Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
How do you know that the excess mortality is in excess when Statistics Canada's published data says that it isn't?sMASH wrote:When everything is regular, u would expect a certain amount of deaths.
Some new factor that attacks the most vulnerable drove up the death rate for 2020 2021,wnd 2022.
That new factor has been removed or at least weskened from when it started, and other factors to mitigate its effect should reduce the excess death rate back to normal levels.
But the people who would hsve died now, was killed off in 2020 to 2022. So normally u wpipd expect some to die now, they were already killed off.
So the expected death rate should be less now.
But its still more... Even after immunity snd after the virus mutated down.
Some other factor is keeping tue excess death rate high
shhhh don't tell him thatwing wrote:If someone is following a certain person on social media and makes his opinions based solely on the social media person's teaching, does that make smash a sheep?
The country that froze bsnk accounts of protestors, snd people supporting protestors?adnj wrote:How do you know that the excess mortality is in excess when Statistics Canada's published data says that it isn't?sMASH wrote:When everything is regular, u would expect a certain amount of deaths.
Some new factor that attacks the most vulnerable drove up the death rate for 2020 2021,wnd 2022.
That new factor has been removed or at least weskened from when it started, and other factors to mitigate its effect should reduce the excess death rate back to normal levels.
But the people who would hsve died now, was killed off in 2020 to 2022. So normally u wpipd expect some to die now, they were already killed off.
So the expected death rate should be less now.
But its still more... Even after immunity snd after the virus mutated down.
Some other factor is keeping tue excess death rate high
sMASH wrote:The country that froze bsnk accounts of protestors, snd people supporting protestors?adnj wrote:How do you know that the excess mortality is in excess when Statistics Canada's published data says that it isn't?sMASH wrote:When everything is regular, u would expect a certain amount of deaths.
Some new factor that attacks the most vulnerable drove up the death rate for 2020 2021,wnd 2022.
That new factor has been removed or at least weskened from when it started, and other factors to mitigate its effect should reduce the excess death rate back to normal levels.
But the people who would hsve died now, was killed off in 2020 to 2022. So normally u wpipd expect some to die now, they were already killed off.
So the expected death rate should be less now.
But its still more... Even after immunity snd after the virus mutated down.
Some other factor is keeping tue excess death rate high
U asking if their govt stats are reliable?
"where is the data to prove the govt stats wrong? " who collected the data? The authorities.adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:The country that froze bsnk accounts of protestors, snd people supporting protestors?adnj wrote:How do you know that the excess mortality is in excess when Statistics Canada's published data says that it isn't?sMASH wrote:When everything is regular, u would expect a certain amount of deaths.
Some new factor that attacks the most vulnerable drove up the death rate for 2020 2021,wnd 2022.
That new factor has been removed or at least weskened from when it started, and other factors to mitigate its effect should reduce the excess death rate back to normal levels.
But the people who would hsve died now, was killed off in 2020 to 2022. So normally u wpipd expect some to die now, they were already killed off.
So the expected death rate should be less now.
But its still more... Even after immunity snd after the virus mutated down.
Some other factor is keeping tue excess death rate high
U asking if their govt stats are reliable?
Then you have no idea how it happened or why it happened or proof that it even happened at all.
The pivotal issue is that if the published statistics are wrong, where are the data that refute the published statistics?
sMASH wrote:"where is the data to prove the govt stats wrong? " who collected the data? The authorities.adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:The country that froze bsnk accounts of protestors, snd people supporting protestors?adnj wrote:How do you know that the excess mortality is in excess when Statistics Canada's published data says that it isn't?sMASH wrote:When everything is regular, u would expect a certain amount of deaths.
Some new factor that attacks the most vulnerable drove up the death rate for 2020 2021,wnd 2022.
That new factor has been removed or at least weskened from when it started, and other factors to mitigate its effect should reduce the excess death rate back to normal levels.
But the people who would hsve died now, was killed off in 2020 to 2022. So normally u wpipd expect some to die now, they were already killed off.
So the expected death rate should be less now.
But its still more... Even after immunity snd after the virus mutated down.
Some other factor is keeping tue excess death rate high
U asking if their govt stats are reliable?
Then you have no idea how it happened or why it happened or proof that it even happened at all.
The pivotal issue is that if the published statistics are wrong, where are the data that refute the published statistics?
All u can do is look at other similar countries, like uk snd australia, and compare performances.
And so far uk and Australia have steady higher than expected excess deaths.
adnj wrote:Yea. The UK, Australia, Canada thing is definitely looking like a hoax.
adnj wrote:Yea. The UK, Australia, Canada thing is definitely looking like a hoax.
If you're pulling that together, you had better hurry. Because other than the two COVID mRNA vaccines, new mRNA vaccines for at least twelve other diseases are already in human trials.sMASH wrote:Just need a health status on all mrna recipients.
World wide, they sll on a database, so it should be easy
redmanjp wrote:the chart needs to run from pre pandemic years like from 2019.
redmanjp wrote:the chart needs to run from pre pandemic years like from 2019.
adnj wrote:redmanjp wrote:the chart needs to run from pre pandemic years like from 2019.
drchaos wrote:adnj wrote:redmanjp wrote:the chart needs to run from pre pandemic years like from 2019.
Draw a straight line across the trend and you will find there is an upward trend in deaths from all causes from the start of the graph to the end. Its not dramatic but it is rising.
So deaths from all causes are on the rise.
Thanks for providing data proving that we are experiencing excess deaths ... Didn't know Fembot adnj was a closet anti vaxxer lol
adnj wrote:drchaos wrote:adnj wrote:redmanjp wrote:the chart needs to run from pre pandemic years like from 2019.
Draw a straight line across the trend and you will find there is an upward trend in deaths from all causes from the start of the graph to the end. Its not dramatic but it is rising.
So deaths from all causes are on the rise.
Thanks for providing data proving that we are experiencing excess deaths ... Didn't know Fembot adnj was a closet anti vaxxer lol
The expected all cause deaths will increase because the population increases. Other than that, your interpretation of the graphed data is simply in error.
Posts misrepresent research on multiple sclerosis and COVID-19 vaccines found in WHO databaselsMASH wrote:https://youtu.be/I9S2jooTxkQ
Apparently, mrna is inked to multiple sclerosis...
From WHO itself....
Safe and effective yo!
What do you mean 'a couple cases'? Panadol (Paracetamol) kills 458 people a year.ruffneck_12 wrote:Funny how there's a digital billboard by Morvant Junction that claims there has been zero vax deaths...... (For something that came out recently)
Vs
Panadol being around for so long and having a couple cases where people had adverse reactions to it despite being so safe.
Makes you think if they fudged the numbers a little bit.
ed360123 wrote:What do you mean 'a couple cases'? Panadol (Paracetamol) kills 458 people a year.ruffneck_12 wrote:Funny how there's a digital billboard by Morvant Junction that claims there has been zero vax deaths...... (For something that came out recently)
Vs
Panadol being around for so long and having a couple cases where people had adverse reactions to it despite being so safe.
Makes you think if they fudged the numbers a little bit.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracetamol_poisoning#:~:text=Paracetamol%20overdose%20results%20in%20more,acute%20liver%20failure%20per%20year.
People aren't prevented from flying snd working if they don't take a paracetamol.adnj wrote:About 400 billion doses of paracetamol are sold every year. The deaths that do occur are typically from paracetamol user overdose at a rate of about 1 death for every 1000 overdoses.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 113 guests