Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Conrad wrote:You darn lens whore you!
Is the performance really that different as reviews say online?
trini mk5 wrote:If anyone is interested in a Sigma 70-200 f2.8 for nikon cameras. PM me. Looking for around $4500TT
trini mk5 wrote:Conrad wrote:You darn lens whore you!
Is the performance really that different as reviews say online?
I used the 70-300mm at a wedding and its a very good lens. A lot of people don't realise that the 55-200mm is a very sharp lens, once they know how to use it.
But the 70-300 is better in terms of build quality, focus speed, and image quality( although this is subjective).
Also its a good investment because its a Full Frame lens, so in future if you decide to go up to that, you wont need a telephoto lens right away.
lighthammer wrote:very nice baby shot!
I've notices a lot of photogs like to do high-key for baby shots, i wonder if that's an artistic thing or if it's an accepted common practice in the industry....
one time in the UK, I was taking a pic of a friend's baby and she was freaked out about the flash bouncing off the ceiling, she thought the bright light would burn her baby's skin - some ppl get all worked up with babies and bright light, so it pays to ask first, lol
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests