Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Redress10 wrote:88sins wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:The US is the world's only remaining super power.
don't buy into donald dump's illusion.
No illusion here bro...Russia doesn't even have a properly functioning aircraft carrier. They also don't have the shipbuilding facilities to build any new ones. The last one was built in Ukraine.
toyolink wrote:This fixation about whose button is bigger is the stuff tragic comedies are made of.
Really, the so called world leaders who are pre-occupied with nukes count need to avail themselves to professional help.
desifemlove wrote:no, it not.
it's a great power.
USA is the only superpower.
Russia's GDP is only bearly in the top ten.
it's armed forces iz old and decrpit. it has nukes, but USA has more.
it's navy is sheit.
and its army could beat Ukraine's but not NATO's. or even China's.
and it's cultural reach....there's vodka, but the biggest vodka brand in the world is British......
The USSR was a superpower, but Russia no. if anything, this is wy Putin vex and acting bad man now.
desifemlove wrote:no, it not.
it's a great power.
USA is the only superpower.
Russia's GDP is only bearly in the top ten.
it's armed forces iz old and decrpit. it has nukes, but USA has more.
it's navy is sheit.
and its army could beat Ukraine's but not NATO's. or even China's.
and it's cultural reach....there's vodka, but the biggest vodka brand in the world is British......
The USSR was a superpower, but Russia no. if anything, this is wy Putin vex and acting bad man now.
88sins wrote:Redress10 wrote:88sins wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:The US is the world's only remaining super power.
don't buy into donald dump's illusion.
No illusion here bro...Russia doesn't even have a properly functioning aircraft carrier. They also don't have the shipbuilding facilities to build any new ones. The last one was built in Ukraine.
I will only state this.
You mentioned aircraft carriers as an example, but the hard truth is in fact that such equipment are only truly necessary IF a country wishes to move substantial amounts of it's military assets far away from home to be within striking distance of an enemy in preparation for times of war. Their current lack of an aircraft carrier that you might think of as a weakness is in fact a very telling sign. A sign that Russia has no desires or intentions to engage in conflicts outside it's borders unless it absolutely must, & in which case if they must they will make full use of their other assets, & you can bet they do actually have substantial very effective alternatives that compensate for the lack of one type of vessel.
Note I mentioned current lack of an aircraft carrier . It won't stay that way for long, because it's already being addressed & it's not only an aircraft carrier being built either. Several nuclear powered (& iirc armed) subs are being built as well, & I believe some are actually in active service right now.
but feel free to believe whatever you wish.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:desifemlove wrote:no, it not.
it's a great power.
USA is the only superpower.
Russia's GDP is only bearly in the top ten.
it's armed forces iz old and decrpit. it has nukes, but USA has more.
it's navy is sheit.
and its army could beat Ukraine's but not NATO's. or even China's.
and it's cultural reach....there's vodka, but the biggest vodka brand in the world is British......
The USSR was a superpower, but Russia no. if anything, this is wy Putin vex and acting bad man now.
Not sure what you are talking about.
You are correct Russia GDP is sh!t, has corruption, too many drunks etc etc etc
However Russia doesn't need a Navy because its best defense is its large land mass among many air defense which they have the best in the world.
Russia has the most tanks in the world for land defense again.
Russia has the most ICBM nukes and they are more advanced than that of the US.
Redress10 wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:desifemlove wrote:no, it not.
it's a great power.
USA is the only superpower.
Russia's GDP is only bearly in the top ten.
it's armed forces iz old and decrpit. it has nukes, but USA has more.
it's navy is sheit.
and its army could beat Ukraine's but not NATO's. or even China's.
and it's cultural reach....there's vodka, but the biggest vodka brand in the world is British......
The USSR was a superpower, but Russia no. if anything, this is wy Putin vex and acting bad man now.
Not sure what you are talking about.
You are correct Russia GDP is sh!t, has corruption, too many drunks etc etc etc
However Russia doesn't need a Navy because its best defense is its large land mass among many air defense which they have the best in the world.
Russia has the most tanks in the world for land defense again.
Russia has the most ICBM nukes and they are more advanced than that of the US.
Russia doesn't have more advanced anything that the US.
A lot of their tanks are also old and out of date.
Russia's military assets are also old and out of date. Things are literally falling apart.
China is more technologically advanced than Russia.
We can all agreed that countries such as Russia, China, USA etc could never be fully conquered because of the size of their countries.
Eagle View Enterprises wrote:What surprises me is that a few people here in Trinidad think they can evaluate Russia based on US media facts.
They ignore that Russia always in the US, and EU radar....for some reason.
You all are not experts. We are all just speculating on US media "facts"
Eagle View Enterprises wrote:What surprises me is that a few people here in Trinidad think they can evaluate Russia based on US media facts.
They ignore that Russia always in the US, and EU radar....for some reason.
You all are not experts. We are all just speculating on US media "facts"
Redress10 wrote:88sins wrote:Redress10 wrote:88sins wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:The US is the world's only remaining super power.
don't buy into donald dump's illusion.
No illusion here bro...Russia doesn't even have a properly functioning aircraft carrier. They also don't have the shipbuilding facilities to build any new ones. The last one was built in Ukraine.
I will only state this.
You mentioned aircraft carriers as an example, but the hard truth is in fact that such equipment are only truly necessary IF a country wishes to move substantial amounts of it's military assets far away from home to be within striking distance of an enemy in preparation for times of war. Their current lack of an aircraft carrier that you might think of as a weakness is in fact a very telling sign. A sign that Russia has no desires or intentions to engage in conflicts outside it's borders unless it absolutely must, & in which case if they must they will make full use of their other assets, & you can bet they do actually have substantial very effective alternatives that compensate for the lack of one type of vessel.
Note I mentioned current lack of an aircraft carrier . It won't stay that way for long, because it's already being addressed & it's not only an aircraft carrier being built either. Several nuclear powered (& iirc armed) subs are being built as well, & I believe some are actually in active service right now.
but feel free to believe whatever you wish.
Why are we even talking about nukes? Nukes can't be used. Stop talking about nukes. Nukes serve one purpose in the world today and that is to be a deterrent.
We're removing the nuclear options from the table so how are they going to expand the the Russian Empire if they can't move a large amount of assets? What are they going to use? A new aircraft carrier costs 10 billion usd. The only thing that they have as a deterrent are the nukes. Some of you all act almost as though Russians are not humans. How far west can you honestly believe Russia can march. Russia can't successfully take on NATO in a conventional war. Remember wars are also won by convincing the minds of the citizens. How many Russians you honestly believe are willing to fight and die for Putin? Russia is a very fragmented state. Very fragmented.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Eagle View Enterprises wrote:What surprises me is that a few people here in Trinidad think they can evaluate Russia based on US media facts.
They ignore that Russia always in the US, and EU radar....for some reason.
You all are not experts. We are all just speculating on US media "facts"
It is actually confirmed that Russia has more nuclear ICBMs than anyother country on earth even CNN admitted this, CNN of all media outlets.
People in Trinidad does simply parrot this rubbish that Hillary was saying about how Russian military is rusted junk, little do they know just how much money Putin pumped into this military
desifemlove wrote:no, it not.
it's a great power.
USA is the only superpower.
Russia's GDP is only bearly in the top ten.
it's armed forces iz old and decrpit. it has nukes, but USA has more.
it's navy is sheit.
and its army could beat Ukraine's but not NATO's. or even China's.
and it's cultural reach....there's vodka, but the biggest vodka brand in the world is British......
The USSR was a superpower, but Russia no. if anything, this is wy Putin vex and acting bad man now.
shogun wrote:Nice bubble you got there, ZoomNazi
zoom rader wrote:desifemlove wrote:no, it not.
it's a great power.
USA is the only superpower.
Russia's GDP is only bearly in the top ten.
it's armed forces iz old and decrpit. it has nukes, but USA has more.
it's navy is sheit.
and its army could beat Ukraine's but not NATO's. or even China's.
and it's cultural reach....there's vodka, but the biggest vodka brand in the world is British......
The USSR was a superpower, but Russia no. if anything, this is wy Putin vex and acting bad man now.
Again you talk chit.
You dont know and the rest of us dont know what counties has what,
Nukes are the only superpower and those that have it are superpowers.
adnj wrote:Russia has as nearly as many nuclear weapons as all other nations combined. That is enough to qualify Russia as having enough significant worldwide influence to qualify as a Superpower.
Redress10 wrote:[
Imagine being a "superpower" and having ur spies kick out of England. LMAO
VexXx Dogg wrote:Lemme paint it like a car analogy.
You go to a car show. Tons of new evos, subarus, a couple exotics around. Ferraris, Lambos, a Bentley, even a Bugatti to the front.
In one dark corner, under a dimly let tent, you see a rusted down cressida sitting low with a fat bottom. Looks like it was fighting gravity and lost. You go for a closer look and see telltale 15x10 Weld racing wheels on some sticky slicks.
Other than that it looks normal.
pop the hood you see a gleaming, proper built brand new 1GZ with a pair of turbos larger than a bull's head, with top to bottom Top Secret regalia, handbuilt by Nagata himself. It fires up with barely a tumble, the steady burble of the thousands of miniature explosions exiting 6 inch side exit pipes. You feel the hairs on the back of your neck raise when a nondescript man, in nondescript clothes gently prods the accelerator pedal, much like a mother scolding a defiant infant, and the resultant fighter-jet whine starts building slowly.
Russia is that cressida.
Don't underestimate it.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 134 guests