Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Habit 7 and Redman are both instrument technicians in their spare time web searchingsMASH wrote:No tank dip or level readings or flow trends available to cross check the quantities. All remaining is the signed receipts from Doekisingh to cross check the dips from nazim Baksh wells.
I wonder what was the fone call to Baksh that night. Was about.
Nah , they have to do Web searches to find out dat.sMASH wrote:They calibrating the depth of Rowley k hole
zoom rader wrote:Habit 7 and Redman are both instrument technicians in their spare time web searchingsMASH wrote:No tank dip or level readings or flow trends available to cross check the quantities. All remaining is the signed receipts from Doekisingh to cross check the dips from nazim Baksh wells.
I wonder what was the fone call to Baksh that night. Was about.
200 m waste, after we was lashed we need to tighten belts and eat one fig.Redman wrote:Hasnt the board changed?
Red government scampsRedman wrote:So who is the board.?
Also AV MC.
sMASH wrote:It's on the scale of thr beethsm Waste water treatment plant... Beetham plant is too expensive for the output ur gonna get from it... Thr compressor project trying to solve the problem of low gas supply. That cat be solved that way, only more gas. U can't compress gas u don't have.
sMASH wrote:It's on the scale of thr beethsm Waste water treatment plant... Beetham plant is too expensive for the output ur gonna get from it... Thr compressor project trying to solve the problem of low gas supply. That cat be solved that way, only more gas. U can't compress gas u don't have.
lancer_man wrote:sMASH wrote:It's on the scale of thr beethsm Waste water treatment plant... Beetham plant is too expensive for the output ur gonna get from it... Thr compressor project trying to solve the problem of low gas supply. That cat be solved that way, only more gas. U can't compress gas u don't have.
The business case for compression would have been to reduce offshore platform manifold and tubing head pressures, which maximizes reservoir recovery and provides more gas volumes into the network than would be possible with natural flow and network pressures. What seems to be the problem with this project is that TROC achieved the same purpose, making these compressors redundant. Where it appears the ball was dropped was determining if the project was still viable before pulling the trigger on procurement and commencement of execution.
Best they sell it , the red government has failed another business.sMASH wrote:Ngc going so good thry need to borrow???
sMASH wrote:Ngc going so good thry need to borrow???
FB_IMG_1634860035021.jpg
zoom rader wrote:Red government ppl will save they took that loan to make a profit
Bull5hitRedman wrote:If only the NGCs capital base wasn't raided via an unheard of dividend policy.
16B TTD plus debt, plus
And yes Dragon the renegotiating of the complex has increased the revenue we get from LNG... especially given the prices in Euro and Asia
In terms of the loan I haven't read what it's for.
But if the ROI is higher than the cost of funds..then it makes sense in that regard.
What experience you have in lng ?Redman wrote:If only the NGCs capital base wasn't raided via an unheard of dividend policy.
16B TTD plus debt, plus
And yes Dragon the renegotiating of the complex has increased the revenue we get from LNG... especially given the prices in Euro and Asia
In terms of the loan I haven't read what it's for.
But if the ROI is higher than the cost of funds..then it makes sense in that regard.
He has no industrial experience, he's just a keyboard pu55y that sits and looks for infor on the webCantmis wrote:What experience you have in lng ?Redman wrote:If only the NGCs capital base wasn't raided via an unheard of dividend policy.
16B TTD plus debt, plus
And yes Dragon the renegotiating of the complex has increased the revenue we get from LNG... especially given the prices in Euro and Asia
In terms of the loan I haven't read what it's for.
But if the ROI is higher than the cost of funds..then it makes sense in that regard.
Yes that's the recipe.sMASH wrote:Load it down with debt. Split it up, pipe it off
Cantmis wrote:What experience you have in lng ?Redman wrote:If only the NGCs capital base wasn't raided via an unheard of dividend policy.
16B TTD plus debt, plus
And yes Dragon the renegotiating of the complex has increased the revenue we get from LNG... especially given the prices in Euro and Asia
In terms of the loan I haven't read what it's for.
But if the ROI is higher than the cost of funds..then it makes sense in that regard.
Production from Manatee "could start as early as 2025, but this depends on the speed at which the parties can install infrastructure," the energy ministry told Argus today.
Output is projected to start at 300mn cf/d, rising to 700mn cf/d, the ministry said.
"The Manatee development presents a significant medium-term opportunity for the local energy sector to bolster gas supply to both domestic and LNG export markets," Shell said.
Redman wrote:If only the NGCs capital base wasn't raided via an unheard of dividend policy.
16B TTD plus debt, plus
And yes Dragon the renegotiating of the complex has increased the revenue we get from LNG... especially given the prices in Euro and Asia
In terms of the loan I haven't read what it's for.
But if the ROI is higher than the cost of funds..then it makes sense in that regard.