Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
sMASH wrote:Nukes have two uses: in times of war, when going all out. Or as a deterrent to going all out.
Everybody will press their luck and do all sorts of shenanigans because they know that anybody with nukes will be reluctant to use them.... It's a point of no return action. The only ones who may not are Pakistan, North Korea, and Iran.
That is why, so much fear mongering is used on North Korea and iran, they might be the only people that might have cause to use them.
But, they won't cause they know that trigger is a suicide trigger. They will be instantly obliterated by friend and foe alike.
Having nukes is not a sign of a superpower... Being able to intimidate other countries and bend their wills and desires towards Ur own, is.
.
zoom rader wrote:desifemlove wrote:no, it not.
it's a great power.
USA is the only superpower.
Russia's GDP is only bearly in the top ten.
it's armed forces iz old and decrpit. it has nukes, but USA has more.
it's navy is sheit.
and its army could beat Ukraine's but not NATO's. or even China's.
and it's cultural reach....there's vodka, but the biggest vodka brand in the world is British......
The USSR was a superpower, but Russia no. if anything, this is wy Putin vex and acting bad man now.
Again you talk chit.
You dont know and the rest of us dont know what counties has what,
Nukes are the only superpower and those that have it are superpowers.
desifemlove wrote:zoom rader wrote:desifemlove wrote:no, it not.
it's a great power.
USA is the only superpower.
Russia's GDP is only bearly in the top ten.
it's armed forces iz old and decrpit. it has nukes, but USA has more.
it's navy is sheit.
and its army could beat Ukraine's but not NATO's. or even China's.
and it's cultural reach....there's vodka, but the biggest vodka brand in the world is British......
The USSR was a superpower, but Russia no. if anything, this is wy Putin vex and acting bad man now.
Again you talk chit.
You dont know and the rest of us dont know what counties has what,
Nukes are the only superpower and those that have it are superpowers.
i talking basic international relations dog. but yuh not very educated, so it figures you don't know dis.
i talking ting most in the field would agree with...run along now. you spend penty time cussing, but don't get i don't care lol. not very adult, are you?
toyota2nr wrote:In terms of military Russia is a superpower. The last count by CNN estimated that Russia has the most nukes. Russia recently unveiled a missile that they boast can reach or hit anywhere in the world. Today there was an article that said a Russian submarine surfaced near the US coast without being detected.
88sins wrote:toyota2nr wrote:In terms of military Russia is a superpower. The last count by CNN estimated that Russia has the most nukes. Russia recently unveiled a missile that they boast can reach or hit anywhere in the world. Today there was an article that said a Russian submarine surfaced near the US coast without being detected.
there's a reason they weren't detected, but I eh go say it here.
wtf wrote:Russian Military 》》》》 American Military
Ok Mr.Feminist.FuadAdnan wrote:wtf wrote:Russian Military 》》》》 American Military
LOL.
You really one dhal belly clown. What you know about military Mr. 39 year old virgin
I see you now return from your ban.
Redman wrote:Well the war mongers are also now exporters of Hydrocarbons- so Peace is bad for business.
The US military is strong but by some accounts its ability to project that power in a battle over Ukraine is limited.
Russia is better prepared economically to fight a battle- and has Anti American support from other major players.
Frankly the US will be fragile because of their economic position today.
IF I were Russia I would simply offer Nato the ability to set up in the Ukraine -Russia will match the NATO forces in Ukraine with the equivalent in Cuba or Venezuela.
If its ok to plant NATO forces in the Ukraine-then its ok for Russia to set up in the West.
Biden is outclassed by Putin
wtf wrote:Russian Military 》》》》 American Military
teems1 wrote:wtf wrote:Russian Military 》》》》 American Military
lol no. US Army is more well equipped and trained than anyone else.
The Russians may have a better fighting spirit and willingness to die for their country, but those things mean diddly squat now.
It's some guy in Nevada using an Xbox controller to pilot a drone thousands of miles away to destroy buildings, bridges and infrastructure with scary accuracy.
Dizzy28 wrote:Redman wrote:Well the war mongers are also now exporters of Hydrocarbons- so Peace is bad for business.
The US military is strong but by some accounts its ability to project that power in a battle over Ukraine is limited.
Russia is better prepared economically to fight a battle- and has Anti American support from other major players.
Frankly the US will be fragile because of their economic position today.
IF I were Russia I would simply offer Nato the ability to set up in the Ukraine -Russia will match the NATO forces in Ukraine with the equivalent in Cuba or Venezuela.
If its ok to plant NATO forces in the Ukraine-then its ok for Russia to set up in the West.
Biden is outclassed by Putin
Russia has the GDP of Texas. They can't afford a war of attrition. And Germany aside NATO is on board with supporting Ukraine so the US will not be going it alone. So far apart from the direct shipment of arms from the UK-
index.jpg
Dizzy28 wrote:Redman wrote:Well the war mongers are also now exporters of Hydrocarbons- so Peace is bad for business.
The US military is strong but by some accounts its ability to project that power in a battle over Ukraine is limited.
Russia is better prepared economically to fight a battle- and has Anti American support from other major players.
Frankly the US will be fragile because of their economic position today.
IF I were Russia I would simply offer Nato the ability to set up in the Ukraine -Russia will match the NATO forces in Ukraine with the equivalent in Cuba or Venezuela.
If its ok to plant NATO forces in the Ukraine-then its ok for Russia to set up in the West.
Biden is outclassed by Putin
Russia has the GDP of Texas. They can't afford a war of attrition. And Germany aside NATO is on board with supporting Ukraine so the US will not be going it alone. So far apart from the direct shipment of arms from the UK-
index.jpg
agent007 wrote:The US military under the current administration is weak. Russia has strong leadership atm. In terms of theoretical advantage, this lies with the US. It's all about timing and strategy and who you align with. Russia has very powerful allies who all are willing to die for the cause. I can't say same for America and its allies. The true test is to see action.
Russia, in addition to the CSTO clip, may have France, Germany, Iran, China, Pakistan, North Korea, Turkey and a whole contingent of Arab/Middle Eastern nations to back them up and that is a VERY powerful group.
The USA has Canada, UK, India, Israel, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Australia and some NATO members.
If Israel comes to the USA's defense then all antisemitic nations would fall in line to wipe them off the face of the earth. It has nothing to do with which alliance you are a part of now. The minute Israel joins in, consider this WW3.
Anyway, based on America's allies alone, I won't be quick to intimate them but the truth is, the US military is so powerful, they actually can take on Russia all by itself. It's like a street thug with a firearm masquerading as a badjohn then there's a rambo like marine who will use his training and defense capability to take the thug down.
The downside is, America has too many rules especially when it comes to engagement and I think it's enemies know this. Sit back and thank God we here in T&T don't have any external enemies. All of our enemies are within.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: SLVR1 and 250 guests