Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
White knight and simp are used to describe men that allowed themselves to get bobolised by women.Its not a matter of hate.There really are women that beat up and abuse their men.Here's how it goes...paid_influencer wrote:i've come to realize "white knight" and "simp" are just words used by incels to describe men who don't hate women
timelapse wrote:
Now I know for certain Paid is a woman.
Any man talking so had his nuts snipped.
Go iron my shirt there paid
matr1x wrote:Why do ppl think women are exempt from being abuser?
88sins wrote:matr1x wrote:Why do ppl think women are exempt from being abuser?
Why you seem surprised? Is over a 50 years worth of "you can't hit a girl", "put women on a pedestal", "every woman is a queen" nonsense that's been ram-rodded into young boys and young mens heads, to protect females that need protection from themselves more than they do from any random man.
That's how the matrix worksThe_Honourable wrote:Why Is it always the automatic suggestion when a woman kills a man it is in self defence?
The_Honourable wrote:Why Is it always the automatic suggestion when a woman kills a man it is in self defence?
paid_influencer wrote:that is toxic masculinity talking
in our society, men raised to believe violence is the way to solve problems. so they beat, hit, shoot and kill everybody
DMan7 wrote:I bet she'll be let go on "self-defense' as an excuse or at the very least a slap on the wrist.
ruffneck_12 wrote:paid_influencer wrote:that is toxic masculinity talking
in our society, men raised to believe violence is the way to solve problems. so they beat, hit, shoot and kill everybody
Literally no school or children's show/movie teaches that. They teach good values and only to retaliate when your opponent gets physical, and even then it's usually some big speech about being the bigger person and turning the other cheek.
The ghetto areas might teach violence tho.
You really need to stop getting your talking points from the Joo run media networks in the US.
Because the majority of news articles in this thread is about men getting beat and stabbed by manipulative women, and you talking about how men toxic.
You make no mention of how women tug on heartstrings to make it seem like they're the victim.
*coughAmberHeardcough*
brb, paying alimony to my divorced wife even though she makes her own money
Girl, 13, stabbed in eye trying to defend abused mother
https://trinidadexpress.com/newsextra/girl-13-stabbed-in-eye-trying-to-defend-abused-mother/article_0eff6fc0-9024-11ed-be99-37af1ed527f7.html
A 13-year-old girl was stabbed in the eye when she tried helping her mother who was being beaten by an ex-boyfriend outside the family’s home in San Juan on Sunday.
Police were told that at around 9a.m. Anesa Dookie, 39, was at her home at Mission road when the suspect arrived and began beating her in the front yard.
Dookie was pushed to the ground.
Her daughter ran to help, and the suspect pulled a knife to stab Dookie, police were told.
He missed Dookie and stabbed the girl in the right side of the face and eye.
He ran.
Both victims were taken to hospital, where the 13-year-old is listed in a stable condition.
The Child Protection Unit and Children’s Authority are involved in the case.
Police have identified the suspect.
MDtuner70 wrote:ruffneck_12 wrote:paid_influencer wrote:that is toxic masculinity talking
in our society, men raised to believe violence is the way to solve problems. so they beat, hit, shoot and kill everybody
Literally no school or children's show/movie teaches that. They teach good values and only to retaliate when your opponent gets physical, and even then it's usually some big speech about being the bigger person and turning the other cheek.
The ghetto areas might teach violence tho.
You really need to stop getting your talking points from the Joo run media networks in the US.
Because the majority of news articles in this thread is about men getting beat and stabbed by manipulative women, and you talking about how men toxic.
You make no mention of how women tug on heartstrings to make it seem like they're the victim.
*coughAmberHeardcough*
brb, paying alimony to my divorced wife even though she makes her own money
Lol Keep them coming.
Take notes panty man Max on what decent tuner reading content is. I suggest you use the awards ched to analyze the tuners who can finesse and make a ched flow nicely. Let's hope for 2023 you can up your game from that weird, immature and unintelligent style of "trolling" that you think makes you look cool lol.
maj. tom wrote:What you've said has always been a valid point, despite being quite a perfunctory argument, in fact the most typical presented at any gender discussion anywhere without true examination of any real issues affecting males or females. So then, where is the other half of your presentation?
You're being a bit deceptive because you conveniently left out a whole other gender. Was toxic femininity ever covered on your Gender Studies syllabus? False rape accusations? Verbal and psychological abuse? Female rapist is still not a legal term in many countries. Court sentences for the same crime? What are the statistics on that? Child custody cases favour who just because of gender? Am I making up any of this? Female pedophiles? Don't exist right? Grooming? Are any of these things ever mentioned in our society? Only males do these things because of that toxic masculinity and patriarchal beliefs right? 1 in 4 homeless people are women right?
Comparing tit for tat in a gender discussion is also pointless because genders are not equal. And anyone who told you that have been lying to you and somewhere you must have known this. They both have evolved with different psychology and physicalities, both having great strengths and also weaknesses to endure life on earth in a union to propagate our species. One could have never got here today without the other. When someone mentions toxic masculinity you just know they're full of bullsheit right away without understanding male-male dynamics in a real society and how difficult it is to survive as a male because they're only presenting from a modern female view. Weren't there any powerful women in history who were Queens and other high ranking leaders who hugely influenced the movement of culture and the politics of the entire system of government globally?
When they talk about patriarchy you know that they're presenting an extremely shallow view because only until about the 16th century were common men seen as humans with any rights. Before that only people with land title and wealth could participate in any form of society other than being slave peasants, however common men were always chosen for the countless wars that drove the fodder machines of modern Europe and civilization. Within the USA 1776 Constitution it was the same, only white male landowners had identity and rights. Not poor men. Not black men. Not Amerindian men. Not Chinese slave railway workers. How did 10 million men and boys die in the mud in France 1914 - 1918 while the women back home would stick white feathers on any man not in uniform? That patriarchy? What patriarchy is it you're referring to exactly in the post WW2 era? Are not huge burdens still expected of men in modern times in lieu of intense societal shame and rejection? What do women know about that? If you do have critical thinking skills it would lead you back to how the genders of our species evolved and why it was naturally thrust upon men to be leaders of tribes and then Kingdoms, almost along the same biological evidence as why male chimpanzees, gorillas and even lions lead their pack on survival through hardest times.
Gender Studies lie to you by telling only half-truths. University is supposed to enable much higher critical thinking than that. Genders are supposed to work together to accomplish better societies, not divide them like how the modern trend of gender discussions go with hardly anything productive, resulting in fact just creating policy to punish one gender more, depending on the jurisdiction. Look at the recent Roe v Wade reversal in USA and that is definitely and clearly patriarchy attempting to punish women for having sex. But again, it's just a few white men. Most people, both genders do support the 1973 RvW decision. On the opposite look at all the things I mentioned in the 2nd paragraph. What would you call that?
But look at the sickening violence plaguing Trinidad right now. How is that patriarchy? Masculine Toxicity? That's just a general dismissive term of not understanding the life on the streets of men consumed in gang life and the duty of protecting turf. What would women generally understand about those things? Are they the ones who have a duty to create support and income for a family? Why are so many young men sucked into these violent and warzone situations and not young women? Just promulgate a concept that it's Toxic Masculinity?
When you state that term TM, are you aware of its suggestive effects on porous minded, non-experienced persons being conditioned? Like yourself of course. That males are inherently bad, they're toxic, they're bred of violence and only know how to hurt and be toxic in interactions and their very nature, they need to be fixed they're what's wrong with society, it's quite a piece of conjured imagery with that term. Are you aware of why that piece of Gender propaganda has become so widespread into regular gender talk today? But say it, what changes do you think can be made to devolve this supposed toxicity in male behaviour? Realizing the fact that most males have evolved to support these traits, so much evidence in muscle, brain and bone development and structure of most male species on the planet. Well what about the 95% of males who don't commit gender violence? What about the percent of females who do? What percent of female driven abuse and violence is unreported or simply not considered damaging to males? The ones where everyone laughs and thinks it's funny when a woman abuses a man. Summation ignore what doesn't fit with the syllabus?? Did you mention any of that?
DMan7 wrote:Why not toxic humanity? Why segregate toxicity on just one gender? Completely nonsensical. Both genders has their own toxic traits.
Jared Mohammed wrote:DMan7 wrote:Why not toxic humanity? Why segregate toxicity on just one gender? Completely nonsensical. Both genders has their own toxic traits.
Because one of the sexes have more privilege afforded to them compared to the other. As a result, negative traits emerge from it. Femininity was often disregarded and for men who display it, in any shape or form, are more likely to be ostracized.
ruffneck_12 wrote:
On average, how many women vagrants you see?
Jared Mohammed wrote:DMan7 wrote:Why not toxic humanity? Why segregate toxicity on just one gender? Completely nonsensical. Both genders has their own toxic traits.
Because one of the sexes have more privilege afforded to them compared to the other. As a result, negative traits emerge from it. Femininity was often disregarded and for men who display it, in any shape or form, are more likely to be ostracized.