Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
VexXx Dogg wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:I just interested in seeing how she gonna show the country that the office of the president is needed.
why she (or any president) hadda do that?
PNM wrote the constitution to which they go against it.Rovin wrote:is this really a democracy
why is d selection of president always solely d choice of whichever ruling party in power , those who wrote our constitution really effed up that or did they knowingly do it to suit their purpose
if they didnt want d whole population to vote at least put a few choices so d elected MPs & d local Councillors can vote but no, we in charge & we putting who we feel good : talk dun ...
Yeah ,don't hold your breath on that, she will fall in line just as the rest before have.Words are no indicator of a person's intentions. Her actions over the coming months will speak the truth about her intent and her character. Anyone can write or pay to have a fancy speech written with many promises. She now get the wuk, time will tell if she can perform.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:I just interested in seeing how she gonna show the country that the office of the president is needed.
wing wrote:Too bad the NAR and PP saw it fit to leave the Constitution exactly as it is, even with massive parliamentary majorities. We really like it so.
Les Bain wrote:De Dragon wrote:And ah setta dummies falling for her unifying speech
Just like JUHN Scarfy, only ah setta talk when you win about being for all people, and then the very next breath, showing your true, stink colours.
That voting crowd too busy rejoicing at the woman is boss angle to analyse the implications of Kangaloo appointment.
If the transgender movement ends up being accepted locally, is a safe bet PNM will eventually install a trans president for their voters to bawl they progressive.
"The guy in the video questioning how the man on the ground is charged for petty crimes but the men on top are not. The rule of law states that no man above the law however that doesn't happen in real life."hover11 wrote:SUPPORT FOR DPP: People gathered outside the Richmond Street, Port of Spain office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to show support for DPP Roger Gaspard, SC, on Tuesday morning. Social activists Michael Kerr and Lennox Smith explained to reporters the purpose for the gathering.
VIDEO BY ELEXZINE BISSOO
https://fb.watch/jyWH14MWdK/
The guy in the video questioning how the man on the ground is charged for petty crimes but the men on top are not. The rule of law states that no man above the law however that doesn't happen in real life.
Question wing, if the man who in charge of whether you keep your wuk tells you not to give instructions to charge or turn a blind eye to certain ppl then wouldn't you inevitably be singing for your supper which compromises your role which is supposed to be unbiased? The DPP is not given the resources to prosecute with minimal staff to add insult to injury.wing wrote:"The guy in the video questioning how the man on the ground is charged for petty crimes but the men on top are not. The rule of law states that no man above the law however that doesn't happen in real life."hover11 wrote:SUPPORT FOR DPP: People gathered outside the Richmond Street, Port of Spain office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to show support for DPP Roger Gaspard, SC, on Tuesday morning. Social activists Michael Kerr and Lennox Smith explained to reporters the purpose for the gathering.
VIDEO BY ELEXZINE BISSOO
https://fb.watch/jyWH14MWdK/
The guy in the video questioning how the man on the ground is charged for petty crimes but the men on top are not. The rule of law states that no man above the law however that doesn't happen in real life.
Doesn't that means that the DPP has failed? Or at least partially at fault?
So which is it? Singing for supper or not given resources? Your obvious attempt to blame the PNM causing you to type crap. But I suspect this discussion going to go the way of the covid, public servants and lotto discussion, ie round and round in an endless circle. So I'm outhover11 wrote:Question wing, if the man who in charge of whether you keep your wuk tells you not to give instructions to charge or turn a blind eye to certain ppl then wouldn't you inevitably be singing for your supper which compromises your role which is supposed to be unbiased? The DPP is not given the resources to prosecute with minimal staff to add insult to injury.wing wrote:"The guy in the video questioning how the man on the ground is charged for petty crimes but the men on top are not. The rule of law states that no man above the law however that doesn't happen in real life."hover11 wrote:SUPPORT FOR DPP: People gathered outside the Richmond Street, Port of Spain office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to show support for DPP Roger Gaspard, SC, on Tuesday morning. Social activists Michael Kerr and Lennox Smith explained to reporters the purpose for the gathering.
VIDEO BY ELEXZINE BISSOO
https://fb.watch/jyWH14MWdK/
The guy in the video questioning how the man on the ground is charged for petty crimes but the men on top are not. The rule of law states that no man above the law however that doesn't happen in real life.
Doesn't that means that the DPP has failed? Or at least partially at fault?
Mindless puppet....they stifle and frustrate him to the point where his hands are tied. With no resources and on top of it demand that he turns a blind eye to certain instances. That compromises the office. Never in the history of leadership has the independent office of the DPP been subject to this level of scrutiny and that should say something is wrong.wing wrote:So which is it? Singing for supper or not given resources? Your obvious attempt to blame the PNM causing you to type crap. But I suspect this discussion going to go the way of the covid, public servants and lotto discussion, ie round and round in an endless circle. So I'm outhover11 wrote:Question wing, if the man who in charge of whether you keep your wuk tells you not to give instructions to charge or turn a blind eye to certain ppl then wouldn't you inevitably be singing for your supper which compromises your role which is supposed to be unbiased? The DPP is not given the resources to prosecute with minimal staff to add insult to injury.wing wrote:"The guy in the video questioning how the man on the ground is charged for petty crimes but the men on top are not. The rule of law states that no man above the law however that doesn't happen in real life."hover11 wrote:SUPPORT FOR DPP: People gathered outside the Richmond Street, Port of Spain office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to show support for DPP Roger Gaspard, SC, on Tuesday morning. Social activists Michael Kerr and Lennox Smith explained to reporters the purpose for the gathering.
VIDEO BY ELEXZINE BISSOO
https://fb.watch/jyWH14MWdK/
The guy in the video questioning how the man on the ground is charged for petty crimes but the men on top are not. The rule of law states that no man above the law however that doesn't happen in real life.
Doesn't that means that the DPP has failed? Or at least partially at fault?
Wing is a paid PNM blogger brohover11 wrote:Mindless puppet....they stifle and frustrate him to the point where his hands are tied. With no resources and on top of it demand that he turns a blind eye to certain instances. That compromises the office. Never in the history of leadership has the independent office of the DPP been subject to this level of scrutiny and that should say something is wrong.wing wrote:So which is it? Singing for supper or not given resources? Your obvious attempt to blame the PNM causing you to type crap. But I suspect this discussion going to go the way of the covid, public servants and lotto discussion, ie round and round in an endless circle. So I'm outhover11 wrote:Question wing, if the man who in charge of whether you keep your wuk tells you not to give instructions to charge or turn a blind eye to certain ppl then wouldn't you inevitably be singing for your supper which compromises your role which is supposed to be unbiased? The DPP is not given the resources to prosecute with minimal staff to add insult to injury.wing wrote:"The guy in the video questioning how the man on the ground is charged for petty crimes but the men on top are not. The rule of law states that no man above the law however that doesn't happen in real life."hover11 wrote:SUPPORT FOR DPP: People gathered outside the Richmond Street, Port of Spain office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to show support for DPP Roger Gaspard, SC, on Tuesday morning. Social activists Michael Kerr and Lennox Smith explained to reporters the purpose for the gathering.
VIDEO BY ELEXZINE BISSOO
https://fb.watch/jyWH14MWdK/
The guy in the video questioning how the man on the ground is charged for petty crimes but the men on top are not. The rule of law states that no man above the law however that doesn't happen in real life.
Doesn't that means that the DPP has failed? Or at least partially at fault?
Kickstart is an unpaid UNC bloggerKickstart wrote:Wing is a paid PNM blogger brohover11 wrote:Mindless puppet....they stifle and frustrate him to the point where his hands are tied. With no resources and on top of it demand that he turns a blind eye to certain instances. That compromises the office. Never in the history of leadership has the independent office of the DPP been subject to this level of scrutiny and that should say something is wrong.wing wrote:So which is it? Singing for supper or not given resources? Your obvious attempt to blame the PNM causing you to type crap. But I suspect this discussion going to go the way of the covid, public servants and lotto discussion, ie round and round in an endless circle. So I'm outhover11 wrote:Question wing, if the man who in charge of whether you keep your wuk tells you not to give instructions to charge or turn a blind eye to certain ppl then wouldn't you inevitably be singing for your supper which compromises your role which is supposed to be unbiased? The DPP is not given the resources to prosecute with minimal staff to add insult to injury.wing wrote:"The guy in the video questioning how the man on the ground is charged for petty crimes but the men on top are not. The rule of law states that no man above the law however that doesn't happen in real life."hover11 wrote:SUPPORT FOR DPP: People gathered outside the Richmond Street, Port of Spain office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to show support for DPP Roger Gaspard, SC, on Tuesday morning. Social activists Michael Kerr and Lennox Smith explained to reporters the purpose for the gathering.
VIDEO BY ELEXZINE BISSOO
https://fb.watch/jyWH14MWdK/
The guy in the video questioning how the man on the ground is charged for petty crimes but the men on top are not. The rule of law states that no man above the law however that doesn't happen in real life.
Doesn't that means that the DPP has failed? Or at least partially at fault?
The office was put into disrepute and you want respect for office? Putting an extremely biased individual in the position which is supposed to be unbiased and serve without favour, she took an oath and telling the public well live with it.wing wrote:Even though the new president was elected legally, even while being an active politician, there should be some respect for the office even though we disagree with the office holder. When supposed educated adults continue making fun of the president's name, what does it say to the young ones? Then we act all surprised and outraged when the youths go astray.
Rovin wrote:kangaroo gets Order of T&T ...
wing wrote:Even though the new president was elected legally, even while being an active politician, there should be some respect for the office even though we disagree with the office holder. When supposed educated adults continue making fun of the president's name, what does it say to the young ones? Then we act all surprised and outraged when the youths go astray.
Rovin wrote:kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo, kangaroo ...
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 289 guests