Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
I am afraid that wing displays pantie man behavior, its a common trend among PNM bloggers.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:wing wrote:Never see come see from the bush. He only know about going down by the river and harassing families with stupid panel van noise. Logic escapes those who live through race politics. If the stadium was in grande, once is PNM he'll find a problem with it.eliteauto wrote:This falls squarely on the LOC, re the parking restrictions and the park and ride system. The traffic management was also terrible, I felt sorry for those coming off the highway at Gasparillo and those coming through from Marabella.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:https://trinidadexpress.com/news/local/park-and-walk---pain-for-cricket-fans/article_2017eb50-29ef-11ef-956b-6b4cde196a38.html
Soooo after how much hundred million spent on this stadium we still have to get it right? From day 1, the location was brainless! Just another way for somebody to eat ah food again.
Race politics? You talking about logic? That stadium was never supposed to be there in the first place. Both parties are at fault for that. It's simple common sense, but typical retard as you are... Once you comment on the party in power you are automatically an opposition supporter.
You keep calling out my music hobby though? Jealously kills I see. FYI, I don't disturb the peace. Period! There is an entire forum dedicated to car audio so I suggest you trying getting off elsewhere. If you are to poor to afford a hobby, that's not my fault.
zoom rader wrote:Habit7 has said a few times that Petrotrin is profitable a good few times on tuner.sMASH wrote:zoom rader wrote:Meanwhile Habit7 goes around telling ppl Petrotrin still opensMASH wrote:The workers are not the same, the management are not the same, the directors are not the same, non of the pensions or other perks like medical are the same... Even the names are not the same.zoom rader wrote:Jobs lost & forex lost with a host of lies produced to say Petrotrin pre 2018 was not profitable.Habit7 wrote:matix wrote:https://youtu.be/hxcOyh5cdfo?si=Phet2hph3aPLu5r2
Whenever I see someone cites this as a lie, it loudly tells me that they don’t know what Petrotrin did pre 2018 and what they are doing now. I suggest they look up what is an integrated oil company.
Jack arse country
They closed down petrotrin and opened paria ,heritage , a paper company called petrotrin and some other entity nobody talks about so I cant recall .
The way allyuh does watch point a Pierre say petrotrin didnt close is the same way so much allyuh minding other man children..If so ,has "petrotrin" been profitable?Habit7 wrote:alfa wrote:I want him to try and walk into the compound with a petrotrin logo on a coverall and see what happens.
Well that is called trespassing. Anybody walking onto any compound they are not authorised to do so is breaking the law. Nevertheless, it doesn't refute the fact that Petrotrin was not closed down but successfully restructured to be the profitable, tax-paying entity it wasn't. That was 5yrs ago, get over it.
Even wiki says it's closed. Evvvvvvry body reading internet will learn thst it closed .
All business students understand that restructuring where everybody changed out ,even the names and business models ,means it was closed .
If a secondary school student do a project and they Google it, they woyid see it was closed .
The only way they seeing it "restructured " is in balisier house archives ... Where it also says Eric Williams battled prince Charles to liberate trinidad to become republic , and not the crown getting rid of colonies ,and we just happened to to be one to get kicked out to independence .
I dont have time to search & post his quote, but if he continues tobe an arse i will find and post.
Also i remember clearly he also said he post stuff and make tuners believe. Like the rest of pnm bloggers this is how they operate.
pugboy wrote:https://www.instagram.com/reel/C8MxiYvKwBR/?igsh=aGR0c251OWdlN3g1shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Reporter : we are seeing an increase in home invasions
PM: Really?
Reporter: yes there has been a lot
PM: Its not a matter of it increasing... It just happening
Can't make this sheit up.... Allyuh defend the mild of Rooster there
pugboy wrote:https://www.instagram.com/reel/C8MxiYvKwBR/?igsh=aGR0c251OWdlN3g1shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Reporter : we are seeing an increase in home invasions
PM: Really?
Reporter: yes there has been a lot
PM: Its not a matter of it increasing... It just happening
Can't make this sheit up.... Allyuh defend the mild of Rooster there
I calling him out on his bullśĥitmatix wrote:zoom rader wrote:Habit7 has said a few times that Petrotrin is profitable a good few times on tuner.sMASH wrote:zoom rader wrote:Meanwhile Habit7 goes around telling ppl Petrotrin still opensMASH wrote:The workers are not the same, the management are not the same, the directors are not the same, non of the pensions or other perks like medical are the same... Even the names are not the same.zoom rader wrote:Jobs lost & forex lost with a host of lies produced to say Petrotrin pre 2018 was not profitable.Habit7 wrote:matix wrote:https://youtu.be/hxcOyh5cdfo?si=Phet2hph3aPLu5r2
Whenever I see someone cites this as a lie, it loudly tells me that they don’t know what Petrotrin did pre 2018 and what they are doing now. I suggest they look up what is an integrated oil company.
Jack arse country
They closed down petrotrin and opened paria ,heritage , a paper company called petrotrin and some other entity nobody talks about so I cant recall .
The way allyuh does watch point a Pierre say petrotrin didnt close is the same way so much allyuh minding other man children..If so ,has "petrotrin" been profitable?Habit7 wrote:alfa wrote:I want him to try and walk into the compound with a petrotrin logo on a coverall and see what happens.
Well that is called trespassing. Anybody walking onto any compound they are not authorised to do so is breaking the law. Nevertheless, it doesn't refute the fact that Petrotrin was not closed down but successfully restructured to be the profitable, tax-paying entity it wasn't. That was 5yrs ago, get over it.
Even wiki says it's closed. Evvvvvvry body reading internet will learn thst it closed .
All business students understand that restructuring where everybody changed out ,even the names and business models ,means it was closed .
If a secondary school student do a project and they Google it, they woyid see it was closed .
The only way they seeing it "restructured " is in balisier house archives ... Where it also says Eric Williams battled prince Charles to liberate trinidad to become republic , and not the crown getting rid of colonies ,and we just happened to to be one to get kicked out to independence .
I dont have time to search & post his quote, but if he continues tobe an arse i will find and post.
Also i remember clearly he also said he post stuff and make tuners believe. Like the rest of pnm bloggers this is how they operate.
It’s a waste of time to debate with someone who eats PNM sheit for breakfast, lunch and dinner. They defend lies, with their own version of what transpired. The country is under siege atm and we all like it so.
pugboy wrote:why don’t you quote his words for us then
transcript what he says if you do confident that he never said so
you just digging a deeper hole and embarrassing yuhself
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Reporter : we are seeing an increase in home invasions
PM: Really?
Reporter: yes there has been a lot
PM: Its not a matter of it increasing... It just happening
Can't make this sheit up.... Allyuh defend the mild of Rooster there
Habit7 wrote:pugboy wrote:why don’t you quote his words for us then
transcript what he says if you do confident that he never said so
you just digging a deeper hole and embarrassing yuhself
You want me to quote him saying what you heard?
He who alleges must prove. You quote him to back up what you are alleging he said.
BTW for the students reading on, Wikipedia is not a source.
16 cycles wrote:His thought process on the unpredictability of home invasions is an excellent point for granting FuLs to responsible owners
bluefete wrote:As a matter of fact, here is the PM in his very own words: I know you have some problems understanding hours and minutes on a video, so I will help you out - Go straight to 1:15:56 - that is 1 hour, 15 minutes and 56 seconds, almost to the end of the video, nah!
After you listen to it, you could hush yuh trap with yuh crap![/b]
bluefete wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Reporter : we are seeing an increase in home invasions
PM: Really?
Reporter: yes there has been a lot
PM: Its not a matter of it increasing... It just happening
Can't make this sheit up.... Allyuh defend the mild of Rooster thereHabit7 wrote:pugboy wrote:why don’t you quote his words for us then
transcript what he says if you do confident that he never said so
you just digging a deeper hole and embarrassing yuhself
You want me to quote him saying what you heard?
He who alleges must prove. You quote him to back up what you are alleging he said.
BTW for the students reading on, Wikipedia is not a source.
A, A. Habit7. De balisier brigade top up yuh account so yuh could come back. Nice, nice.
But yuh come back with balisier BS after drinking balisier water. Stop trying to fool people with your sematics, nah.
I heard the PM say the very same thing. I was incredulous at the PM's initial response. Like he living in a hole somewhere.
As a matter of fact, here is the PM in his very own words: I know you have some problems understanding hours and minutes on a video, so I will help you out - Go straight to 1:15:56 - that is 1 hour, 15 minutes and 56 seconds, almost to the end of the video, nah!
After you listen to it, you could hush yuh trap with yuh crap!
So u shift the goal post.Habit7 wrote:bluefete wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Reporter : we are seeing an increase in home invasions
PM: Really?
Reporter: yes there has been a lot
PM: Its not a matter of it increasing... It just happening
Can't make this sheit up.... Allyuh defend the mild of Rooster thereHabit7 wrote:pugboy wrote:why don’t you quote his words for us then
transcript what he says if you do confident that he never said so
you just digging a deeper hole and embarrassing yuhself
You want me to quote him saying what you heard?
He who alleges must prove. You quote him to back up what you are alleging he said.
BTW for the students reading on, Wikipedia is not a source.
A, A. Habit7. De balisier brigade top up yuh account so yuh could come back. Nice, nice.
But yuh come back with balisier BS after drinking balisier water. Stop trying to fool people with your sematics, nah.
I heard the PM say the very same thing. I was incredulous at the PM's initial response. Like he living in a hole somewhere.
As a matter of fact, here is the PM in his very own words: I know you have some problems understanding hours and minutes on a video, so I will help you out - Go straight to 1:15:56 - that is 1 hour, 15 minutes and 56 seconds, almost to the end of the video, nah!
After you listen to it, you could hush yuh trap with yuh crap!
Much like how you were fooled by the TTPS demonstration in front of POS City Hall, I think you are equally out of your depth here.
WRT pugboy, I was responding to an ongoing false claim of his that PM claimed that the PM has the final say on the granting of FULs at a Conversation with the Prime Minister. He cannot quote nor pinpoint where in the 2:15hr broadcast he said it. He just gives a generalised wide time frame. He is toting about it for like a month now but has yet to provide any detail to his claim. Now above, he wants me to quote the PM not saying what he is claiming the PM said. That is nonsense. He who alleges must prove. He must quote the PM saying what he is claiming he said, not me.
That has nothing to do with the post-Cabinet press meeting on Thursday.
You need to calm down and be more perceptive.
Yep u remember this very well.alfa wrote:Habit is the same one some years ago quoted a 'professor' who claimed that flooding was both beneficial and necessary. All that just to defend PNM inactivity in waterway clearing smh.
Don't take bait, this time the paid propagandist has unlimited data
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Reporter : we are seeing an increase in home invasions
PM: Really?
Reporter: yes there has been a lot
PM: Its not a matter of it increasing... It just happening
Can't make this sheit up.... Allyuh defend the mild of Rooster there
Well yesHabit7 wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Reporter : we are seeing an increase in home invasions
PM: Really?
Reporter: yes there has been a lot
PM: Its not a matter of it increasing... It just happening
Can't make this sheit up.... Allyuh defend the mild of Rooster there
I feeling spicy so let's tackle this.
Sometimes I wonder behind some of your profiles you all are women. Because you all are moved by emotions and not facts. Most men I know are mature enough to let the blunt facts affect their opinion and then let the emotion flow from a fact-informed opinion. But as in the case above, no facts have been presented, the PM responds by demanding the facts, the female reporter cannot give the facts, the PM briefly presents them and addresses the question nonetheless.
What the snowflakes here are grasping their pearls and saying, "how can the PM not affirm my emotions?" "Who can deny that home invasions are not increasing?" "Just like in the world of the hammer, everything is a nail, I am constantly focusing on home invasions, the press is feeding it to me, therefore home invasions must be increasing!"
I am sure as head of the NatSec Council the PM know the stats and he was briefly refuting her. TT law doesnt have an offense of home invasion, but TTPS classifies it under Burglaries and Breakings. But since nobody wants to recall the stats, I decided to look at it:
Burglaries and Breakings Jan 1-Apr 30 https://ttps.gov.tt/Stats/Crime-Totals-By-Month
2015-795
2016-829
2017-748
2018-644
2019-652
2020-561
2021-542
2022-597
2023-515
2024-505
So the PM corrects the reporter that unfortunately while they are occurring, there is no EVIDENCE of an increase. But the response of the OP and many others in this and other threads is feminine emotion.
Don't get me wrong, 1 home invasion is too much, it is sad that we have to live in the fear of home invasions. But the facts/the evidence/the stats/the objective truth doesn't show an increase like what the reporter is referring to.
But what I am going to get in response to this: PNM Propaganda, Balisier Juice, and every other personal attack against me. I don't mind my back is broad. But I know what response I am not going to get is someone refuting the facts.
But know that next time as men, on the auspicious eve of Father's Day, be men that form your opinions based on facts, not on emotions.
Expect a massive push on race!sMASH wrote:Get ready for the pnm bloggers to jump out harder as they get into 2025 GE gear.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/home-invasions-on-the-rise-6.2.2011751.f8648d3989
So it's safe to say ttps lying and these are not FACTS
alfa wrote:Burglaries and breakins are not the same as what we've seen recently with homeowners being beaten and terrorized hence the term home invasion. Of the stats you've posted can you tell me how much of burglaries and breakins are simply a report of a piper jumping a wall and stealing your gas tank, or breaking a window when no one is home to steal a TV?
Unless you can categorize further to differentiate between this and actual invasions with violence which I'm sure was what the reporter was alluding to, I call BS to you and Rowley's statements.
You can define it any which way you want. You can accuse me of using stats conveniently as if that makes them false. Unless you have stats to prove otherwise, it is a similar baseless rant.pugboy wrote:he using stats conveniently as usual
a modern home invasion is not the same as those defined burglaries stats he like to quote
a home invasion is a fully organized crime of armed hostage taking and grievous assault with robbery as opposed to a break in and enter to grab and go by a singular burglar/piper
for example...?sMASH wrote:Habit have a habit of throwing out false information when he think nobody following , hoping some unsuspecting people think he talking fax .
good, let more come counter the UNC bloggers here who posting UNC propaganda and surprised that ppl disagree based on facts.sMASH wrote:Get ready for the pnm bloggers to jump out harder as they get into 2025 GE gear.
Habit7 wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/home-invasions-on-the-rise-6.2.2011751.f8648d3989
So it's safe to say ttps lying and these are not FACTS
"Police data between January and May showed that burglaries and robberies are on the rise in the Tobago, Central, North-Central, North Eastern and Port of Spain Divisions."
These are where the rises are. However, nationwide there is no data of an increase.alfa wrote:Burglaries and breakins are not the same as what we've seen recently with homeowners being beaten and terrorized hence the term home invasion. Of the stats you've posted can you tell me how much of burglaries and breakins are simply a report of a piper jumping a wall and stealing your gas tank, or breaking a window when no one is home to steal a TV?
Unless you can categorize further to differentiate between this and actual invasions with violence which I'm sure was what the reporter was alluding to, I call BS to you and Rowley's statements.
You have no data to show Rowley is wrong. This nothing but a feminine emotional rant. No facts.You can define it any which way you want. You can accuse me of using stats conveniently as if that makes them false. Unless you have stats to prove otherwise, it is a similar baseless rant.pugboy wrote:he using stats conveniently as usual
a modern home invasion is not the same as those defined burglaries stats he like to quote
a home invasion is a fully organized crime of armed hostage taking and grievous assault with robbery as opposed to a break in and enter to grab and go by a singular burglar/piperfor example...?sMASH wrote:Habit have a habit of throwing out false information when he think nobody following , hoping some unsuspecting people think he talking fax .good, let more come counter the UNC bloggers here who posting UNC propaganda and surprised that ppl disagree based on facts.sMASH wrote:Get ready for the pnm bloggers to jump out harder as they get into 2025 GE gear.
As if PNM needs to paid ppl to come here to further crush UNC hopes. UNC doing that fine by themselves.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests