Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
True. I take it that John gave Rowley the report directly and maybe Rowley leaked it to justify his hate and disapproval of Gary returning as COP.Mmoney607 wrote:How such a report reach into the hands of the media??????? These tactics were the same ones used between 2010-2015. Remember how long now mark bassant saying the arrest of a former pp govt minister is imminent regarding embd contracts.
pugboy wrote:correct but that doesn’t justify a pure bobol dept taking millions in plain view
regardless of if you experienced grief in your life and had to decide to go that route
and well a legally obtained gun via a processing fee is a kinda oxymoron
although many would beg to differRedman wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:The basic fact though is not a single legally issued firearm was used to commit a crime.
Many of them were used to stop crimes and send good boys to the great crime scene in the sky
Agreed
Phone Surgeon wrote:The basic fact though is not a single legally issued firearm was used to commit a crime.
I dunno much about guns na but when you talking about barrel you talking about them old school 8 shot revolver?MaxPower wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:The basic fact though is not a single legally issued firearm was used to commit a crime.
Lol
The TTPS is in a total mess where corruption, politics and incompetency is rampant and suddenly we have to believe that not one legally issued firearm was used to commit a crime?
Question, if someone has a legal firearm and they switch their firearm barrel out after their registered forensics, can the firearm still be traced if used in a crime?
MaxPower wrote:Question, if someone has a legal firearm and they switch their firearm barrel out after their registered forensics, can the firearm still be traced if used in a crime?
Phone Surgeon wrote:I dunno much about guns na but when you talking about barrel you talking about them old school 8 shot revolver?
VII wrote:Heard men not only losing their extra guns but their FULs too...ouch..they and their lawyers have their work cut out for them over the next few years, not to mention possible charges .
And make no mistake this is going to go all the way because of the motivation to tarnish Gary's legacy..
bluefete wrote:VII wrote:Heard men not only losing their extra guns but their FULs too...ouch..they and their lawyers have their work cut out for them over the next few years, not to mention possible charges .
And make no mistake this is going to go all the way because of the motivation to tarnish Gary's legacy..
So what is the point then, in allowing citizens to own legal firearms?
Or is it that a news set of racketeers are in office who have to get their cuts?
Is about time , why isn't GG in handcuffs he should be charged for misbehaviour in public office for the very least, Gary pointing fingers but who signed off on these expedited FULsVII wrote:Heard men not only losing their extra guns but their FULs too...ouch..they and their lawyers have their work cut out for them over the next few years, not to mention possible charges .
And make no mistake this is going to go all the way because of the motivation to tarnish Gary's legacy..
bluefete wrote:VII wrote:Heard men not only losing their extra guns but their FULs too...ouch..they and their lawyers have their work cut out for them over the next few years, not to mention possible charges .
And make no mistake this is going to go all the way because of the motivation to tarnish Gary's legacy..
So what is the point then, in allowing citizens to own legal firearms?
Or is it that a news set of racketeers are in office who have to get their cuts?
MaxPower wrote:bluefete wrote:VII wrote:Heard men not only losing their extra guns but their FULs too...ouch..they and their lawyers have their work cut out for them over the next few years, not to mention possible charges .
And make no mistake this is going to go all the way because of the motivation to tarnish Gary's legacy..
So what is the point then, in allowing citizens to own legal firearms?
Or is it that a news set of racketeers are in office who have to get their cuts?
To protect themselves, family, business and property.
But jeezus crice man, having 20 guns is over doing it and the dealers should have never encouraged this whether they offered or the citizens asked.
But i guess getting slapped with $1M+ in your face for multiple variations and applications feels so good.
alfa wrote:MaxPower wrote:bluefete wrote:VII wrote:Heard men not only losing their extra guns but their FULs too...ouch..they and their lawyers have their work cut out for them over the next few years, not to mention possible charges .
And make no mistake this is going to go all the way because of the motivation to tarnish Gary's legacy..
So what is the point then, in allowing citizens to own legal firearms?
Or is it that a news set of racketeers are in office who have to get their cuts?
To protect themselves, family, business and property.
But jeezus crice man, having 20 guns is over doing it and the dealers should have never encouraged this whether they offered or the citizens asked.
But i guess getting slapped with $1M+ in your face for multiple variations and applications feels so good.
I know a dude on the range with me, a relative newbie but managed to aquire a pistol and in a matter of months applied for a variation and now carries a pistol carbine. I'm taking about an actual 9mm clone of a semi auto AR-15. All the while I know people who can't get a basic handgun but others getting several variations. Guy in question is a business man. I never asked if he paid the 50000 cuz I don't know him personally but to get a carbine in months I'm sure he did. I for one am glad Gary get wood. By all means take your bribe if you want as that will never stop but don't come telling the public you're different and everyone will get an FUL if they deserve it and all that nonsense giving people false hope
hover11 wrote:The mamaguy of GG, telling ppl to apply for FULs especially women when women were targeted last year but only giving the ppl who pay to expedite their licenses approval
Mmoney607 wrote:Regardless of what happened under gg, are we happy to love in a country where the pnm directorate could use their "independent" commissions to hire one of their former "independent" judges to do some report to allude to criminal activity? Is there anything that gg can be charged for here? Probably not. So this is the work of Rowley to tarnish gg name because he realized gg was more popular than him.
MaxPower wrote:hover11 wrote:The mamaguy of GG, telling ppl to apply for FULs especially women when women were targeted last year but only giving the ppl who pay to expedite their licenses approval
Exactly Jason.
Wasting the blasted people time having them running around here and there to organize documents only to wait like some Jackox to satisfy a GG Nancy story all because they just want at least one chance to save and protect a life.
GG really had me going. I loved how he talked….so much dignity and confidence….a man for the people.
Turned out to be a very nasty and selfish individual.
Max,MaxPower wrote:hover11 wrote:The mamaguy of GG, telling ppl to apply for FULs especially women when women were targeted last year but only giving the ppl who pay to expedite their licenses approval
Exactly Jason.
Wasting the blasted people time having them running around here and there to organize documents only to wait like some Jackox to satisfy a GG Nancy story all because they just want at least one chance to save and protect a life.
GG really had me going. I loved how he talked….so much dignity and confidence….a man for the people.
Turned out to be a very nasty and selfish individual.
The red party is the same.You will figure that out eventuallyMaxPower wrote:hover11 wrote:The mamaguy of GG, telling ppl to apply for FULs especially women when women were targeted last year but only giving the ppl who pay to expedite their licenses approval
Exactly Jason.
Wasting the blasted people time having them running around here and there to organize documents only to wait like some Jackox to satisfy a GG Nancy story all because they just want at least one chance to save and protect a life.
GG really had me going. I loved how he talked….so much dignity and confidence….a man for the people.
Turned out to be a very nasty and selfish individual.
Phone Surgeon wrote:You know anybody personally who lost their guns?
Phone Surgeon wrote:Allyuh moving like getting a ful in a timely manner illegal cuz yuh accustom to people waiting 10 years for a ful.
Vii it have rumors all over that people losing their ful but yet to know of anyone who actually did
bluefete wrote:VII wrote:Heard men not only losing their extra guns but their FULs too...ouch..they and their lawyers have their work cut out for them over the next few years, not to mention possible charges .
And make no mistake this is going to go all the way because of the motivation to tarnish Gary's legacy..
So what is the point then, in allowing citizens to own legal firearms?
Or is it that a news set of racketeers are in office who have to get their cuts?
hover11 wrote:Is about time , why isn't GG in handcuffs he should be charged for misbehaviour in public office for the very least, Gary pointing fingers but who signed off on these expedited FULsVII wrote:Heard men not only losing their extra guns but their FULs too...ouch..they and their lawyers have their work cut out for them over the next few years, not to mention possible charges .
And make no mistake this is going to go all the way because of the motivation to tarnish Gary's legacy..
eliteauto wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:Allyuh moving like getting a ful in a timely manner illegal cuz yuh accustom to people waiting 10 years for a ful.
Vii it have rumors all over that people losing their ful but yet to know of anyone who actually did
I know people who got several variations and additional units but whose last variation got stalled when this issue surfaced as a result their FULs are stuck at Admin building and they were told ( when they enquired ) that they would have to lodge their units at the nearest station which would leave them vulnerable as such they have not done that
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], pugboy and 72 guests