Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
PariaMan wrote:Reality is as history has shown PNM are much much more likely to change their vote .
Actually all changes in government so far has been due to that swing PNM vote
Unc diehards vote one way always
Remember NAR 1986
Panday 2001
PP 2010
Those swing PNM will do the right as always and vote out PNM
Dizzy28 wrote:PariaMan wrote:Reality is as history has shown PNM are much much more likely to change their vote .
Actually all changes in government so far has been due to that swing PNM vote
Unc diehards vote one way always
Remember NAR 1986
Panday 2001
PP 2010
Those swing PNM will do the right as always and vote out PNM
This would be a nice hypothesis if it were true.
Swing votes not swing PNM votes won the elections for the PP in 2010.
You do know in 2007 PNM won an election with 299k votes and they lost winning 12 seats in 2010 with 284k votes.
There was no mass exodus of die hard PNMs.
If anything UNC die hards swung harder between 2002 and 2007.
The vote loss to the UNC was 71k in 2007 while the PNM actually gained votes between 2002 and 2007. This is with a reasonably well positioned 3rd party.
Tell me more about die hards though!!!!
Note: Given the static demography the nice thing is our electorate changes marginally.
hover11 wrote:.
VexXx Dogg wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:PariaMan wrote:Reality is as history has shown PNM are much much more likely to change their vote .
Actually all changes in government so far has been due to that swing PNM vote
Unc diehards vote one way always
Remember NAR 1986
Panday 2001
PP 2010
Those swing PNM will do the right as always and vote out PNM
This would be a nice hypothesis if it were true.
Swing votes not swing PNM votes won the elections for the PP in 2010.
You do know in 2007 PNM won an election with 299k votes and they lost winning 12 seats in 2010 with 284k votes.
There was no mass exodus of die hard PNMs.
If anything UNC die hards swung harder between 2002 and 2007.
The vote loss to the UNC was 71k in 2007 while the PNM actually gained votes between 2002 and 2007. This is with a reasonably well positioned 3rd party.
Tell me more about die hards though!!!!
Note: Given the static demography the nice thing is our electorate changes marginally.
_Formerly_ static demography.
Latinx getting citizenship and making new citizens. Voting patterns will change over time. Maybe as short as the next 2-3 election cycles. Political strategy will have to shift to pander to this new subpop.
PNM gets votes by appealing to the urban youth which is left foot right foot and other Gangster songs or 6ixx or whatever its calledj.o.e wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:PariaMan wrote:Reality is as history has shown PNM are much much more likely to change their vote .
Actually all changes in government so far has been due to that swing PNM vote
Unc diehards vote one way always
Remember NAR 1986
Panday 2001
PP 2010
Those swing PNM will do the right as always and vote out PNM
This would be a nice hypothesis if it were true.
Swing votes not swing PNM votes won the elections for the PP in 2010.
You do know in 2007 PNM won an election with 299k votes and they lost winning 12 seats in 2010 with 284k votes.
There was no mass exodus of die hard PNMs.
If anything UNC die hards swung harder between 2002 and 2007.
The vote loss to the UNC was 71k in 2007 while the PNM actually gained votes between 2002 and 2007. This is with a reasonably well positioned 3rd party.
Tell me more about die hards though!!!!
Note: Given the static demography the nice thing is our electorate changes marginally.
_Formerly_ static demography.
Latinx getting citizenship and making new citizens. Voting patterns will change over time. Maybe as short as the next 2-3 election cycles. Political strategy will have to shift to pander to this new subpop.
It’s not significant enough. Let’s say 20k people spread around multiple constituencies. A bulk of new votes with a known voting preference in a marginal might matter. But that’s not the case. More Vennies in central for e.g not gonna help any party.
death365 wrote:5 more days till all is forgotten ... back to normal
The price of delivery for KFC and Pizza Hut has gone up by $5.
Prestige Holdings Ltd CEO Simon Hardy says while some customers would not be pleased with the increase, it was necessary to balance costs to the company.
Speaking with Newsday on Wednesday, Hardy said the delivery fee for KFC and Pizza Hut meals had been increased to $25 on September 20.
"At the end of the day, I hate raising prices, and we acknowledge it will mean an extra cost to those delivery customers.
"However, it is bringing convenience to people.
"Again, we hate to have to increase costs, but we also have to balance our costs with the service we provide, and this is what we felt was best. It went into effect before (the budget): when the last change in gasoline prices happened we increased the rates to our drivers.
"Delivery is a very expensive channel and we subsidise every meal we deliver but we can no longer absorb that kind of subsidy."
Prestige Holdings Ltd is the franchise holder for KFC, Pizza Hut, TGI Fridays, Subway and Starbucks.
In March, KFC introduced a charge of $2 for three packets of ketchup or mustard. The decision sparked widespread criticism on social media and in April a media release announced the charge would be dropped.
Use what is recommended in the book. What kind of vehicle is itdeath365 wrote:Hijack thread time... for the Super vs Premium gas question again.
so yesterday i finally got my new vehicle and the EVIL book and dealership says that it has to use 95 premium and not super. the question is can i use our local super gas with little or no consequences?
Use puncheon bhaideath365 wrote:Hijack thread time... for the Super vs Premium gas question again.
so yesterday i finally got my new vehicle and the EVIL book and dealership says that it has to use 95 premium and not super. the question is can i use our local super gas with little or no consequences?
I don't know if you can flash and remap the ECU in these like the older models but the ECU has been very flexible in adjusting for octane levels in older models. They adjust for the lower octane but it's always wise to retune for longevity.death365 wrote:its a Subaru XV 1.6 ... book says 95 Ron
death365 wrote:Hijack thread time... for the Super vs Premium gas question again.
so yesterday i finally got my new vehicle and the EVIL book and dealership says that it has to use 95 premium and not super. the question is can i use our local super gas with little or no consequences?
eliteauto wrote:Considering the cost benefit ratio is better you use the recommended fuel. Is the price difference between super and premium great enough to contribute to huge savings over time? Would the ecu compensate for the lower RON by dumping more fuel which would negate the savings? Would the potential less than optimal operating conditions negate the savings? I think it's better to use the premium and tune your ankle for smarter driving
rollingstock wrote:Honestly the super is crap anyway. The higher cost of the premium negates itself with the extra mileage gained compared to the super for me
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 123 guests