Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
maj. tom wrote:What all these god fearing people fail to realize is that the majority of atheists have been down the god path, were born into various religions and had it shoved down our throats since birth and did all the rituals and prayers and faith without question for a number of years. Until we grew up and just asked a few questions and tried to find some answers on our own through plain old logic and based on what we can observe of the world.
A simple question to ask yourself is how do we know the moon isn't made of green cheese? Well we've been there, we've taken samples, drilled some cores. Gravitation pull calculations and seismic readings? Maybe we're underestimating the density of green cheese.
But in the end we know the moon isn't made of green cheese because it's absurd to think that, because we have observed our world and universe and inferences based on observations follow some logic, then we put forward a hypothesis and test it with experiments.
So all these great god fearing, warmongering people here, just be aware that we have been down the same road as you and were even quite as vehement as you all are at a time, and followed without question and had great fear of disobedience, but we just thought about things differently and looked for proof and came to sound conclusions. We grew up. Kids believe that story about santa claus until they grow up and woke all night to see if they saw santa and his reindeer. Then they followed through with the inference of parents buying gifts through logic and then observed it. The god story isn't that different. Logic is a part of the human brain that would take its natural course with the right tools and education, but instead we are forced to learn something else that has never had any stable grounds to begin with because of the political nature and power it imparts upon men.
MG Man wrote:sigh
I actually miss the megadoc 'debates'
this adam fella scares me
is fear = worship?AdamB wrote:Don't fear me but rather fear (worship) your Guardian LORD because HE created you for that specific purpose. Also, have hope that He will guide you to the truth, a little more hope than fear!!
AdamB wrote:
@sMASH & Megadoc1: The Quran is without error (no doubt). .
AdamB wrote:Sounds like you were hurt and may need some therapy. Taking out your pent-up anger and resentment on believers of story books?
bluefete wrote:There is a reason for that which I will explain soon.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:is fear = worship?AdamB wrote:Don't fear me but rather fear (worship) your Guardian LORD because HE created you for that specific purpose. Also, have hope that He will guide you to the truth, a little more hope than fear!!
AdamB wrote:...WHAT IS THE NAME OF GOD??
d spike wrote:The whole "name of God" argument is only pertinent to those who claim to know "the name of God" and wave that like some kind of meritorious point - failing to realize that their own religion makes it quite clear that their salvation is based on far more important issues. That's like arguing what the real name is of an actor in a movie when one is attempting to discuss the message or theme of the movie is.
Let us assume this discussion is taking part among those who only believe in one supreme being.
A name's sole purpose is to discriminate between the identified being from other similar beings.
Are there other supreme beings?
Are you worried that Fruggle will intercept the prayers you sent to Fred, simply because you sneezed while praying?
Whom do you wish to differentiate between? Or is it that your religion secretly accepts the existence of other gods? (Please...)
If you pray to god (or God... or even GOD) how many are there up there to be mistakenly identified?
AdamB wrote:d spike wrote:While one can come into a public forum and state one's point of view, no matter how radical (one does have the right of free speech), one cannot come into a public forum and state one's point of view THAT ALL ELSE IS WRONG AND THOSE WHO BELIEVE OTHERWISE WILL BE PUNISHED. A right is not a license. One has rights to do as one sees fit AS LONG AS ONE DOES NOT IMPINGE OR INFRINGE ON THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS. Apart from being just plain bad manners, you are denying others their right to not be offended unduly in public. There is a major difference between statement and imposition.
FACT IS FACT, TRUTH IS TRUTH, RIGHT IS RIGHT, WRONG IS WRONG!!
You should appreciate that I am not giving you BS or hiding my beliefs (like dspike). That's my position and I believe it and will defend it.
d spike wrote:One has rights to do as one sees fit AS LONG AS ONE DOES NOT IMPINGE OR INFRINGE ON THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS. Apart from being just plain bad manners, you are denying others their right to not be offended unduly in public.
d spike wrote:Whatever I say at this point isn't going to change anything - just give you something to spit or sneer at. Your attitude in dealing with others on this forum has made this quite clear.
d spike wrote:I refuse to label my personal beliefs here, for there is no real interaction with those with whom you are communicating. (It would be like a girl posting a picture of herself and expecting advice on make-up/choices of clothing... she would be swamped by lewd remarks and not a few off-colour propositions... There are things that can be dealt with here, but religion and spirituality need a more human environment.
Yet, Megadoc1 does not understand nor accept this. He accuses me simply because I won't 'identify' my position. The poor child does not realize here is not the place for this.
d spike wrote: I believe I am not here to teach - that is for somewhere else. I am merely acting as a guide. All I will suggest is that you carefully review your tenets, and more importantly, the actions their influence encourages you to perform. I will not be as crass as some to demand you explain why you think what you think. Unlike such characters, I respect the choice of belief of others - until they start disrespecting such a choice. I hope to ask the same of others is not asking too much.
d spike wrote: I have clearly stated that all persons will have their 'bias', due to personality, culture, upbringing, experiences, and so forth. Our personal choices are truly our own when we make them based on our exposure, experiences and learning. "To thine own self be true". The sign of maturity is in using one's own bias to judge what is right for oneself, but not letting it cloud one's judgment of others.
the reason I asked this is because if the god of islam is all knowing and the quran is without erorrAdamB wrote:sMASH wrote:@ doc i don't know arabic all too well, and primarily rely on translations. so i would have to say so far so good, any discrepancies are due to the inability to of arabic to directly translate to english. but to give u an idea of the the discrepancy, one meaning may be 'day' while historically the same word was also used to mean 'period of time'. that is where the context needs to be referenced.
@sMASH & Megadoc1: The Quran is without error (no doubt)........
crossdrilled wrote:No fear.... Can't be a muslim
Jesus said alot of things that one would have to ignore if they should agree with what d spike is saying ...to make this point one have to ignore more words of Jesus than the ones that d spike is accusingd spike wrote:AdamB, as far as "being confused" when some folks seem to focus on Jesus more that you are comfortable with, here is something he said that I am sure even you will agree with - to some extent at least.d spike wrote:When Jesus spoke about who would be going to hell or heaven at the end of time, he was very specific.
This is in response to those "christian" remarks made previously, concerning the danger of certain folks going to hell, specifically the "unbelievers" and "nay-sayers".
In Matthew 25:34-45, Jesus describes “Judgment Day”, saying that “the people of all nations” will be gathered and divided into two groups:
Then the King will say to the people on his right, “Come, you that are blessed by my Father! Come and possess the kingdom which has been prepared for you ever since the creation of the world. I was hungry and you fed me, thirsty and you gave me a drink; I was a stranger and you received me in your homes, naked and you clothed me; I was sick and you took care of me, in prison and you visited me.”
The righteous will then answer him, “When, Lord, did we ever see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and gave you a drink? When did we ever see you a stranger and welcome you in our homes, or naked and clothe you? When did we ever see you sick or in prison and visit you?”
The King will reply, “I tell you, whenever you did this for one of the least important of these brothers of mine, you did it for me!”
Then he will say to those on his left, "Away from me, you that are under God’s curse! Away to the eternal fire which has been prepared for the Devil and his angels! I was hungry but you would not feed me, thirsty but you would not give me a drink; I was a stranger but you would not welcome me in your homes, naked but you would not clothe me; I was sick and in prison but you would not take care of me.”
Then they will answer him, “When, Lord, did we ever see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and we would not help you?”
The King will reply, “I tell you, whenever you refused to help one of these least important ones, you refused to help me!”
Ummmmm... he didn't say anything about believing or not believing... or being a Pentecostal or Catholic or Buddhist...
Why are those, who claim vehemently to be the followers of this man, so quick to ignore these words, but focus their rantings instead on those who don't share their specific religious grouping?
megadoc1 wrote:the reason I asked this is because if the god of islam is all knowing and the quran is without erorrAdamB wrote:sMASH wrote:@ doc i don't know arabic all too well, and primarily rely on translations. so i would have to say so far so good, any discrepancies are due to the inability to of arabic to directly translate to english. but to give u an idea of the the discrepancy, one meaning may be 'day' while historically the same word was also used to mean 'period of time'. that is where the context needs to be referenced.
@sMASH & Megadoc1: The Quran is without error (no doubt)........
why did the author of the Qur'an thought that Christians believe in three gods?(no they don't ) how come the god of the quran nor his messenger was aware that the concept of the trinity was formulated by Christians, as an attempt to make sense of what they believe regarding who God is and how he have been manifested ? they never believed there are three gods, nor did they ever believe God is one of three so where did the author of the quran get that from? this is a serious error! can you address this please ?.......thanks!
MG Man wrote:AdamB wrote:
@sMASH & Megadoc1: The Quran is without error (no doubt). .
I have my doubts.....
Tell me this..........how can some islamic theologists, versed in arabic, read the koran and see it as peace, love and harmony, yet other Islamic clerics, equally versed in the religion see justification for war, killings, female circumcision etc?????
Same book, same verses..........same islamic scholars even from the same country....
And all of them read it with a pure heart, only seeking truth in 'god's word'
Seriously.........god couldn't make it less easy to be misguided?
u can't cite translations or outsiders because these are learned islamic scholars
MG Man wrote:AdamB wrote:
@sMASH & Megadoc1: The Quran is without error (no doubt). .
I have my doubts.....
Tell me this..........how can some islamic theologists, versed in arabic, read the koran and see it as peace, love and harmony, yet other Islamic clerics, equally versed in the religion see justification for war, killings, female circumcision etc?????
Same book, same verses..........same islamic scholars even from the same country....
And all of them read it with a pure heart, only seeking truth in 'god's word'
Seriously.........god couldn't make it less easy to be misguided?
u can't cite translations or outsiders because these are learned islamic scholars
[/quote]d spike wrote:AdamB wrote:...WHAT IS THE NAME OF GOD??
For reasons best known to yourself (but easily guessed by most) you are avoiding responding to my posts. (Speaking of which, whatever happened to that post of yours regarding the referring to Jesus as "Lord"? Did you even go back and look at the page from the Catholic forum you referred to?)b]
pseudorandom wrote:MG Man wrote:AdamB wrote:
@sMASH & Megadoc1: The Quran is without error (no doubt). .
I have my doubts.....
Tell me this..........how can some islamic theologists, versed in arabic, read the koran and see it as peace, love and harmony, yet other Islamic clerics, equally versed in the religion see justification for war, killings, female circumcision etc?????
Same book, same verses..........same islamic scholars even from the same country....
And all of them read it with a pure heart, only seeking truth in 'god's word'
Seriously.........god couldn't make it less easy to be misguided?
u can't cite translations or outsiders because these are learned islamic scholars
Well, the part about "all of them read it with a pure heart, only seeking truth in 'god's word'" is not really true. Most of them have personal agendas. Anyone can take any text and twist it to mean anything, especially when focusing on only one line out of context with the rest of verses. It's when people have their own personal agendas instead to seeking truth is when this happens.
Instead of looking at the people who practice the religion, look at the religion itself from a theoretical and academic point of view. Make sure your heart's intention is purely to seek truth, and not just to find ammunition against a religion. Then look at all religions and their real teachings, and not that portrayed by mass media, and see which one(s) make the most sense and most likely to be the real truth.
With the Quran, look at it's history, how it was revealed, how it was compiled, it's inimitable style of language, how people in Muhammad's time reacted to hearing verses of the Quran, the efforts in protecting it, and of course the verses themselves and their tasfir.
People live their lives bound by what they accept as "correct" and "true"
That's how they define "reality".
But what does it mean to be "correct" or "true?" These are vague concepts... No one stops to think that their "reality" may all be a mirage. .....
AdamB wrote:megadoc1 wrote:the reason I asked this is because if the god of islam is all knowing and the quran is without erorr
why did the author of the Qur'an thought that Christians believe in three gods?(no they don't ) how come the god of the quran nor his messenger was aware that the concept of the trinity was formulated by Christians, as an attempt to make sense of what they believe regarding who God is and how he have been manifested ? they never believed there are three gods, nor did they ever believe God is one of three so where did the author of the quran get that from? this is a serious error! can you address this please ?.......thanks!
Firstly, the author of the Quran is Allah, the Creator, the God of Abraham, Moses and Jesus (your GOD the father as you call HIM and my ONE TRUE GOD). It is not befitting to HIS Majesty that you accuse HIM of having an erroneous thought.
Also, [Musa (Moses)] said: "The knowledge thereof is with my Lord, in a Record. My Lord is neither unaware nor He forgets. " Quran 20:52
my point is this the god of the quran and its author cannot be all knowing as long as they think that Christians believe in three gods it is a misunderstanding of what the Christians believe
Secondly, you said "the concept of the trinity was formulated by Christians, as an attempt to make sense of what they believe regarding who God is and how he have been manifested". Do you admit that the entire Christian faith is built on the belief of the Trinity which "was formulated" by man and NOT GOD??!!
No! that's why you should learn what Christians really believe ..the christian faith is not built on the trinity ,the trinity is a concept formulated as an attempt to explain the God head, why not learn what it is about? the entire christian faith is built on Jesus and who he claims to be.... John 8:24 "Itold you that you would die in your sins; if you do not believe that I am [the one I claim to be], you will indeed die in your sins."
Thirdly, "they never believed there are three gods, nor did they ever believe God is one of three". So what is the Trinity? Not God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit? Have you not elevated Jesus from man to GOD (or some to Son of GOD)? please tell me how you came up with three gods and I would show you how much you, just like the god of islam and the author of the quran have no Idea or the willingness to learn the Idea behind the trinity
To put it simply, if you say Jesus was more than a man (that he is God or a god to be worshipped or the Son of God who is the "Lord"), but in reality he is only a man (flesh and blood) then you have broken the first Commandment (Thou shalt have no other gods besides/before me) by worshipping what would be categorized as "other god".I believe that Jesus is both God and man but you would really have to look into what the christians believe before we go any further..look up hypóstasis or hypostatic union its another concept just like the trinity that christians use to explian the nature of christ
The modern belief in the trinity originated in the 4th century at the Council of Nicaea in approximately 325 C.E. King Constantine, the Roman Emperor and an adherent to paganism, presided over the Council. Its main purpose was to unite the Roman Empire by achieving agreement on Christian doctrine. This would promote a universal consolidation within the church. you are half way there if you really looked in to this you would see that there were many other concepts that were presented parallel to the trinity and were considered heretical, this council was established to affirm the trinity as the most accurate concept in explaining the God head ...at least you learned that it was done three hundred years after Christianity so how then can you say that the entire christian faith is built on the trinity?
History teaches that much later, after instituting a mandatory belief in the trinity, Constantine tried to be more tender and merciful with the decision, but it was too late. The Nicene Creed (also known as the Athenasian Creed) had taken hold. All who did not believe in the trinity doctrine were persecuted and killed. Every available instrument of torture was used on the nonbeliever. The Nicene Creed has since been amended, but it is still read today in many of the Protestant and Catholic churches. Those churches that associate themselves with the World Council of Churches now require belief in the trinity doctrine.
Source:http://www.2001translation.com/Trinity.html this is false ..it was not mandatory to believe in the trinity it was mandatory to become christian! whenever I am home I would write more on this
ABA Trading LTD wrote:I just have one lil question Adam, you believe that thing about the Quran coming straight from Allah and being brought down to earty by the angel Gabreel/Gabriel?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 132 guests