Flow
Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

bluefete
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14685
Joined: November 12th, 2008, 10:56 pm
Location: POS

New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby bluefete » December 18th, 2016, 8:46 am

Image

TRAGEDY
When The New York Times Defended Putting a Black Man in the Bronx Zoo
One of the biggest attractions in New York City in 1906 was none other than an African man bought and placed in a cage with apes.

Gil Troy

12.17.16 1:01 AM ET

Just as the late Stephen Jay Gould updated Charles Darwin by arguing that humans evolved through fits and starts—“punctuated equilibrium”—social progress also is less steady than we would like. Even amid a positive trajectory, there are breakthroughs, plateaus, and setbacks. Sometimes, what seems like a step back actually helps propel society forward. The short unhappy life of Ota Benga—the human being exhibited in the Bronx Zoo—demonstrates how one big example of racist ugliness may have resulted in at least one small step toward racial progress.

Although the true origins of this sad story begins with the specious theories of superiority whites developed centuries ago, Benga’s tale begins in the early 1900s, in the Belgian-controlled Congo Free State. His life in his community ended when King Leopold’s Force Publique (This man was one, true SOB) invaded his world, murdering his wife and two children, then selling him as a slave to the Baschilele tribe. This all too familiar outrage took a bizarre turn when an American anthropologist, Samuel Philips Verner, purchased him for five dollars’ worth of cloth and salt. This woefully misguided missionary then brought Benga along with eight other young Africans to star in the 1904 St. Louis World’s Fair.

Benga’s slight build, dark skin, and artificially sharpened teeth—from a ritual called chipping—fit many Americans’ racist stereotype of the African savage. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch greeted the “African Pygmies for the World’s Fair” on June 26, 1904. Benga and his troupe won the gold medal for entertaining the crowds with their dances and other tribal rituals.

Pre-media-age often flocked to fairs, carnivals, and circuses to see curiosities. Two years after, Benga returned with Verner to Africa but, Verner claimed, then insisted on returning to America, and the Bronx Zoo debacle began. This time, Benga was exhibited in a cage with animals, first a chimpanzee, then an orangutan.

Simply writing those words makes the stomach churn. The layers of racism, the depths of dehumanization, that spawned such an act proved that four decades after the Civil War freed the slaves, Americans were not yet liberated from America’s original sin. Millions in this nation supposedly dedicated to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness were frequently deprived of life, robbed of liberty, blocked from happiness merely because of their skin color. The collaboration of top scientists, a leading cultural institution, and masses in New York City, the purported capital of enlightened America, proves how systemic the sin was. These blue rednecks, if you will, debunk many Northerners’ tendency self-image as the noble heroes ultimately defeating Southern whites’ savagery.

“Bushman Shares a Cage with Bronx Park Apes,” The New York Times headlined on Sept. 9, 1906. The subhead reported: “Some Laugh at his Antics, But Many are Not Pleased.” “Something about it that I don’t like,” one “white man” admitted. Black ministers defined what there was not to like. The Reverend James H. Gordon lamented: “Our race, we think, is depressed enough, without exhibiting one of us with apes. We think we are worthy of being considered human beings, with souls.”

The Times’ editors, among others, disagreed with Gordon. With as many as 40,000 crowding the zoo in one day to see Benga, the paper editorialized: “Not feeling particularly vehement excitement ourselves over the exhibition of an African ‘pigmy’ in the Primate House of the Zoological Park, we do not quite understand all the emotion which others are expressing in the matter. Still, the show is not exactly a pleasant one, and we do wonder that the Director did not foresee and avoid the scoldings now aimed in his direction.” The editorial also declared, “As for Benga himself, he is probably enjoying himself as well as he could anywhere in his country, and it is absurd to make moan over the imagined humiliation and degradation he is suffering.” Claiming that “Pygmies are very low in the human scale,” America’s newspaper of record concluded: “The idea that men are all much alike except as they have had or lacked opportunities for getting an education of books is now far out of date.”

Ultimately, however, the cruelty of this act, its utter inhumanity, stirred the consciences of the normally passive, those go-along get along citizens whose self-involvement often enables communal sins. The backlash began in the black community, then spread. The Reverend Gordon turned to a leading African-American attorney, Wilford H. Smith, and they received backing from John Henry E. Millholland, a wealthy white civil rights activist. The city controller visited. Benga himself became unruly — skirmishing with the visiting hordes. A Louisiana newspaper delightedly denounced this “Northern Outrage,” writing: “Yes, in the sacred city of New York… almost daily mobs find exciting sport in chasing negroes through the streets without much being said about it.” Finally declaring it “utterly impossible to control him,” the utterly unapologetic director of the Zoological Society, William Temple Hornaday, released Benga. This shameful behavior had shamed the racists.

Feeding the backlash was the fact that at that time, a few miles from the Bronx Zoo, the intellectual revolution America needed for a Civil Rights revolution to succeed was stirring. Franz Boas, a Jewish refugee from Germany’s anti-Semitism, was among the scientific pioneers helping Americans rethink their fundamental assumptions about race and culture. Boas taught that race was a cultural construct not a biological fact. Intellectuals have no monopoly on virtue—despite his being correct, other academics resisted his findings—and held back his career—for years. Eventually, this revolutionary insight would become a common understanding that the great significance imputed to these differences said more about white assumptions of superiority than any black deficiencies.

Ota Benga was freed. But as with too many victims of racism, the scars of the hatred still shackled his soul. Initially, Gordon placed him in the Howard Coloured Orphan Asylum in Brooklyn—a 23-year-old infantilized, housed with kids. By 1910, Benga was living at the all-black Lynchburg Theological Seminary and College, in Virginia, where he enjoyed a seemingly bucolic existence. He taught neighboring boys how to hunt, how to sing his tribal songs, how to make fires. He told exciting tales about the elephants back home which were “big, very big.”

On March 19, 1916, Otto Bingo, as he was now known, danced by the fire, more frenzied than usual, more melancholy than usual. A few hours later, he pulled out a gun he had secured and shot himself in the heart.

Thus ends another racial Rashomon, another opportunity to debate whether the proverbial American racial glass is half empty or half full—and if America can ever cure itself of its racist birth defect. True, this heartrending story demonstrates the ongoing blight of American racism. But ultimately, Boas truths prevailed. Today, the Bronx Zoo’s spokesperson regrets this “mistake” from “a moment in time,” this blot on that fine institution’s history. Today, the overwhelming majority of Americans lament the greater blot of racism on our country’s history. And today, we all must dedicate ourselves to purging any vestiges of racism still lingering within our society, within our souls. We cannot rewrite history but we can—and must—do all we can to correct it.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... x-zoo.html

bluefete
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14685
Joined: November 12th, 2008, 10:56 pm
Location: POS

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby bluefete » December 18th, 2016, 8:58 am

Make sure to read the part about Darwin!!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/06/nyreg ... 06zoo.html

Image
Ota Benga, a Congolese pygmy, posed at the Bronx Zoo in 1906. Credit Wildlife Conservation Society

The Scandal at the Zoo

By MITCH KELLERAUG. 6, 2006

WHEN New Yorkers went to the Bronx Zoo on Saturday, Sept. 8, 1906, they were treated to something novel at the Monkey House.

At first, some people weren’t sure what it was. It — he — seemed much less a monkey than a man, though a very small, dark one with grotesquely pointed teeth. He wore modern clothing but no shoes. He was proficient with bow and arrow, and entertained the crowd by shooting at a target. He displayed skill at weaving with twine, made amusing faces and drank soda.

The new resident of the Monkey House was, indeed, a man, a Congolese pygmy named Ota Benga. The next day, a sign was posted that gave Ota Benga’s height as 4 feet 11 inches, his weight as 103 pounds and his age as 23. The sign concluded, “Exhibited each afternoon during September.”

Visitors to the Monkey House that second day got an even better show. Ota Benga and an orangutan frolicked together, hugging and wrestling and playing tricks on each other. The crowd loved it. To enhance the jungle effect, a parrot was put in the cage and bones had been strewn around it. The crowd laughed as the pygmy sat staring at a pair of canvas shoes he had been given. “Few expressed audible objection to the sight of a human being in a cage with monkeys as companions,” The New York Times wrote the next day, “and there could be no doubt that to the majority the joint man-and-monkey exhibition was the most interesting sight in Bronx Park.”

But the Ota Benga “exhibit” did not last. A scandal flared up almost immediately, fueled by the indignation of black clergymen like the Rev. James H. Gordon, superintendent of the Howard Colored Orphan Asylum in Brooklyn. “Our race, we think, is depressed enough, without exhibiting one of us with the apes,” Mr. Gordon said. “We think we are worthy of being considered human beings, with souls.”

One hundred years later, the Ota Benga episode remains a perfect illustration of the racism that pervaded New York at the time. Mayor George McClellan, for example, refused to meet with the clergymen or to support their cause. For this he was congratulated by the zoo’s director, William Temple Hornaday, a major figure not only in the zoo’s history but also in the history of American conservation, who wrote to him, “When the history of the Zoological Park is written, this incident will form its most amusing passage.”

The Bronx Zoo, which opened in 1899, was a young institution during the Ota Benga scandal. Those at the zoo today look back at the episode with a mixture of regret and resignation. “It was a mistake,” said John Calvelli, senior vice president for public affairs of the Wildlife Conservation Society, which owns and runs the zoo. “When you reflect on it, you realize that it was a moment in time. You have to look at the time in which it happened, and you try to understand why this would occur.”

That understanding may deepen with a recent spike in interest in Ota Benga, who died in March 1916 when he shot himself in the heart. His story has inspired writers, artists and musicians, and there is even an effort to exhume his remains from a cemetery in Lynchburg, Va., where he spent the last six years of his life, and return them to Congo.

“This was his wish,” said Dibinga wa Said, a Congolese involved in the exhumation campaign. “He wanted to go home.”

From the Bush to the Bronx

Ota Benga had already lived an eventful life by the time he arrived in the Bronx. According to the 1992 book “Ota Benga: The Pygmy in the Zoo,” by Phillips Verner Bradford and Harvey Blume, he was a survivor of a pygmy slaughter carried out by the Force Publique, a vicious armed force in service to Leopold II, the king of Belgium and the ruler of what was then called Congo Free State. Among the dead were Ota Benga’s wife and two children.

The killers sold him into slavery to a tribe called the Baschilele. He was in the slave market when his deliverance appeared one day in the form of Samuel Phillips Verner, 30, an Africa-obsessed explorer, anthropologist and missionary from South Carolina (and a grandfather of Dr. Bradford, the author).

Mr. Verner had been hired to take some pygmies and other Africans back to St. Louis for the extensive “anthropology exhibit” at the 1904 World’s Fair. There, for the edification of American fairgoers, they and representatives of other aboriginal peoples, like Eskimos, American Indians and Filipino tribesmen, would live in replicas of their traditional dwellings and villages.

After examining Ota Benga and being particularly pleased by his teeth, which had been filed to sharp points in the manner common among his people, Mr. Verner bought him from his captors and, along with several other pygmies and a few other Africans, took him to St. Louis. When the fair was over, he took them all back to Africa as promised.

Ota Benga was unable to make a successful transition to his original way of life, and continued to spend a lot of time with Mr. Verner as the anthropologist pursued his interests in Africa, which included the collection of artifacts and animal specimens. Their friendship grew, and Ota Benga asked Mr. Verner to return with him to “the land of the muzungu” — the land of the white man. The blond South Carolinian and the pygmy arrived back in New York in August 1906.

Their first stop, as Dr. Bradford and Mr. Blume recount in their book, was the American Museum of Natural History, whose director, Hermon Bumpus, agreed to store not just Mr. Verner’s cargo of collectibles, including a couple of chimpanzees, but — temporarily, at least — Ota Benga himself. Mr. Verner, who was broke, left for the South to try to raise some money, and the pygmy’s residency in the Museum of Natural History began. He was given a place to sleep and seems to have been free to roam the museum. Mr. Bumpus bought him a white duck suit.

Before long, though, the African became difficult to control. Among other things, he threw a chair at Florence Guggenheim, the philanthropist, and almost hit her in the head. Fed up, Mr. Bumpus suggested that Mr. Verner explore the possibilities at the zoo. Hornaday, the zoo’s director, was receptive, agreeing to lodge not just Mr. Verner’s animals but Ota Benga, too. Toward the end of August, the defining chapter in the pygmy’s strange life had begun.

Degradation and Darwin

Ota Benga was free to wander the zoo as he pleased. Sometimes he helped the animal keepers with their jobs. In fact, Hornaday described the African as being “employed” by the zoo, though there is no record he was ever paid. He spent a lot of time at the Monkey House, caring for Mr. Verner’s one surviving chimp and bonding as well with an orangutan named Dohong.

Contrary to common belief, Ota Benga was not simply placed in a cage that second weekend in September and put on display. As Dr. Bradford and Mr. Blume point out, the process was far subtler. Since he was already spending much time inside the Monkey House, where he was free to come and go, it was but a small step to encourage him to hang his hammock in an empty cage and start spending even more time there. It was but another small step to give him his bow and arrows, set up a target and encourage him to start shooting. This was the scene that zoogoers found at the Monkey House on the first day of the Ota Benga “exhibit.”

The next day, word was out. The headline in The New York Times read: “Bushman Shares a Cage With Bronx Park Apes.” Thousands went to the zoo that day to see the new attraction, to watch him carry on so amusingly, often arm in arm, with Dohong the orangutan.

But the end came quickly. Confronted with the protests of the Colored Baptist Ministers’ Conference, Mr. Hornaday suspended the exhibit that Monday afternoon.

To the black ministers and their allies, the message of the exhibit was clear: The African was meant to be seen as falling somewhere on the evolutionary scale between the apes with which he was housed and the people in the overwhelmingly white crowds who found him so entertaining.

“The person responsible for this exhibition,” said the Rev. R. S. MacArthur, a white man who was pastor of the Calvary Baptist Church, “degrades himself as much as he does the African. Instead of making a beast of this little fellow, we should be putting him in school for the development of such powers as God gave him.”

It was not just racism that offended the clergymen. As Christians, they did not believe in Darwin, and the Ota Benga exhibit, as Mr. Gordon of the Howard Colored Orphan Asylum said, “evidently aims to be a demonstration of Darwin’s theory of evolution.”

“The Darwinian theory is absolutely opposed to Christianity, and a public demonstration in its favor should not be permitted,” Mr. Gordon said.


As for the press, The Evening Post reported that Ota Benga, according to the zoo’s animal keepers, “has a great influence with the beasts — even with the larger kind, including the orang-outang with whom he plays as though one of them, rolling around the floor of the cages in wild wrestling matches and chattering to them in his own guttural tongue, which they seem to understand.”

