Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
V2NR 3.0 wrote:Carry them in a cane field and tell them "run" and then use the moving targets as a shooting range. Don't waste tax payers money on these men...God forbids I ever become national security
V2NR 3.0 wrote:Carry them in a cane field and tell them "run" and then use the moving targets as a shooting range. Don't waste tax payers money on these men...God forbids I ever become national security
bluesclues wrote:V2NR 3.0 wrote:Carry them in a cane field and tell them "run" and then use the moving targets as a shooting range. Don't waste tax payers money on these men...God forbids I ever become national security
nah. the chance of escape too much higher than 1% in that setting. what we need is a black site to rape them with spiked bat and then burn the carcass and let it file as a missing persons report.
Slartibartfast wrote:bluesclues wrote:V2NR 3.0 wrote:Carry them in a cane field and tell them "run" and then use the moving targets as a shooting range. Don't waste tax payers money on these men...God forbids I ever become national security
nah. the chance of escape too much higher than 1% in that setting. what we need is a black site to rape them with spiked bat and then burn the carcass and let it file as a missing persons report.
Is that what Jesus would want?![]()
Violence begets violence. I'm all for execution but once it is done humanely, not for their sake, but for the sake of the executioners. Too many people seem to be getting pleasure out of the pain of others and perpetuating the cycle isn't going to make it stop.
Slartibartfast wrote:
Violence begets violence. I'm all for execution but once it is done humanely, not for their sake, but for the sake of the executioners. Too many people seem to be getting pleasure out of the pain of others and perpetuating the cycle isn't going to make it stop.
Slartibartfast wrote:So just to recap; you guys are saying you support murder, rape, torture and other heinous acts that the criminals do under the condition that you think the victim deserves the punishment?
bluesclues wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:So just to recap; you guys are saying you support murder, rape, torture and other heinous acts that the criminals do under the condition that you think the victim deserves the punishment?
we saying we want murderous gunmen/kidnapper and traffickers out of our society. and for that u know and i know.. u have to turn up the heat in the kitchen till the fire bunning off they seat of they pants.
Slartibartfast wrote:bluesclues wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:So just to recap; you guys are saying you support murder, rape, torture and other heinous acts that the criminals do under the condition that you think the victim deserves the punishment?
we saying we want murderous gunmen/kidnapper and traffickers out of our society. and for that u know and i know.. u have to turn up the heat in the kitchen till the fire bunning off they seat of they pants.
Hmmmm. Still didnt answer my question though.
bluesclues wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:bluesclues wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:So just to recap; you guys are saying you support murder, rape, torture and other heinous acts that the criminals do under the condition that you think the victim deserves the punishment?
we saying we want murderous gunmen/kidnapper and traffickers out of our society. and for that u know and i know.. u have to turn up the heat in the kitchen till the fire bunning off they seat of they pants.
Hmmmm. Still didnt answer my question though.
there is the greater problem of u not understanding the strategic achievement of objectives in my proposed crime plan. but i will just say that there are many ways to accomplish an objective within all the legal and democratic requirements even though it may not seem so on the surface.
i will however try to reword your statement so that it falls more in line with the intentions.
i will say that i support the idea that they deserve a punishment which matches the crime. in this case we are talking the taking of life and forms of extreme psychological humiliation of regular civillians. and that i believe that if a man denies another their right to life in a robbery or other murderous situation, then they have consequently also given up that right to life for themselves.
once that can be established, and it has been for centuries, u just work within that framework to achieve your objectives. expanding on legislation where necessary. its really left to the understanding of your leadership. this is why in other countries there is more competence from law enforcement agencies.
Slartibartfast wrote:bluesclues wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:bluesclues wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:So just to recap; you guys are saying you support murder, rape, torture and other heinous acts that the criminals do under the condition that you think the victim deserves the punishment?
we saying we want murderous gunmen/kidnapper and traffickers out of our society. and for that u know and i know.. u have to turn up the heat in the kitchen till the fire bunning off they seat of they pants.
Hmmmm. Still didnt answer my question though.
there is the greater problem of u not understanding the strategic achievement of objectives in my proposed crime plan. but i will just say that there are many ways to accomplish an objective within all the legal and democratic requirements even though it may not seem so on the surface.
i will however try to reword your statement so that it falls more in line with the intentions.
i will say that i support the idea that they deserve a punishment which matches the crime. in this case we are talking the taking of life and forms of extreme psychological humiliation of regular civillians. and that i believe that if a man denies another their right to life in a robbery or other murderous situation, then they have consequently also given up that right to life for themselves.
once that can be established, and it has been for centuries, u just work within that framework to achieve your objectives. expanding on legislation where necessary. its really left to the understanding of your leadership. this is why in other countries there is more competence from law enforcement agencies.
That seems as though you, bluesclues, the one true interpreter of the Bible and mouthpiece of the Lord on earth is saying that, yes, you support murder, rape, torture and other heinous acts.
I was just looking for a yes or no. If I interpreted you answer wrongly then just state "No", along with a reason why my interpretation of your answer is wrong.
reddo100 wrote:Why not we copy and paste Singapore we are good at every thing else?
Been here for the past 8yrs+ and its the safest place to be....
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-24428567
10. The most unhappy people in the world
In Singapore you can find almost anything you desire but one thing in short supply, apparently, is happiness.
A recent Gallup report revealed that Singapore's wealthy population is the unhappiest, or least positive, in the world, less happy than people in Iraq, Haiti, Afghanistan and Syria.
bluesclues wrote:what we need is a black site to rape them with spiked bat and then burn the carcass and let it file as a missing persons report.
Slartibartfast wrote:Let's bring the argument back to its source. Bluesclues do you still think this is an acceptable punishment for crime? Taking the "eye for an eye" approach?bluesclues wrote:what we need is a black site to rape them with spiked bat and then burn the carcass and let it file as a missing persons report.
Some other questions I have.
Who will be the person knocking nails into a bat and forcing it up a naked man's behind? Would it be a specialist or would the punishment just be on the daily "to do list" of prison guards or whoever else?
What kind of a person do you think would gravitate to this role?
How much do you think a person should be paid for torturing and killing an individual?
How will other criminals (that are currently free) find out about the torturing that took place?
Note that what you are arguing for is not just the death penalty. You are arguing for planned torture which is completely different. To put it more simply, I have nothing against the death penalty in principle so there is no need to argue that aspect of your argument.
Let's assume for the sake of both of our arguments argument that detection and convictions aren't problems as no solution would work until that is fixed.
Slartibartfast wrote:Lol. You have to think.
I will admit though, your sidestepping skills on point as always. You should teach Zumba.
Slartibartfast wrote:Lol. You have to think.
I will admit though, your sidestepping skills on point as always. You should teach Zumba.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 73 guests