Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
rspann wrote:Used parts anyone ?
mrtrini45 wrote:rspann wrote:Used parts anyone ?
Is it for sale
Type Rated wrote:3e541c13-f5ad-4a26-b513-d952078be922.jpg
New machine?
Where does it say that the chopper is for executive travel?Habit7 wrote:The govt had the choice to use the executively outfitted Sikorsky S76D (to go nowhere necessary) along with the lease, insurance, maintenance, fuel and staff training cost. When they do, the UNC would say see, you are using the helicopter for executive travel just as we did.
Or run try to break the lease and settle damages. But the govt is to blame for not returning it as soon as possible.
Nevertheless, why did we need such large twin-engine helicopter for executive travel within T&T?
What you wanna know about choppers bro ?Redman wrote:ZR you never work aviation....so you eh know one fck
zoom rader wrote:Where does it say that the chopper is for executive travel?Habit7 wrote:The govt had the choice to use the executively outfitted Sikorsky S76D (to go nowhere necessary) along with the lease, insurance, maintenance, fuel and staff training cost. When they do, the UNC would say see, you are using the helicopter for executive travel just as we did.
Or run try to break the lease and settle damages. But the govt is to blame for not returning it as soon as possible.
Nevertheless, why did we need such large twin-engine helicopter for executive travel within T&T?
Who or which official document indicates it was brought for executive trsvel?
Is this the case of the Jet that the red government wanted to buy under Manning for his travels?
Young has many things before like the covid-19 exemption is a first come first serve basis and then he change it .Habit7 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Where does it say that the chopper is for executive travel?Habit7 wrote:The govt had the choice to use the executively outfitted Sikorsky S76D (to go nowhere necessary) along with the lease, insurance, maintenance, fuel and staff training cost. When they do, the UNC would say see, you are using the helicopter for executive travel just as we did.
Or run try to break the lease and settle damages. But the govt is to blame for not returning it as soon as possible.
Nevertheless, why did we need such large twin-engine helicopter for executive travel within T&T?
Who or which official document indicates it was brought for executive trsvel?
Is this the case of the Jet that the red government wanted to buy under Manning for his travels?
Sikorsky S76D is called the Executive Helicopter https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/ ... 0_READ.pdf
Young said it was outfitted for executive travel https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/young-w ... c7d8a7590a
Manning is dead, this is about the helicopter now. Stop deflecting.
Sikorskys are the bread and butter of UK rigg serviceHabit7 wrote:You dont trust Lockheed Martin either?
Redman wrote:lol
but ZR... again you eh turn a spanner on a chopper----so therefore by your singularly stupid logic- you eh know one fack about it....and therefore should shut up
Redman wrote:But you never mention that....ok carry on boss.
By the way....you did work for PNM too?
Cuz yuh does talk bout them plenty...
sMASH wrote:Edmund dillion and small pin had enogh chance to undo the contract for the helicopter of they wasnt using it.
It was their time now. That 100m is on young.
Nah, bia used do Radar in the early 1990s . Money was not that great and jobs was few and far in trini. Went on to Instrument control from that job.jm3 wrote:lol zr that is a total lie
Never said I worked on Northrop and not in Trinidad.jm3 wrote:you never worked on noc 5
Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:Edmund dillion and small pin had enogh chance to undo the contract for the helicopter of they wasnt using it.
It was their time now. That 100m is on young.
“The proposed terms agreed to contained a net lease clause - basically this prevented us, the people of Trinidad and Tobago, from terminating this lease arrangement. So in other words from the day you sign this lease arrangement for five years, you are then bound to pay the full cost of the lease arrangement and you cannot terminate the contract if you terminated it two months, three months later you were then bound to pay the full extent of this contract,”
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/young-w ... c7d8a7590a
sMASH wrote:Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:Edmund dillion and small pin had enogh chance to undo the contract for the helicopter of they wasnt using it.
It was their time now. That 100m is on young.
“The proposed terms agreed to contained a net lease clause - basically this prevented us, the people of Trinidad and Tobago, from terminating this lease arrangement. So in other words from the day you sign this lease arrangement for five years, you are then bound to pay the full cost of the lease arrangement and you cannot terminate the contract if you terminated it two months, three months later you were then bound to pay the full extent of this contract,”
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/young-w ... c7d8a7590a
they coudl renegotiate the million dollar bullet payment for the malcom jones wgtl loan, they could renegotiate this.
and someone said that they had renewed the lease in 2016, during edmund dillion's term.
if any body know about reversing a court decision is these two nat sec ministers.