Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
BRZ wrote:Just obey the law and you should have No problem.
Driving WITHOUT insurance should now be a $ 30,000.00 FINE though!
Soochi boi wrote:@supercharged turbo. I beg to differ in the event that I drive with my fogs because my low beam to bright . I should be charged or should just blind people ?
What kinda vehicle you driving that your low beam too bright?Soochi boi wrote:@supercharged turbo. I beg to differ in the event that I drive with my fogs because my low beam to bright . I should be charged or should just blind people ?
supercharged turbo wrote:What kinda vehicle you driving that your low beam too bright?Soochi boi wrote:@supercharged turbo. I beg to differ in the event that I drive with my fogs because my low beam to bright . I should be charged or should just blind people ?
hustla_ambition101 wrote:supercharged turbo wrote:What kinda vehicle you driving that your low beam too bright?Soochi boi wrote:@supercharged turbo. I beg to differ in the event that I drive with my fogs because my low beam to bright . I should be charged or should just blind people ?
I think the real question is if his lights are stock or did he put in some ridiculous hid nonsense
nervewrecker wrote:Sounds like the wrong body headlight fluid he used.
Sunil did it in his slyphy and he had to use DRL's and fogs to drive in the night afterwards.
supercharged turbo wrote:What kinda vehicle you driving that your low beam too bright?Soochi boi wrote:@supercharged turbo. I beg to differ in the event that I drive with my fogs because my low beam to bright . I should be charged or should just blind people ?
Spitfir3 wrote:supercharged turbo wrote:What kinda vehicle you driving that your low beam too bright?Soochi boi wrote:@supercharged turbo. I beg to differ in the event that I drive with my fogs because my low beam to bright . I should be charged or should just blind people ?
![]()
nervewrecker wrote:Meem mind they use it onno, is the fact that it not designed for driving that bothers me.
Raj's driving with lights not designed for such dont have proper visibility in front the vehicle and are a hazard to other people / pedestrians / animals etc.
Slartibartfast wrote:nervewrecker wrote:Meem mind they use it onno, is the fact that it not designed for driving that bothers me.
Raj's driving with lights not designed for such dont have proper visibility in front the vehicle and are a hazard to other people / pedestrians / animals etc.
Please elaborate. How do they pose a hazard to other people, pedestrians and animals in a way that regular headlights do not.
Also, everyone is different. Isn't it possible that one person might be more comfortable riding with their car being lit up from lower down? Personally, in a heavy rain at night on a road without street lights (north coast road) I find it a lot easier to see if I use fog lights instead of normal headlights. I also find it a lot less distracting if oncoming cars do the same.
Slartibartfast wrote:^^^ Regardless of what lights you have on, if you blinding oncoming traffic then it becomes a hazard and if you blinding oncoming traffic that much then you should only drive in the daytime. Bess they start giving out a "automatic/daytime license"
Soochi boi wrote:Understand that if your fogs not illuminating road properly use your low beam as well. As said fogs is not for driving but should be a law against it. Trinidadians need some common sense To know what to do and what not to do .
nervewrecker wrote:Soochi boi wrote:Understand that if your fogs not illuminating road properly use your low beam as well. As said fogs is not for driving but should be a law against it. Trinidadians need some common sense To know what to do and what not to do .
What part of fog light you dont understand? Its not a driving light![]()
You supposed to use your low beam to illuminate the road when it needs illuminating, not the fog lights. Your fog lights are to make your vehicle more visible to other drivers in low lighting conditions. Your headlights are to allow you to see in the dark.
There is a law against it.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], stillwater and 98 guests