Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
timelapse wrote:Volunteers for projects are minimum.You have to pay peoplematr1x wrote:Majority of people agree that climate change is an issue. Why is the call for "give us more money" the first move they.make?
Miktay wrote:matr1x wrote:Majority of people agree that climate change is an issue. Why is the call for "give us more money" the first move they.make?
Cuz the climate change lobby iznt really interested in the planet or people. Yet they've duped millions into believing in the new climate religion.
And, what's your point?matr1x wrote:Not saying it's a religion, but to the average person, and added tax is just another burden
Pubs closure warning: 'My energy bill went to £35,000 from £13,000'
Pubs across the UK will be forced to close due to energy costs soaring by as much as 300%, brewery bosses have said.
Leaders of six of the country's largest breweries have called for "immediate government intervention" on sky-high energy bills this winter.
The landlord of one pub in Essex told the BBC that his energy costs had risen from about £13,000 a year to £35,000.
Pub owners said the energy crisis would cause "real and serious irreversible" damage to the industry without support.
adnj wrote:Miktay wrote:matr1x wrote:Majority of people agree that climate change is an issue. Why is the call for "give us more money" the first move they.make?
Cuz the climate change lobby iznt really interested in the planet or people. Yet they've duped millions into believing in the new climate religion.
Believing that millions think that climate change iz a new religion iz simple minded at best.
wing wrote:The power of free thinking will lead us away from all obstacles. I look forward to seeing the good doctor sMASH his way through this one.maj. tom wrote:hmm, like they will have to wear masks to protect from the vaccine now.
But they know that "masks don't work."
Quite a dilemma. How will their mentally ill conspiracy gymnastics solve this one? Stay Trini-tuned!
adnj wrote:Ripped from another thread. With a few word swaps, it seems wholly appropriate here, also.
There is a salient point in the post below. You didn't seem to get it before. Perhaps if I re-repost.Miktay wrote:adnj wrote:Ripped from another thread. With a few word swaps, it seems wholly appropriate here, also.
That maybe true....never claimed 2b original. But the analogy has stuck.
The Big Climate Change lobby has nothing of substance. Only doctrine...scare tactics and an average marketing campaign.
But look on the bright side.
At least I don't repeatedly post the same tired climate change media articles claiming everything wrong in the world today iz due to Anthropogenic Climate Change...and there's a multi trillion $ solution to fix it.
Of course you and your climate change friends don't ever say from where thiz money will come... take one guess...
adnj wrote:Ripped from another thread. With a few word swaps, it seems wholly appropriate here, also.wing wrote:The power of free thinking will lead us away from all obstacles. I look forward to seeing the good doctor sMASH his way through this one.maj. tom wrote:hmm, like they will have to wear masks to protect from the vaccine now.
But they know that "masks don't work."
Quite a dilemma. How will their mentally ill conspiracy gymnastics solve this one? Stay Trini-tuned!
Miktay wrote:adnj wrote:Miktay wrote:matr1x wrote:Majority of people agree that climate change is an issue. Why is the call for "give us more money" the first move they.make?
Cuz the climate change lobby iznt really interested in the planet or people. Yet they've duped millions into believing in the new climate religion.
Believing that millions think that climate change iz a new religion iz simple minded at best.
Not really. Thats exactly what it iz. Maybe not for 100% but for a vocal majority.
One reason to believe that iz that any effort to suggest alternative solutions to the Big Climate lobby's primary solution iz rebuffed az heretical.
According to the Big Climate lobby there's only one path to climate salvation. That path involves spending trillions to assuage climate change.
They started out innocuously and predictably enough. Bitcoin or ethereum? Virtual reality or augmented reality? Who will get quantum computing first, China or Google? Eventually, they edged into their real topic of concern: New Zealand or Alaska? Which region would be less affected by the coming climate crisis? It only got worse from there. Which was the greater threat: global warming or biological warfare? How long should one plan to be able to survive with no outside help? Should a shelter have its own air supply? What was the likelihood of groundwater contamination? Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system, and asked: “How do I maintain authority over my security force after the event?” The event. That was their euphemism for the environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear explosion, solar storm, unstoppable virus, or malicious computer hack that takes everything down.
matr1x wrote:Miktay wrote:adnj wrote:Miktay wrote:matr1x wrote:Majority of people agree that climate change is an issue. Why is the call for "give us more money" the first move they.make?
Cuz the climate change lobby iznt really interested in the planet or people. Yet they've duped millions into believing in the new climate religion.
Believing that millions think that climate change iz a new religion iz simple minded at best.
Not really. Thats exactly what it iz. Maybe not for 100% but for a vocal majority.
One reason to believe that iz that any effort to suggest alternative solutions to the Big Climate lobby's primary solution iz rebuffed az heretical.
According to the Big Climate lobby there's only one path to climate salvation. That path involves spending trillions to assuage climate change.
Just like a communist utopia, the costs are made in human lives
adnj wrote:
At a time of economic uncertainty, the legislation gives companies more confidence that they can earn a return on their bets. The investments serve as affirmation of political leaders’ intent: to further accelerate America’s transition away from fossil fuels and to reduce dependence on foreign suppliers, especially those in China.
Investment in renewable energy will total $1.2 trillion by 2035, analysts at Wood Mackenzie estimate, substantially more than would have been the case without the legislation. Spending on solar power installations, for example, will be two-thirds higher because of the law, according to the consultancy.
“We’ve seen an outpouring of interest from all kinds of companies,” including carmakers, battery suppliers and mining companies, said Isaac Chan, a partner in the Chicago office of the management consultancy Roland Berger who advises clients in the auto industry. The climate package, he said, “makes the calculus better for producing in North America as opposed to making E.V.s in Asia and importing them.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/07/busi ... -bill.html
Toilet paper manufacturer Hakle files for bankruptcy
No, not the pasta, but the toilet paper got it. Ironically, the German second major object of desire in the peak phase of the corona pandemic is now causing a well-known renovation case. Not long ago it was hoarded, hoarded and stacked. That should have been for the financial well-being of the manufacturer, one might have thought. But the world of sanitary paper is obviously quite confused. First the plague and the hoarding, which resulted in an acceleration of production. Then the cost explosion because of the Ukraine war and its aftermath.
In any case, the toilet manufacturer Hakle gives the latter on its home page as a reason for having applied for insolvency proceedings in self-administration at the District Court of Düsseldorf. Such insolvency proceedings are not the end of a company. Hakle will continue to exist, as will toilet paper and the Hakle Feucht and Servus brands. The management also remains in office, only a trustee is placed at his side. Above all, he looks at how the company can get its costs under control again.
adnj wrote:
7 September 2022 | Climate and Environment
A rise in the frequency, intensity and duration of heatwaves will not only increase wildfires this century but also worsen air quality – harming human health and ecosystems, according to a new report from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) launched on Wednesday, the International Day of Clean Air for Blue Skies.
https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/09/1126141
Europe power firms need 1.5 trillion euros in margin calls, Equinor says
LONDON, Sept 6 (Reuters) - European energy companies need at least 1.5 trillion euros ($1.5 trillion) to cover the cost of their exposure to soaring gas prices, Norwegian energy group Equinor has estimated, and that does not include firms in Britain.
Several European countries are providing billions of euros in support to power suppliers caught out by extra collateral payments on their trades - known as margin calls - but Equinor's estimate suggests such support is a fraction of the overall bill.
redmanjp wrote:'Doomsday glacier' that could trigger 6ft sea level rise is 'holding on by its fingernails'
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/doomsday-glacier-which-could-trigger-6-ft-sea-level-rise-hanging-on-by-fingernails-152859859.html
timelapse wrote:Beach cleanup anyone?IMG-20220907-WA0007.jpg
redmanjp wrote:timelapse wrote:Beach cleanup anyone?IMG-20220907-WA0007.jpg
Govt should mandate this for all companies making bottles- hundreds of these end up in the drains and then as 10 mins of rain fall is flood.
another idea- perhaps also place a small rfid tag on it and receivers on all major rivers- if u pay for it with linx/card it is tracked and if it ends up in a river u get a fine.
adnj wrote:redmanjp wrote:timelapse wrote:Beach cleanup anyone?IMG-20220907-WA0007.jpg
Govt should mandate this for all companies making bottles- hundreds of these end up in the drains and then as 10 mins of rain fall is flood.
another idea- perhaps also place a small rfid tag on it and receivers on all major rivers- if u pay for it with linx/card it is tracked and if it ends up in a river u get a fine.
Plastic bottles in many other places have a deposit. That is simple to do and many people collect the bottles for return.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 106 guests