Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
nervewrecker wrote:Desalcott in point lisas has a 40mgd plant.
I know of one in Moruga I'd like to visit one day and iirc seven seas has something to do with the third somewhere along the south western peninsula. I'm not sure of their output.
They provide potable water from filtration of saline water via reverse osmosis. The process name pretty much sums up the operation and consumes large amounts of energy. If I'm not mistaken we aren't paying the cost price for water either. That might be the next thing price will be increased on.
Still unsure of Emilio point.
A reservoir / s would have been a good idea outside of cities plagued by flooding in the rainy season. Collect the excess run off that drainage infrastructure can't accommodate and treat it. If not made potable, introduce a grey water system self.
A reservoir is a far better idea than a stadium.
Redman wrote:If we flex seal toruba..that will work?
IMHO.
Meter the end user.
Attach a cost.
Start billing ...with the intent to start collecting in a year.
This will make us all more aware and able to measure our usage.
What is measured can be managed/ conserved
We then can.
-Attaché a value to water we collectively and individually use
-See what is actually delivered to the end user,vs what is sent by suppliers.
Solve the issues based on real data.
Have all data published real time.
Redman wrote:If we flex seal toruba..that will work?
IMHO.
Meter the end user.
Attach a cost.
Start billing ...with the intent to start collecting in a year.
This will make us all more aware and able to measure our usage.
What is measured can be managed/ conserved
We then can.
-Attaché a value to water we collectively and individually use
-See what is actually delivered to the end user,vs what is sent by suppliers.
Solve the issues based on real data.
Have all data published real time.
Metering is pretty expensive though. They can and should start with all those properties that have multiple rental apartments and then move on down to individual households after.
Redman wrote:The bottled water companies pay WASA a very small rate per gallon.
"Filter' it and sell.
It's like cocaine without the noise.
I wish I thought of it
The mean annual rainfall in the country is 2 200 mm (Table 2). Long-term annual renewable surface water resources are estimated at 3 740 million m3, of which 3 600 million m3 in Trinidad and 140 million m3 in Tobago. Long-term average annual renewable groundwater resources are estimated at 614 million m3, of which 545 million m3 in Trinidad and 69 million m3 in Tobago. Considering an overlap between surface water and groundwater resources of 514 million m3, the total Internal Renewable Water Resources (IRWR) are estimated at 3 840 million m3/year.
In 2011, total water withdrawal in the country was estimated at 383.2 million m3 of which 237.6 million m3 or 62 percent for municipal use, 128.9 million m3 or 34 percent for industrial use and 16.7 million m3 or 4 percent for agricultural use (Table 3 and Figure 1).
nervewrecker wrote:EmilioA wrote:nervewrecker wrote:EmilioA wrote:nervewrecker wrote:EmilioA wrote:nervewrecker wrote:EmilioA wrote:
Is a pond you feel you digging ?
A new reservoir is a multi year project. and it go probably have to start in the dry season so the rain dont wash away the construction.
Separately the 4 new desal plants were supposed to remove the need for a new reservoir. I wondering what them doing .
1 - we in dry season
2 - desal plants have a high operating cost. might be cheaper to dig the reservoir.
You know we have 4 desal plants already and plans for 2 more ?
How many times have we stayed on the path towards sustainable development?
That's not an answer. If you know nothing about the desal plants just say so.
I happen to know it's energy intensive and costs taxpayers more per gallon than it would be to treat a gallon of fresh water from a source that is of exceptional quality.
But as laws aren't enforced and the environment is neglected our fresh water reserves quality drop so it now costs more per gallon.
As the costs increase and some cannot be treated with the conventional methods we now have to turn to desalination. It's expensive and it wouldn't have cost anything to enforce the law and protect the environment.
What's your argument again?
What are the desal plants doing NOW ?
What kind of question is that?
Make your point plz. I don't think we both on the same page here.
pete wrote:Is the 41% lost in leaks?
shogun wrote:What's the current status on these regulations?
Think it's safe to say precipitation isn't a problem anymore?
Rory Phoulorie wrote:shogun wrote:What's the current status on these regulations?
Think it's safe to say precipitation isn't a problem anymore?
A few days of rain and all the reservoirs and aquifers replenished?
shogun, you izza a borse hydrogeologist.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Dizzy28, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], tool-band, VexXx Dogg and 129 guests