Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Kyrie Irving Collaborates With Lockstep Ventures to Launch Consulting Firm for Minority-Owned Businessesst7 wrote:hover11 wrote:Bro so you think their only means of income is sports, you do know these ppl are entrepreneurs right they themselves are a brand and have businesses, they can make money sometimes they continue sports as it's just something they like but if push come to shove they could retire at any timest7 wrote:ANYWAY.
you think they have money because just so? there are sponsorships with signed contracts. if you dont perform or unwilling to perform for sponsor branding, i wonder what's gonna happen? gotta forfeit some of those riches or risk getting sued for more.
mansions require upkeeps, especially if you have more than one and that's plenty dinero. unless they have money invested, maybe they could survive the fall out but your dumbass only see the black and white in front of you - daz why you a sufferer for life. let's see if they humble enough to sell their mansions to live in a suburban house and readjust their lifestyle.
i sure someone here knows waaaay more about this than the both of us combined.
can you confirm that they have other channels of revenue or are you just frothing assumptions because 'durrr they have a billiion dollahs'
hover11 wrote:Whatever legislation they put will be illegal because of the constitution unless they change the constitution no law can supersede it. Just like the property tax ent they were going to charge you $5000 for failure to send them your information how did that go for them.I done set aside that money and waiting patiently for that "criminal" charge
Well like many thousands of homeowners including myself waiting patiently for that criminal charge, I not submitting any documentsadnj wrote:hover11 wrote:Whatever legislation they put will be illegal because of the constitution unless they change the constitution no law can supersede it. Just like the property tax ent they were going to charge you $5000 for failure to send them your information how did that go for them.I done set aside that money and waiting patiently for that "criminal" charge
... The judgement did not extend to the Government’s current data collection exercise which is being done under a different statutory regime. The current deadline for submission under the new policy, which is yet to be challenged, is January 31.
“Nothing herein is intended to be construed as affecting that exercise which is not before this court on this appeal,” Rajkumar said.
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/court-o ... b6ac237818
Paid influencer,paid_influencer wrote:hover11, I am no lawyer or claim to be, but I see the case falling apart because:
1. An employee worker can reasonably expect someone to be liable in case of an adverse reaction.
2. Employers can claim medical liability belongs the health authority administering the vaccine.
3. The health authority will not accept liability for the vaccines, as they are emergency use.
4. The worker can reasonably expect recourse in the event of an adverse reaction. If there is no recourse available, the terms are not reasonable.
Somebody needs to hold the the hot potato if it is to be made mandatory.
The vaccine seems to be saving lives tho, definitely take the Pfizer (not J&J or Sinopharm, those are inferior) if you are older/sicker/have risk factors.
I'm fairly certain that the government currently has all the information necessary for anyone that purchased a house from them that was also built by them.hover11 wrote:Well like many thousands of homeowners including myself waiting patiently for that criminal charge, I not submitting any documentsadnj wrote:hover11 wrote:Whatever legislation they put will be illegal because of the constitution unless they change the constitution no law can supersede it. Just like the property tax ent they were going to charge you $5000 for failure to send them your information how did that go for them.I done set aside that money and waiting patiently for that "criminal" charge
... The judgement did not extend to the Government’s current data collection exercise which is being done under a different statutory regime. The current deadline for submission under the new policy, which is yet to be challenged, is January 31.
“Nothing herein is intended to be construed as affecting that exercise which is not before this court on this appeal,” Rajkumar said.
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/court-o ... b6ac237818
hover11 wrote:Paid influencer,paid_influencer wrote:hover11, I am no lawyer or claim to be, but I see the case falling apart because:
1. An employee worker can reasonably expect someone to be liable in case of an adverse reaction.
2. Employers can claim medical liability belongs the health authority administering the vaccine.
3. The health authority will not accept liability for the vaccines, as they are emergency use.
4. The worker can reasonably expect recourse in the event of an adverse reaction. If there is no recourse available, the terms are not reasonable.
Somebody needs to hold the the hot potato if it is to be made mandatory.
The vaccine seems to be saving lives tho, definitely take the Pfizer (not J&J or Sinopharm, those are inferior) if you are older/sicker/have risk factors.
You see this funny thing called responsibility and accountability, no one likes it, no one wants to take onus that they have you experiencing discomfort or worse and suffer the legal repercussions due to such. I still cannot grasp how the employers want it mandatory yet if any negative effects were to occur after your first, 2nd or booster shot , nobody is liable, they hadda come better than that.
Hmm that's strange the Supreme Court didn't consider such a dutyadnj wrote:hover11 wrote:Paid influencer,paid_influencer wrote:hover11, I am no lawyer or claim to be, but I see the case falling apart because:
1. An employee worker can reasonably expect someone to be liable in case of an adverse reaction.
2. Employers can claim medical liability belongs the health authority administering the vaccine.
3. The health authority will not accept liability for the vaccines, as they are emergency use.
4. The worker can reasonably expect recourse in the event of an adverse reaction. If there is no recourse available, the terms are not reasonable.
Somebody needs to hold the the hot potato if it is to be made mandatory.
The vaccine seems to be saving lives tho, definitely take the Pfizer (not J&J or Sinopharm, those are inferior) if you are older/sicker/have risk factors.
You see this funny thing called responsibility and accountability, no one likes it, no one wants to take onus that they have you experiencing discomfort or worse and suffer the legal repercussions due to such. I still cannot grasp how the employers want it mandatory yet if any negative effects were to occur after your first, 2nd or booster shot , nobody is liable, they hadda come better than that.
Synonyms: responsibility, accountability, duty.
Vaccination 'a civic duty' according to new report
“Getting vaccinated is a civic duty, warn health experts,” The Independent has reported.
The news is based on a new report on adult immunisation in the UK produced by the International Longevity Centre.
The report's main message is that there needs to be greater focus on adult immunisation and it calls for increased adult vaccination against infectious diseases such as flu.
This, they argue, will help reduce the burden of infection on an ageing population (who are more vulnerable to infection), combat the growing menace of antibiotic resistance and save the NHS money.
https://www.nicswell.co.uk/health-news/ ... new-report
Irrelevant. You don't have a US passport.hover11 wrote:Hmm that's strange the Supreme Court didn't consider such a dutyadnj wrote:hover11 wrote:Paid influencer,paid_influencer wrote:hover11, I am no lawyer or claim to be, but I see the case falling apart because:
1. An employee worker can reasonably expect someone to be liable in case of an adverse reaction.
2. Employers can claim medical liability belongs the health authority administering the vaccine.
3. The health authority will not accept liability for the vaccines, as they are emergency use.
4. The worker can reasonably expect recourse in the event of an adverse reaction. If there is no recourse available, the terms are not reasonable.
Somebody needs to hold the the hot potato if it is to be made mandatory.
The vaccine seems to be saving lives tho, definitely take the Pfizer (not J&J or Sinopharm, those are inferior) if you are older/sicker/have risk factors.
You see this funny thing called responsibility and accountability, no one likes it, no one wants to take onus that they have you experiencing discomfort or worse and suffer the legal repercussions due to such. I still cannot grasp how the employers want it mandatory yet if any negative effects were to occur after your first, 2nd or booster shot , nobody is liable, they hadda come better than that.
Synonyms: responsibility, accountability, duty.
Vaccination 'a civic duty' according to new report
“Getting vaccinated is a civic duty, warn health experts,” The Independent has reported.
The news is based on a new report on adult immunisation in the UK produced by the International Longevity Centre.
The report's main message is that there needs to be greater focus on adult immunisation and it calls for increased adult vaccination against infectious diseases such as flu.
This, they argue, will help reduce the burden of infection on an ageing population (who are more vulnerable to infection), combat the growing menace of antibiotic resistance and save the NHS money.
https://www.nicswell.co.uk/health-news/ ... new-report
Wait for it it's coming...redmanjp wrote:I still think we are yet to see the omicron wave. No way we seeing an explosion of cases in other countries and just the same average here since Delta came through.
paid_influencer wrote:interesting how the island is so delayed on waves. Delta took a while to get here, too. Seems to suggest strong action on borders is one of our greatest tools in preventing spread
paid_influencer wrote:interesting how the island is so delayed on waves. Delta took a while to get here, too. Seems to suggest strong action on borders is one of our greatest tools in preventing spread
It coming and we have a population that mostly dgaf about covid, vaccinated and unvaccinated and will carry on, latter also dislikes hospitals. Expect numbers to be even less telling of the situation in the near future.redmanjp wrote:I still think we are yet to see the omicron wave. No way we seeing an explosion of cases in other countries and just the same average here since Delta came through.
Redman wrote:People not reporting.
The omnicron infections spiking to 2.5 _ 3x previous peaks...it will do the same here.
I think the data is no longer showing the full picture as people self diagnose and self isolate.
People no longer consider the virus a death sentence...so why put yourself through the system.
pugboy wrote:We likely have a few hundred ppl with natural infection antibodies based on a doing a reverse calculation of how many persons died using the 3% rate.
This plus the 600k jabbed could be a theoretical good sized herd.
So who knows, maybe we are resisting the 0micron since our real wave started later than other countries so the antibodies could still be active and not worn off like in the other countries.
Dohplaydat wrote:While we might have very high herd immunity (and I'd say otherwise given that we are still averaging just under 600 a day and 20 deaths per day).
And another thing, herd immunity from OG/P1/Delta or vaccination, does not prevent omicron re-infection. I know several people some of whom are vaccinated who had a delta between 3-6 months ago and got Omicron (mostly UK and US family/friends + one trini guy who infected me last month).
I think given how testing limitations, we won't see the 'rise' until it's absolutely really high.
That might be later this month, but it could be as soon as this upcoming week.
Given what I'm seeing in US and a few other countries, it doesn't look like our deaths will reduce significantly, at best it might level off at 15 per day for the next 6 weeks.
K74T wrote:6 more Omicron cases
FB_IMG_1642375976637.jpg
paid_influencer wrote:interesting how the island is so delayed on waves. Delta took a while to get here, too. Seems to suggest strong action on borders is one of our greatest tools in preventing spread
redmanjp wrote:paid_influencer wrote:interesting how the island is so delayed on waves. Delta took a while to get here, too. Seems to suggest strong action on borders is one of our greatest tools in preventing spread
it may have worked with previous strains, but with omicron there is considerable immune escape so lots of vaxxed ppl getting it and free to come in to the country without even a home quarantine and/or 2nd PCR test which i sure would have picked up some cases which are now kick starting community spread.
even though infections are always more than cases, if there is an explosion in cases as we have seen in other countries there has to be a similar rise in cases, despite many ppl not testing - so if cases are 1/5 of infections but u reaching 20000 infections per day we should have 4000 cases per day.
The only barrier to that is if we hit a testing limit where there aren't enough tests. and this would have to be affecting not just public labs/hospitals but private ones as well.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, foreignused, Google [Bot], Habit7, pugboy and 199 guests