The New York Times wrote in an editorial: “Not feeling particularly vehement excitement ourselves over the exhibition of an African ‘pigmy’ in the Primate House of the Zoological Park, we do not quite understand all the emotion which others are expressing in the matter. Still, the show is not exactly a pleasant one, and we do wonder that the Director did not foresee and avoid the scoldings now aimed in his direction.” The editorial added, “As for Benga himself, he is probably enjoying himself as well as he could anywhere in his country, and it is absurd to make moan over the imagined humiliation and degradation he is suffering.”

The New York Globe printed a letter from a reader that said: “I lived in the south several years, and consequently am not overfond of the negro, but believe him human. I think it a shame that the authorities of this great city should allow such a sight as that witnessed at the Bronx Park — a negro boy on exhibition in a monkey cage.”

And The New York Daily Tribune, evincing little interest in facts, wrote of Ota Benga’s past: “His first wife excited the hunger of the rest of the tribe, and one day when Ota returned from hunting he learned that she had passed quietly away just before luncheon and that there was not so much as a sparerib for him.”

Hornaday remained unapologetic, insisting that his only intention was to put on an “ethnological exhibit.” In a letter to the mayor, he defended “my action in placing Dr. Verner’s very interesting little African where the people of New York may see him without annoyance or discomfort to him.” In another letter, he said that he and Madison Grant, the secretary of the New York Zoological Society — who 10 years later would publish the racialist tract “The Passing of the Great Race” — considered it “imperative that the society should not even seem to be dictated to” by the black clergymen.

The public, at any rate, had not yet had its fill of Ota Benga, whose name was now a household one. Though no longer on official display, the African was still living at the zoo and spending time with his primate friends in the Monkey House. On Sunday, Sept. 16, 40,000 people went to the zoo, and everywhere Ota Benga went that day, The Times reported, the crowds pursued him, “howling, jeering and yelling.”

The newspaper reported, “Some of them poked him in the ribs, others tripped him up, all laughed at him.”

Suicide, and MySpace

Toward the end of September, arrangements were made for Ota Benga to live at the Howard Colored Orphan Asylum. Eventually he was sent to the asylum’s facility in eastern Long Island. Then, in January 1910, Mr. Gordon arranged for the pygmy to move to Lynchburg, where he had already spent a semester at a Baptist seminary.

In Lynchburg, Ota Benga had his teeth capped and became known as Otto Bingo. He spent a lot of time in the woods, hunting with bow and arrow, and gathering plants and herbs. He did odd jobs and worked in a tobacco factory. He became friendly with the poet Anne Spencer, who lived in Lynchburg, and through her met both W. E. B. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington.

No one can be absolutely sure why Ota Benga killed himself that afternoon in March 1916. Dr. Dibinga, the Congolese who wants to return the pygmy’s remains to Congo, agrees with the view expressed in a Lynchburg newspaper report of the time: “For a long time the young negro pined for his African relations, and grew morose when he realized that such a trip was out of the question because of the lack of resources.” Mr. Verner himself wrote that Ota Benga “probably succumbed only after the feeling of utter inassimilability overwhelmed his brave little heart.”

Dr. Bradford, the author, would like to see the zoo erect a statue or some other sort of memorial to Ota Benga, but Mr. Calvelli of the Wildlife Conservation Society says he does not think that is necessary. He argues that the best way for the zoo to remember Ota Benga is for the wildlife society to keep at its efforts to preserve wild places in Congo.

“Congo is a very important area for us, and we’ve been there for many, many years,” he said. “The way we memorialize the Ota Benga experience is by making sure that the place where Ota Benga came from remains a place where his people can continue to live.”

After 100 years, Ota Benga seems to be having the last word. His name has been adopted by the Ota Benga Alliance for Peace, Healing and Dignity in Congo and by a Houston-based collective of African-American artists called Otabenga Jones and Associates. This spring he was the subject of a three-day conference in Lynchburg that included lectures, readings and an ecumenical service. Dr. Dibinga and other participants in that conference are hoping to have an even bigger one next year, with Congolese pygmies in attendance.

In 2001, “Ode to Ota Benga,” a “historical lecture with piano improvisations” by the performer and composer Lester Allyson Knibbs, was presented at the Bronx Academy of Arts and Dance. In 2003, the Brooklyn-based alternative band Piñataland recorded the song “Ota Benga’s Name,” drawing many of the lyrics from a poem that appeared in The New York Times on Sept. 19, 1906: “In this land of foremost progress/ In this wisdom’s ripest age/ We have placed him in high honor in a monkey’s cage.”

To make the return of Ota Benga complete, he even has a page at http://www.myspace .com. The “About Me” section quotes the sign that hung briefly at the Monkey House, including its final phrase, “Exhibited each afternoon during September.”




Just So Sad

Click and read the .pdf

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-fr ... 946797D6CF

Sundar
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1443
Joined: July 5th, 2012, 12:33 pm
Location: Rock Road
Contact:

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby Sundar » December 18th, 2016, 9:31 am

If you look at society some people should be in cages. And all these gangs are similar to tribes of long ago. Fighting for territory and raiding raping killing. Mankind still hasn't evolved. White man still rules the world and sets the trends. All is sheep just follow blindly.

User avatar
Dizzy28
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 18953
Joined: February 8th, 2010, 8:54 am
Location: People's Republic of Bananas

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby Dizzy28 » December 18th, 2016, 9:54 am

TL,DR

User avatar
MrSennin
Sweet on this forum
Posts: 348
Joined: December 5th, 2016, 6:10 am

Re: RE: Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby MrSennin » December 18th, 2016, 10:21 am

Dizzy28 wrote:TL,DR

X2
Can someone do a shorten version of this

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby desifemlove » December 18th, 2016, 11:42 am

so? BS!!

people that time were racist....freaking idiocy!

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby desifemlove » December 18th, 2016, 11:44 am

Sundar wrote:If you look at society some people should be in cages. And all these gangs are similar to tribes of long ago. Fighting for territory and raiding raping killing. Mankind still hasn't evolved. White man still rules the world and sets the trends. All is sheep just follow blindly.

and people promoting tribal voting, cos they have to stick together, and cos they were "oppressed" long ago...ent? jus with a name like Sundar, you should know all about that, as it's as big a problem in this country as gangs. :lol:

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby desifemlove » December 18th, 2016, 11:47 am

bluefete wrote:Image

TRAGEDY
When The New York Times Defended Putting a Black Man in the Bronx Zoo
One of the biggest attractions in New York City in 1906 was none other than an African man bought and placed in a cage with apes.

Gil Troy

12.17.16 1:01 AM ET

Just as the late Stephen Jay Gould updated Charles Darwin by arguing that humans evolved through fits and starts—“punctuated equilibrium”—social progress also is less steady than we would like. Even amid a positive trajectory, there are breakthroughs, plateaus, and setbacks. Sometimes, what seems like a step back actually helps propel society forward. The short unhappy life of Ota Benga—the human being exhibited in the Bronx Zoo—demonstrates how one big example of racist ugliness may have resulted in at least one small step toward racial progress.

Although the true origins of this sad story begins with the specious theories of superiority whites developed centuries ago, Benga’s tale begins in the early 1900s, in the Belgian-controlled Congo Free State. His life in his community ended when King Leopold’s Force Publique (This man was one, true SOB) invaded his world, murdering his wife and two children, then selling him as a slave to the Baschilele tribe. This all too familiar outrage took a bizarre turn when an American anthropologist, Samuel Philips Verner, purchased him for five dollars’ worth of cloth and salt. This woefully misguided missionary then brought Benga along with eight other young Africans to star in the 1904 St. Louis World’s Fair.

Benga’s slight build, dark skin, and artificially sharpened teeth—from a ritual called chipping—fit many Americans’ racist stereotype of the African savage. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch greeted the “African Pygmies for the World’s Fair” on June 26, 1904. Benga and his troupe won the gold medal for entertaining the crowds with their dances and other tribal rituals.

Pre-media-age often flocked to fairs, carnivals, and circuses to see curiosities. Two years after, Benga returned with Verner to Africa but, Verner claimed, then insisted on returning to America, and the Bronx Zoo debacle began. This time, Benga was exhibited in a cage with animals, first a chimpanzee, then an orangutan.

Simply writing those words makes the stomach churn. The layers of racism, the depths of dehumanization, that spawned such an act proved that four decades after the Civil War freed the slaves, Americans were not yet liberated from America’s original sin. Millions in this nation supposedly dedicated to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness were frequently deprived of life, robbed of liberty, blocked from happiness merely because of their skin color. The collaboration of top scientists, a leading cultural institution, and masses in New York City, the purported capital of enlightened America, proves how systemic the sin was. These blue rednecks, if you will, debunk many Northerners’ tendency self-image as the noble heroes ultimately defeating Southern whites’ savagery.

“Bushman Shares a Cage with Bronx Park Apes,” The New York Times headlined on Sept. 9, 1906. The subhead reported: “Some Laugh at his Antics, But Many are Not Pleased.” “Something about it that I don’t like,” one “white man” admitted. Black ministers defined what there was not to like. The Reverend James H. Gordon lamented: “Our race, we think, is depressed enough, without exhibiting one of us with apes. We think we are worthy of being considered human beings, with souls.”

The Times’ editors, among others, disagreed with Gordon. With as many as 40,000 crowding the zoo in one day to see Benga, the paper editorialized: “Not feeling particularly vehement excitement ourselves over the exhibition of an African ‘pigmy’ in the Primate House of the Zoological Park, we do not quite understand all the emotion which others are expressing in the matter. Still, the show is not exactly a pleasant one, and we do wonder that the Director did not foresee and avoid the scoldings now aimed in his direction.” The editorial also declared, “As for Benga himself, he is probably enjoying himself as well as he could anywhere in his country, and it is absurd to make moan over the imagined humiliation and degradation he is suffering.” Claiming that “Pygmies are very low in the human scale,” America’s newspaper of record concluded: “The idea that men are all much alike except as they have had or lacked opportunities for getting an education of books is now far out of date.”

