Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
De Dragon wrote:st7 wrote:you only have to pay for luggage if you chose the Lite option which was created for those who travel without checked luggage, otherwise Classic and up options have luggage included
Wait, so you have to pay for carry ons?
De Dragon wrote:st7 wrote:you only have to pay for luggage if you chose the Lite option which was created for those who travel without checked luggage, otherwise Classic and up options have luggage included
Wait, so you have to pay for carry ons?
MaxPower wrote:De Dragon wrote:st7 wrote:you only have to pay for luggage if you chose the Lite option which was created for those who travel without checked luggage, otherwise Classic and up options have luggage included
Wait, so you have to pay for carry ons?
DeDumDum,
The boys speaking about checked luggage and you asking about carry ons? Slow it down and read back the post over. Jeezus crice.
Does know the non-visa/passport holders yes.
Anyways, no you don’t have to pay for carry ons nor is that even an option.
De Dragon wrote:Vene blue ball, greasy faced, pimply, mammy boy MC. Nobody was talking to you.
Invest some of your KFC salary in some English Language lessons, since your Grade 5 in Basic English A, is showing.
MaxPower wrote:De Dragon wrote:Vene blue ball, greasy faced, pimply, mammy boy MC. Nobody was talking to you.
Invest some of your KFC salary in some English Language lessons, since your Grade 5 in Basic English A, is showing.
Ok DeWorldTraveller,
You get make out asking a stupid question because of your illiteracy and your buttons get pressed yes…..early early morning and you ranting?
Padna you have an issue understanding simple
English Language. You need to relax, take a deep breath, when the shaking and dribbling stops, then read slowly and try to understand.
MaxPower wrote:Study you still confused AF and lost in space as to if you still have to pay for a carry on luggage lol
Aye yuh pressure is very high this morning, let me not make it worse.
Bye
De Dragon wrote:Tun Tun paying for carry on is not unique, or unheard of .
hen again you accustom to pirogue rides down the main when yuh Venes and dem bobolizing yuh to carry dem back to get dey bull and illegal stuff, all while not getting anything but the knowledge that yuh KFC money funding it
What a sad, sad kant you are!
MaxPower wrote:De Dragon wrote:Tun Tun paying for carry on is not unique, or unheard of .
hen again you accustom to pirogue rides down the main when yuh Venes and dem bobolizing yuh to carry dem back to get dey bull and illegal stuff, all while not getting anything but the knowledge that yuh KFC money funding it
What a sad, sad kant you are!
DeDumDum,
Correct, it is not unheard of.
But don’t try to change it around now. If you read and understood the boy post correctly, you would realize that check in luggage was being referenced.
Stop beating up, slow it down next time.
Run along now, i see the pressure reading not good again this morning.
hover11 wrote:This is why the government should not be in any form of business, the aim of a business is to make a profit ,you telling me each flight losing $40,000 and you still flying? Make it make sense!!
I understand but this is a sunk cost....are we really Willing to stimulate Tobago's economy at the cost of 40k per flight?Dizzy28 wrote:hover11 wrote:This is why the government should not be in any form of business, the aim of a business is to make a profit ,you telling me each flight losing $40,000 and you still flying? Make it make sense!!
The purpose of TAB flights are not to make a profit.
Its to stimulate the Tobago economy.
Like a subway, but in the sky...Dizzy28 wrote:hover11 wrote:This is why the government should not be in any form of business, the aim of a business is to make a profit ,you telling me each flight losing $40,000 and you still flying? Make it make sense!!
The purpose of TAB flights are not to make a profit.
Its to stimulate the Tobago economy.
sMASH wrote:Like a subway, but in the sky...Dizzy28 wrote:hover11 wrote:This is why the government should not be in any form of business, the aim of a business is to make a profit ,you telling me each flight losing $40,000 and you still flying? Make it make sense!!
The purpose of TAB flights are not to make a profit.
Its to stimulate the Tobago economy.
Waste of money... Let Tha foot that bill
sMASH wrote:Like a subway, but in the sky...Dizzy28 wrote:hover11 wrote:This is why the government should not be in any form of business, the aim of a business is to make a profit ,you telling me each flight losing $40,000 and you still flying? Make it make sense!!
The purpose of TAB flights are not to make a profit.
Its to stimulate the Tobago economy.
Waste of money... Let Tha foot that bill
X100000000000matix wrote:Simpler solution is to let people pay the actual cost of the tickets. Not run at a loss but try to break even. Too many subsidies here
hover11 wrote:X100000000000matix wrote:Simpler solution is to let people pay the actual cost of the tickets. Not run at a loss but try to break even. Too many subsidies here
All free ride done, pay your way
sMASH wrote:dug out from the recesses of the cranium
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, Google [Bot] and 122 guests