Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
paid_influencer wrote:why d rass you calling it a pet? you so dotish you don't realize that is in no way a pet? it is a dangerous animal, even defined in law as such. you hadda be dotish or willfully cruntish to calling that a pet.
if you, for whatever god damn reason, want to keep that animal on your premises, you are responsible for it. there is no divine right to keep an animal like that on your premises. WE allow YOU to keep that animal under the condition you are responsible for it and all its actions. If it kill somebody, YOU are responsible for that.
If you not comfortable with that, do not have that animal on your premises. simple. it real basic. even dotish people who think that animal is a pet could understand that
rollingstock wrote:My pompeks bite more people than I can count. Almost all incidents from persons underestimating the ankle biters.
Rott, pit and shepherds only ever bit slippers, shoes, mats and mudguards. 4kin pompek bit me too. We should ban those small aggressive dogs also.
It's unlikely that the parents will take any legal action. The owner of the dog and the mother of the deceased are siblings. The mother is already saddened by the loss of her daughter, now she is fearful that she will also lose her brother to prison (her words). Also, both parents of the deceased hold active portfolios in the church so they're leaning towards biblical resolve rather than legal.hover11 wrote:Owner of killer dog in police custody
https://trinidadexpress.com/news/local/ ... ium=social
Hope the parent takes them to civil court as well it may not get back his daughter but ppl have to understand negligence has consequences
redmanjp wrote:i find the law should include dogs and cats that being a pest- coming every single day to defecate on your lawn.
Dizzy28 wrote:redmanjp wrote:i find the law should include dogs and cats that being a pest- coming every single day to defecate on your lawn.
You going to trigger the animal rights crew. You don't remember the big backlash when someone poisoned the stray cats by Caroni close to the Caroni tours area down there?
killercow wrote:It's unlikely that the parents will take any legal action. The owner of the dog and the mother of the deceased are siblings. The mother is already saddened by the loss of her daughter, now she is fearful that she will also lose her brother to prison (her words). Also, both parents of the deceased hold active portfolios in the church so they're leaning towards biblical resolve rather than legal.hover11 wrote:Owner of killer dog in police custody
https://trinidadexpress.com/news/local/ ... ium=social
Hope the parent takes them to civil court as well it may not get back his daughter but ppl have to understand negligence has consequences
A three-year-old boy is now hospitalised after being mauled by a dog at his Barrackpore home on Monday.
Cassyann Dass believes her quick action saved his life.
rollingstock wrote:My pompeks bite more people than I can count. Almost all incidents from persons underestimating the ankle biters.
Rott, pit and shepherds only ever bit slippers, shoes, mats and mudguards. 4kin pompek bit me too. We should ban those small aggressive dogs also.
How come the child didn't get knocked down in the road? Because as parents you are supposed to take precautions with small children!dogg wrote:Lovers of violent killer dogs will say to blame the mother for having the child in the first place not so? Cuz the dog is a good boy.
Monday Nov 15A three-year-old boy is now hospitalised after being mauled by a dog at his Barrackpore home on Monday.
Cassyann Dass believes her quick action saved his life.
dogg wrote:Lovers of violent killer dogs will say to blame the mother for having the child in the first place not so? Cuz the dog is a good boy.
Monday Nov 15A three-year-old boy is now hospitalised after being mauled by a dog at his Barrackpore home on Monday.
Cassyann Dass believes her quick action saved his life.
MaxPower wrote:Fellas now ketching up here.
Most importantly, is the dog okay?
De Dragon wrote:MaxPower wrote:Fellas now ketching up here.
Most importantly, is the dog okay?
No moron, the dog is dead.
MaxPower wrote:De Dragon wrote:MaxPower wrote:Fellas now ketching up here.
Most importantly, is the dog okay?
No moron, the dog is dead.
Animal cruelty.
Irresponsible parents again…you should know what i talking about.
MaxPower wrote:De Dragon wrote:MaxPower wrote:Fellas now ketching up here.
Most importantly, is the dog okay?
No moron, the dog is dead.
Animal cruelty.
Irresponsible parents again…you should know what i talking about.
Film him and turn footage over to the police.Theres a huge fine for those things now.nemisis wrote:It have a neighbor a neighbor living on a back street that every morning and night as he passes the side of the house does he pelting the dog in the yard. His reasons is the dog does be barking at him when he passing the house. Tell me why I need to put up cameras at cost to myself to start to be able to get a handle on this stupidness
alfa wrote:Max I suggest you take time to read the article. The kid was in his home which was newly built and unfenced. The dog belonged to a contractor who's a neighbor and was allowed to roam the streets freely and was reported to have attached another kid before. The owner is to blame and the express today claimed he threatened the kid's parents if they went public. The dog is an Akita pot hound mix so banning dangerous dogs is irrelevant here unless people want to ban dogs on the whole
timelapse wrote:Film him and turn footage over to the police.Theres a huge fine for those things now.nemisis wrote:It have a neighbor a neighbor living on a back street that every morning and night as he passes the side of the house does he pelting the dog in the yard. His reasons is the dog does be barking at him when he passing the house. Tell me why I need to put up cameras at cost to myself to start to be able to get a handle on this stupidness
A little idiot by me keeps doing things to aggravate my dogs I spoke to his mother and told her in plain talk that if my dogs ever escape,they will be coming for him first.I have footage of him pelting my dogs from outside, and if he doesn't stop,I will be calling the police.I haven't had that issue again with him, so I won't pursue it further.
nemisis wrote:It have a neighbor a neighbor living on a back street that every morning and night as he passes the side of the house does he pelting the dog in the yard. His reasons is the dog does be barking at him when he passing the house. Tell me why I need to put up cameras at cost to myself to start to be able to get a handle on this stupidness
Any dog owner will tell you.The owner needs more training than the dog.88sins wrote:nemisis wrote:It have a neighbor a neighbor living on a back street that every morning and night as he passes the side of the house does he pelting the dog in the yard. His reasons is the dog does be barking at him when he passing the house. Tell me why I need to put up cameras at cost to myself to start to be able to get a handle on this stupidness
Your next investment needs to be a wrist-rocket and a big bag of marbles. Same treatment he giving your animal in your yard, he should be able to take in return.
As regards the article, I really sorry for the kid.
And I know some short-sighted idiots go say "kill all dem bad dog before they bite somebody". But the fact is that the owner is responsible, not all dogs everywhere.
I wonder if it's feasible to have the state set up an obedience training program, where you go and pay a small fee and go to the class and get instruction on training your pet. No bitework or agitation, just basic commands. And afterwards, you have to show the animal is actually properly obedience trained to get a certificate for the animal.
As it is now, paying for training from a professional experienced trainer is expensive, and that is one of the main reasons why most people DON'T bother with it, they don't see the point in paying 2500-3500 to train a dog
pugboy wrote:not always possible,
dogs can sense if a person has a weak personality,
no amount of "training" the owner can help
88sins wrote:nemisis wrote:It have a neighbor a neighbor living on a back street that every morning and night as he passes the side of the house does he pelting the dog in the yard. His reasons is the dog does be barking at him when he passing the house. Tell me why I need to put up cameras at cost to myself to start to be able to get a handle on this stupidness
Your next investment needs to be a wrist-rocket and a big bag of marbles. Same treatment he giving your animal in your yard, he should be able to take in return.
As regards the article, I really sorry for the kid.
And I know some short-sighted idiots go say "kill all dem bad dog before they bite somebody". But the fact is that the owner is responsible, not all dogs everywhere.
I wonder if it's feasible to have the state set up an obedience training program, where you go and pay a small fee and go to the class and get instruction on training your pet. No bitework or agitation, just basic commands. And afterwards, you have to show the animal is actually properly obedience trained to get a certificate for the animal.
As it is now, paying for training from a professional experienced trainer is expensive, and that is one of the main reasons why most people DON'T bother with it, they don't see the point in paying 2500-3500 to train a dog
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Gladiator, Google Adsense [Bot] and 74 guests