.80 [95%CI:1.50-2.16], p<0.01) increases in risk of death, respectively. Notably, the observed CFR increase coincided with the second consecutive month of declining number of diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 cases. Taken together, these preliminary findings suggest significant increases in CFR in young and middle-aged adults after identification of a novel SARS-CoV-2 strain circulating in Brazil, and this should raise public health alarms, including the need for more aggressive local and regional public health interventions and faster vaccination.
https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/373/bmj.n879.full.pdf
Screenshot 2021-05-10 at 4.35.45 pm.png
Numb skull like you living in Brazil?
Trinidad Data please all else you speculating.
Yall keep comparing Trinidad to Brazil.
Like I said you does move to high ground when Malaysia get hit with a Tsunami.
if a variant that originated there reach here and spreading rapidly yuh doh think the same thing would end up happening?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 88 guests