Ultimately, however, the cruelty of this act, its utter inhumanity, stirred the consciences of the normally passive, those go-along get along citizens whose self-involvement often enables communal sins. The backlash began in the black community, then spread. The Reverend Gordon turned to a leading African-American attorney, Wilford H. Smith, and they received backing from John Henry E. Millholland, a wealthy white civil rights activist. The city controller visited. Benga himself became unruly — skirmishing with the visiting hordes. A Louisiana newspaper delightedly denounced this “Northern Outrage,” writing: “Yes, in the sacred city of New York… almost daily mobs find exciting sport in chasing negroes through the streets without much being said about it.” Finally declaring it “utterly impossible to control him,” the utterly unapologetic director of the Zoological Society, William Temple Hornaday, released Benga. This shameful behavior had shamed the racists.

Feeding the backlash was the fact that at that time, a few miles from the Bronx Zoo, the intellectual revolution America needed for a Civil Rights revolution to succeed was stirring. Franz Boas, a Jewish refugee from Germany’s anti-Semitism, was among the scientific pioneers helping Americans rethink their fundamental assumptions about race and culture. Boas taught that race was a cultural construct not a biological fact. Intellectuals have no monopoly on virtue—despite his being correct, other academics resisted his findings—and held back his career—for years. Eventually, this revolutionary insight would become a common understanding that the great significance imputed to these differences said more about white assumptions of superiority than any black deficiencies.

Ota Benga was freed. But as with too many victims of racism, the scars of the hatred still shackled his soul. Initially, Gordon placed him in the Howard Coloured Orphan Asylum in Brooklyn—a 23-year-old infantilized, housed with kids. By 1910, Benga was living at the all-black Lynchburg Theological Seminary and College, in Virginia, where he enjoyed a seemingly bucolic existence. He taught neighboring boys how to hunt, how to sing his tribal songs, how to make fires. He told exciting tales about the elephants back home which were “big, very big.”

On March 19, 1916, Otto Bingo, as he was now known, danced by the fire, more frenzied than usual, more melancholy than usual. A few hours later, he pulled out a gun he had secured and shot himself in the heart.

Thus ends another racial Rashomon, another opportunity to debate whether the proverbial American racial glass is half empty or half full—and if America can ever cure itself of its racist birth defect. True, this heartrending story demonstrates the ongoing blight of American racism. But ultimately, Boas truths prevailed. Today, the Bronx Zoo’s spokesperson regrets this “mistake” from “a moment in time,” this blot on that fine institution’s history. Today, the overwhelming majority of Americans lament the greater blot of racism on our country’s history. And today, we all must dedicate ourselves to purging any vestiges of racism still lingering within our society, within our souls. We cannot rewrite history but we can—and must—do all we can to correct it.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... x-zoo.html

you do realise that Western society at that time was highly racist?

if you do, whey then post this?

User avatar
RASC
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8338
Joined: February 6th, 2004, 11:00 am

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby RASC » December 18th, 2016, 12:34 pm

NYT vacated 8 floors of their own building.
They're hemorrhaging money.

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby desifemlove » December 18th, 2016, 1:08 pm

Image

so some US rag defended it...meh, who gives a firetruck?

Sundar
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1443
Joined: July 5th, 2012, 12:33 pm
Location: Rock Road
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby Sundar » December 18th, 2016, 1:16 pm

desifemlove wrote:
Sundar wrote:If you look at society some people should be in cages. And all these gangs are similar to tribes of long ago. Fighting for territory and raiding raping killing. Mankind still hasn't evolved. White man still rules the world and sets the trends. All is sheep just follow blindly.

and people promoting tribal voting, cos they have to stick together, and cos they were "oppressed" long ago...ent? jus with a name like Sundar, you should know all about that, as it's as big a problem in this country as gangs. :lol:

My name is SUNDAR, you know nothing about me. You're a racist that hasn't evolved from the past and you never will. I feel you belong in a cage.

User avatar
Strugglerzinc
punchin NOS
Posts: 4043
Joined: July 1st, 2005, 11:11 am
Location: Second star to the right.

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby Strugglerzinc » December 18th, 2016, 1:33 pm

Dafuq is your point? How is this relevant to anything?

axe
I LUV THIS PLACE
Posts: 1071
Joined: May 2nd, 2007, 11:52 pm

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby axe » December 18th, 2016, 1:49 pm

Belgium had Human Zoos before this....King Leopold was a true monster: scraping rubber sap off natives with knives, cutting off children hands and feet if their father didnt make the quota of rubber gum. And he was given the Congo by the "league of nations" back then...

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: RE: Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby desifemlove » December 18th, 2016, 2:12 pm

Sundar wrote:
desifemlove wrote:
Sundar wrote:If you look at society some people should be in cages. And all these gangs are similar to tribes of long ago. Fighting for territory and raiding raping killing. Mankind still hasn't evolved. White man still rules the world and sets the trends. All is sheep just follow blindly.

and people promoting tribal voting, cos they have to stick together, and cos they were "oppressed" long ago...ent? jus with a name like Sundar, you should know all about that, as it's as big a problem in this country as gangs. :lol:

My name is SUNDAR, you know nothing about me. You're a racist that hasn't evolved from the past and you never will. I feel you belong in a cage.

haha...you've judged me a lot, i judge you. is there some rule that says people have to view your positively? act like a man and get over it. :mrgreen:

User avatar
Miktay
Shifting into 6th
Posts: 2088
Joined: July 30th, 2013, 1:13 am

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby Miktay » December 18th, 2016, 2:36 pm

RASC wrote:NYT vacated 8 floors of their own building.
They're hemorrhaging money.


Yep. Fewer ppl read or advertise in newspapers these days.

User avatar
MaxPower
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16065
Joined: October 31st, 2010, 2:37 pm

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby MaxPower » December 18th, 2016, 3:24 pm

Regardless of race, all lazy people should be enslaved and whipped.

Only then will the upcoming youth realize what time it is.

Sundar
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1443
Joined: July 5th, 2012, 12:33 pm
Location: Rock Road
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby Sundar » December 18th, 2016, 3:50 pm

desifemlove wrote:
Sundar wrote:
desifemlove wrote:
Sundar wrote:If you look at society some people should be in cages. And all these gangs are similar to tribes of long ago. Fighting for territory and raiding raping killing. Mankind still hasn't evolved. White man still rules the world and sets the trends. All is sheep just follow blindly.

and people promoting tribal voting, cos they have to stick together, and cos they were "oppressed" long ago...ent? jus with a name like Sundar, you should know all about that, as it's as big a problem in this country as gangs. :lol:

My name is SUNDAR, you know nothing about me. You're a racist that hasn't evolved from the past and you never will. I feel you belong in a cage.

haha...you've judged me a lot, i judge you. is there some rule that says people have to view your positively? act like a man and get over it. :mrgreen:

Have you ever had counseling? Someone to talk to? You should seek help before it's too late. Seriously. There's always a reason behind negative thinking.

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby desifemlove » December 18th, 2016, 6:24 pm

i'm sorry? haha...it seems that you keep continuing at it, then i'll come back..watch it...haha. like why do you presume i think negatively or want to scope me out? just gives me more ammo to judge you.lol.

Sundar
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1443
Joined: July 5th, 2012, 12:33 pm
Location: Rock Road
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby Sundar » December 18th, 2016, 8:49 pm

desifemlove wrote:i'm sorry? haha...it seems that you keep continuing at it, then i'll come back..watch it...haha. like why do you presume i think negatively or want to scope me out? just gives me more ammo to judge you.lol.

Well I don't take it lightly that you're making a mockery of my name. Which in turn is an insult to my culture. My parents gave that name to me according to scripture. How dare you insult me with your nasty attitude. How do you face your maker.

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby desifemlove » December 18th, 2016, 9:33 pm

eh? i'll repeat what i said, i judge you everytime you judge me.....haha. there's nothing saying i cannot,bar some random retard thought in yuh head.

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17912
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: RE: Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby De Dragon » December 19th, 2016, 8:50 am

Sundar wrote:
desifemlove wrote:i'm sorry? haha...it seems that you keep continuing at it, then i'll come back..watch it...haha. like why do you presume i think negatively or want to scope me out? just gives me more ammo to judge you.lol.

Well I don't take it lightly that you're making a mockery of my name. Which in turn is an insult to my culture. My parents gave that name to me according to scripture. How dare you insult me with your nasty attitude. How do you face your maker.

Don't bother. Feminine is the resident troll since pios ride out.............

Sundar
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1443
Joined: July 5th, 2012, 12:33 pm
Location: Rock Road
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby Sundar » December 19th, 2016, 11:51 am

De Dragon wrote:
Sundar wrote:
desifemlove wrote:i'm sorry? haha...it seems that you keep continuing at it, then i'll come back..watch it...haha. like why do you presume i think negatively or want to scope me out? just gives me more ammo to judge you.lol.

Well I don't take it lightly that you're making a mockery of my name. Which in turn is an insult to my culture. My parents gave that name to me according to scripture. How dare you insult me with your nasty attitude. How do you face your maker.

Don't bother. Feminine is the resident troll since pios ride out.............

Is the intermittent haha... Between words that links some underlying mental illness or something. I can sense the false front to get attention.

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17912
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby De Dragon » December 19th, 2016, 11:56 am

Sundar wrote:
De Dragon wrote:
Sundar wrote:
desifemlove wrote:i'm sorry? haha...it seems that you keep continuing at it, then i'll come back..watch it...haha. like why do you presume i think negatively or want to scope me out? just gives me more ammo to judge you.lol.

Well I don't take it lightly that you're making a mockery of my name. Which in turn is an insult to my culture. My parents gave that name to me according to scripture. How dare you insult me with your nasty attitude. How do you face your maker.

Don't bother. Feminine is the resident troll since pios ride out.............

Is the intermittent haha... Between words that links some underlying mental illness or something. I can sense the false front to get attention.

At least pios had some original ideas and thoughts. Femmy does talk pure sheit all the time without let up.

Daran
Shifting into 6th
Posts: 1989
Joined: May 13th, 2012, 1:39 pm

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby Daran » December 19th, 2016, 2:36 pm

Is this post meant to be some discussion prompt on racism or the fall of the NYT, anti-evolution?

Let's deal with all briefly:

RacismPrejudice based on race is stupid and ignorant -prejudice based on culture, behavior or religion is understandable and justifiable in many cases. In most cases modern day racism is an abstraction of continiued class prejudice.

NYT - They won't fail once the market for intelligent Trump bashing exists.

Evolution is real

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby desifemlove » December 19th, 2016, 6:00 pm

De Dragon wrote:
Sundar wrote:
De Dragon wrote:
Sundar wrote:
desifemlove wrote:i'm sorry? haha...it seems that you keep continuing at it, then i'll come back..watch it...haha. like why do you presume i think negatively or want to scope me out? just gives me more ammo to judge you.lol.

Well I don't take it lightly that you're making a mockery of my name. Which in turn is an insult to my culture. My parents gave that name to me according to scripture. How dare you insult me with your nasty attitude. How do you face your maker.

Don't bother. Feminine is the resident troll since pios ride out.............

Is the intermittent haha... Between words that links some underlying mental illness or something. I can sense the false front to get attention.

At least pios had some original ideas and thoughts. Femmy does talk pure sheit all the time without let up.

it depends.....i think you just parrot stuff the economists and "experts" say, and don't have time to be a true UNC.

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby desifemlove » December 19th, 2016, 6:04 pm

Sundar wrote:
De Dragon wrote:
Sundar wrote:
desifemlove wrote:i'm sorry? haha...it seems that you keep continuing at it, then i'll come back..watch it...haha. like why do you presume i think negatively or want to scope me out? just gives me more ammo to judge you.lol.

Well I don't take it lightly that you're making a mockery of my name. Which in turn is an insult to my culture. My parents gave that name to me according to scripture. How dare you insult me with your nasty attitude. How do you face your maker.

Don't bother. Feminine is the resident troll since pios ride out.............

Is the intermittent haha... Between words that links some underlying mental illness or something. I can sense the false front to get attention.

yes, so you scope me out, and try and beyotch that you are being "judged".....haha..did your "parents" tell you how to get on with people? maybe your "parents" should tell you or have told you that people can "judge" you all they want....

Sundar
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1443
Joined: July 5th, 2012, 12:33 pm
Location: Rock Road
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby Sundar » December 19th, 2016, 6:21 pm

desifemlove wrote:
Sundar wrote:
De Dragon wrote:
Sundar wrote:
desifemlove wrote:i'm sorry? haha...it seems that you keep continuing at it, then i'll come back..watch it...haha. like why do you presume i think negatively or want to scope me out? just gives me more ammo to judge you.lol.

Well I don't take it lightly that you're making a mockery of my name. Which in turn is an insult to my culture. My parents gave that name to me according to scripture. How dare you insult me with your nasty attitude. How do you face your maker.

Don't bother. Feminine is the resident troll since pios ride out.............

Is the intermittent haha... Between words that links some underlying mental illness or something. I can sense the false front to get attention.

yes, so you scope me out, and try and beyotch that you are being "judged".....haha..did your "parents" tell you how to get on with people? maybe your "parents" should tell you or have told you that people can "judge" you all they want....

Calm down dey judge Judy
I see you didn't have parents.

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby desifemlove » December 19th, 2016, 6:29 pm

no...but then you're upset a stranger is juding you....perhaps learn basic social comprehension next time.....or tell me why i have to view you positively??? haha...and take your God talk elsewhere, i dunno if you're a pundit or not, i doh care.

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17912
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby De Dragon » December 19th, 2016, 7:06 pm

desifemlove wrote:no...but then you're upset a stranger is juding you....perhaps learn basic social comprehension next time.....or tell me why i have to view you positively??? haha...and take your God talk elsewhere, i dunno if you're a pundit or not, i doh care.

I think his issue is being judged by someone with a single digit IQ. :wink:

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: New York Times Defended Putting This Man in a Zoo

Postby desifemlove » December 19th, 2016, 7:46 pm

De Dragon wrote:
desifemlove wrote:no...but then you're upset a stranger is juding you....perhaps learn basic social comprehension next time.....or tell me why i have to view you positively??? haha...and take your God talk elsewhere, i dunno if you're a pundit or not, i doh care.

I think his issue is being judged by someone with a single digit IQ. :wink:

not really...it's how it works.....he's a grown man (thouh I think woman)...is this how both of you behave in real life?? haha..do you even have a job, or wife/gf, and ting? is this how you behave in yuh big overseas wuk?? i think both of you have some asperger's condition...it fits in how you communicate....

I will judge him/her/it as long as he/she/it judges me! If he/she/it/you disagree...fine, then get checked or act like men...

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests