Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
VII wrote:Hmm,but he would have the rubber stamp defence in his favor.. lol..hover11 wrote:Is about time , why isn't GG in handcuffs he should be charged for misbehaviour in public office for the very least, Gary pointing fingers but who signed off on these expedited FULsVII wrote:Heard men not only losing their extra guns but their FULs too...ouch..they and their lawyers have their work cut out for them over the next few years, not to mention possible charges .
And make no mistake this is going to go all the way because of the motivation to tarnish Gary's legacy..
I mean like in your circle. Your close bredrin must ask or tell you about if a scene play offVII wrote:Phone Surgeon you're not gonna hear a peep from men who have been asked to bring in their weapons. Who wants that kinda publicity?
pugboy wrote:rubber stamp is no excuse,
the firearms act clearly says the cop is the person responsible for the granting of license
nothing about which employees pushed the paper in front him to sign
just like how the act says the cop can revoke a license as he sees fit.
the buck always has to stop somewhere
but dont doubt if there really is a criminal investigation in that dept that ppl start to throw gg under the bus
there is never honesty amongst bandits
Phone Surgeon wrote:I mean like in your circle. Your close bredrin must ask or tell you about if a scene play offVII wrote:Phone Surgeon you're not gonna hear a peep from men who have been asked to bring in their weapons. Who wants that kinda publicity?
pugboy wrote:he is the first person who not shame to say he is a rubber stamp
Phone Surgeon wrote:The fellas who know their rights and know they can't legally be tied to expedition fees telling the investigators hull dey mc
Not everyone have the belly to do it though.
alfa wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:The fellas who know their rights and know they can't legally be tied to expedition fees telling the investigators hull dey mc
Not everyone have the belly to do it though.
Just like how not everyone had the belly to launch combined lawsuits against Williams when he had people in limbo for years neither approving or turning down applications. Everyone just followed the status quo and it will be the same way in this situation. If the govt decides to confiscate guns man go boil down like bhagi and play by the rules. The people I feel sorry for are the poor saps who paid their money right before the mark bus and lose all. I take it back it, it's actually kinda funny when you think about it lol
Phone Surgeon wrote:The fellas who know their rights and know they can't legally be tied to expedition fees telling the investigators hull dey mc
Not everyone have the belly to do it though.
Redman wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:The fellas who know their rights and know they can't legally be tied to expedition fees telling the investigators hull dey mc
Not everyone have the belly to do it though.
If my reading of the act is correct the CoP giveth and he can taketh away.
These acts seem deliberately vague
hover11 wrote:Griffith questions leaked FUL report
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/griffit ... 9c84c00063
Which is the greater crime the leak or the crime itself, certain men on here justifying bribing public officials in order to get whatever they want, shows something about the integrity of most. This FUL white collar crime has to stop, suspend it , investigate and review the entire process because it is definitely flawed.
hover11 wrote:This certainly has new meaning now
THE PRIME MINISTER'S 2020 LETTER OF COMPLAINT ABOUT GARY GRIFFITH.
In the Prime Minister’s strongly-worded letter which was dated September 12, he raised several matters which he said were “cause for concern to me and indicate a level of instability and unsuitability for a person holding the office of Commissioner of Police. A dangerous and unacceptable precedent had been set and cannot be nurtured nor tolerated.”
“Additionally, I must record that Mr Griffith has displayed disturbing behaviour on previous occasions when it appears that he disagrees with others, including members of the public who may disagree with him or comment, unfavourably, on anything to do with him. He has also disrespected Minister of National Security Stuart Young on occasions. I also received a complaint from the Director of Strategic Services about Mr Griffith’s accusations against him (I provide a copy for your perusal and records) and the manner in which Mr Griffith conducted himself on that occasion was of serious concern and I tasked the Minister of National Security to investigate the allegations and resolve the matter between these two high ‘sensitive office’ holders in the national security arena,” the Prime Minister’s letter stated.
More here:
https://trinidadexpress.com/news/local/ ... ium=social
If you are legally entitled to it then they have to justify taking it away. You will see plenty court cases with this and the government/cop or whoever will lose because once it was granted it is legally yours unless you do something to lose it.Redman wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:The fellas who know their rights and know they can't legally be tied to expedition fees telling the investigators hull dey mc
Not everyone have the belly to do it though.
If my reading of the act is correct the CoP giveth and he can taketh away.
These acts seem deliberately vague
16 cycles wrote:anyone with 20+ firearms is a hobbyist...or preparing for a zombie apocalypse
Phone Surgeon wrote:If you are legally entitled to it then they have to justify taking it away. You will see plenty court cases with this and the government/cop or whoever will lose because once it was granted it is legally yours unless you do something to lose it.Redman wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:The fellas who know their rights and know they can't legally be tied to expedition fees telling the investigators hull dey mc
Not everyone have the belly to do it though.
If my reading of the act is correct the CoP giveth and he can taketh away.
These acts seem deliberately vague
The fact that the process was sped up in itself not a crime.
people with imminent threats to their lives etc could have their process sped up .
The fellas who accept the bribes could be charged and if they can trace the bribes its a scene.
Those who have criminal record or didn't have the certificate of character etc cud legally lose theirs.
Phone Surgeon wrote:Just millions of taxpayer money going to waste in lawyer fees and costs for people who should just be left with their licensed fuls in any event.
Besides from the persons with criminal records
They could take them fellas guns
BTW please show me a article in which a ful holder has used his licensed firearm to commit a crime. Thanks.Redress10 wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:Just millions of taxpayer money going to waste in lawyer fees and costs for people who should just be left with their licensed fuls in any event.
Besides from the persons with criminal records
They could take them fellas guns
"Left with their licensed fuls in any event"?
So after ppl pay their bribe and cut all kinda corners in order to gt they should just be left with it? So you doh care that some ppl who now have a firearm in their homes with their families may in fact be suicidal, domestic abusers, suffering from road rage, arsehole neighbours, cyah take horn, does sell a lil coke to cover the books etc.
You really feel all these ppl with fuls are good upstanding citizens? Must be joking.
Btw...your definition of criminal is very convenient. Once you pay a bribe you have no moral authority to call ppl criminal anymore because you are in fact a criminal as well.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 326 guests