Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
thingcall wrote:I run a small to medium automotive business and think it's about that time to get someone who is qualified to do my books and administrative work, but would like to know a ball park figure with respect to salarie
matix wrote:Salary btw
thingcall wrote:It would be nice to get someone to do everything officewise, but being realistic that would probably be near impossible. Which might make more sense? hiring an office manager and every 6mts or so get a firm to do my books, or hiring an sec/acc?
matix wrote:Salary btw
Monkey Man wrote:i would do that gob for 15K a moth. no problem.
I already pm you my remusé .
I can start now if you want. Jus send me directions.
dude2014 wrote:Your business has grown and your busy ness will also grow. An assistant Manager is what is needed. When you are not there does the business close?. As the business continues to grow you will need (professional) advise on how to set up your accounting, inventory, what making money and what is not.
Your personal training in Finance, meeting Statutory requirements, growing your business, can be met by a Financial Services Provider, who does not have to be a full time staff member. The longevity of the business should also be considered. Fees may determine who and what type of arrangement you will want. Best of luck bro ...........
zorced wrote:Post the JD if you want a serious answer. That would address scope then you have to look at volume of transactions.
dude2014 wrote:Upon Shree Kirpalani's death, presumably greedy suppliers and other creditors came knocking on the business door for their money. With a properly defined succession plan in place, they would have had to tuck their tails or it would have forcibly fell off their greedy, grimmy butts. In short a plan to meet payments to suppliers, taking in stock and the like would have been continued as normal. A will or some legal construction to satisfy/support the business. allowing his heirs to rein in the threat and take control of the business.
Phone Surgeon wrote:have to agree with 88sins there
suppliers have bills to meet and workers to pay as wel
dude2014 wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:have to agree with 88sins there
suppliers have bills to meet and workers to pay as wel
I see my point was lost upon both of you. Businesses that plan to succeed, succeed with the plan as there was a contingency plan in place. how would you feel that your heirs lost pappy or mammy business because there was no plan.
Kirpalani did not have a plan and is the typical response from many businesses. You die, the business dies.
The plan would have ensured that workers get paid, value is being created and any person or entity interested in purchasing the "business" would have an established brand, customer base and possibly reduced value on the assets, provided his heirs even knew what to do.
88sins wrote:dude2014 wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:have to agree with 88sins there
suppliers have bills to meet and workers to pay as wel
I see my point was lost upon both of you. Businesses that plan to succeed, succeed with the plan as there was a contingency plan in place. how would you feel that your heirs lost pappy or mammy business because there was no plan.
Kirpalani did not have a plan and is the typical response from many businesses. You die, the business dies.
The plan would have ensured that workers get paid, value is being created and any person or entity interested in purchasing the "business" would have an established brand, customer base and possibly reduced value on the assets, provided his heirs even knew what to do.
son, what you fail to realize is that even tho a business is a separate entity from its owner/s, it it's owner/s that run it & sustain it through the relationships they make & maintain with suppliers. Simple as that.
Here's an example
You own a business, & you have a credit customer that places orders for you to supply them with stock for resale. You are familiar with the owner, & he's proven to be reliable with his payments through your years of doing business together. You & the customer meet occasionally over a decade, sometimes in a business capacity, sometimes in a casual setting, & you get to know who his offspring are. With me so far?
So one day your loyal customer gives up the ghost, & shortly thereafter his son proposes to take the helm of his business. Now let's say the son has had a history of substance abuse, a gambling addiction, a history of poor decision making skills & has a case pending for criminal fraud charges. Would you accept that amount of risk, just because you knew his father? I seriously doubt it. You might treat him as a new customer with a very low credit limit, or a cash only customer until he proves he can run his fathers business, or sever ties with the company altogether depending on your relationship with him.
But lets say you did, & he remained true to the form of his character, & he ordered $30K your goods that you bore costs & expenses to produce,& he never forwarded payment to your business for those goods. Wouldn't you think it'd be safe to say, that loss you made could've been easily avoided? & who in your opinion would be responsible for that loss? In short, its you. You made the poor choice to extend a credit facility to a sketchy customer based on emotional/illogical reasoning, while in possession of information that pointed to a high probability of that outcome before it happened, & still went that route anyway.
If you wish you can let yourself be guided by blind loyalty to a person or their offspring, or emotions when running a business. It's only your time, money, effort, health you put into it. If you want to risk all you've invested, just because you knew his daddy, go right ahead. But if it doesn't go the way you hoped, & you want to get mad at someone, look in the mirror & you'll see the one who's primarily responsible.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: matr1x and 36 guests