Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
hover11 wrote:The only difference is its our tax dollars that fund this aside from kfc funding the ketchup. This is basically tax evasion.
timelapse wrote:Bringing in fancy cars at the expense of tax revenue while not fixing roads seems kinda like a dunce move.These ministers does even drive these cars at all ?
To channel my inner Rowley,VexXx Dogg wrote:timelapse wrote:Bringing in fancy cars at the expense of tax revenue while not fixing roads seems kinda like a dunce move.These ministers does even drive these cars at all ?
It's a salary benefit, and parliamentarians are grossly underpaid compared with equivalent jobs in private sector.
A salary benefit at whose expense? This isn't a business, this is a country that is facing deficit after deficit budget. Unlike a business that paying executives top salaries and added bonuses. Taxpayers always footing the bill and getting the sheitty end of the stick. Every politician is a millionaire yet they complain that private sector better than them, the underhand perks u able to do while in office you can't do that in private sector but they will never mention that. Would they?VexXx Dogg wrote:timelapse wrote:Bringing in fancy cars at the expense of tax revenue while not fixing roads seems kinda like a dunce move.These ministers does even drive these cars at all ?
It's a salary benefit, and parliamentarians are grossly underpaid compared with equivalent jobs in private sector.
timelapse wrote:To channel my inner Rowley,VexXx Dogg wrote:timelapse wrote:Bringing in fancy cars at the expense of tax revenue while not fixing roads seems kinda like a dunce move.These ministers does even drive these cars at all ?
It's a salary benefit, and parliamentarians are grossly underpaid compared with equivalent jobs in private sector.
I tell them to be parliamentarian?
Let me ask you this, if parliamentarian salary so small, how does one afford a Maybach?
And allyuh does wonder where de forex going .
Left foot right foot yes
hover11 wrote:A salary benefit at whose expense? This isn't a business, this is a country that is facing deficit after deficit budget. Unlike a business that paying executives top salaries and added bonuses. Taxpayers always footing the bill and getting the sheitty end of the stick. Every politician is a millionaire yet they complain that private sector better than them, the underhand perks u able to do while in office you can't do that in private sector but they will never mention that. Would they?VexXx Dogg wrote:timelapse wrote:Bringing in fancy cars at the expense of tax revenue while not fixing roads seems kinda like a dunce move.These ministers does even drive these cars at all ?
It's a salary benefit, and parliamentarians are grossly underpaid compared with equivalent jobs in private sector.
Similar to that of a previous finance minister using insider trading to secure her investment before a well known financial institution faced bankruptcyVexXx Dogg wrote:hover11 wrote:A salary benefit at whose expense? This isn't a business, this is a country that is facing deficit after deficit budget. Unlike a business that paying executives top salaries and added bonuses. Taxpayers always footing the bill and getting the sheitty end of the stick. Every politician is a millionaire yet they complain that private sector better than them, the underhand perks u able to do while in office you can't do that in private sector but they will never mention that. Would they?VexXx Dogg wrote:timelapse wrote:Bringing in fancy cars at the expense of tax revenue while not fixing roads seems kinda like a dunce move.These ministers does even drive these cars at all ?
It's a salary benefit, and parliamentarians are grossly underpaid compared with equivalent jobs in private sector.
Underhand perks? do tell
sMASH wrote:pugboy wrote:I see Inshan highlight how the porsche dealership could get an entrance off the highway yet highway roti shop getting licks still
prolly a porsche could accelerate to highway speeds that it wouldnt interupt... but 5 roti police van willl take a tad more build up time.
where is this porsche business place?
sMASH wrote:Meanwhile, people up on phillip case about using disused land fur agriculture, they see no problem with the current administration approach to agriculture...
VexXx Dogg wrote:sMASH wrote:Meanwhile, people up on phillip case about using disused land fur agriculture, they see no problem with the current administration approach to agriculture... FB_IMG_1656271930136.jpg
Incorrect.
I have a problem with both the government’s ineptitude towards agriculture as well as pea’s vaporware/pipe dreams.
sMASH wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:sMASH wrote:Meanwhile, people up on phillip case about using disused land fur agriculture, they see no problem with the current administration approach to agriculture... FB_IMG_1656271930136.jpg
Incorrect.
I have a problem with both the government’s ineptitude towards agriculture as well as pea’s vaporware/pipe dreams.
okay, boomer
K74T wrote:
goodtimes.jpg
K74T wrote:
goodtimes.jpg
I growing peppers indoorspugboy wrote:he might be right though for certain plants
ent ppl growing weed indoors ?
Travelling officers actually use their vehicles.Thats different.Parliamentarians get driven everywhere with government vehicles with escort.WTF we hadda be giving them vehicle purchase perks for millions of dollars wasted for?VexXx Dogg wrote:timelapse wrote:To channel my inner Rowley,VexXx Dogg wrote:timelapse wrote:Bringing in fancy cars at the expense of tax revenue while not fixing roads seems kinda like a dunce move.These ministers does even drive these cars at all ?
It's a salary benefit, and parliamentarians are grossly underpaid compared with equivalent jobs in private sector.
I tell them to be parliamentarian?
Let me ask you this, if parliamentarian salary so small, how does one afford a Maybach?
And allyuh does wonder where de forex going .
Left foot right foot yes
Don't many of them already have lucrative careers outside the public service?
And to extend the argument - public servants who are travelling officers also benefit from tax concessions. Is it that you want to remove it from them as well?
Doh get me wrong inno. F*ck the whole r*d h*use. I just like looking at arguments from all possible angles and many of the beatups on social media weak AF
What we allow is what will continuetimelapse wrote:Travelling officers actually use their vehicles.Thats different.Parliamentarians get driven everywhere with government vehicles with escort.WTF we hadda be giving them vehicle purchase perks for millions of dollars wasted for?VexXx Dogg wrote:timelapse wrote:To channel my inner Rowley,VexXx Dogg wrote:timelapse wrote:Bringing in fancy cars at the expense of tax revenue while not fixing roads seems kinda like a dunce move.These ministers does even drive these cars at all ?
It's a salary benefit, and parliamentarians are grossly underpaid compared with equivalent jobs in private sector.
I tell them to be parliamentarian?
Let me ask you this, if parliamentarian salary so small, how does one afford a Maybach?
And allyuh does wonder where de forex going .
Left foot right foot yes
Don't many of them already have lucrative careers outside the public service?
And to extend the argument - public servants who are travelling officers also benefit from tax concessions. Is it that you want to remove it from them as well?
Doh get me wrong inno. F*ck the whole r*d h*use. I just like looking at arguments from all possible angles and many of the beatups on social media weak AF
K74T wrote:SCAM
Phillip would be obviously be paying someone to collect persons info and try to find matching jobs for them.VexXx Dogg wrote:What the $50 for tho?
Can someone please explain how this job seeker registration works?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 125 guests