Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
redmanjp wrote:Habit7 wrote:paid_influencer wrote:the country cannot survive 15 years of rowley
If we only had a democratic way of the country choosing a leader…
daz not enough - we should have a 2 term limit - at least not more than 2 consecutive ones. given someone else a chance.
Habit7 wrote:redmanjp wrote:Habit7 wrote:paid_influencer wrote:the country cannot survive 15 years of rowley
If we only had a democratic way of the country choosing a leader…
daz not enough - we should have a 2 term limit - at least not more than 2 consecutive ones. given someone else a chance.
Sure but doesn’t the electorate take care of that already?
Since Dr Williams, which PM has gotten more than 2 consecutive terms?
paid_influencer wrote:Habit7 wrote:redmanjp wrote:Habit7 wrote:paid_influencer wrote:the country cannot survive 15 years of rowley
If we only had a democratic way of the country choosing a leader…
daz not enough - we should have a 2 term limit - at least not more than 2 consecutive ones. given someone else a chance.
Sure but doesn’t the electorate take care of that already?
Since Dr Williams, which PM has gotten more than 2 consecutive terms?
just to be clear, ent you want rowley to win next year? you want 15 years of rowley?
We live in stupid country filled with idiots like you that post Milat crap and not explain why Arse wari still collecting rents on empty buildings and impsbert tax exemptions.Habit7 wrote:paid_influencer wrote:Habit7 wrote:redmanjp wrote:Habit7 wrote:paid_influencer wrote:the country cannot survive 15 years of rowley
If we only had a democratic way of the country choosing a leader…
daz not enough - we should have a 2 term limit - at least not more than 2 consecutive ones. given someone else a chance.
Sure but doesn’t the electorate take care of that already?
Since Dr Williams, which PM has gotten more than 2 consecutive terms?
just to be clear, ent you want rowley to win next year? you want 15 years of rowley?
I don’t believe Rowley is going up for a third term. But let’s say he does, won’t it be with a democratic mandate from the majority of constituencies that he will be PM?
The way you all behaving one will swear Rowley is PM because he rode into POS with a convoy of Hiluxes and killed the last PM. If you don’t like Rowley vote him out. But if your alternative doesn’t have the mandate you can’t get vex with Rowley that he does.
Habit7 wrote:I don’t believe Rowley is going up for a third term.
redmanjp wrote:Habit7 wrote:paid_influencer wrote:the country cannot survive 15 years of rowley
If we only had a democratic way of the country choosing a leader…
daz not enough - we should have a 2 term limit - at least not more than 2 consecutive ones. given someone else a chance.
maj. tom wrote:When PNM internal elections due? Or he just going to announce it one day and it will be a snap party leadership race?
That's not a real election, its a gimmick and pre planned.Habit7 wrote:maj. tom wrote:When PNM internal elections due? Or he just going to announce it one day and it will be a snap party leadership race?
PNM executive and leadership is every 4 years. The last election was Dec 2022.
aaron17 wrote:Whether PNM win or UNC win ..we gonna be in the same situation...nothing will be done.... country done..destined to fail
Newspapers : "What I love about TNT"? stuff running out to say we.
DMan7 wrote:If UNC loses with Kamla, she will still be there and those under her will be singing her praises again for the next elections in 2030 and shutting down people who wants a change in leadership. Nothing changes.
MaxPower wrote:Remove Kamla,
People will still vote PNM.
Phillip will fix it.dogg wrote:Kamla shoulda vacate 4 yrs ago if not 9.
It have any PNM supporters switching over to UNC due to Kamla?
UNC have to wait another 5 yrs with a new leader to be competitive.
wing wrote:Phillip will fix it.dogg wrote:Kamla shoulda vacate 4 yrs ago if not 9.
It have any PNM supporters switching over to UNC due to Kamla?
UNC have to wait another 5 yrs with a new leader to be competitive.
zoom rader wrote:PNM Victory 2025.
VexXx Dogg wrote:zoom rader wrote:PNM Victory 2025.
2030 too bro. Unless they monumentally firetruck something up.
some people in the UNC quite happy to sit on opposition bench, slap table and ride the perks without having to do much work.
dogg wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:zoom rader wrote:PNM Victory 2025.
2030 too bro. Unless they monumentally firetruck something up.
some people in the UNC quite happy to sit on opposition bench, slap table and ride the perks without having to do much work.
UNC supporters happy in opposition too.
This way they could complain and moan and groan about PNM daily.
Imagine now, them will elect the no-hoper Kamla as party leader without a 2nd thought.
Mmoney607 wrote:MaxPower wrote:Remove Kamla,
People will still vote PNM.
PNM will actually win by a wide margin of kamla is removed
Alpha_2nr wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:MaxPower wrote:Remove Kamla,
People will still vote PNM.
PNM will actually win by a wide margin of kamla is removed
"PNM will actually win by a wide margin, whether or not Kamla is removed."
Fixed it for you.
PNM will prevail. Nothing can change that.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR and 110 guests