Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Robin Montano wrote:
"Let's turn to the political theatre that is unfolding now between Dr. Rowley and Dr. Moonilal. Dr. Rowley held a press conference yesterday (Thursday) in which he slammed Dr. Moonilal's allegations as false and political mischief. His lawyer, who was by his side, is reported as saying that everything that Dr. Moonilal said or alleged was false.
The problem here is that everything is not false ... or at least, does not appear to be false. The facts (as reported) are:
(1) the email is real;
(2) the email was sent to the Prime Minister's cousin;
(3) the email begins with the words "Good morning Honourable Prime Minister ..."
Now, there are some who say that if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck and quacks like a duck that there is a fair degree of certainty that it is a duck. So? Where are we with this? If Dr. Rowley was innocent of the charges then one would expect that he would protest his innocence all around the mulberry bush. But what if he was guilty? He wouldn't say "all yuh ketch me" and go quietly. He would more than likely also protest that he was innocent. The point here is that his protestations are natural and unfortunately take us nowhere nearer to the truth.
So, we now turn to the investigation by the relevant authorities that has been (quite properly) called for. The problem here is that when the emailgate saga exploded the same authorities launched an investigation which eventually ended some two years later with a whimper that seemed to suggest that the emails that (the same) Dr. Rowley had brandished in Parliament were faked. But nobody has been punished or called out for this. Why?
And now the very same authorities are being called on to investigate this A&V payment scandal. What confidence can the public have that these authorities will do their job fairly and impartially? And if you believe that they will, then why do you believe that? Do you believe that they did their job fairly in emailgate? If you do, then why do you believe that?"
Robin Montano
*powersRovin's Audio wrote:rowlie face in dat video looking like he eh sleep whole night since he hear coonilal talk .....
kstt wrote:
Who is this and what is his link to the case?
Saw it circulating on social media but not sure about the link to this case?
Moonilal to launch ‘democracy fund’
Sean Douglas
OROPOUCHE East MP Dr Roodal Moonilal will not retract his allegations against the Prime Minister over a dubious Florida bank account and will not pay the “substantial sum” sought by Dr Rowley’s pre-action protocol letter. Instead Moonilal will launch a “Defence of Democracy Fund” among supporters to help pay for his legal team that includes Anand Ramlogan and British Queen’s Counsel Richard Clayton. At Parliament yesterday, he told reporters he would say more at the Monday Night Forum being held by the United National Congress at Couva.
Alleging Rowley’s legal action against him was repressive, he said the matter should instead have been fully vented by debate in Parliament. The MP said this is the first budget debate within memory at which a sitting prime minister had not spoken, despite having had hours in which to do so and address the allegations.
hydroep wrote:Coonilal crowdfunding yes.
Ah hope people eh chupid enough to give him their hard earned money. Let him pay it out of pocket, after all if his accusations are true, he will win and Sh!tkicker will have to pay his legal bills. Buh if is lie he lying...Moonilal to launch ‘democracy fund’
Sean Douglas
OROPOUCHE East MP Dr Roodal Moonilal will not retract his allegations against the Prime Minister over a dubious Florida bank account and will not pay the “substantial sum” sought by Dr Rowley’s pre-action protocol letter. Instead Moonilal will launch a “Defence of Democracy Fund” among supporters to help pay for his legal team that includes Anand Ramlogan and British Queen’s Counsel Richard Clayton. At Parliament yesterday, he told reporters he would say more at the Monday Night Forum being held by the United National Congress at Couva.
Alleging Rowley’s legal action against him was repressive, he said the matter should instead have been fully vented by debate in Parliament. The MP said this is the first budget debate within memory at which a sitting prime minister had not spoken, despite having had hours in which to do so and address the allegations.
https://newsday.co.tt/2018/10/16/moonilal-to-launch-democracy-fund/
sMASH wrote:Hoss. I thought Quamina sharpening he teeth fir legal battle. Only to see headlines, 'coonilal need to apologize and react statement'
What kinda beat up is dat...
Is like watching Abbott and Costello.
sMASH wrote:I didn't think a preaction protocol was necessary, cause quamina was barking at everybody in a public address that they ARE going to sue.
Rushes off to register rspann28@gmail.com!!!!!!rspann wrote:I want to find out something, and I not accusing anybody of anything. If I want to correspond with someone and I don't want anybody to know, I could set up an email account using another name?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests