Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
BY next month, students enrolled at university could have to pay a third of their fees while postgraduate students may have to pay their full fees.
And come next year, if tertiary institutions are not accredited by the Accreditation Council of Trinidad and Tobago, funding will be stopped.
Those are some of the recommendations included in the report by the task force on the Government Assistance for Tuition Expenses (GATE) programme, which was handed over to Education Minister Anthony Garcia last week.
GATE, implemented under late prime minister Patrick Manning in 2004, funds free tertiary education in the country.
Kamla: Don’t remove GATE
Published on Jul 14, 2016, 11:00 pm
“It would be a step backward if we took away GATE (Government Assistance for Tuition Expenses) or restricted it.”
Opposition Leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar commented yesterday during a question and answer segment with American motivational speaker Dawnna St Louis. The event was part of the Women In Leadership Conference hosted by the Arthur Lok Jack Graduate School of Business, at Hilton Trinidad, St Ann’s.
“The vision is for education, the opportunity for upliftment,” said Persad-Bissessar. “We opened the door for tech-vocational studies. I know Education Minister Anthony Garcia has the GATE report. I look forward to the report. Education is the passport out of poverty.”
On Tuesday, Garcia said students applying to tertiary institutions at the start of the new academic year in September, have been advised to continue doing what they need to do as they await Cabinet’s decision on the future of the GATE programme. The Minister said he would be submitting the 70-page report, which contained an executive summary, various analyses and recommendations, to Cabinet.
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/20160714 ... emove-gate
Ronaldo95163 wrote:Not beating up over this but it confuses me but this government prioritizes things.
They done budget 90 mil to fix Brian Lara stadium
Big spend on paintings when they get elected
Big money govt vehicle
Millions to fix red house
iirc there was some eric williams building dey wanted to build too.
But then wanna cut back on education?
Up to now schol money for schols awarded last year cya even pay yet.
PNM yes
Ronaldo95163 wrote:Not beating up over this but it confuses me but this government prioritizes things.
They done budget 90 mil to fix Brian Lara stadium
Big spend on paintings when they get elected
Big money govt vehicle
Millions to fix red house
iirc there was some eric williams building dey wanted to build too.
But then wanna cut back on education?
Up to now schol money for schols awarded last year cya even pay yet.
PNM yes
Ronaldo95163 wrote:Not beating up over this but it confuses me but this government prioritizes things.
They done budget 90 mil to fix Brian Lara stadium
Big spend on paintings when they get elected
Big money govt vehicle
Millions to fix red house
iirc there was some eric williams building dey wanted to build too.
But then wanna cut back on education?
Up to now schol money for schols awarded last year cya even pay yet.
PNM yes
maj. tom wrote:Yeah seems fair.
but FMS not getting a different plan?
1/3 of MBBS/DDS/OPTM ($71,000 to $90,000/year) is way more than the entire of Engineering ($18,000/year).
$6000/year compared to $30,000/year in fees. Is that really the plan to make education affordable to qualified students who cannot afford it?
neexis wrote:maj. tom wrote:Yeah seems fair.
but FMS not getting a different plan?
1/3 of MBBS/DDS/OPTM ($71,000 to $90,000/year) is way more than the entire of Engineering ($18,000/year).
$6000/year compared to $30,000/year in fees. Is that really the plan to make education affordable to qualified students who cannot afford it?
Maybe that's part of the plan to control class sizes. They are putting out more MBBS and DDS graduates than there are jobs for them locally.
zoom rader wrote:I say remove Gate, we need more drain cleaners and men to mix concrete.
zoom rader wrote:I say remove Gate, we need more drain cleaners and men to mix concrete.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:^ To be fair GATE isn't pennies eh, it is a HEAVY burden on tax payers who are paying $50,000 for in most cases glorified A levels and glorified trade certificates being marketed as a degree. And the young people get a fine education for free up to A levels, A levels is not easy it is easier now than before but it still isn't easy the vast majority of students in secondary school never reach A levels so I would say they are getting a damn fine education for free. What many are failing to realize is there are no jobs for our graduates with degrees now, I know people with masters degree who can't find employment and those that do struggle to make more than $6k a month. Right now things like trade has way more money than these degrees. We need to stop wasting tax dollars on this program, GATE devalues a degree.
A degree should be something of a rare commodity. The only degrees that need funding is things like Medical Degrees etc. Skills that we are lacking in this country, and doctors should be forced to work for the state for a minimum of 7 years if they choose to have their degree paid for by the state.
BUT when a degree is dollar for dollar, there is no such thing as exploiting the system it is infact the perfect system. You can't complain that nobody want to help you and at the same time tax payers can't complain that their money is going to waste. Completely remove GATE, bring back dollar for dollar and you will see how quickly all these fly by night degree programs will disappear. Why do we need to pay $50,000 for someone to do a Gender Study degree or a Degree in Peace Studies or a Degree in Carnival etc this is a slap in the face to tax payers.
Yofoot wrote:GATE was set up from the get go to be taken advantage of, free for all.
All a student needs to do was go to tertiary institute, apply for course, fill out GATE form and then start said course, the institute will then send forms to MOE for payment. its as if approval is automatic with no effort from student what so ever. There is no class size cap AFAIK. So it was a matter of getting as much students into courses which equals more money for institute.
Free tertiary education is actually a great idea but was never implemented properly. They should've tried to fixed the implementation in a different way before jumping directly to students has to pay.
Just my idea of what can work:
1) Cap class sizes on all accredited courses
2) Student applies to accredited institute and is approved based on qualifications (class sizes is capped so no free for all)
3) STUDENT takes acceptance letter to MOE themselves
4) MOE reviews acceptance and verifies with institute then provides funds to institute directly, with student getting a receipt
5) Student needs to do this EVERY semester and also has to keep up grade average.
This way, although the student is not paying, they are still expected to put in work and be responsible for getting the funding. It is not automatic.
This will of course mean more work for the MOE and will most lightly cause a rush around application time but the motivated will see it through.
Just an idea.
sMASH wrote:so u really saying, dont educate and qualify yourself because it would be hard to monetize it later? thats just backward.
but cleaning up the system to make it less free for all, is how it should have been in the first place. making the potential student work for what they get, will help cut down on who is doing it just because they can, and keep who really want.
what yofoot has presented are reasonable, for the most part. and i would really like to the government to evaluate the institutions, courses, and the curriculum to ensure they are worth attaining... i went sams for a time, and that was a waste of money, time and effort.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests