Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
eliteauto wrote:OP could you list some of the austerity measures being implemented?
Habit7 wrote:eliteauto wrote:OP could you list some of the austerity measures being implemented?
Expect personal attacks for asking for facts...
ingalook wrote:desifemlove wrote:because comparing the Eurozone to T&T, a small economy with fossil fuels as half of its GDP, does mek good sense.
What exactly you mean here?
Are you saying that Austerity will work here when it fails everywhere? Why??? God iz ah Trini?
De Dragon wrote:ingalook wrote:desifemlove wrote:because comparing the Eurozone to T&T, a small economy with fossil fuels as half of its GDP, does mek good sense.
What exactly you mean here?
Are you saying that Austerity will work here when it fails everywhere? Why??? God iz ah Trini?
He is one of the PNM diehards, the only difference is his weak attempts to appear neutral by saying both UNC/PP and PNM are equally culpable. Look at every statement that comes from him and there is a pro-PNM slant every time. I have no problem with measures taken to save money, but when MY money is being frittered away on Tarouba stadium, Benz, the millionth Eric Williams shrine/memorial, then I draw a line. There seems to be an unholy haste to push every single measure down the populace's throat, with fakery about "consultation" now being exposed as a giant sham.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:OP what do you suggest?
ingalook wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:OP what do you suggest?
Don't impose austerity???
Many of the dumb actions of GOVTT are hard to reverse:
Reducing VAT largly benefited retailers and not consumers
The government has lost billions thanks to this (but they knew they would)
No government can come back in and send back up VAT to 15% without causing significant inflation.
Adding items to the VAT list certainly did cause inflation (Kamla is partially to blame here because they took items off in the first place) but this government had the benefit of this experience since they saw that reducing VAT on items held little benefit for the consumer but went ahead with 12.5% anyway.
The fuel subsidy is very small or non-existant when oil prices are low - why target it now? Because it is easier than when it is high??? BUT IT IS THE WRONG TIME!
The country is going through a tough time - they are only making things tougher
De Dragon wrote:desifemlove wrote:De Dragon wrote:desifemlove wrote:and when did i say everything?? i think i really touched a nerve, but not my problem. i only "blame" UNC for this economic issue, both parties as bad as each other.
Yet I've never seen you call Manning, Panday, Rowley by name. You'd be more credible if you didn't sound like a one track record.
because she is the immediate past PM.....sorry, but then i can see you doh like opinions...
Sorry two track record
Numb3r4 wrote:The whole issue with collection is what got me.
Shouldn't we try to improve the way we go about collecting revenue before raising the amount we intend to collect. I mean we could raise it as high as we want but if the revenue collection service is poor then we still won't get the benefits/revenue that is intended.
ingalook wrote:Habit7 wrote:eliteauto wrote:OP could you list some of the austerity measures being implemented?
Expect personal attacks for asking for facts...
"Austerity measures refer to official actions taken by the government, during a period of adverse economic conditions, to reduce its budget deficit using a combination of spending cuts or tax rises."
Now comes the personal attacks - please learn to use Google!
Ouch - Burn!!!
eliteauto wrote:ingalook wrote:Habit7 wrote:eliteauto wrote:OP could you list some of the austerity measures being implemented?
Expect personal attacks for asking for facts...
"Austerity measures refer to official actions taken by the government, during a period of adverse economic conditions, to reduce its budget deficit using a combination of spending cuts or tax rises."
Now comes the personal attacks - please learn to use Google!
Ouch - Burn!!!
yeah but you didn't answer my question and your definition is unfinished, so are you saying any tax measure or spending cut implemented during difficult economic times is considered an austerity measure? So wouldn't that mean that austerity measures are implemented by almost every Gov't? Again my questions are predicated by YOUR definition.
ingalook wrote:eliteauto wrote:ingalook wrote:Habit7 wrote:eliteauto wrote:OP could you list some of the austerity measures being implemented?
Expect personal attacks for asking for facts...
"Austerity measures refer to official actions taken by the government, during a period of adverse economic conditions, to reduce its budget deficit using a combination of spending cuts or tax rises."
Now comes the personal attacks - please learn to use Google!
Ouch - Burn!!!
yeah but you didn't answer my question and your definition is unfinished, so are you saying any tax measure or spending cut implemented during difficult economic times is considered an austerity measure? So wouldn't that mean that austerity measures are implemented by almost every Gov't? Again my questions are predicated by YOUR definition.
Not my definition boss, that's why I put it in quotation marks - it is literally the first definition that comes up in google
To answer your first question - Yes
To answer your second question - Yes it is implemented by every stupid government
What you didn't ask - Why is it done?
Answer - it is far easier to tax your citizens than be fiscally responsible
I am speculating there is a bit of scapegoating going on regarding this online shopping tax.
Firstly, this is not an issue of recovering taxes from corporations operating outside of Trinidad and Tobago. It is about dampening the demand of online shopping to curb forex leakage.
With that in mind, has the Government released an estimate of the amount of foreign exchange leakage that is occurring through online shopping? I heard a number mumbled during the presentation by a back-bencher but I’m yet to see a concrete number.
Instead, all we hear is “increasing popularity of online shopping was another culprit, with purchases being paid for by credit cards” or “online shopping is an area of tremendous leakage of this country’s foreign exchange” or “online purchases are now a significant area of foreign exchange demand” (real quotes from newspapers).
And then over the last three years we have the major corporations as significant spenders of foreign exchange (as released by former Central Bank governor Jwala Rambarran): one spent US$507 million; another spent US$169 million; another spent US$153 million and a fourth spent US$136 million.
All of them are glorified online shoppers engaged in buy-markup-resell businesses. They offer little domestic value added and simply transfer surplus from consumers. Will these companies also attract the seven per cent tax?
The Government needs to quantify the leakage attributable to online shopping and provide us with a comparison on how this stacks against the “corporations” involved in the same line of business. Essentially they are putting similar strains on foreign exchange.
Whether an individual needs these products is another debate. But we need to understand how this affects competition and the distribution of income. Online shopping and low limit credit cards (US$1,000) have provided the common man with an alternative source for goods and services that could not be afforded on the local market—largely due to price gouging. This has had direct implications on the standard of living for citizens.
This seven per cent tax is essentially closing the online market and passing the bargaining power back to these “corporations”. Their profits will continue to soar and the income will be payable to a select class locally. How much of the population owns shares in these “corporations”?
I’m not disputing the need to curb non-productive foreign exchange leakage. I’m just disturbed by the biased manner in which its being orchestrated. Clearly you can see who the big winners are.
Miguel Dindial
via e-mail
ingalook wrote:eliteauto wrote:ingalook wrote:Habit7 wrote:eliteauto wrote:OP could you list some of the austerity measures being implemented?
Expect personal attacks for asking for facts...
"Austerity measures refer to official actions taken by the government, during a period of adverse economic conditions, to reduce its budget deficit using a combination of spending cuts or tax rises."
Now comes the personal attacks - please learn to use Google!
Ouch - Burn!!!
yeah but you didn't answer my question and your definition is unfinished, so are you saying any tax measure or spending cut implemented during difficult economic times is considered an austerity measure? So wouldn't that mean that austerity measures are implemented by almost every Gov't? Again my questions are predicated by YOUR definition.
Not my definition boss, that's why I put it in quotation marks - it is literally the first definition that comes up in google
To answer your first question - Yes
To answer your second question - Yes it is implemented by every stupid government
What you didn't ask - Why is it done?
Answer - it is far easier to tax your citizens than be fiscally responsible
VexXx Dogg wrote:How much revenue is lost through improper income tax collection?
We have an entire shadow economy of people who don't pay income tax, yet the entire system is propped up by those that do. It's not that I'm hating on the small entrepreneur. It's the fact that some people who make millions and evade the taxman.
Look at the IRS model, it's very unbiased and they get the business of collection done. We make it too easy to evade with no real repercussions.
VexXx Dogg wrote:How much revenue is lost through improper income tax collection?
We have an entire shadow economy of people who don't pay income tax, yet the entire system is propped up by those that do. It's not that I'm hating on the small entrepreneur. It's the fact that some people who make millions and evade the taxman.
Look at the IRS model, it's very unbiased and they get the business of collection done. We make it too easy to evade with no real repercussions.
York wrote:the objective is to reduce online shopping thereby conserving foreign exchange for traditional business imports...which stimulates the economy by providing jobs for ppl and service etc.
those who can afford to buy online can afford to pay more or opt for traditional with warranty etc...but conserving jobs, cause ppl going home in this current economy.
Dizzy28 wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:How much revenue is lost through improper income tax collection?
We have an entire shadow economy of people who don't pay income tax, yet the entire system is propped up by those that do. It's not that I'm hating on the small entrepreneur. It's the fact that some people who make millions and evade the taxman.
Look at the IRS model, it's very unbiased and they get the business of collection done. We make it too easy to evade with no real repercussions.
Its not just the small entrepreneur...its doctors and lawyers and then medium sized businesses that get "professional accounting advice" on hiding from corporation taxes as well as remitting incorrect VAT.
Its the business man buying a Range and not paying the BIK on it.
Habit7 wrote:eliteauto wrote:OP could you list some of the austerity measures being implemented?
Expect personal attacks for asking for facts...
Habit7 wrote:Right on time.
drchaos wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:How much revenue is lost through improper income tax collection?
We have an entire shadow economy of people who don't pay income tax, yet the entire system is propped up by those that do. It's not that I'm hating on the small entrepreneur. It's the fact that some people who make millions and evade the taxman.
Look at the IRS model, it's very unbiased and they get the business of collection done. We make it too easy to evade with no real repercussions.
Its not just the small entrepreneur...its doctors and lawyers and then medium sized businesses that get "professional accounting advice" on hiding from corporation taxes as well as remitting incorrect VAT.
Its the business man buying a Range and not paying the BIK on it.
What nonsense is this??? Professional accounting advice? Nah you just don't have to declare when your patients pay cash lol. And you good to go!
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 46 guests