Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pugboy wrote:a new cop needs to admit that ful dept is not only corrupt but predatory which is the worst part
he will need to put proper systems for applicants to track their applications to know where they stand and not be in a black hole waiting on a response
X300016 cycles wrote:legalize it for law abiding folks (right to "bear arms")....take away the bobol
hover11 wrote:X300016 cycles wrote:legalize it for law abiding folks (right to "bear arms")....take away the bobol
sam1978 wrote:Max , I want one to deal with those illegal Vene criminals. One shot one kill. Like Bop.
Max,MaxPower wrote:sam1978 wrote:Max , I want one to deal with those illegal Vene criminals. One shot one kill. Like Bop.
Sam,
I agree that we must deal with the criminals.
What about the Trini criminals?
88sins wrote:Can't have too much freeness where every clown with a few dollars and an ID can have access to small arms. That will be easily abused and then chaos will ensue.
But if every eligible homeowner or business owner/operator is allowed to keep a shotgun at their residence and a pistol on their person, well yes I can see that as a step in the right direction. Eligibility should also be tied to employment status. Not a good sign that Kwame/Vijai want a pistol but works nowhere for the last 5 years and living in a rented apt or he mudda house.
MaxPower wrote:sam1978 wrote:Max , I want one to deal with those illegal Vene criminals. One shot one kill. Like Bop.
Sam,
I agree that we must deal with the criminals.
What about the Trini criminals?
sam1978 wrote:MaxPower wrote:sam1978 wrote:Max , I want one to deal with those illegal Vene criminals. One shot one kill. Like Bop.
Sam,
I agree that we must deal with the criminals.
What about the Trini criminals?
Well yeah. Instant corn for them . Most of those local bandits don’t want to work . They use poverty as an excuse but have money to buy guns and outfit, give their girls for weave and nails. The same money could be invested in a lil cart or barrel to sell water , drinks etc but they want to distress hardworking people. The next set who don’t use violence only finding ways to outsmart , con, promise and sell dreams.
pugboy wrote:most certainly an instruction from higher up in govt
he is only leading as interim because he is highest ranking left, not even acting cop so unlikely he trying to setup his own style or mongoose gang
but the excuse to save money nobody could argue with that
De Dragon wrote:pugboy wrote:most certainly an instruction from higher up in govt
he is only leading as interim because he is highest ranking left, not even acting cop so unlikely he trying to setup his own style or mongoose gang
but the excuse to save money nobody could argue with that
Or by appearing willing to carry out the instructions from higher up, does it position him better for when the PolSC is reformed and a CoP is to be appointed?
For all the laws to streamline the process and to make it appear to be free of interference, we have painfully seen that exposed as a huge fallacy. If the PM, AG, PolSC Chair and even the President, could find themselves involved in subverting the process, then we might as well just have the ruling party appoint a CoP
Yes and it makes way for the red government to install a puppet that will spy and harass the opposition just as they did with Panday.eliteauto wrote:Isn't the COP approved by parliamentary vote? So in essence the COP is appointed by the ruling party
sam1978 wrote:They should make it like licensing dept. walk with two forms of ID and your fee, get a learners . Go back after and get your FUL once you pass the test. Only restriction should be a criminal record.
Aren't all state boards as well how can an entity have a vision or sense of direction when every 5 years you change heads?eliteauto wrote:Isn't the COP approved by parliamentary vote? So in essence the COP is appointed by the ruling party
j.o.e wrote:sam1978 wrote:They should make it like licensing dept. walk with two forms of ID and your fee, get a learners . Go back after and get your FUL once you pass the test. Only restriction should be a criminal record.
This would make sense if our police system didn’t have such a poor rate of solving crimes. Once you don’t get caught you are not a criminal. Most criminals don’t get caught.
But I agree the system should be freed up with no bobol.
When the monk talk, you should listen.Monk BANzai wrote:hover11 wrote:Waiting for civilian GG responseFB_IMG_1635186487665.jpg
I think as a country and society we are just unaccustomed to "Change Management Strategy" brought in to bear/execute a particular agenda because of a degree of trust and momentum and familiarity of expectations.
To me GG's "hires" were standard. That it's/was being kept under the radar for so long does not make it wrong. Ultimately these contracts were just that.... contract which means it was short-term.
It's 101 Strategy at work.. You cant work within the bureaucratic (sp) system you've inherited. If you're looking for rapid change and you have the authority to bring in a Change Management Team, do so. This has nothing to do with the existing "chain of command within a clearly tinged system. If there is a framework for a change agenda is precisely why persons from outside would and should be brought into the system to affect the types of outcomes you looking for.
Of course, there are those who are in the TTPS who would see it differently and say that with these positions being freed up it makes for promotion within the service. But if there are questionable elements within the service, how would putting already tarnished persons in those positions contribute to assist with proper un-biased Change Management?
These are not padded roles...If anything some positions I've seen are substantially underpaid for the roles. Y'all are trying to liken it to some corrupt practice but at the end of the day, all of the examples given are demonstrated by roles that require some specific outcomes. There is a difference in the complexion of the service (good or bad depending on who you ask) and for the last 3 years, you can't deny that there has been a change. This can only happen from persons not fettered within the existing structure..... those brought in were not core TTPS persons.
Nothing out of the ordinary to me. But meem knows nothing of the TTPS inner workings (something which we're not giving enough credence to: the public's lack of information on the subject in it's entirety) ...I've worked with GG and S. Edgehill within the Energy Space before they transitioned to Gov't but that's like saying you're basing the entire Star Wars series on one installment....foolish...Those in the know or have access to more information or a position of knowledge you are free to disagree....And I only commenting from a position of Change Management.
So ease up on the keyboard grenades y'all want to pelt at this contribution. Those who know me know I don't debate.
hover11 wrote:Aren't all state boards as well how can an entity have a vision or sense of direction when every 5 years you change heads?eliteauto wrote:Isn't the COP approved by parliamentary vote? So in essence the COP is appointed by the ruling party
So why nobody making a jail this is blantant misbehavior in public office at the very leastDe Dragon wrote:hover11 wrote:Aren't all state boards as well how can an entity have a vision or sense of direction when every 5 years you change heads?eliteauto wrote:Isn't the COP approved by parliamentary vote? So in essence the COP is appointed by the ruling party
A Service Commission is different from a State Board, and those appointments are made by the President to preserve impartiality, independence and resist political interference. What we saw in actuality, was a supposedly independent commission betraying their mandate, aided and abetted either through willful actions, or incompetence from the PM, President and Chair.
Bliss overstepped her bounds, and did what she had ZERO authority to do as was borne out by the High Court ruling
The PM allegedly interfered directly in the process by having a meeting with Bliss, Weekes on the merit list after which it was illegally/improperly rescinded
The President facilitated an improper meeting with allegedly JUHN Scarfy and Bliss.
All these actions resulted in a circumvention of the Constitution, and the law, no matter what sheit LFD RFD PNM slinging "duty" and "loss of confidence"
hover11 wrote:Ex workers seeking full payment of their contracts which they are obligated to could cost taxpayers Millions....taxpayers as usual getting shaft
Dizzy28 wrote:hover11 wrote:Ex workers seeking full payment of their contracts which they are obligated to could cost taxpayers Millions....taxpayers as usual getting shaft
As per the article
"One line in the termination letters, signed by Jacob stated “you will be compensated for the unexpired period of your contract. In trying to make sense of the termination letter, one worker said “the understanding is that we would be paid for whatever is outstanding on our contracts. That was part of the communication. But to our surprise, no terms and conditions were given.”
https://www.cnc3.co.tt/fired-ttps-worke ... contracts/
They know they are getting the full payment as its in the letter of termination. They are seeking the monies in a onetime lump sum and not monthly till the end date of the contract.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 134 guests