Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Rooki3 wrote:coolstorybro
nervewrecker wrote:S_2NR wrote:nervewrecker wrote:S_2NR wrote:foglights make potholes more visible so yes, they serve a purpose in trinidad
Headlights do too....
foglights do a better job imo (maybe cause they're closer to the ground)
Yea? where your headlights aimed?
So your foggies closer to the road you say, alright, Quick question:
foggies closer to the road & illuminate only a short distance in front le veekle while le headlights illuminate a larger distance in front (in your case at treetops)....which one gives you better reaction time to a pothole spotted in front your vehicle?
Stephon. wrote:That's nice, still doesn't change the fact that "illegal" cars are being licensed with the same lights you are so passionate about correcting me with, which are illegal to drive with.
Then again, your laws have to be enforced in 2012, yet it seems like they were written with a nail and hammer into stone.
People are driving 2012 vehicles on a road with 1912 laws
S_2NR wrote:nervewrecker wrote:S_2NR wrote:nervewrecker wrote:S_2NR wrote:foglights make potholes more visible so yes, they serve a purpose in trinidad
Headlights do too....
foglights do a better job imo (maybe cause they're closer to the ground)
Yea? where your headlights aimed?
So your foggies closer to the road you say, alright, Quick question:
foggies closer to the road & illuminate only a short distance in front le veekle while le headlights illuminate a larger distance in front (in your case at treetops)....which one gives you better reaction time to a pothole spotted in front your vehicle?
Oh goarr all this beat up.
Ill buy an almera, clearly their lights are superior.
nervewrecker wrote:Stephon. wrote:That's nice, still doesn't change the fact that "illegal" cars are being licensed with the same lights you are so passionate about correcting me with, which are illegal to drive with.
Then again, your laws have to be enforced in 2012, yet it seems like they were written with a nail and hammer into stone.
People are driving 2012 vehicles on a road with 1912 laws
Whats illegal about the cars?
You still didnt see where or what I corrected you about either smh.
Stephon. wrote:nervewrecker wrote:Stephon. wrote:That's nice, still doesn't change the fact that "illegal" cars are being licensed with the same lights you are so passionate about correcting me with, which are illegal to drive with.
Then again, your laws have to be enforced in 2012, yet it seems like they were written with a nail and hammer into stone.
People are driving 2012 vehicles on a road with 1912 laws
Whats illegal about the cars?
You still didnt see where or what I corrected you about either smh.
So LEDs are legal then? Dunno seems like the officer I spoke to a few months ago were wrong then.
S_2NR wrote::lol:![]()
Funny. What's funnier is u actually think I'll buy that sh1t
thelem wrote:i think people are missing the point of the true matter. The law is enforce upon the officer. And not based on the beliefs of citizens.
So far everyone is saying things based on hear say or what an officer or LO told them. The law never specifically said "FOGLIGHTS" are illegal. It said additional lights. And i further believe that when people use HID kits in the foglight, make them an easy target for an officer to say...aye you pull aside. That's illegal. Or when they want to drive with the foglights on alone even if its with HID or without.
So in other words, if 2 cars were driving on the highway during a roadblock. A B14 and an Audi, both with foglights on, but the B14 has his park lights on with his foglights and the Audi with his headlights and fogs, the officer would pull the B14 arse aside.
S_2NR wrote::lol:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
anything else u wanna get off your chest sugarplum?
silent_riot wrote:Motor Vehicles & Road Traffic Act, Ch48:50 Fines
Only offenses I am seeing wrt light are "Unauthorised lights to front or rear of vehicle" and "Vehicle with unauthorised spot or swivel lights".
Unauthorised lights are defined as:
"there shall not be affixed to the front of a motor
vehicle any lighted lamp other than the headlights
and side lights except with the approval in writing
of the Licensing Authority, nor to the rear of a
motor vehicle or trailer any lighted lamp other
than the red light prescribed by these Regulations
except as permitted by paragraph (m)(iii) of
this regulation;"
The key word is any.
Pg 156 in here
I do have a vehicle with "fog lights" but they are integrated within the headlights themselves. The reasoning that they are "useless in our climate and hazardous to road users" is false. Yellow fog lights (single wavelengths) are better at penetrating fog than mixed spectrum "white" headlights, which improves the safety of all drivers. I drive through light fog occasionally between Couva and Port of Spain on early mornings.
In 2008 a new law was passed by the European Commission that meant all new cars and small vans purchased after February 2011 had to have daytime running lights, and lorries will follow suit from August 2012. The new vehicles will have the daytime running lights (DRL) that come on automatically when the engine is started. This law will not affect cars bought before this period and DRL´s will not have to be retro fitted.
Daytime running lights are not new to the UK. Volvo´s were the first vehicles that came with these as standard, although the driver did have the option to turn them off. Volvo´s were fitted with DRL´s due to the laws in Sweden and have always been seen as a safety feature. The European Commission had introduced this law on advice that there could be a significant reduction in road deaths and serious injuries. Those that are opposed to the new law argue that the glare from these lights will be distracting. There is also concern over motor cyclists and the possibility of a rise in pollution due to increased fuel usage.
In a report for the Department for Transport it was confirmed, "There is substantial evidence that the mandatory use of DRL would provide a net accident reduction. However, the evidence concerning the magnitude of the effect and particularly the relationship with accident severity is considerably weaker."
Many manufacturers are already planning and designing their new ranges of cars and vans with the future regulations in mind. The new range of Audi´s (which can be seen below) will all come with daytime running lights as standard.
* Could save 5500 lives a year
* European Parliament expected to approve it
* Britain opposed to plans, but can't block them
All new cars could have headlights that remain on all of the time from 2011.
A Dutch study found that daytime running lights could prevent 5500 deaths and 155,000 injuries across Europe each year, and the switch has been backed by
the European Commission.
The proposal is now being sent to the European Parliament for final aproval.
Daytime running lights were made compulsory in Scandinavian countries in the late 1970s.
In 2006, Austria, Croatia and Chech Republic became the first countries outside of
Northern Europe to follow suit.
However, the proposals have come in for criticism, as it is estimated that having headlights on all the time will increase the average fuel bill by up to 5%.
Britain has opposed the measure as unnecessery, but is unable to block it because a majority of other EU nations were in favour and transport issues are not subject to veto.
rollingstock wrote:I too sick to reply here, too much to type too little patience, kinda pissy with this cold.
But just to help, some of you all talking rell sheit.
rollingstock wrote:Let me help out here.
1. You cannot be charged for playing a loud instrument in a vehicle if your music is off. (yes music is considered a loud instrument, in fact if you are beating a piece of iron, that suffices by law)
2. If your speakers on your backdash or anywhere on the vehicle obscures your view you can be charged.
3. They cannot charge you for having speakers bigger than 8", however this size and bigger in a custom dash may/will block your view.
4. That arseness about trunk space? really dude? REALLY???
silent_riot wrote:Why is this so difficult to understand?
The law says headlights, it doesn't specify that your headlights has to powered by a tungsten, halogen, HID, or LED source, nor does it say the number of light sources in that headlight are limited to a single source.
thelem wrote:So in other words, if 2 cars were driving on the highway during a roadblock. A B14 and an Audi, both with foglights on, but the B14 has his park lights on with his foglights and the Audi with his headlights and fogs, the officer would pull the B14 arse aside.
BrotherHood wrote:thelem wrote:So in other words, if 2 cars were driving on the highway during a roadblock. A B14 and an Audi, both with foglights on, but the B14 has his park lights on with his foglights and the Audi with his headlights and fogs, the officer would pull the B14 arse aside.
What about if this was the other way around? i.e the Audi with his park lights and fogs and the B14 with headlights and fogs?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests