Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Val wrote:We just need to focus more on tourism, we have such unexplored potential with that. But trinis need to come off their high horses before we can be good hosts.
Daran wrote:Val wrote:We just need to focus more on tourism, we have such unexplored potential with that. But trinis need to come off their high horses before we can be good hosts.
But truthfully aside from some eco tourism and carnival, Trinidad does not offer much. Tobago is a gold mine that can be much improved.
Dizzy28 wrote:Daran wrote:Val wrote:We just need to focus more on tourism, we have such unexplored potential with that. But trinis need to come off their high horses before we can be good hosts.
But truthfully aside from some eco tourism and carnival, Trinidad does not offer much. Tobago is a gold mine that can be much improved.
Everyone keeps harping on Carnival as our Tourism product. Look at the figures. The months with Carnival are not even within the top three busiest arrival periods in Trinidad. That would be the months of July August and December.
Further breakdown shows a significant portion of the people coming for Carnival are diaspora who stay with friends and family consequently not making use of local hotels and guesthouses and even taxi services. (The fully booked hotels around that time do indicate that we have a dearth of hotel room stock though)
Carnival isn't as attractive to non diaspora foreigners as Trinidadians like to think it is.
UML wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Daran wrote:Val wrote:We just need to focus more on tourism, we have such unexplored potential with that. But trinis need to come off their high horses before we can be good hosts.
But truthfully aside from some eco tourism and carnival, Trinidad does not offer much. Tobago is a gold mine that can be much improved.
Everyone keeps harping on Carnival as our Tourism product. Look at the figures. The months with Carnival are not even within the top three busiest arrival periods in Trinidad. That would be the months of July August and December.
Further breakdown shows a significant portion of the people coming for Carnival are diaspora who stay with friends and family consequently not making use of local hotels and guesthouses and even taxi services. (The fully booked hotels around that time do indicate that we have a dearth of hotel room stock though)
Carnival isn't as attractive to non diaspora foreigners as Trinidadians like to think it is.
More importantly how much money is spent on carnival and our "culture" is alarming.
The NCC fails to calculate if we make a profit or continuous loss every year for carnival.
Daran wrote:Val wrote:We just need to focus more on tourism, we have such unexplored potential with that. But trinis need to come off their high horses before we can be good hosts.
But truthfully aside from some eco tourism and carnival, Trinidad does not offer much. Tobago is a gold mine that can be much improved.
Dizzy28 wrote:Daran wrote:Val wrote:We just need to focus more on tourism, we have such unexplored potential with that. But trinis need to come off their high horses before we can be good hosts.
But truthfully aside from some eco tourism and carnival, Trinidad does not offer much. Tobago is a gold mine that can be much improved.
Everyone keeps harping on Carnival as our Tourism product. Look at the figures. The months with Carnival are not even within the top three busiest arrival periods in Trinidad. That would be the months of July August and December.
Further breakdown shows a significant portion of the people coming for Carnival are diaspora who stay with friends and family consequently not making use of local hotels and guesthouses and even taxi services. (The fully booked hotels around that time do indicate that we have a dearth of hotel room stock though)
Carnival isn't as attractive to non diaspora foreigners as Trinidadians like to think it is.
gastly369 wrote:BuyingOleIronOleBatteryBuying..
silent_riot wrote:Good reporting by Judy Kanhai, but inaccurate headline.
Just to clarify terminology: "Government Energy Revenue" and "Government Revenue" are two different figures in public finance. So it is confusing when the two are used interchangeably, as in this headline. Government Revenue from Oct 2013-May 2014 was TT$34.7B, while Government Revenue from Oct 2014-May 2015 was TT$34.1B. This is a 1.7% decrease. Government Expenditure for the same period increased by 1.6%. Government Energy revenue did decrease by 19.1%
Consider that only 19.1% of energy revenue was lost when the oil price dropped by 51% from $97 to $47.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:silent_riot wrote:Good reporting by Judy Kanhai, but inaccurate headline.
Just to clarify terminology: "Government Energy Revenue" and "Government Revenue" are two different figures in public finance. So it is confusing when the two are used interchangeably, as in this headline. Government Revenue from Oct 2013-May 2014 was TT$34.7B, while Government Revenue from Oct 2014-May 2015 was TT$34.1B. This is a 1.7% decrease. Government Expenditure for the same period increased by 1.6%. Government Energy revenue did decrease by 19.1%
Consider that only 19.1% of energy revenue was lost when the oil price dropped by 51% from $97 to $47.
Makes sense when the government main revenue is based on gas prices which haven't changed as much as oil.
The discussion however from the politicians towards the public is simplification. The budget is based in the price of oil cuz the public eh gonna understand if it based on gas prices. Oil prices mainly affect petrotrin.
Finally, anyone can be a reporter and then editor. That's why u will find misleading articles such as this one.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests