Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Redman wrote:Here is my point.
The evidence for all the above....juliens,Jones etc has to be built in terms of connecting them to the money....just like whatever cases that are going on against the UNC crew....
Hackshaws case, however will be proved or disproved based on information already in hand.....his bank activity,approvals,BIR etc etc etc are all recorded somewhere, in TnT.
Yet here we are still figuring out how and who will conduct, if he will be available....etc etc etc...
It seems clear that all this is about burning time.....it is asinine that this matter is still being figured out.
If an agency had the authority to access the info....all the info would take a few weeks max to accumulate.
The length of time taken to bring these cases....is the main hurdle....that’s a rules,regulations and law thing.
With a big dollop of lack of will to change on the part of the players involved.
PMM has to take foundation blame since they have been 90% in officeRedman wrote::roll:
Business, governance and corruption have outpaced our legal framework for decades...regardless of who is in power and how tight their shirts fit.
we should have pursued the case win lose or draw.
De Dragon wrote:rollingstock wrote:Police service commission
So, could he refer Hackshaw to the PSC? Seeing as he is conflicted?
daxt0r wrote:if he not prosecuting hackshaw then they GG should also shut he trap on gang leaders getting gov contract.
So only hernandez and hackshaw could get contract and funds outside TTPS despite regulations let everybody eat ah food na man with a lil slap on d wrist. everybody wa rock back in retirement too.
daxt0r wrote:if he not prosecuting hackshaw then they GG should also shut he trap on gang leaders getting gov contract.
So only hernandez and hackshaw could get contract and funds outside TTPS despite regulations let everybody eat ah food na man with a lil slap on d wrist. everybody wa rock back in retirement too.
You mean like Faris?Redman wrote:Its same as renting out state land- using state resources for private gain etc.
It then corrupts the functionality of the service...
zoom rader wrote:You mean like Faris?Redman wrote:Its same as renting out state land- using state resources for private gain etc.
It then corrupts the functionality of the service...
Money for nothing
Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:You mean like Faris?Redman wrote:Its same as renting out state land- using state resources for private gain etc.
It then corrupts the functionality of the service...
Money for nothing
No money for nothing is Rudy and Jerlean way.The way they mark up land....it better to rent.
Unless if they braking the laws , noRedman wrote:The behavior of two possible leaders of the main opposition party isn't relevant?