TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pugboy wrote:A Moses chap get charged the other for discounting the value of a property or something to dodge stamp duty,
Wonder if that applies here to a townhouse heavily discounted
Careful you are labeled as a racist PNM. Don't you realize once you are not anti PNM, then you are automatically a PNM stooge.The_Honourable wrote:pugboy wrote:A Moses chap get charged the other for discounting the value of a property or something to dodge stamp duty,
Wonder if that applies here to a townhouse heavily discounted
If I recall correctly, I believe Rowley said that the property was purchased at pre-development price meaning he got into the deal before the townhouse was completed, which is normal. Now did the developers "discounted" the price for Rowley? Probably but very hard to prove because of that predevelopment cover. Also, if Rowley paid the correct amount in stamp duty off the 1.68M valuation which according to the Express he did, then the purchase was above board.
eliteauto wrote:pugboy wrote:A Moses chap get charged the other for discounting the value of a property or something to dodge stamp duty,
Wonder if that applies here to a townhouse heavily discounted
Discounting the value to lower stamp duty is not the same as selling a unit at a lower price, a seller can sell at any price he wants, I know houses that sold for $1 legally
pugboy wrote:You sure was a direct sale or property was owned by a company and transaction was share transfer ?
I find that very hard to believe, even the vat dept does do audits for under valued sales.eliteauto wrote:pugboy wrote:A Moses chap get charged the other for discounting the value of a property or something to dodge stamp duty,
Wonder if that applies here to a townhouse heavily discounted
Discounting the value to lower stamp duty is not the same as selling a unit at a lower price, a seller can sell at any price he wants, I know houses that sold for $1 legally
It also shows the integrity of the people that vote for PNM and their moral standards areAlphaMan wrote:The integrity commission admits the PM broke the law but no way exists to prosecute him....
redmanjp wrote:where are these $1 houses u speak of?
AlphaMan wrote:Why exactly should PM Rowley get my vote on Monday?
nick639v2 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:Why exactly should PM Rowley get my vote on Monday?
He gonna win, might as well be on the winning team bro
His winnings means more invasionsAlphaMan wrote:nick639v2 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:Why exactly should PM Rowley get my vote on Monday?
He gonna win, might as well be on the winning team bro
Him winning means I'll have to pay my property tax.
Doesn't seem like a winning situation for me.
AlphaMan wrote:nick639v2 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:Why exactly should PM Rowley get my vote on Monday?
He gonna win, might as well be on the winning team bro
Him winning means I'll have to pay my property tax.
Doesn't seem like a winning situation for me.
Not necessarily, this can be repealed with a much fairer system.DMan7 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:nick639v2 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:Why exactly should PM Rowley get my vote on Monday?
He gonna win, might as well be on the winning team bro
Him winning means I'll have to pay my property tax.
Doesn't seem like a winning situation for me.
Him not winning means you still have to pay your property tax. So what's the plan now?
Kickstart wrote:Not necessarily, this can be repealed with a much fairer system.DMan7 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:nick639v2 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:Why exactly should PM Rowley get my vote on Monday?
He gonna win, might as well be on the winning team bro
Him winning means I'll have to pay my property tax.
Doesn't seem like a winning situation for me.
Him not winning means you still have to pay your property tax. So what's the plan now?
They held 29 of 41 seats, more than a three fifths majority. They allowed a dead and buried PNM to take back power and subject the country to Rowley and friends since then.paid_influencer wrote:did the pp actually have a constitutional majority i thought they was like a seat short
wing wrote:They held 29 of 41 seats, more than a three fifths majority. They allowed a dead and buried PNM to take back power and subject the country to Rowley and friends since then.paid_influencer wrote:did the pp actually have a constitutional majority i thought they was like a seat short
If people don't want the current corrupted house tax by the PNM, then they know when GE comes what to do, which is axe the oppressive tax.eliteauto wrote:Kickstart wrote:Not necessarily, this can be repealed with a much fairer system.DMan7 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:nick639v2 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:Why exactly should PM Rowley get my vote on Monday?
He gonna win, might as well be on the winning team bro
Him winning means I'll have to pay my property tax.
Doesn't seem like a winning situation for me.
Him not winning means you still have to pay your property tax. So what's the plan now?
Repealed by who? The Gov't is still the Gov't buddy this is an LGE, the LG reform is already passed and the current opposition had a constitutional majority in Gov't for 5 years and did nothing but state that property tax is coming
Kickstart wrote:If people don't want the current corrupted house tax by the PNM, then they know when GE comes what to do, which is axe the oppressive tax.eliteauto wrote:Kickstart wrote:Not necessarily, this can be repealed with a much fairer system.DMan7 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:nick639v2 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:Why exactly should PM Rowley get my vote on Monday?
He gonna win, might as well be on the winning team bro
Him winning means I'll have to pay my property tax.
Doesn't seem like a winning situation for me.
Him not winning means you still have to pay your property tax. So what's the plan now?
Repealed by who? The Gov't is still the Gov't buddy this is an LGE, the LG reform is already passed and the current opposition had a constitutional majority in Gov't for 5 years and did nothing but state that property tax is coming
Rovin wrote:i now seeing on d news karen taxsharer has resigned from d poo nm ...
She said the PNM, under Rowley, should not get another term in government.
“I resigned because if they are being so brazen and emboldened to treat the citizenry in the manner in which they are treating them in the last few years, if they get another term, we will have ourselves to blame.” ...
Nunez-Tesheira, who made it clear she was “not supporting any other party in particular,” said, “What I am supporting is my country and I know that if this country does not get a chance to regroup, we are lost because all the signs are there.
“A woman who is battered and knows that she is being battered feels hopeless, helpless and after a while starts blaming herself and that is what has happened to TT under this current government. And it cannot continue.”
Someone who understands the law more than all pnm barristers combined, apparentlywing wrote:Who exactly is Ravi Balgobin Maharaj? How is he able to afford Anand with all these cases? Does Anand do it pro Bono? Google search says he's a political analyst, I never knew that field was so lucrative.
Most if not all of them are cut from the same cloth. Rotten and interested only in the money and power.sMASH wrote:Someone who understands the law more than all pnm barristers combined, apparentlywing wrote:Who exactly is Ravi Balgobin Maharaj? How is he able to afford Anand with all these cases? Does Anand do it pro Bono? Google search says he's a political analyst, I never knew that field was so lucrative.
Rovin wrote:at least she has d conscience\guts to stand up & say d truth ...
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 103 guests
