Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
alfa wrote:Wonder what the new fees will be after the beat up is over?
Phone Surgeon wrote:They should completely open it up
Allow everyone without a criminal record the right to have a gun.
Put the process online so no one could hold your physical file hostage or hide it in their car or home
Simple as that.
We need firearmsMaxPower wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:They should completely open it up
Allow everyone without a criminal record the right to have a gun.
Put the process online so no one could hold your physical file hostage or hide it in their car or home
Simple as that.
Phone,
T&T is topping the world with Covid and this is due to the outright and blatant irresponsibility of Trinis.
And they want firearms?
Madness
ROFLpugboy wrote:but most of them ranges owned by the same dealers who encouraging the racket
pugboy wrote:but most of them ranges owned by the same dealers who encouraging the racket
pugboy wrote:in theory yes, but in this country there is no single govt appointed test body which is legit
far less for something involving guns with a long history of bobol from the top.
ppl will just pay money to pass the test.
What percentage of ford ranger drivers did a heavyT licenese test ?
We have dumb laws that is suited for 1960s , in other countries a ford ranger is not classed as heavy T.pugboy wrote:in theory yes, but in this country there is no single govt appointed test body which is legit
far less for something involving guns with a long history of bobol from the top.
ppl will just pay money to pass the test.
What percentage of ford ranger drivers did a heavyT licenese test ?
16 cycles wrote:Are there any post colonial countries that are pro gun for citizens(right to "bear" arms) other than those who fought for that right/independence?
zoom rader wrote:We have dumb laws that is suited for 1960s , in other countries a ford ranger is not classed as heavy T.pugboy wrote:in theory yes, but in this country there is no single govt appointed test body which is legit
far less for something involving guns with a long history of bobol from the top.
ppl will just pay money to pass the test.
What percentage of ford ranger drivers did a heavyT licenese test ?
zoom rader wrote:We have dumb laws that is suited for 1960s , in other countries a ford ranger is not classed as heavy T.
While i wanna agree with you, up until the introduction of those 3.2 ranger/RORO hiace/new batch of NV350 that met the 2950KG + mark, there really never was the need for the average driver to have a class 4 permit.zoom rader wrote:We have dumb laws that is suited for 1960s , in other countries a ford ranger is not classed as heavy T.pugboy wrote:in theory yes, but in this country there is no single govt appointed test body which is legit
far less for something involving guns with a long history of bobol from the top.
ppl will just pay money to pass the test.
What percentage of ford ranger drivers did a heavyT licenese test ?
The dealers will keep them below the threshold, its been done before. Massy actually sold a batch of underweight NV350 from the 1st batch to keep them out of the class 4 range.pugboy wrote:so far only the ranger and nissan panel van are heavyt
but all the other pickups are inching up to the heavyt category of mgw 2954kg, some are 2900
them officers must be licking they lips for when that time comeszoom rader wrote:We have dumb laws that is suited for 1960s , in other countries a ford ranger is not classed as heavy T.pugboy wrote:in theory yes, but in this country there is no single govt appointed test body which is legit
far less for something involving guns with a long history of bobol from the top.
ppl will just pay money to pass the test.
What percentage of ford ranger drivers did a heavyT licenese test ?
Redman,Redman wrote:So with the right system....the FULL holder would have an insurance policy to pay for damages, he would have to submit to a drug/alco test.
All agreed to before he get the license
Yuh get yuh ting, get a good holster, don't be cheap
hover11 wrote:Redman,Redman wrote:So with the right system....the FULL holder would have an insurance policy to pay for damages, he would have to submit to a drug/alco test.
All agreed to before he get the license
Yuh get yuh ting, get a good holster, don't be cheap
Is it right to be carrying your firearm to a public space like a bar to begin with where intoxication is inevitable, his license should be revoked and I hope the lady survives to file a civil suit against him
hover11 wrote:Redman,Redman wrote:So with the right system....the FULL holder would have an insurance policy to pay for damages, he would have to submit to a drug/alco test.
All agreed to before he get the license
Yuh get yuh ting, get a good holster, don't be cheap
Is it right to be carrying your firearm to a public space like a bar to begin with where intoxication is inevitable, his license should be revoked and I hope the lady survives to file a civil suit against him
Ent Rising Star is a UNC rum shop?Phone Surgeon wrote:lol the amount of FUL holders does be liming rising star, they would never enforce that.
they just hadda ban that idiot who shoot the woman
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, foreignused and 188 guests